Sri Lanka v England, Super Eights, World Twenty20, Pallekele

Broad left to rue 'average' days

England came as the defending champions but never played like it and, once again, it was problems in the Powerplay that led to their defeat

David Hopps in Pallekele

October 1, 2012

Comments: 34 | Text size: A | A

There probably was an England side that could have reached the World Twenty20 semi-finals, but it was not the one which lost three matches out of five and, by virtue of a 19-run defeat against Sri Lanka in Pallakele, crashed out of the competition at the Super Eights stage. Sri Lanka have surely never entered a semi-final with more vigour since their breakthrough win in the World Cup 16 years ago. England, by contrast, never really found the way.

The team that will never be tested (always an advantage) would have included Ian Bell alongside Alex Hales and Luke Wright at the top of the order, it would have married Kevin Pietersen and Eoin Morgan in the middle order - Pietersen thereby making spectators' hair stand on end in the crowd rather than making his own hair stand on end for the benefit of the TV studio - it would have recognised Samit Patel's ability against spin bowling at No. 6, and the young guns, Craig Kieswetter and Jonny Bairstow could have contested the keeping position at No 7. Jos Buttler would have been a stand-by batsman able to observe and learn his trade.

The imaginary team, or course, is just a concoction, another theory to go with countless others that flooded the social network sites as England crashed out of the tournament. The real England side, young and untutored in Asian conditions, competed and were found wanting. But they not as ordinary as many were suggesting.

Stuart Broad, a captain who has spoken throughout with a refreshing mix of positivity and candour, admitted: "We can look at missed opportunities but over the whole tournament we have not been good enough. What you get with young guys is some days absolute brilliance and other days a bit of averageness and I think as a team over the past three weeks we have shown a bit of both.

"The talent is certainly there. If you go onto Cricinfo these are the guys who are performing week in, week out in domestic cricket. It is very disappointing to go out because I know we have the firepower in that dressing room to go far."

England were pilloried for making three changes but that did not capture the reality. The inclusion of Patel and Jade Dernbach, in place of Tim Bresnan and Danny Briggs, who had played against New Zealand, was just a return to first principles.

"We changed the team for the New Zealand game and used Danny Briggs as an attacking option in the first six overs," Broad said. "Against Sri Lanka under lights it was unlikely a spinner was going to bowl in the first six with our seam attack. The pitch definitely changes under lights here. It gets quicker than in a day game."

While other sides continue to speak of the need to take advantage of the initial six-over Powerplay, get a flyer and then push the ball around against the spinners in the middle overs, England obsessed over statistics purporting to prove that retention of wickets won matches more often than not

They made one change: they dropped Kieswetter. It is hard to question his omission because he had become an increasingly troubled figure at the top of the order. "Kiesy has probably not had the three weeks he would like," Broad said. "I am sure he will bounce back but we had not had some very good starts in the last few weeks and with a must-win game we obviously wanted to rectify that."

It is fair, though, to wonder why England first picked Kieswetter at the top of the order and then seemed bent on entirely confusing him. While other sides continue to speak of the need to take advantage of the initial six-over Powerplay, get a flyer and then push the ball around against the spinners in the middle overs, England obsessed over statistics purporting to prove that retention of wickets won matches more often than not, especially when the likes of Morgan could explode in the later overs.

Kieswetter, who might imagine himself a potential match-winner as a pinch-hitter, suddenly found that his job description had entirely changed and he was expected to be more conventional, in which case Bell should have been a shoo-in. Unlike Wright, he was not mentally strong enough to cope with it.

It was quite a feat also for England to replace Kieswetter with the only batsman whose mental state was arguably even frailer, Ravi Bopara. He proved as much as he laboured six balls over a single before - however you want to dress it up - he missed a straight one. His England career will take some rescuing and only he can find the will to do it.

Bopara had tweeted two days earlier: "A whole day of FIFA I reckon. Nothing else to do in Kandy." Clearly the Temple of the Tooth, which tradition has it holds the tooth relic of the Buddha, did not appeal, the botanical gardens, with their wild orchid house, was equally untempting; and travelling deeper into the Hill Country was a no-no.

All the talk had been of how England would play Sri Lanka's spinners. Patel played them wonderfully well, although as Sri Lanka's captain, Mahela Jayawardene, pointed out, they were hindered to some extent by a heavier evening dew. Akhila Dananjaya, the 18-year-old legspinner, still found time to bowl Eoin Morgan on the reverse sweep.

Ravi Bopara was bowled for 1, Sri Lanka v England, Super Eights, World Twenty20, Pallekele, October 1, 2012
Ravi Bopara's return was an ill-judged selection by England and he was bowled for just a single © Getty Images

The Dananjaya story, a youngster who was spotted by Jayawardene at a net session, and was thrust first into the Sri Lanka Premier League and then World Twenty20, is a curiosity in Sri Lanka; in England, where players are educated, processed, re-educated, re-processed, analysed, re-evaluated, re-analysed, discussed, tried and tested, it would be a miracle. It is the equivalent of somebody not quite interesting Leicestershire and then a few months later bowling Kumar Sangakkara. It is not about to happen.

"The way Samit Patel played the spin was very encouraging," Broad said. "He looked a class act out there. His big strength is how he plays the spin and hits over the off side. He made a few spinners go for a few runs tonight. That is a huge positive not just for the Twenty20 side but for England going forward. If we could have hung around and stayed with him, the last four or five overs can go for anything."

Neither could you entirely fault Broad's assessment of Lasith Malinga's decisive second over in which he removed Luke Wright, Jonny Bairstow (deceived by a slower ball, lest the England captain's description does not communicate this point) and Alex Hales, leaving England 18 for 3.

"Obviously those three wickets in the third over damaged us quite a bit," Broad said. "It is Twenty20 cricket, isn't it. Lasith got a short, wide one, caught point, he got one caught mid-off and he got a leg side lbw that was missing six stumps. But he bowled really well, he bowled full and straight and he showed the class that the IPL pays millions for. He obviously hurt us with those three wickets but they weren't jaffas were they? We just managed to get out to them."

And so, England's challenge ended. Now all that is left is the end game involving Kevin Pietersen. It is meant to be imminent. It probably is. But don't hold your breath.

David Hopps is the UK editor of ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: David Hopps

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Meety on (October 4, 2012, 5:51 GMT)

@JG2704 on (October 03 2012, 08:47 AM GMT) - loved the 2nd last sentence, I can almost hear the clatter of a million keystrokes strumming....

Posted by JG2704 on (October 3, 2012, 9:02 GMT)

@John H Chambers on (October 03 2012, 05:08 AM GMT) Not sure how ECB have handled this or who said what at negotiations , but it wasn't ECB who sent texts to member(s) of the opposition was it?

Posted by JG2704 on (October 3, 2012, 8:57 GMT)

@Meety on (October 02 2012, 23:41 PM GMT) Sorry your comms haven't got through. I certainly would say our squad was thereabouts the best we had. I'd have had Anderson above Dernbach. Maybe Woakes but I'd prefer him as a test bowler. One guy said Foster - good shout but no one knew how bad Craig would perform.I'm never totally confident of Eng chasing anything down but 180 is way too much esp in SC so for that part I have to blame our bowlers even before our batsmen start their inns. The one thing I blame our batsmen for above anything else is amount of dot balls. Not sure weather Flower is oblivious to this or whether our batsmen aren't following instructions

Posted by JG2704 on (October 3, 2012, 8:47 GMT)

@Gerard Pereira on (October 02 2012, 07:39 AM GMT) And how did flat track kings India do in the super 8s? Demolished by green toppers Australia and lucky not to lose against a side which has nothing to play for and at least we were always going to fail and weren't even supposed to qualify for the super 8s let alone win a match. What's that now for India in shorter formats this year - a tri nation and a 4 team tournament which you couldn't even qualify for a final in and then could not even qualify - in your own conditions - for the semis in this one. So yes Eng are mediocre but at least nothing more was expected of us

Posted by   on (October 3, 2012, 5:08 GMT)

Well, if the ECB leaves out the best twenty over batsman in the world, what can be expected? Eh? "Our cricketers have let the country down this summer" writes pb10677. No. The ECB has.

Posted by Meety on (October 2, 2012, 23:41 GMT)

@JG2704 on (October 02 2012, 15:43 PM GMT) - I think any team that regularly gets 180+ in SL is going to win a lot of games. The SLPL, the scores were rarely that high. Amongst the many comments I have made on this match, only 2 have gone thru. I would say that this Eng squad was technically the best that Eng could/should of sent in THIS format with the obvious exception of KP. I would of selected Woakes as a bowler (let alone batsmen) ahead of all the pacers bar Finn. I would of selected Taylor ahead of most of the specialist batemsn at the Cup (T20 stats are better than quite a few). I wonder if Bell was selected just to spend time in the nets with the winter Indian tour in mind? (I mean why bring him & not play him????). With the benefit of hindsight - everyone has 20/20 vision (no deliberate pun intended)!

Posted by phoenixsteve on (October 2, 2012, 22:11 GMT)

It was very noticable during the embers of the Sri Lanka v England game that the new found 'dressing room unity' doesn't seem to apply to Samit Patel and his remarkable one man fight? Even when he a Swann were blazing away there seemed to be no encouragement/appreciation for the England dugout? Maybe they've become to used to watching dazzling displays from KP and hate to see individual brilliance? Not that there was much of it on show over recent matches..... COME ON ENGLAND!!!

Posted by phoenixsteve on (October 2, 2012, 21:59 GMT)

@PB10677.... Spot on! I couldn't agree more and a perfect observation. I watched all of the Ryder cup live ( i live in the USA) and what a result! The European side were amazing, punched above their weight and showed amazing spirit and determination! Now as for the England cricketers...... well you know!

Posted by JG2704 on (October 2, 2012, 15:43 GMT)

@PcDadda on (October 02 2012, 02:29 AM GMT) Personally - while I recognise we have a problem vs spin , I feel in this particular tournament our bowlers have let us down more than our batsmen. If we were set 180ish totals in England I reckon we'd lose far more than we win

Posted by kingsafu on (October 2, 2012, 15:33 GMT)

Sri lanka were beaten by south africa in the group stages. so thier unbeaten run is only 3 matches and not 5.

Posted by BigDataIsAHoax on (October 2, 2012, 11:42 GMT)

Not at home and without KP (South African) = Below average English team.

Posted by   on (October 2, 2012, 8:17 GMT)

they are competitive in seaming conditions and poor in spinning tracks.. its as simple as that.. but England can be forgiven considering how the other so called "title contenders" SA and NZ performed in this WC. Luke and Finn really deserve to be in a team playing the semis..

Posted by pb10677 on (October 2, 2012, 8:10 GMT)

England as a side have been an immense disappointment this calendar year. In the UK, it is a time where every other sport has stepped its game up and delivered (with the exception of football, which will never have any concerns about interest levels anyway). People in the UK are talking about what an amazing year it has been, with the Olympics, Bradly Wiggins winning the Tour de France, Andy Murray won in the US and then capped off by the astonishing effort by the Ryder Cup team at the weekend. No one is mentioning cricket in these conversations, and I believe it has missed a BIG opportunity to re-establish its profile in the UK. Our cricketers have let the country down this summer with their lacklustre performances and these embarrassing off field issues. Not a happy fan at the moment!

Posted by   on (October 2, 2012, 7:39 GMT)

Average days from an average team. England's slide into mediocrity continues first the test loss against SA and now the loss of the ODI crown. No KP no contest .England confirming what we all knew, they can only operate on green tops.

Posted by Meety on (October 2, 2012, 7:22 GMT)

@PcDadda on (October 02 2012, 02:29 AM GMT) - thought I was sufferring from an alternate reality, I thought SL lost a joke of a game against the Saffas too! Don't agree with "... SL seem the team most likely to lift the trophy..." - I think there is a team who genuinely is so far undefeated looking pretty good!

Posted by Lmaotsetung on (October 2, 2012, 5:35 GMT)

People seem to forget that this is a VERY VERY VERY young England team. Only Swann is above 30 yrs old and everyone else is under 28! I think with a little more experience this team could have gone further but unfortunately we no longer have the likes of Collingwood, Pietersen, Sidebottom, etc. T20 will always be a hit n miss thing. I'd be more interested to see how this young team perform in the 50ov format as it is a better indicator of test readiness.

Posted by SanjivAwesome on (October 2, 2012, 4:42 GMT)

The best player was behind the mike instead of being behind a bat.

Posted by prannsshu on (October 2, 2012, 3:16 GMT)

Is this end of bopara in english out fits???

Posted by Sagay-Ed on (October 2, 2012, 2:40 GMT)

Srilanka are unbeaten in 5 matches. Didn't they lose to South Africa in the group stage?

Posted by PcDadda on (October 2, 2012, 2:29 GMT)

The report is factually incorrect - SL are NOT unbeaten in the last five matches - they did lose the group stage match against SAF. Having said that - SL seem the team most likely to lift the trophy. BTW - why hasn't the writer referred to England's biggest problem - playing in the sub-continent with an open mind and willingness to adapt to the conditions here. Until England start looking forward to tours in the sub-continent they'll always go back disappointed.

Posted by mcsdl on (October 2, 2012, 2:22 GMT)

It has only a little to do with the team selection... In reality English squad is just not good enough... Stuart Broad must be having a laugh when he said "must be one of those average days"..! You knew its a must win game before the start, so there is no way you could blame the effort... In reality England did try but they got comprehensively out played through out the tounament. They were lucky to even come this far..!

Posted by KingOwl on (October 2, 2012, 2:15 GMT)

Oh, now for the typically English excuses. This is the best one I have seen: The best team was at home, attending to their gardens - this was the Second XI playing! Nice one!

Posted by Sanj747 on (October 2, 2012, 1:55 GMT)

The continued slide of English cricket. Totally outplayed. Playing India next in India won't be easy. Looking foward to the series with keen interest.

Posted by phoenixsteve on (October 2, 2012, 1:45 GMT)

Interesting but quite inappropraite headline? England's "average" performance. They aspired to be avaerage and most of the time nearly ALL of the squad could only dream of being AVERAGE! The bowling of Finn and Swann was OK. The batting apparently couldn't play spin...... and then it couldn't play seam? In short it couldn't play! Still, I bet they're all happy (warm & fuzzy) in the dressing room? A happy bunch of underperforming losers who have let their country/profession/selves down- but maybe that's what the dinosuars who reign over English cricket want? Are we to revert to English mediocrity after so much success? It seems that is what Hugh Morris and his cronies wan't for us? Success must have been very unacustomed & they had that naughty boy (KP) to deal with! I'm hoping to hear about resignations and the acceptance of responsibility. I'm not holding my breath though- neither should KP? A sad episode in mediocrity and a classic lesson on "how to shoot yourself in the foot"!

Posted by vswami on (October 2, 2012, 1:29 GMT)

If cricket was played on Statsguru, England would be the T20 champs. Except that in real cricket, you got to even face straight balls.

Posted by SurlyCynic on (October 2, 2012, 0:57 GMT)

Hang on, I read the article on Buttler when the tournament started and apparently he was the player 'everyone was talking about', destined to have a huge impact - now he doesn't make the fantasy England team? Anyway, Broad was a poor choice as captain. But England will always have that Afghanistan win, noone can take that away from them.

Posted by   on (October 2, 2012, 0:44 GMT)

pfffft, England has now eclipsed Australia in condoning loses on the basis of a bad day, the conditions, poor selections etc. What about saying that England was totally outplayed by a team on song and be done with it? in fact, with the exception of England, most teams will perform very strongly at home in major tournaments, so there should be no shame in losing what was effectively a QFinal to the host team. I think SL was experimenting and were not a 100% about this game despite the apparent intensity. Bowling Ajantha Mendis for his full quota of overs was proof of this. England, go home, say that the Ashes is the most important tournament in the world and congratulate the non-particpants and navel gaze until the next tournament

Posted by   on (October 2, 2012, 0:05 GMT)

Long story short , in absence of KP, English team is just another sub par team like ZIM /BD or AFG

Posted by kamiCric on (October 1, 2012, 23:56 GMT)

You've been soft on Broad. He picked a completely strange line up today. Top order looked as frail as the crashing stumps.

Posted by   on (October 1, 2012, 23:55 GMT)

Oh here we go the excuses have started already. You could have chased that score a hundred times and you would have fell well short. You're forgetting that you lost the game with the ball.

Posted by   on (October 1, 2012, 23:12 GMT)

There are indeed countless theories knocking around. But unlike this report the vast majority of them acknowledge that Matt Prior is by far England's best wicketkeeper-batsman. Not only is he a much better keeper, but with or without taking the gloves he's proven himeslf to be one of the best six batsmen in the country, with figures far better in tests than the sea of failures that have played as England's sixth batter in recent years. He's also arguably the very best player of spin England have. But he also was made to open in short forms for no good reason whatsoever, and then discarded unjustly. England have only three truly world class players that every country would want. Anderson, Prior and KP - and they didn't take any of them. Hopefully with alll the failures this year we'll finally see the back of Andy Flower (and his idiotic selections), who like Strauss is long past his usefulness. l

Posted by Patchmaster on (October 1, 2012, 22:57 GMT)

Broad just doesn't seem to have a captains like brain. I seriously think they should bring in Cook to open with Lumb (bring him back as well !) and he can be a genuine captain, with experience and knowledge.

Posted by CricketFundas on (October 1, 2012, 22:29 GMT)

The great thing for England's opponents was that the only 2 good players in the English team (Pietersen and Bell) werent in the side.

If anyone expected England to progress beyond the Super 8s they are either smoking something, plain crazy, or an wishful English fan! Bye bye England.

Posted by Venkat_Super_11 on (October 1, 2012, 22:04 GMT)

Why unfinished? "His shot, in FIFA football terms, was a case of hitting the ...."what?

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
David HoppsClose
David Hopps David Hopps joined ESPNcricinfo as UK editor early in 2012. For the previous 20 years he was a senior cricket writer for the Guardian and covered England extensively during that time in all Test-playing nations. He also covered four Olympic Games and has written several cricket books, including collections of cricket quotations. He has been an avid amateur cricketer since he was 12, and so knows the pain of repeated failure only too well. The pile of untouched novels he plans to read, but rarely gets around to, is now almost touching the ceiling. He divides his time between the ESPNcricinfo office in Hammersmith and his beloved Yorkshire.
Tournament Results
Sri Lanka v West Indies at Colombo (RPS) - Oct 7, 2012
West Indies won by 36 runs
Australia v West Indies at Colombo (RPS) - Oct 5, 2012
West Indies won by 74 runs
Sri Lanka v Pakistan at Colombo (RPS) - Oct 4, 2012
Sri Lanka won by 16 runs
India v South Africa at Colombo (RPS) - Oct 2, 2012
India won by 1 run
Australia v Pakistan at Colombo (RPS) - Oct 2, 2012
Pakistan won by 32 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days