Pakistan v Australia, 1st Test, Lord's, 1st day July 13, 2010

Ponting fails to lord it and gives the elbow

  shares 31

Leg before bowled
There wasn't much doubt that Shane Watson was out in the fifth over, but there was a little confusion about how the scorebook would read. When Watson shouldered arms to Mohammad Aamer, the ball lobbed up off his pad and trickled back to knock one of the bails off, but the ball travelled so slowly that the umpire Ian Gould had already raised his finger to Aamer's lbw appeal. It's not the first time such an incident has occurred in Test cricket. At Trent Bridge in 1950, Sonny Ramadhin bowled Doug Insole off his pads, but the umpire Frank Chester insisted the dismissal go down as lbw, as he had raised his finger before the stumps were broken. The laws of cricket were soon changed to dictate that bowled always takes precedence over other forms of dismissal.

Ponting second best among Lord's letdowns
With a nondescript nudged single to midwicket, Ricky Ponting moved past Brian Lara to become the second highest run scorer in Test history. It was Ponting's last run for the innings, as he was out in the same over and was left on 11,954 Test runs, ahead of Lara on 11,953 but well behind Sachin Tendulkar on 13,447. Incredibly, considering the trio has a combined aggregate of more than 35,000 Test runs, none of the three have managed to earn a place on the Lord's honour board. Even more remarkably, Lara's 54 against England in 1995 is the best score any of the men have managed in a combined 11 Tests at the home of cricket.

No elbow room
Ponting and Aamer came close to a visit to the match referee after they clashed when Aamer had Ponting caught at short leg. In his follow through, Aamer ran close to Ponting, who moved his elbow slightly and made contact with the bowler, and it was not the first time Aamer has clashed with an Australian batsman on this tour. During the second Twenty20 at Edgbaston, Aamer leapt high into the air to celebrate bowling Michael Clarke, but misjudged his jump and crashed into the batsman. On that occasion, the players were all smiles as Aamer apologised and the pair shared a pat on the back.

IPL's shadow looms large
"Bell ringer for today is Justin Langer," was the message on the electronic boards across Lord's. Nothing unusual there, except that the laconic Australian stared intensely at the bell for a moment as if it was some sacred object and touching it would reduce its veneer. Thankfully he did not take a step back. But what was really out of place was the name of one of the teams, listed in the following line, that Langer represented through his career: "Australia, Middlesex, Rajasthan Royals, Somerset, Western Australia." Langer had played just one IPL match for Rajasthan, and considering his strong allegiance for his home state of Western Australia, one would've expected his home state to be ranked behind his national squad. The English sentiment towards the IPL is indifferent but MCC seems to have an affinity for the richest cricket league.

Failing to see the light
If the ICC wants to encourage more fans to Test cricket, going off for bad light at 1.50 in the afternoon is not a good move. But the umpires were convinced that conditions were gloomy enough to warrant a break in play, much to the annoyance of fans who had paid at least £30 per ticket. Even more frustrating for the spectators, the Lord's floodlights could not be turned on as Pakistan, the host team, decided it would create inconsistency as the venue for the second Test, Headingley, has no lights. How the one affects the other is anyone's guess, but fortunately on this occasion play resumed after 12 minutes. At least another anachronism of Test cricket was done away with: the once immovable lunch break was pushed back by half an hour due to a 90-minute weather delay at the start of play.

No debut nerves
Pure reflex. Aamer had been cleverly working out Ponting immediately after lunch by changing angles, lengths and using the seam cleverly to keep the batsman guessing. He then smartly placed a short leg in Umar Amin, knowing the Australian captain's tendency to push to the leg side trying to ward the delivery swinging into him. Amin, one of the two Pakistan debutants, had watched the ball drop in front of him just before the bad-light delay. But Ponting was feeling the pressure as Aamer remained stubborn and when the Pakistani speedster once again dipped it in, Ponting played it awkwardly towards Amin. It was a spectacular pouch considering it was only his first Test and the nerves could have easily gripped him, but Amin remained stable. His stance was perfect: standing on the balls of the feet, sitting on the haunches, his head was relaxed and this right balance allowed him to see the ball coming into his paws and he clasped the ball safely without any fuss.

Brydon Coverdale is a staff writer at Cricinfo and Nagraj Gollapudi is an assistant editor

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • POSTED BY sankar.vallabhan on | July 15, 2010, 6:09 GMT

    Agarkkar is able to score a century at LORDS. Kapil Dev is able to score hundred, Kapital Devasation in the year 1982 (8 wickets+89+43), world cup in 1983, 5 Wickets in 1986, 4 consicutive six in 1991. He is a greater than 3 (lara+tendu+ponting). Ponting rather better than lara+tendu

  • POSTED BY Kal_3L on | July 14, 2010, 19:23 GMT

    Again, the duck by ponting adds to his frustration! Unfortunate that Lords is not ez on the greats!

    and as far as the Match Referee goes, obviously the benefit of doubt goes to the Aussies, because most of the ref's and ICC itself like to keep Pakistan down, just have a look at 3 lbw's which would have had australia all out for less than 200 in the 1st innings, 2 of them by asif, 1 by aamir!

  • POSTED BY aalkool on | July 14, 2010, 12:11 GMT

    As expected, Aamer has been reprimanded to maintain the spirit of cricket. And as expected, Ponting escapes censure to maintain the spirit of cricket. The tone is set for more loutish, boorish behaviour from the Australian cricket team, by none other than Chris Broad!!! Not even a fig leaf of equality to maintain the spirit of cricket.

  • POSTED BY Boris72 on | July 14, 2010, 11:53 GMT

    Why does Aamer have such a long follow through after a wicket anyway?

  • POSTED BY Kal_3L on | July 14, 2010, 10:19 GMT

    @Paullie....sorry buddy, i've always admired the sportsmen spirit that the aussies have shown, especially Ponting, but this time around I do believe his frustration has gotten the better of him, just look at the replay again, Ponting leans into Aamir, which does seem to be very much deliberate. for you consideration, here's a photo

    http://www.cricinfo.com/pakistan-v-australia-2010/content/current/gallery/467199.html

  • POSTED BY __PK on | July 14, 2010, 6:56 GMT

    Aamer leaps to crash into Clarke and it's a misjudgement. Pointing slightly twitches an elbow and it's deliberate? Ponting-bashing much?

  • POSTED BY stationmaster on | July 14, 2010, 6:49 GMT

    Going off for VERY marginal light is just the ticket to drive people AWAy from test matches. The ICC needs to look at this ruling, it's simply working against the very thing they are trying to promote - i.e. TEST CRICKET - come on guys, we need to move with the times here.

  • POSTED BY thair9999 on | July 14, 2010, 4:58 GMT

    Comon Pointing, Aamer is almost half your age. And this is cricket not rugby. Stop being sore losers if a kid got you out.

  • POSTED BY ozmanuzman on | July 14, 2010, 4:57 GMT

    Boo to ponting elbow !!!!

  • POSTED BY busbybabe on | July 14, 2010, 2:54 GMT

    You may notice that the order of the teams that Justin Langer represented follows an alphabetic order. It is purely on that account that Western Australia as ended up last and Rajasthan Royals second! Don't make a mountain out of a molehill!!

  • POSTED BY sankar.vallabhan on | July 15, 2010, 6:09 GMT

    Agarkkar is able to score a century at LORDS. Kapil Dev is able to score hundred, Kapital Devasation in the year 1982 (8 wickets+89+43), world cup in 1983, 5 Wickets in 1986, 4 consicutive six in 1991. He is a greater than 3 (lara+tendu+ponting). Ponting rather better than lara+tendu

  • POSTED BY Kal_3L on | July 14, 2010, 19:23 GMT

    Again, the duck by ponting adds to his frustration! Unfortunate that Lords is not ez on the greats!

    and as far as the Match Referee goes, obviously the benefit of doubt goes to the Aussies, because most of the ref's and ICC itself like to keep Pakistan down, just have a look at 3 lbw's which would have had australia all out for less than 200 in the 1st innings, 2 of them by asif, 1 by aamir!

  • POSTED BY aalkool on | July 14, 2010, 12:11 GMT

    As expected, Aamer has been reprimanded to maintain the spirit of cricket. And as expected, Ponting escapes censure to maintain the spirit of cricket. The tone is set for more loutish, boorish behaviour from the Australian cricket team, by none other than Chris Broad!!! Not even a fig leaf of equality to maintain the spirit of cricket.

  • POSTED BY Boris72 on | July 14, 2010, 11:53 GMT

    Why does Aamer have such a long follow through after a wicket anyway?

  • POSTED BY Kal_3L on | July 14, 2010, 10:19 GMT

    @Paullie....sorry buddy, i've always admired the sportsmen spirit that the aussies have shown, especially Ponting, but this time around I do believe his frustration has gotten the better of him, just look at the replay again, Ponting leans into Aamir, which does seem to be very much deliberate. for you consideration, here's a photo

    http://www.cricinfo.com/pakistan-v-australia-2010/content/current/gallery/467199.html

  • POSTED BY __PK on | July 14, 2010, 6:56 GMT

    Aamer leaps to crash into Clarke and it's a misjudgement. Pointing slightly twitches an elbow and it's deliberate? Ponting-bashing much?

  • POSTED BY stationmaster on | July 14, 2010, 6:49 GMT

    Going off for VERY marginal light is just the ticket to drive people AWAy from test matches. The ICC needs to look at this ruling, it's simply working against the very thing they are trying to promote - i.e. TEST CRICKET - come on guys, we need to move with the times here.

  • POSTED BY thair9999 on | July 14, 2010, 4:58 GMT

    Comon Pointing, Aamer is almost half your age. And this is cricket not rugby. Stop being sore losers if a kid got you out.

  • POSTED BY ozmanuzman on | July 14, 2010, 4:57 GMT

    Boo to ponting elbow !!!!

  • POSTED BY busbybabe on | July 14, 2010, 2:54 GMT

    You may notice that the order of the teams that Justin Langer represented follows an alphabetic order. It is purely on that account that Western Australia as ended up last and Rajasthan Royals second! Don't make a mountain out of a molehill!!

  • POSTED BY SkillNotResult on | July 14, 2010, 0:57 GMT

    Not sure that the IPL shadow looms large when it comes to listing JL's team-representation... it's just that they are listed in alphabetical order.

  • POSTED BY on | July 14, 2010, 0:05 GMT

    "Australia, Middlesex, Rajasthan Royals, Somerset, Western Australia."

    Looks like alphabetical sorting to me.

  • POSTED BY on | July 13, 2010, 22:22 GMT

    Shane Watson was given out leg before the wicket when the ball hit the stumps. He couldn't have covered the wicket as the stumps were exposed for the ball to hit the bails at the point of impact! And what if the ball had hit the wicket and the bail didn't fall. Can a batsman be given out LBW? "He can't be covering the wicket for the ball to hit the wicket " If the angle of the delivery and how the ball deviates is considered after hitting the pitch by the umpire. How it deviates off the pads is broad. Is there a law covering this? As my point is the batsman can't be covering the wicket to be given LBW.

  • POSTED BY aalkool on | July 13, 2010, 22:03 GMT

    Spirit of cricket!!! Since when do you elbow your opponents if they get you out? Don't think Ponting will stop being boorish.

  • POSTED BY true_cricket_fan on | July 13, 2010, 21:33 GMT

    There is nothing unusual in the order of teams Langer represented which were displayed on the electronic boards. It's just that they are sorted in the alphabetical order.

  • POSTED BY aahd81 on | July 13, 2010, 21:11 GMT

    That Amir - Ponting incident is certainly going to get a lot of attention but I think Ponting was the one being harsh. Amir got him out owing to an absolute blinder by Umer Amin. Amir's first reaction was to celebrate with Umer, he shared a high five with him and then jumped high, heading off to celebrate with the rest of the team but then he realized everyone was gathering on the off-side and he changed his direction. Ponting saw him and put his elbow out. There was a case where the Pakistan players were trying to get under Ponting's skin but I don't think this was meant to be a part of it. It was the old man losing his cool instead...

  • POSTED BY Cricdish on | July 13, 2010, 21:00 GMT

    "Australia, Middlesex, Rajasthan Royals, Somerset, Western Australia." Langer had played just one IPL match for Rajasthan, and considering his strong allegiance for his home state of Western Australia, one would've expected his home state to be ranked behind his national squad.

    Ever considered the possibility that the teams were listed in alphabetical order?

  • POSTED BY on | July 13, 2010, 20:49 GMT

    Well done Team Pakistan ... keep it up

  • POSTED BY on | July 13, 2010, 20:48 GMT

    "Australia, Middlesex, Rajasthan Royals, Somerset, Western Australia." is more alphabetical than anything else

  • POSTED BY Roamer on | July 13, 2010, 20:42 GMT

    Apologies to correct you, it was not IPL's shadow when they mentioned about the teams Langer represented, all the teams that he represented were displayed in alphabetical order..... common sense :)

  • POSTED BY popcorn on | July 13, 2010, 20:24 GMT

    I am beginning to think Mohammed Aamer's run-in to Michael Clarke, and now Ricky Ponting,is deliberate. The Match referee should haul him up.

  • POSTED BY on | July 13, 2010, 20:10 GMT

    I think you're reading too much in to Justin Langer and the Royals. It simply was a case of listing his teams in alphabetical order.

  • POSTED BY murad357 on | July 13, 2010, 20:03 GMT

    "Australia, Middlesex, Rajasthan Royals, Somerset, Western Australia." Langer had played just one IPL match for Rajasthan, and considering his strong allegiance for his home state of Western Australia, one would've expected his home state to be ranked behind his national squad ...

    => Seems like it was arranged alphabetically ....

  • POSTED BY on | July 13, 2010, 20:02 GMT

    Hi. Regarding Justin Langer's teams, I suggest that you are seeing something that really isn't there. The teams are listed alphabetically.

  • POSTED BY on | July 13, 2010, 20:00 GMT

    "IPL's shadow looms large "Bell ringer for today is Justin Langer," was the message on the electronic boards across Lord's. Nothing unusual there, except that the laconic Australian stared intensely at the bell for a moment as if it was some sacred object and touching it would reduce its veneer. Thankfully he did not take a step back. But what was really out of place was the name of one of the teams, listed in the following line, that Langer represented through his career: "Australia, Middlesex, Rajasthan Royals, Somerset, Western Australia." Langer had played just one IPL match for Rajasthan, and considering his strong allegiance for his home state of Western Australia, one would've expected his home state to be ranked behind his national squad. The English sentiment towards the IPL is indifferent but MCC seems to have an affinity for the richest cricket league. "

    Or maybe they were simply using alphabetical order, as seems to be the actual case here? One still uses that, right?

  • POSTED BY on | July 13, 2010, 19:53 GMT

    Regarding the IPL's shadow looms large: They listed the teams Langer played for in alphabetical order. I dont think MCC care abt IPL :)

  • POSTED BY Noompa on | July 13, 2010, 19:48 GMT

    Um, did nobody realize that Justin Langer's team were listed in alphabetical order and not in order of importance? Had he played for Zimbabwe instead of Australia, his national team would have been the last one to appear. It isn't the good folks at the MCC, but Mr. Coverdale who appears to have the IPL on the mind!

  • POSTED BY on | July 13, 2010, 19:34 GMT

    "Australia, Middlesex, Rajasthan Royals, Somerset, Western Australia." Did you notice the alphabetical order of team names? Maybe, MCC contrived this to put the RR before WA!

    I'm not a fan of IPL. But, please don't make an issue when there is none.

  • POSTED BY alloutfornoloss on | July 13, 2010, 19:21 GMT

    Maybe they arranged the sides Langer played for alphabetically. So RR came before WA.

  • POSTED BY SaifQazi on | July 13, 2010, 18:59 GMT

    i suppose MCC was either tryin to be too pedantic or accurate, because the name of the teams r in alphabetic order in Langer's case.. isnt it?? lolzz i think i am bein too nerdy now:p

  • POSTED BY Aussasinator on | July 13, 2010, 18:57 GMT

    I hope the match referee doesnt show the past colors of ICC match referees and reprimand Amer and let Ponting go scot free. It was Ponting who moved his elbow and not Aamer.Tv replays showed it. The loser in Ponting is going from bad to worse. He's bringing the game to disrepute all over again. Pkistan should not play this match further if Aamer is punished unfairly.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • POSTED BY Aussasinator on | July 13, 2010, 18:57 GMT

    I hope the match referee doesnt show the past colors of ICC match referees and reprimand Amer and let Ponting go scot free. It was Ponting who moved his elbow and not Aamer.Tv replays showed it. The loser in Ponting is going from bad to worse. He's bringing the game to disrepute all over again. Pkistan should not play this match further if Aamer is punished unfairly.

  • POSTED BY SaifQazi on | July 13, 2010, 18:59 GMT

    i suppose MCC was either tryin to be too pedantic or accurate, because the name of the teams r in alphabetic order in Langer's case.. isnt it?? lolzz i think i am bein too nerdy now:p

  • POSTED BY alloutfornoloss on | July 13, 2010, 19:21 GMT

    Maybe they arranged the sides Langer played for alphabetically. So RR came before WA.

  • POSTED BY on | July 13, 2010, 19:34 GMT

    "Australia, Middlesex, Rajasthan Royals, Somerset, Western Australia." Did you notice the alphabetical order of team names? Maybe, MCC contrived this to put the RR before WA!

    I'm not a fan of IPL. But, please don't make an issue when there is none.

  • POSTED BY Noompa on | July 13, 2010, 19:48 GMT

    Um, did nobody realize that Justin Langer's team were listed in alphabetical order and not in order of importance? Had he played for Zimbabwe instead of Australia, his national team would have been the last one to appear. It isn't the good folks at the MCC, but Mr. Coverdale who appears to have the IPL on the mind!

  • POSTED BY on | July 13, 2010, 19:53 GMT

    Regarding the IPL's shadow looms large: They listed the teams Langer played for in alphabetical order. I dont think MCC care abt IPL :)

  • POSTED BY on | July 13, 2010, 20:00 GMT

    "IPL's shadow looms large "Bell ringer for today is Justin Langer," was the message on the electronic boards across Lord's. Nothing unusual there, except that the laconic Australian stared intensely at the bell for a moment as if it was some sacred object and touching it would reduce its veneer. Thankfully he did not take a step back. But what was really out of place was the name of one of the teams, listed in the following line, that Langer represented through his career: "Australia, Middlesex, Rajasthan Royals, Somerset, Western Australia." Langer had played just one IPL match for Rajasthan, and considering his strong allegiance for his home state of Western Australia, one would've expected his home state to be ranked behind his national squad. The English sentiment towards the IPL is indifferent but MCC seems to have an affinity for the richest cricket league. "

    Or maybe they were simply using alphabetical order, as seems to be the actual case here? One still uses that, right?

  • POSTED BY on | July 13, 2010, 20:02 GMT

    Hi. Regarding Justin Langer's teams, I suggest that you are seeing something that really isn't there. The teams are listed alphabetically.

  • POSTED BY murad357 on | July 13, 2010, 20:03 GMT

    "Australia, Middlesex, Rajasthan Royals, Somerset, Western Australia." Langer had played just one IPL match for Rajasthan, and considering his strong allegiance for his home state of Western Australia, one would've expected his home state to be ranked behind his national squad ...

    => Seems like it was arranged alphabetically ....

  • POSTED BY on | July 13, 2010, 20:10 GMT

    I think you're reading too much in to Justin Langer and the Royals. It simply was a case of listing his teams in alphabetical order.