India in England 2011

History of comebacks offers India hope

Abhinav Mukund has no illusions about replacing Virender Sehwag's brilliance, but is aware that India will expect him to imbibe the most crucial ingredient in their rise up the world rankings - the ability to rebound

Sharda Ugra at Trent Bridge

July 27, 2011

Comments: 194 | Text size: A | A

As MS Dhoni and his not so merrie men made their way on to the field at Trent Bridge, all comments about India's pathologically slow start to overseas tours was being given symbolic affirmation. The white wooden frame of the visitors' dressing room was being painted to ensure that Nottingham's beautiful, cumulus cloud of a cricket ground would actually be ready in time for Friday's storm and fury.

India must find a way to be ready too, and only the wettest of blankets will believe the series is already over. Just like 'mental disintegration' was part of the Australian template, the ability to absorb and respond to shock or setback is India's. It has become a part of their DNA in the last decade, fundamental to their climb up the Test rankings and their particularly good performances in the last two tours of England.

Nine years ago, India had lost the first Test at Lord's and Sourav Ganguly, their unperturbed captain at the time, met Indians on the street who mournfully told him they were going to be returning home. "Why so soon? Stick on, we're going to level the series." A draw was eked out in the second Test at Trent Bridge, and victory arrived in Headingley. India batted first in bad-tempered weather, on a green wicket and piled up a big score to set up the win. In 2007, India were rescued by the rain at Lord's but came to Nottingham and found both jelly beans and Zaheer Khan's swing. The match and the series was eventually won.

Status quo on Zaheer fitness front

  • According to the India team manager Anirudh Chaudhary, there has been "a considerable improvement" in Zaheer's recovery from the hamstring injury he picked on the first afternoon at Lord's. Zaheer was expected to bowl in the second innings, at least according to the update sent by Chaudhary on the second day, but was only spotted walking in and out of the gymnasium.
  • At Trent Bridge today, Zaheer did not join the rest of the squad at their complete nets but instead underwent a light training in the company of the team physio Ashish Kaushik. Initially both men walked around the ground, followed by a steady jog. Kaushik then put Zaheer through the paces while he timed him. Zaheer then did some stretching in the gymnasium.
  • After the Lord's defeat, MS Dhoni had stated that he would not rush his premier fast bowler if he was not 100% fit. Chaudhary indicated that the chances of Zaheer returning for the second Test were positive. The lines continued to be blurred.

Lord's 2011 is now lost, England are rampant and India are left with their totem Zaheer trying to race back into the contest. If the state of a team's best players is ever meant to imply a squad's comfort zone, India are well out of it. They must deal with a set of circumstances that may sound like the partnership of doom and gloom. They must find a way to transform it into the spark plugs that can turn their engine on.

The last decade in England constantly offers them patterns. The success of the opening combination in 2007 was marked down as one of the central pillars of India's first series win in England since 1986. It was not the result of India's most settled opening pair - Virender Sehwag and Gautam Gambhir. Sehwag had been dropped from the team following a train-wreck of a 2007 World Cup and Gambhir was not yet a gleam in the selectors' eyes. India opened with Wasim Jaffer and Dinesh Karthik, who averaged 53.67 per stand in 2007 and produced the first century opening stand for India in England since 1979. In 2002, it was opener-allrounder Sanjay Bangar's survival with Rahul Dravid in Headingley that set up the first Test win in England in 16 years.

So when rookie opener Abhinav Mukund turns up to bat in India's first innings, it will not be surprising if he carries neither baggage nor reservations. His view from the inside could be construed as just the circulation of PR spin; it is more a pointer to how the Indians choose to handle what is on their plate. India will regroup after Lord's, Abhinav said with complete composure, because of what it had taken them to become World No. 1. "We have conquered a lot of challenges on the way here," he said. "A lot of the players are experienced enough and have played in these conditions. We have come here to take up the challenges and will definitely give it a good fight."


Gautam Gambhir and Abhinav Mukund survived a testing period, England v India, 1st Test, Lord's, 2nd day, July 22, 2011
Abhinav Mukund and Gautam Gambhir can derive inspiration from the Trent Bridge air: here's where Virender Sehwag struck his first Test century as an opener © Getty Images
Enlarge

When Abhinav and his partner Gautam Gambhir set off in Nottingham's most English of conditions, they would do well to think less of what the wicket holds than of what one man made of it. Sehwag's absence for the first two Tests is seen as one of India's biggest woes, but the two left-hand openers should keep in mind that this is where he scored his first Test century as a makeshift opener before going on to become a great of the modern game.

Abhinav answered a question about being a replacement for Sehwag by speaking slowly and clearly. "First of all, if you are looking at me as one of the persons to replace someone like Sehwag ... it's going to be big boots to fill ... I don't want to replace Sehwag or play like he does, because it's not possible. I just want to go out there and play like I know and if it comes off, it's good for the team. Any team requires a start from their openers, I don't think it's anything new."

Zaheer's possible absence from this Test as well would not, Abhinav said, mean a toothless bowling line-up. "It's not that we have a depleted attack, but when you lose a fast bowler in the game, it's a completely different scenario." India's quick bowling options on offer, he believed, were more than adequate, "Zaheer has been our strike bowler for a long time, but I think Ishant Sharma has being bowling really well too. He was Man of the Series in the West Indies, Praveen Kumar has taken five wickets and Sreesanth is waiting in the wings."

Sreesanth's arrival on the field of play could immediately signal the advent of another tussle between his bowling skill and his love for performance art. However, if he and his more reasoned team-mates live up to their reputation for bouncing back, Nottingham could once again become the venue where the slow start gives way to series-turning momentum.

Rahul Dravid, well-schooled in the art of the turnaround, was given a break from the nets this afternoon. The Indians finished their practice with Harbhajan Singh and Yuvraj Singh having a bat, their shots heading towards the painters on the scaffolding. One of the workmen called out to the other wondering whether they were ever going to get their job completed. The men going to occupy the balcony they were painting would have told them not to worry and that the 'well begun is half done' philosophy is over-rated. All that matters at the end is the finished product. Abhinav said, "Obviously we were all disappointed. We do not want to look back. We'll take the positives and move on... It is a four-match series."

Sharda Ugra is senior editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Sharda Ugra

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (July 29, 2011, 18:46 GMT)

indian shows y they are the 1 one....still any 1 have dought ...after this performance

Posted by   on (July 29, 2011, 9:07 GMT)

@SriLankanFan1978 & @ Ravin Dias,hello guys am nt sure why u compares ur side with no.1 indian side??india have won the series in WI,PAK,ENG have drew the series in Aus,SL,SA with the same bowling lineup n batting lineup,wat SL has done???have they won the test series in Ind,Aus,Eng,SA,WI?

Posted by   on (July 28, 2011, 19:03 GMT)

India #1 Rank team? Then Aus is #1 rank ODI team and everyone knows that is not true.India won only one test against WI,2-draws.What you see is what you get.England and SA are the two best test sides.Then Aus , Sl and Ind are in the same level.India is the best ODI team but an average Test team.There batting line-up is filled with sloggers but not enough proper batsmen( except sachin and Dravid).So it suits ODI's but not Test cricket.Lords was the best place for them to get a draw with a flat pitch,but now it is going to be even harder to save upcoming test matches.Dhoni is such a negative thinking captain,and he proves it over and over again.If there is going to be a captain cool,it would be the coolest man on the field Sewag.He should be india's captain and Dhoni should only play ODI's.

Posted by Lallubhai on (July 28, 2011, 19:01 GMT)

@ pirki , Man don't you know its the pakistani batsmen that are the' true' flat track bullies . The Indian batsmen have scored heavily against the best bowlers all over the world . Just ask the Aussies & S.Africans . Thats why they climbed to no1 in rankings . pakistan are no 6 .Soon even W. Indies will go ahead of pakistan.

Posted by landl47 on (July 28, 2011, 17:55 GMT)

It's fun to see all the remedies for India's problems being put forward by the Indian fans. Open with Dravid- open with Yuvi- drop Bhaji- play 5 bowlers- play Sree- play Munaf- drop Raina (!)- play Mishra- play Irfan or Kartik, who aren't even in the squad.... it reminds me of Australia during the Ashes series. All the fans had a remedy for Aus's problems and they were all different. Let's look at England: Tremlett has an injury and might not play. Bresnan replaces him. Nobody's suggesting wild remedies or putting forward multiple players, even though England has far more strength in depth than India, with Finn, Shazad, Onions and Woakes all more than capable replacements. That's because England is good enough to cover anyone's absence. Cook and Morgan failed in the first innings- England got 474-8. Anderson had a bad first innings- India bowled out for 286. Wake up, it's not 2007 or 2002. This is a good England team. It will be tough for India to draw this series, let alone win.

Posted by Venkat_Gowrishankar on (July 28, 2011, 17:34 GMT)

People talk here that India do not deserve to be the No1 side and so on. I do accept they are entitled to their opinions. Fact is that, just because England won a series in australia does not mean they are currently the deserving #1 team in the world. I doubt if Anderson can hardly swing the ball in the sub continent ( World cup is proof to that ). India's atleast for its sake has ensured that they never lose an away series in conditions totally alien to theirs. Unless England defeat India In India and Sri lanka in Srilanka, they can forget about the #1 rank. I dont even recall an England side winning a series in India in the past 2 decades, India has atleast won once .

Posted by   on (July 28, 2011, 16:39 GMT)

Even Aussies who r in the peak in 2001 lost test series against INDIA ......for who r all suspect indias performence dont forget the above mention series where india made a come back after losing in mumbai........eventhough we played in home condition......they up against some solid bowling lineup......so definetly india will back in english soil after all its just a slow start(as usual) in overseas..........

Posted by   on (July 28, 2011, 16:11 GMT)

we can only hope our stars come good tomorrow...its not the same situation as usual because this time we are missing zaheer and sehwag and probably gambhir as well...20 wickets cant be easy enough to get specially with harbhajan's form...but hopefully the senior batsmen put their hand up..

Posted by Immchr on (July 28, 2011, 16:02 GMT)

(conti..) Should not the No.1 test side be proud & ambitious or should it be timid & hopeless ? All Indians, whether journalists or commentators or whoever, after England set us 458 in 125 overs, never ever thought that an Indian win was possible. Their only thought was escaping with a draw. Why this negativity ? Whats wrong with seeking glory ? Even if India had played at only 3 runs an over, they would have still ended up with 375 runs.

Hence, my advice to the Indian team is to play all the 3 tests with an intent to win & not to escape with a draw. I hope this message goes through to them. Or else, they will lose the series badly.

We are not lacking in ability. We are lacking in confidence. On the other hand the biggest English weapon is their positivity. They are playing to win. If India only plays to escape without losing they will not succeed. India should remember how they had England in the 2nd innings at 62 for 5. They can dismiss England for 100 if they played aggressive.

Posted by SriLankanFan1978 on (July 28, 2011, 16:01 GMT)

For current situation ICC ranking should be changed as follows.

1. England 2. South Africa 3. Sri Lanka 3. India 5. Australia

Indians haven't good bowlers to all out opposition team twice.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Sharda UgraClose
Tour Results
England v India at Cardiff - Sep 16, 2011
England won by 6 wickets (with 10 balls remaining) (D/L method)
England v India at Lord's - Sep 11, 2011
Match tied (D/L method)
England v India at The Oval - Sep 9, 2011
England won by 3 wickets (with 7 balls remaining) (D/L method)
England v India at Southampton - Sep 6, 2011
England won by 7 wickets (with 5 balls remaining)
England v India at Chester-le-Street - Sep 3, 2011
No result
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days