Indian Premier League 2010

IPL sets down time-out ruling

Nagraj Gollapudi in Mumbai

March 4, 2010

Comments: 29 | Text size: A | A
Team-mates mob Mashrafe Mortaza after he ran out Andrew Symonds, Deccan Chargers v Kolkata Knight Riders, IPL, Johannesburg, May 16, 2009
The IPL has decided when teams can use their strategic time-outs © Associated Press
Enlarge
Related Links
News : IPL shortens match timeouts
Players/Officials: Lalit Modi
Series/Tournaments: Indian Premier League
Teams: India

The IPL management has laid down the guidelines for when teams can use their two-and-a-half minute strategic time-out in 2010: the bowling side can ask for the break between the sixth and eighth overs while the batting team can opt for the same anywhere between overs 11 to 16.

The mid-innings strategic time-out, which came in for widespread criticism after it was introduced in the 2009 season, had been reduced from seven-and-a-half minutes per side for the third season.

Lalit Modi, the IPL chairman, admitted that the league was forced to review the duration of the timeout after important players including Sachin Tendulkar had disapproved of the long break because it hampered a team's momentum.

"That was a trial process," Modi said. "Now we have changed it to total of five minutes split into two-and-a-half minutes for each time. The bowling team can take it from overs six to eight while we have noticed that the batting team always need to discuss with their team-mates at the end stages, so they can opt for the timeout between overs 11-16."

While introducing the tactical time-out, Modi stated its purpose was allow teams to discuss strategies instead of having to spend time on it during the course of the game, and hence minimise match-time delays. Critics disagreed instantly, saying it was nothing but another channel for the league to make more money.

But the franchises, some of whom had originally not accepted the interruption openly, now say the timeout is necessary from the both the cricketing and the financial perspective. "[The] strategy break is good because you need to get more revenues in it," one of the franchise officals said. "Ultimately the entertainment part is great but within a short break you have to get the revenues otherwise the IPL can't survive."

Even if teams agree the timeout is beneficial, some are still trying to come to grips with it. "You cannot do much in such a short time. You cannot reinvent a wheel," said TA Sekar, director of cricket for Mumbai Indians, who was with earlier with Delhi Daredevils for the first two years of the IPL. "Invariably each time there was a break players lost concentration. It is quite an innovative thing they are trying, it may help, it may not."

But Sekar admitted breaks were important in the Twenty20 due to the rapid manner in which changes occur. "Twenty20 is a game where execution of your plan is very, very important because you don't have the time to comeback," he said. "So [the] strategy break may be helpful because somebody inside [the dug-out] might see something happening which the players inside may not see."

Nagraj Gollapudi is an assistant editor at Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: Nagraj Gollapudi

© ESPN EMEA Ltd.

Comments: 29 
Posted by ramgoat on (March 10 2010, 23:18 PM GMT)

To be honest the IPL is copying to much from north American sport.Since when cricket have time out ?the Ipl is just bringing the game down,Its all about money and business its not cricket anymore.

Posted by Navin84 on (March 09 2010, 06:24 AM GMT)

Please look at the wording properly in this article. In the first paragraph they mentioned "the bowling side can ask for the break between the sixth and eighth overs while the batting team can opt for the same anywhere between overs 11 to 16. " This means the bowling team only option is the 7th over and the batting team overs 12 to 15 because they said BETWEEN. Then again Mr. Modi said "The bowling team can take it from overs six to eight while we have noticed that the batting team always need to discuss with their team-mates at the end stages, so they can opt for the timeout between overs 11-16." Now this means the bowling team can take it from the overs 6 to 8. WHICH REALLY IS IT???

Posted by   on (March 09 2010, 00:12 AM GMT)

IPL is about money and nothing else....

Posted by   on (March 08 2010, 09:41 AM GMT)

it shoud be optional if the team wants

Posted by edisonlights on (March 07 2010, 15:59 PM GMT)

Timeouts are a waste of time. They're only for money. Lalit Modi is earning a lot of bucks through this. He's a kind of selfish person.

Posted by srkrishnan16 on (March 07 2010, 04:22 AM GMT)

I think it's just another money making strategy. Look how all international t20 matches are conducted! Do they have breaks? Let the players play with whatever skill they have continuously for 20 overs! why the break?

Posted by gjoshi88 on (March 06 2010, 16:56 PM GMT)

i feel that their is no need for any time out , its simply wastage of time.

Posted by Suns on (March 06 2010, 15:57 PM GMT)

I agree with Satvir Singh Litt, There should not be any restrictions on when to take break and it should be optional. If a team is going well.. what is the need for it to take a break

Posted by   on (March 06 2010, 05:27 AM GMT)

2.5 minutes is better, coz keeping in mind speed of game, u need to discuss. But, i don't think there should be any quota for it. Every team should have freedom to take it any time during innings, and at maximum, it should anywhere between over 4-16.

Posted by pvik on (March 06 2010, 03:00 AM GMT)

Kapil Dev is the one who founded such a league. Mr Modi just copied ICL and the concepts of English Premier league. Lalit Modi does not deserve any credit. BCCI had to start IPL just to stop ICL from growing. Regarding the time-outs, as per Modi if it has been introduced to help the teams, then leave it optional to the teams. Let them take it only if they want it, do not force teams to take a break just to make money. I am going to switch off my television during the time outs. I request all cricket fans to do this so that they get rid of this time-outs.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Nagraj GollapudiClose
Tournament Results
Super Kings v Mumbai at Mumbai - Apr 25, 2010
Super Kings won by 22 runs
Bangalore v Deccan at Mumbai - Apr 24, 2010
Bangalore won by 9 wickets (with 37 balls remaining)
Super Kings v Deccan at Mumbai - Apr 22, 2010
Super Kings won by 38 runs
Bangalore v Mumbai at Mumbai - Apr 21, 2010
Mumbai won by 35 runs
Kolkata v Mumbai at Kolkata - Apr 19, 2010
Kolkata won by 9 wickets (with 15 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
  • Cricinfo Widgets
Sponsored Links

Access your Indian Rupee earnings from anywhere in the world.

on registering and transfer of USD 250 and above.

At Cricshop.com