Hussain can put accent on change (28 June 1999)
For commentaries on pomp and ceremony it is never a bad idea to turn to Gilbert and Sullivan, and it took Nasser Hussain no time at all to borrow some appropriate lines from the Savoy songbook
28-Jun-1999
28 June 1999
Hussain can put accent on change
Michael Henserson
For commentaries on pomp and ceremony it is never a bad idea to turn
to Gilbert and Sullivan, and it took Nasser Hussain no time at all to
borrow some appropriate lines from the Savoy songbook. About 20
minutes, actually. At his inaugural press conference at Lord's he
went straight into the patter number from Ruddigore: "My eyes are
fully open to my awful situation. . . ."
He said it. Nobody will give him an argument there. The England
captaincy is such an awful situation to confront that Hussain starts
with everybody's best wishes, however many doubts some prominent
people harbour about his suitability. For what it is worth, and
Hussain probably thinks it is not worth much, this column thinks he
should have been appointed a year ago. Others, better placed to
influence the decision, did not and, privately, spelt out their
reasons.
Neither David Graveney, the chairman of selectors, nor Tim Lamb, the
chief executive of the England and Wales Cricket Board, would explain
publicly why Hussain was denied the job last year, other than to
repeat the well-rehearsed line that Alec Stewart was considered the
better bet. English cricket is shot through with that kind of flawed
logic, which is often based on who is "due". The game's motto might
as well be: "No sense, please, we're English."
Now that Hussain is captain, and Duncan Fletcher will shortly stand
by his side as coach, what changes can we expect? Perhaps the biggest
is one that the cricketing press and public can make themselves. We
cannot expect the captain to make a huge difference on his own. It is
not Hussain's fault, any more than it was Stewart's, that this
country lacks the abundance of outstanding players that are
available, for instance, to Australia and Pakistan.
Nor is it his fault that the county game requires a root-and-branch
reform starting, immediately, with the scrapping of an absurd benefit
system that keeps every player in his place as firmly as a Victorian
matron. The greatest service the ECB can perform on behalf of
cricket, and cricketers, is to do away with this outmoded excrescence
at once.
Hussain cannot be held accountable for poor performances on the
field, either. If bowlers insist on bowling both sides of the wicket,
and if batsmen make a habit of giving their wickets away, there is
little a captain can do except lead by example and not pick them
again.
It is clear from experience, though, that England continue to go back
to players who have let them down. Everybody knows who they are, so
there is no point in exposing them to embarrassment. When Matthew
Maynard speaks of Duncan Fletcher, as he did the other day, as a man
who will not tolerate excuses, it is fair to reply: let's wait and
see.
Already Hussain has spoken of his high regard for Mark Taylor, the
former Australia captain, who was "exemplary". Yes, he was. He was
the finest captain of modern times, and why? Because he was a
brilliant leader on the field, and a gracious man off it. He never
did anything to demean himself, his team, or the game.
Hussain has "previous" in that regard - after all, there are not many
batsmen Jonty Rhodes has gone out of his way to "send off" - and
though he has grown up a bit, he has a bit more to do. Not to put too
fine a point on it, he is regarded by the players he will now lead as
the most selfish man in the team, and that cannot be a healthy
reputation for the England captain to have.
Before he does anything else, he can improve the team's conduct, and
he can make a useful start by speaking properly, because he will be
doing plenty of it. Somebody who went to a good university has no
excuse for speaking in that ghastly estuary sludge. Verbal
imprecision often reveals mental laziness. Be a good chap, skipper,
use the letter T. It's not there just to keep S and U company.
He can also clamp down on the vain celebration of hundreds, an
irritating habit at which he himself excels. After making a century
against South Africa last year he charged about, waving his bat like
a spraygun, as though he had won the Derby, the Nobel Peace Prize and
the Ladies' Excuse-Me. It looked undignified and, if he is to be true
to his word, it must stop. That sort of thing alienates spectators.
Most important, he can restore some nobility to the team. It is all
very well Fletcher talking of "discipline, determination and hard
work". One expects as much from a bunch of road-diggers. What is
needed is a sense of adventure. Cricket is not warfare by other
means. It is only a game, in all its wonderful triviality.
The worst failing in English cricket is timidity. Players are scared
to behave naturally, and sometimes even to think for themselves.
Hussain should sit each one down and tell them that these are the
best days of their lives, the ones they will recall when they are
running pubs, working behind office desks or, more likely, filling
spaces in press boxes next to scribes they currently view with such
disdain.
Cricketers may view this estimation of their game - their living,
they would put it - as hopelessly romantic. But they are wrong. We
have been deceived for too long by advocates of supposedly hard-nosed
professionalism when in fact what they represent is a joyless,
risk-free enterprise.
Nasser, it's up to you, lad. You have the chance to remind people of
why cricket is a great game, which means a bit more than who wins at
Edgbaston this week. It is a good time to start, and there is no
reason why you shouldn't get at least two years to make a fist of
things. Just don't look back when your lease has expired and think:
if only.
Source :: The Electronic Telegraph