Shaking Ponting's tree
In the Sydney Morning Herald , Peter Roebuck defends his column from earlier this week in which he called for Ricky Ponting's sacking.
Time to shake the tree. Sacking the captain was the only story remotely dramatic enough to bring everything out into the open. And so the article was written. It had almost been sent earlier in the match but a fever had taken hold and the thought occurred that mood might have been affected. But the point was valid. The leadership had failed.
The Indian argument goes like this: monkey is not offensive, bastard is. The Australian argument goes like this: bastard is not offensive, monkey is. It is a small symptom of a much larger cultural misunderstanding. And then there is the apparently larger issue of the match referee not believing Sachin Tendulkar's account of the monkey slur. To be honest, if the Little Master says it wasn't said, I'm inclined to believe him. He's a man of the highest integrity. Of course, there is the possibility that Sachin didn't hear it as opposed to it not being said. Still, there is another nagging sense of deja vu about the indignation of the Indian team.
Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here