May 25, 2009

Endorsements get a shake-up

How the IPL has moved the goalposts, creating a new paradigm in a multi-million dollar business

Behind the screaming fans, the strategy breaks and the DLF maximums, the IPL also appears to have triggered a significant churning off the field, in the bustling market of cricket. The hugely successful Twenty20 league has just wrapped up its second season, and player managers, franchise officials and investors admit that they are coming to terms with new trends and potential conflicts that are beginning to redefine their bottomlines.

In a nutshell, the IPL appears to have initiated a paradigm shift within the multi-million dollar player-endorsement industry, where individual deals are now gradually losing ground to team endorsements. As a result, concerns are being raised at the shrinking individual player-endorsement pie, looming conflicts between personal and team brands, players being forced to endorse "under-value brands", and contracts that are loaded against high-value cricketers, particularly from India.

So much so that sources close to a few leading Indian players say they will push for crucial tweaks in the IPL's player-franchise contracts after 2010, when the current three-year agreements come to an end.

On the flip side, franchise officials say that they signed up leading cricketers for huge sums - Chennai bought Andrew Flintoff for US$ 1.55m and MS Dhoni for US$ 1.5m, and Bangalore picked up Kevin Pietersen for US$ 1.55m - not just for their cricketing skills, but for the brand value attached. Pietersen and Flintoff appeared for just 21 days in the 37-day tournament, but ended up taking home well over US$ 100,000 per game.

"There is nothing unusual about these contracts," says a senior franchise official. "The IPL contracts do not give franchises anything that is not standard throughout team sports worldwide."

Yet some key concerns persist within the industry, the first of which is the fear that a player endorsing a brand for his IPL team will be shunned by rival brands within the same product category after the tournament. "We are not directly involved with the event, but if you ask me whether it makes brand sense for us to get a player on board before or after the IPL, after him being associated with a rival company during the course of the tournament, I would say not," says V Ramachandran, director, marketing and sales, LG, a leading multinational brand. "Every brand would want a unique association with the celebrity or the player - a prior association which the brand would like to protect. It's purely a case of the players themselves being motivated in favour of the brand."

A case in point is the reported US$ 2-3m deal between Mumbai Indians and Idea, a leading Indian mobile service provider. Through this IPL, Idea has been using Sachin Tendulkar, Harbhajan Singh and Zaheer Khan together and individually in a TV campaign. Tendulkar, who is one of Indian cricket's leading endorsement faces, is paid around US$ 1.02 million per season by Mumbai Indians, but according to market analysts, he would easily have got US$ 1 million if the Idea endorsement was an individual endorsement outside the league.

"But now, Idea gets Tendulkar, Harbhajan and Zaheer in a package deal that they can utilise through the year," says a player agent. "Obviously, the players don't get a single rupee out of this, and also end losing out on personal endorsements from other mobile service providers."

Charu Sharma, the former chief executive of Royal Challengers Bangalore, agrees the players have no option in the current scenario but to come to terms with the "new reality", at least for now. "The IPL was launched in a hurry last year, and most of the rules were made on the run," says Sharma. "So it was clear even then that some areas were bound to blow out later on. In fact, these were exactly some of the reasons why the players refrained from signing their IPL contracts till the last minute last year. But we have to understand and appreciate that the IPL is still raw and evolving and these grey areas will be cleared out eventually."

Franchise officials point out that there are clear safeguards in the IPL's player contracts specifying that brands associated with teams cannot imply that the cricketers are associated with them individually in any manner. "Most of the contracts specify that the players can be used for product endorsement and activation only during the IPL," says a franchise official. "Besides, a team sponsor has to feature at least three players in any advertisements. There are enough and clear safeguards to protect the players."

But behind the fine print, says a player agent, is the fear that some sponsors may tend to project a particular player more in these advertisements. "Besides, it's all about perception," he says. "Once you see Sourav Ganguly or Ishant Sharma endorse a particular product for Kolkata Knight Riders, even if it is with other players, it gets embedded in the public mindspace. You can't then go to individual households and tell them, 'Look, this is a team endorsement and not a personal endorsement.'"

There are fears that a player endorsing a brand for his IPL team will be shunned by rival brands within the same product category after the tournament. Then, of course, there is the obvious conflict between personal and team endorsements. Another area of concern is that some leading players have been forced to endorse certain brands for their franchises in categories they have steadfastly refused to promote in an individual capacity

The other area of concern is that some leading players have been forced to endorse certain brands for their franchises in categories they have steadfastly refused to promote in an individual capacity. For instance, Tendulkar and Rahul Dravid, widely considered role models in Indian cricket, have always refused to endorse liquor brands - until the IPL. Tendulkar now has the Royal Stag logo on his team jersey and Dravid promotes Royal Challenge.

In the same vein, brand analysts say, the IPL has seen some leading players endorse "under-value" brands, which don't match their stature. Again, Tendulkar's case is a prime example - for Mumbai Indians he endorses Luminous Batteries and Zandu Balm, which are brand types that he has not normally been associated with.

"That is the other worry," says a brand analyst. "If the value of a franchise falls, and if it fails to attract enough sponsors, as happened with some teams this time due to the recession, they could end up signing cheap deals. This will then have a domino effect on the player's individual value. Why would anyone sign up a player individually for X amount when you know that you can get him through a team deal for less?"

Then, of course, there is the obvious conflict between personal and team endorsements. For instance, Virender Sehwag endorses Pepsi but has been backing Coca-Cola in newspaper advertisements for Delhi Daredevils. Ishant Sharma, a rising youth icon, has to promote Coca-Cola's Sprite, when he has a personal contract with Pepsi. MS Dhoni endorses Peter England, a suiting brand, for Chennai, but individually promotes Siyaram, a rival brand. Significantly, some of these roles will be reversed in another month when the ICC World Twenty20, of which Pepsi is one of the main sponsors, gets underway in England.

Lathika Khaneja, who manages Sehwag, says that players should be insulated from such situations. "In fact, Sehwag asked me 'Is Pepsi upset?'" says Khaneja, director, Collage Sports Management. "But they can't be because there's the ICC World Twenty20 coming up. These are not rules made by Sehwag, they are made by the ICC or the IPL, and you're paying a lot of money for those rights and you expect to get something for it."

Yudhajit Dutta, who manages Dhoni, and Khaneja, insist that the franchises are right in trying to maximise their investment. The IPL awarded the Mumbai franchise to Reliance industries for their top bid of US$ 111.9 million, Bangalore to the UB Group for US$ 111.6 million, and Chennai to India Cements for US$ 91 million last year. That apart, most of the eight teams have spent US$ 7 million each on purchasing players through three official auctions.

"All these players have been paid quite a lot of money to be playing for their respective teams," says Dutta. "So I think they [the teams] should get something back as well." Dutta's Mindscape Maestros, incidentally, are also the exclusive marketing managers of the Chennai franchise.

A chief executive with one of the eight franchises takes the argument a few steps forward. "One, all this is new and real money for the players, not projected figures on an Excel sheet," says the official. "This money did not exist for them before the IPL, and obviously, they have not been paid such sums just for their cricketing skills. A part of the franchises' thinking while signing players like Pietersen and Andrew Symonds is that they are famous superstars with brand appeal across the world, especially because the second IPL has opened up the possibility of the league going global."

Besides, this is standard practice worldwide in team sport, says the official. "For instance, an Olympic sponsor can use that precious logo for four years."

Beyond this clash of words and views, however, is the big-picture market consensus: all these mini conflicts and trends point to a major shift in where all the money is headed. "Ultimately, we are looking at a scenario when team endorsements will matter the most," says Charu Sharma. "The players and their agents will have to work around that."

Player agents agree and point to the tie-up between Aircel, a mobile services provider, and Chennai Super Kings as a significant pointer. Aircel first teamed up with Chennai and then signed up Dhoni, the India captain, for a personal endorsement deal to extend that association. "Aircel first endorsed Chennai Super Kings last year and only after that did they take Dhoni on board." says Dutta, Dhoni's manager. "It's the team first."

There is still a long way to go before an acceptable balance is struck, says a player agent, and till then there are issues to resolved, possibly after the next IPL, which is tentatively slated for March 2010.

"I don't believe there is a time restriction on the franchise or its partners for using player identification," says a player manager who handles two leading players in the IPL. "This is a grey area and an obvious area for change in the future. What I suspect is going to happen is that some modifications will be made in this area after the 2010 season. Ultimately, guys like Dhoni are going to need to sit down with the IPL to work out some clearer parameters, like more than three players in the adverts and their use only 30 days before and after tournament."

Ajay Shankar is a deputy editor at Cricinfo; Judhajit Basu is a senior sub-editor

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • AdityaMookerjee on May 28, 2009, 12:30 GMT

    If players are auctioned for, then Dhoni may play for another team next year. If he endorsed Coca Cola this year, as a team endorsement, he may have to endorse Pepsi the next year, because of team endorsements. How is the advertiser, who is giving the endorsement to the team, benefitted? There is no perfect world. If there was, then Dhoni should be endorsing both Coca Cola, and Pepsi, together.

  • green_eyed_pune on May 26, 2009, 11:01 GMT

    The young players are not necessarily getting any share from the team deals. They are getting a salary, and probably not an astonishing one, compared to the top dogs. Where the previously unknown players benefit the most is exposure, and the chance to earn their stripes. If they do well in the IPL, they may become a household name one day. So, the greatest benefits are indirect more than direct, methinks.

  • Just_Love_Cricket on May 26, 2009, 7:20 GMT

    In the end.... its Mr. Lalit Modi laughing all the way to the bank.

  • cricket_DD on May 25, 2009, 16:40 GMT

    Is it fair to say then that most of the unknown indian young players are benefeting the most from it, they would not get any personal deals but with the team deals they must be getting a share.

  • AdityaMookerjee on May 28, 2009, 12:30 GMT

    If players are auctioned for, then Dhoni may play for another team next year. If he endorsed Coca Cola this year, as a team endorsement, he may have to endorse Pepsi the next year, because of team endorsements. How is the advertiser, who is giving the endorsement to the team, benefitted? There is no perfect world. If there was, then Dhoni should be endorsing both Coca Cola, and Pepsi, together.

  • green_eyed_pune on May 26, 2009, 11:01 GMT

    The young players are not necessarily getting any share from the team deals. They are getting a salary, and probably not an astonishing one, compared to the top dogs. Where the previously unknown players benefit the most is exposure, and the chance to earn their stripes. If they do well in the IPL, they may become a household name one day. So, the greatest benefits are indirect more than direct, methinks.

  • Just_Love_Cricket on May 26, 2009, 7:20 GMT

    In the end.... its Mr. Lalit Modi laughing all the way to the bank.

  • cricket_DD on May 25, 2009, 16:40 GMT

    Is it fair to say then that most of the unknown indian young players are benefeting the most from it, they would not get any personal deals but with the team deals they must be getting a share.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • cricket_DD on May 25, 2009, 16:40 GMT

    Is it fair to say then that most of the unknown indian young players are benefeting the most from it, they would not get any personal deals but with the team deals they must be getting a share.

  • Just_Love_Cricket on May 26, 2009, 7:20 GMT

    In the end.... its Mr. Lalit Modi laughing all the way to the bank.

  • green_eyed_pune on May 26, 2009, 11:01 GMT

    The young players are not necessarily getting any share from the team deals. They are getting a salary, and probably not an astonishing one, compared to the top dogs. Where the previously unknown players benefit the most is exposure, and the chance to earn their stripes. If they do well in the IPL, they may become a household name one day. So, the greatest benefits are indirect more than direct, methinks.

  • AdityaMookerjee on May 28, 2009, 12:30 GMT

    If players are auctioned for, then Dhoni may play for another team next year. If he endorsed Coca Cola this year, as a team endorsement, he may have to endorse Pepsi the next year, because of team endorsements. How is the advertiser, who is giving the endorsement to the team, benefitted? There is no perfect world. If there was, then Dhoni should be endorsing both Coca Cola, and Pepsi, together.