ICC annual conference

ICC has 'seen sense' - Netherlands

Firdose Moonda

June 28, 2011

Comments: 7 | Text size: A | A

Ryan ten Doeschate celebrates getting to a century, Ireland v Netherlands, World Cup 2011, Group B, March 18, 2011
Netherlands need more players with county experience like Ryan ten Doeschate, according to former captain Roland Lefebvre © AFP
Enlarge
Related Links

Netherlands are delighted that the ICC Board has "seen sense" and overturned the decision to reduce the 2015 World Cup to a 10 team tournament. The event has been expanded to 14 teams with space for four Associate nations to qualify. The Dutch are the only Associates to have played in four World Cups and are confident of securing a spot in the 2015 event.

"We thank and congratulate the President Mr Sharad Pawar for taking up this matter with his fellow Directors to reach this satisfying conclusion," said Richard Cox, KNCB chief executive. "The decision comes after months of delicate and dedicated work to overturn the decision which has involved numerous consultations and interaction with the other High Performance Countries in particular."

Netherlands have only recorded one victory over a Full Member in their history, when they beat Bangladesh by six wickets in June 2010. They left the 2011 World Cup winless after challenging England in the first group-stage match they played, amassing a total of 292 for 6 but being unable to defend it. They went on to lose to West Indies, South Africa, India, Bangladesh and fellow Associates Ireland.

"Looking at the way we performed in India, there is certainly reason to be very positive," Roland Lefebvre, former Dutch captain, told ESPNCricinfo. "We will look forward to improved performances and that first win against a Full Member at the tournament."

Despite none of the Associates qualifying for the quarter-finals in 2011, the tournament was a hailed as a success for a so-called minnows and their proposed exclusion from the future editions was widely criticised. The ICC was called insular and elitist and after mounting pressure have reversed that decision, earning the praise of the smaller teams.

"The format of 14 teams with a qualifying process is entirely appropriate for a sport which has 105 member countries that in a meritocratic environment should have the opportunity to achieve the highest levels of performance," add Cox. "We look forward over the coming months to ensuring that the Netherlands team is part of that and plays its part fully in the ICC Cricket World Cup qualification process."

With teams such as Afghanistan and the United Arab Emirates emerging as competitive Associates, qualification will not be easy for the Dutch, where cricket is still very much a developing sport. "We have two players on the county scene, Ryan [ten Doeschate] and Alexei [Kervezee]. For the Dutch team to be successful we need at least five or six," Lefebvre said.

The country's proximity to England and their inclusion in the CB40 tournament could assist with getting more players absorbed into counties, which Lefebvre thinks will improve cricket at national level. "For the most talented players it is important to move overseas where they can play on grass all the time, play against strong opponents and be involved in more serious training programs," Lefebvre said.

Lefebvre led the team to the 2003 World Cup, where they beat Namibia, and said that he noticed an increase in skills development, funding and competitiveness in the 2011 squad. He hopes that trend can continue now that the team has a chance to play in another World Cup. "There is a more professional attitude of modern day players," he said. "There is also more money available for prep tours and an increased playing program."

Meanwhile, the World Twenty20, which will take place in Sri Lanka next year and was originally supposed to consist of 16 teams, has been reduced down to 12. Lefebvre still thinks the twenty-over format will be the entry point for people to become interested in cricket in Europe, a sport that is still, largely, foreign to them.

"If we want to make cricket accessible to the masses than we have to make it interesting," he said. "They [The Dutch] don't know cricket and the only impression is those people in white standing still on the field. Cricket is hardly ever on telly. We have to change people's perception and the shorter version is the way forward. Short, fast, lots of noise and excitement. Just the format people can handle in a fast and furious society."

Firdose Moonda is ESPNcricinfo's South Africa correspondent

RSS Feeds: Firdose Moonda

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (June 29, 2011, 12:36 GMT)

Canada and not the Netherlands is the only Associate country to play in four CWC.

Posted by Sarfin on (June 29, 2011, 10:37 GMT)

@Arrow011, Couldn't agree with on on the power play topic. Top order batsmen may got a better strike rate for filed restriction, but they have to face the new ball also. Middle order batsmen also get east singles as most of the fielders are set on boundary lines.

Posted by Fast_Track_Bully on (June 29, 2011, 9:14 GMT)

If there are matches between Ireland, ND,Kenya,BD,Zim, Ireland will be the best team and ND will be the runners-up.

Posted by donda on (June 29, 2011, 6:36 GMT)

I think the whole concept of having 4 associate teams in WC is flawed. Zimbabwe , Bangladesh are not showing any progress in last ten years.

I would like to see 8 full members playing WC in 2015 with 2 qualifies between Zimbabwae, Bangladesh , Ireland , Neitherland and all.

10 Team is elite worldcup, 14 teams will be boring because there is huge difference in high level teams and low level teams.

Playing in australia will be extremely difficult for all associates and lower level teams. ICC made a mistake and degraded WC of 2015. Associate do not deserve 4 seats in that WC at all.

Posted by Riderstorm on (June 28, 2011, 21:18 GMT)

@Arrow011 The advantage of the top order batsman is nullified by the fresh conditions of the pitch and the fresh bowlers whereas the middle order is responsible to accumulate singles and two's with enough opportunities to get those with the spreadout field. Hence, the question of unfair doesn't come into picture. And the skillsets of the top order and middle order batsman are distinct and which inturn brings complexity and excitement into the game.

Posted by   on (June 28, 2011, 19:31 GMT)

The Powerplays aren't about fair cricket, they're about making the game exciting for spectators and television audiences. And while the consolidation period of ODIs is fascinating from a strategic standpoint, you've got to admit that sometimes it's the perfect time for a catnap.

Posted by Arrow011 on (June 28, 2011, 18:07 GMT)

ICC has been e stumbling block for Cricket over decades, these all because of ENG-AUS nexus which they never wanted other countries to prosper in Cricket so that Ashes remains biggest for them. Thanks to Sharad Pawar ICC is seeing light.

Good that Runners are done away with in ODI cricket, hope they do away in all formats & also power plays. Power plays can be done away also, why should top order batsmen have advantage over middle & lower order? No wonder, you see top order has the maximum averages in batting not because they are better batsmen but they are getting more free scored runs.It is time we go back to fair ODIs like before 1990s.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Firdose MoondaClose
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days