15 May 1999
India v South Africa
Trevor Chesterfield
ICC Bans South African Bugging Device
HOVE - When the International Cricket Council found an electronic bug in
the ear of the South African captain today they sniffed suspiciously,
checked Law 42 for unfair play and then came down heavily on the team,
having the "illegal device" removed from Hansie Cronje's ear for "bugging"
the system.
The ICC rapped South Africa over the knuckles with a stump for bringing
foreign devices into the game and worked out a statement which has banned
the use of an ear piece device from this year's World Cup.
The pink bit of plastic, not to be found in your paper packet when you
collect your yearly Wisden Cricketers' Almanack, fitted neatly into a
players' ear, and was exposed for the world to see on the cable TV station,
Sky, in England.
"Ah, what's this?" sniffed the sub-continent media. "A South African
plot . . ? Next we'll find bugs in the pitch."
Yet the earpiece is about as simple you can find in a shop which deal
with hearing devices and is no more dangerous than those you will find
being used in other sports, noticeably American football, hockey as well as
soccer.
In a typically stiff upper-lip response the ICC issued a strongly
worded statement after the India innings at the County Ground today, which
confirms that match referee Talit Ali, of Pakistan, stopped Cronje from
wearing the electronic device and any other South African player as well.
He must have overlooked Allan Donald who wore one for a lengthy period at
one stage.
The ICC's statement said "as soon as it was aware of the use of the
device the South Africans were asked by the match referee to remove it". It
was their argument that as the use of the earpiece had not been cleared
with either the match referee or the ICC, and South Africa had not "sought
permission to use it" the ICC felt its withdrawal was necessary.
Although issued by the ICC the statement did not carry the name of an
ICC official, such as David Richards, the chief executive officer. The ICC
statement was also of the arbitrary opinion that the World Cup was "not the
venue" to experiment with new technical devices.
South Africa's coach Bob Woolmer confirmed that the players had asked
for the device to be used after it had become known that it was used in
other sports. As there is nothing in the laws to prevent the use of such
electronic equipment Woolmer was under the impression he did not need
permission to use it.
Known for his innovative ideas Woolmer said the device had been used
in South Africa and a couple of the warm up games. As nothing had been said
the feeling was that the experiment would continue.
The earpieces were bought by the players and are quite expensive,
designed by the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, in
Pretoria, South Africa. The CSIR have provided the South African team with
video support work over the last two seasons, which Woolmer uses to help
detect technical faults in a player's batting or bowling action.
Former Test players, including Mike Procter, the man Woolmer replaced
as South Africa's coach, gave the innovation their tick of approval in the
"yes" box. It is seen as a way to "speed up the game" instead of using the
time honoured sending out batting gloves with the 12th or 13th man with
messages for batsmen or passing on thoughts to the bowler.
It is expected that the item is to be brought up at an ICC meeting
after the World Cup and could be the subject of Cronje's report to the UCB
after the event.
Source :: Trevor Chesterfield