M Parkinson: MCC barricade their Neanderthal cave (2 Mar 1998)
IN an uncertain and ever-changing world we can always rely upon the Marylebone Clodpoles Club to stay where they are, which is, philosophically speaking, in 1787 when they were founded
02-Mar-1998
2 Mar 1998
MCC barricade their Neanderthal cave
By Michael Parkinson
IN an uncertain and ever-changing world we can always rely upon
the Marylebone Clodpoles Club to stay where they are, which is,
philosophically speaking, in 1787 when they were founded. The
vote against women was no surprise to seasoned MCC-watchers such
as myself who have spent a lifetime charting their absurdities.
The members' insensitivity to the world they live in is matched
only by their hypocrisy in having the vote in the first place on
the pretence of equality. The issue was money; public funds to
be used by what must be one of the richest clubs in Britain, if
not the world. The only link between the Exchequer and Lord's
should be a grant to stuff an MCC member so he might be
displayed at the Millennium Dome to demonstrate the link between
Neanderthal man and the Long Room.
The only reason I bother even thinking about MCC is because of
the influence they have over the game of cricket. They claim
they gave up control of the game in the Sixties, and if you
believe that then you are probably made of green cheese. What
happened 30 years ago was MCC members who ran cricket went
undercover. Since that time they have run the game in a variety
of disguises. If the ECB are as keen as they say they are to
democratise cricket, to create a new public, to stop the game
dying on its bum, why do they have their headquarters at Lord's,
which is seen the world over as a symbol of privilege, not to
say bumbling ineptitude?
The Marylebone Cricket Club are described as a private club with
a public function. There you have the problem. It is not only
women who are treated shabbily. It is anyone not wearing the
badge of privilege.
No matter how hard some members try to present a humane face,
the club are perceived as a hoity-toity enclave for toffee-nosed
poseurs, and they are likely to remain that way.
What can be done? Well not a lot if we are to rely on the
members. Instead of trying to change them we ought to
marginalise their influence. Middlesex County Cricket Club
should move elsewhere, perhaps even joining forces with Surrey
so that the capital might have a cricket stadium fit for the
Millennium. The ECB should find new premises away from St John's
Wood. No member of MCC should be allowed on any committee to do
with the running of cricket for the next 200 years, which is how
long they've had hold of the game.
In other words we should leave MCC to their members. That is
what they want and I would do nothing to thwart their ambition.
At the same time I don't think the present demonstration of
blatant sexism should go unremarked. The Queen is patron of the
MCC. I trust she is not amused by last week's vote. Now would
she want to lend her name to a club which wouldn't have her as a
member? We must be told.
Source :: Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk)