India v Australia, 1st Test, Mohali, 2010-11 October 4, 2010

'Poor' Mohali pitch hurts Test cricket

I remember playing a Duleep Trophy match against West Zone at the PCA Stadium in Mohali
29

I remember playing a Duleep Trophy match against West Zone at the PCA Stadium in Mohali. It was a classic Mohali track with pace, bounce and enough lateral movement to keep the batsmen guessing and, for once, making the bowlers believe that being a bowler wasn't that bad a thing. Faster men ruled the match but good batting was also rewarded, for bounce always helps to play shots.

Then there was the second Test match of my debut series against New Zealand at the same venue. While the track wasn't as lively as it was for the Duleep Trophy, it had enough to keep the bowlers interested. What made the show even more exciting were the spectators who'd come out in huge numbers on all five days of the Test match despite India trailing. A lot has changed since then - the pitch is a far cry from its original spirit, turning potentially competitive games into wishy-washy affairs. The spectators too seem to have got a whiff of the bland show, and hence don't care much about turning up and supporting their country.

The ongoing Test Match in Mohali seems to have been hit by both problems : a tame pitch and a low-key audience. The track is not even a pale shadow of what it used to be. The much talked-about pace and bounce is a thing of the past. Now we witness a low, slow wicket that is not ideal for a fair competition between the bat and the ball. If it wasn't for the SG Test ball, which helps the spinners with its pronounced seam and assists the pacers with reverse swing, bowlers may start mulling over their availability for the venue.

The claims holding incessant rains responsible for the insipid pitch at Mohali may fall flat too. When India played England in 2008, it was a high scoring match that ended in a draw.

Ironically, though, when the Ranji Trophy starts in three weeks, the pitch report might behave quite differently. There will be an even grass covering on the track and fast bowlers will share the spoils once again. Spinners play an insignificant role for Punjab in the first-class cricket. I'm not suggesting a green top against Australia, for that would be playing into their hands - like India did in 2004 at Nagpur - but a track with at least some carry and bounce won't hurt the game. It's rather unnerving to see the ball bounce twice to the wicket-keeper on the first day of a Test match.

Unfortunately, this comes at a time when sweeping attempts are being made to resurrect the format and challenge the spectator's growing disenchantment. Earlier, any international match would bring the star-crazy people into the stadium but now their hunger is sated through the IPL. No longer do they need to survive the proceedings of a dull Test match in order to get a glimpse of their favourite stars. Since the IPL has given them a taste of all that they can get from a match, the hosts need to stop taking their spectators for granted.

In order to save the longer format it's absolutely mandatory to encourage parents to bring their kids to watch the purest form of cricket. That might mean opening the gates at a much cheaper price or perhaps allowing kids for free when accompanied by their parents. Also give them incentives like organising tennis-ball cricket matches on the ground after the day's play, running contests during the day and a good PA system in place educating the crowd about the nuances of the game. These measures would enhance the viewing pleasure of the paying public and ensure that our cricketers aren't playing to empty stands.

Former India opener Aakash Chopra is the author of Out of the Blue, an account of Rajasthan's 2010-11 Ranji Trophy victory. His website is here and his Twitter feed here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • fanedlive on October 5, 2010, 11:21 GMT

    The pitch had the perfect set of ingredients to make it a great test match. There was something for Fast bowlers, spinners and batsmen. Even on Day5, there was decent carry to the keeper. We always dont need bouncy tracks for a good contest. And more importantly, the home team should play to their advantage.

  • fanedlive on October 5, 2010, 10:37 GMT

    As it turns out, this test ended up being one of the best ever finishes!!!

    I think the teams that play are more important than the surface. India and Australia have played each other on all kinds of surfaces but still the matches are always interesting. I think the defensive teams like SL, SA etc accept a draw upon seeing a flat low track and then play for tall scoring games.

  • fanedlive on October 5, 2010, 8:56 GMT

    Dont agree with this article. We just witnessed a perfect test match with a thrilling finish, instead of a dull draw.

  • fanedlive on October 5, 2010, 6:29 GMT

    The close result the match is headed towards not withstanding, Akash Chopra is right about the pitch not being what it used to be. Irrespective of how much we try to gain home advantage through pitch being made for our benefit (and I am not against it), the very low bounce hasnt helped us at all.

    Whats worse is the response of the crowd at Mohali and in that I`d like to know how much of a factor was a fact that tickets were priced too heavily. Lets also not forget that its been extremely hot and the stadium does not offer a lot of protection against the beating sun to the large masses.

  • fanedlive on October 5, 2010, 5:57 GMT

    In fact, i think this wicket is quite a good one. has held up exactly as you would expect Indian pitches to, both teams had a decent first innings, and had to fight for their second innings, produced a result in the 5th day. All in all, this pitch has produced a very exciting test match

  • fanedlive on October 5, 2010, 4:38 GMT

    Mate, I don't agree. Johnson have taken 5 wickets plus Bollinger performed well in first innings. What else do you expect?

  • fanedlive on October 5, 2010, 2:42 GMT

    Agree with Mohali's assesment . But dont we know this all along. The pitch would be dull & expecting a large turnout would be like trying to find a needle in a haystack ! Its the brilliance of the bowlers that has made a result imminent here in this test.

    I

  • fanedlive on October 5, 2010, 1:53 GMT

    I agree. This pitch is not poor. It has set-up a great game.

  • fanedlive on October 5, 2010, 0:58 GMT

    Disagree with the pitch assessment by Akash. Gotta wait for the match to get over before giving such assessments. Look at the match status at stumps on day 4. Result is a guarantee now. The bowlers and the batsmen got their fair share. As such, the term "Poor" is used far too loosely nowadays, especially when we have 1 or 2 days of batting paradise. But then, it should be remembered that there are 5 days in a test match. Talk about low/no bounce - well, gotta look at the place where the match is being played. As such, you can't fight with mother nature. You play in Aus/SA - expect bounce, play in England/NZ - expect Swing; play in the sub-continent - expect dust bowl! And yes, Drawn games are boring...but we should accept a hard fought DRAW as a good result.

  • fanedlive on October 4, 2010, 23:28 GMT

    Do not agree with you Aakash. Pitch has given a wonderful match with everybody getting the rewards for hard work be it batters,pacers or spinners. One never expects a pacy , bouncy pitch in India but this one is much better then all the feather-beds laid out in last 2 years.

  • No featured comments at the moment.