Arthur Morris May 17, 2010

'Even today, if somebody throws a ball, I want to chase it'

Arthur Morris was one of Bradman's Invincibles. Here he looks back to the pre-deodorant days: meeting the Don, getting bounced by Keith Miller, the baggy green, and more
  shares 15

Arthur Morris scored a hundred in each innings of his first-class debut when 18, and he never looked back. One of Bradman's Invincibles, he outscored even his captain in 1948. That series included his 182 at Headingley, when he and the Don chased down 404. He followed it up with 196 at The Oval, watching from the other end as Bradman fell for a duck in his final innings.

Did you always open the batting?
The highest I batted in my early days at [Sydney Grade side] St George District Club was five or six, and bowling chinamen a bit. Then, one day, Bill O'Reilly, who had won the toss, saw me relaxing and told me I was opening. I was like "Oh, no, Mr O'Reilly. Truly?" I was 16 or 17 then and continued opening for the rest of my life.

Who was your hero when you were growing up?
Don Bradman, who was every boy's hero. When I was about eight years of age I met him. I put my little hand out and said, "How do you do, Mr Bradman?" I was not groomed and didn't have any shoes on, and to think that I would be playing under his captaincy was just ridiculous.

Why did you look up to him?
He was so great. He just came in and took the game over. You can talk about lots of people getting runs, but he got them quickly - he could get to 300 in a day! After the war, a boss of mine, a fellow called Smith, bowled to Bradman in the nets after he came up from Bowral. Alan Fairfax, who played for Australia pre-war, bowled at him for 10 minutes. Fairfax turned to Smith and said, "This fella is crude, isn't he?" Smith said, "But we haven't beaten his bat yet."

How important is concentration for a batsman?
It is very important. I was talking to Bradman one day when somebody got out on 60. He said, "I can't understand how anyone can get to 60 and not get a hundred." He just went on and on and on. We had some big partnerships but we never really went up and talked to each other because both of us focused on what each one was doing.

Did you really think you could get 404 to win on that final day at Headingley in 1948?
No, no, I didn't. Don wrote in his book that he thought we would get beaten. And I thought we would. But when Don joined me after [Lindsay] Hassett got out, we just regrouped and started hitting. I got some 20 fours in my first hundred because [Norman] Yardley had the field up all the time and I took advantage. After lunch Don had some problems with Denis Compton and seemed confused about playing the Englishman's spin. So I took charge against Compton and went after him for two or three overs. The next day EW Swanton, the cricket writer, wrote that if Compton had kept bowling, they would have won the match. I reckoned we would have won an hour early because Compton was not used to bowling.

Did you initiate the aggressive charge?
It was really after lunch that I got into that mode. Don was marvellous. He let me go. It was during the second session, between lunch and tea, that we grew confident. In the first session we thought we could possibly get a draw. At about half-past three we thought we could win and then we just kept on going.

Do you require a different temperament as an opener?
I suppose you are picked as an opener because you play the new ball well, which means playing off the back foot and not on the forward. Because I grew up in the country, with hard, concrete wickets, I would be cutting and hooking and pulling. That hooking helped me a lot in one instance, when I took 23 runs off Keith Miller's first over in a Sheffield Shield game between New South Wales and Victoria.

"I was having a conversation with a bloke who didn't know anything about cricket and the topic came to Don's duck. He asked me if I was aware of it and I said I was there. So he asked if I was there because I was in England on business. I told him I was at the other end"

Was that when he bowled eight bouncers?
Right. You know where the field was placed - six behind square and a wicketkeeper, so I knew what was coming. I have never seen anyone spitting chips like Miller was. He was really ripping them down.

What did wearing the baggy green mean to you?
Right from my first cap at St George, wearing a cap always gave me a terrific thrill. When I played for New South Wales, it gave me a great thrill. Then I got picked for Australia and that scared the hell out of me.

What did you learn from cricket?
Cricket to me was discipline, loyalty and enjoyment. Even today, if somebody throws a ball somewhere, I want to go and chase it. I just have the natural ball sense, that feeling.

What is the best change on the cricket field you have witnessed?
One of the most sensible things the administrators did was to get rid of leg-side fieldsmen, because it was killing the game. It brought about so much defensive cricket, which I found ridiculous. Len Hutton, who was a great bloke, never got tired of his defensive tactics. So when I took guard against Alec Bedser, I would yell at the umpire, "Six inches outside the leg stump".

Who are the greatest cricketers you have seen?
I saw only two great players in my time: Bradman was the best batsman and O'Reilly was the best bowler.

You made 196 in Bradman's final Test at The Oval. You were standing at the other end. What did you think when he fell for a duck?
He got a couple of very good balls. The wicket was a bit wet and Eric Hollies bowled a beautiful legspinner. Then he bowled another in the same spot, Don went to play the same shot and it was a wrong'un. I was surprised Don came out fairly late in the day instead of sending somebody else in. Nobody knew that his average was so close to 100. I'm sure if Alec [Bedser] knew that, he would have given him one. I'm sure Eric didn't know.

But nobody remembers that you made 196?
I was on a business trip once. I was having a conversation with a bloke who didn't know anything about cricket and the topic came to Don's duck. He asked me if I was aware of it and I said I was there. So he asked if I was there because I was in England on business. I told him I was at the other end.

Did the lack of recognition ever bother you?
It never worried me. I was never in the show-pony class. There was so much modesty in the game then, the cricket culture was completely different. Think of this: the greatest batsman you have seen gets out for a duck. What would the bowler have done today? He would do a couple of cartwheels and the whole team would chase him around the ground and give him a hug. But what happened [in 1948]? Dead silence. The crowds had not come to see me bat, they had come to see Bradman bat.

Has modesty always been a strong point?
It's a strong point of everybody I played with. Modesty has disappeared through American influence in the country and the colour television. We didn't rush into a huddle; if I was fielding on the fence, the huddle would be over by the time I got there. We didn't have deodorants in our days, so can you imagine hugging each other with all of our dirty socks and smelly things?

Nagraj Gollapudi is an assistant editor at Cricinfo. This article was first published in the May 2010 issue of the Wisden Cricketer. Subscribe here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • waspsting on May 18, 2010, 18:16 GMT

    @kr_graj - Grace's comment was even better than the one you mentioned.

    an umpire gave him out, and he told the white coat - "the crowd have come to watch me bat, not watch you umpire!"

  • waspsting on May 18, 2010, 18:15 GMT

    Besdar intrigues me because as a modern cricket watcher (80s to present) - i've never seen a match winning strike bowler who was only medium paced (besdar's keeper used to stand up to him - pace bowlers like that are never match winners now). having never seen it, i'd love to hear more about it.i understand he bowled a lot of unplayable inswinging-leg cutters. thats an explanation for his greatness. I don't see simple inswing troubling top batsmen too much. even leg cutters (at that pace) wouldn't be TOO troublesome.but Morris usually lost his wicket to out and out inswingers on leg stump - which is curious. Modern batsmen like nothing better than that line - they'll flick it all day. what do you think? quick anecdote - the day morris scored 206 in adeilade, one of the fielders asked Bedsar why he got him out, after all, he is your 'bunny'. Bedsar replied - "Bunny? He's batting more like a hare today!"

  • waspsting on May 18, 2010, 18:07 GMT

    Bayman - thanks for the reply! Morris scored heavily in 46 in aus and 48 in eng - thats when the bulk of his runs against bedsar were scored. i don't think he got out to him all that often in those two series either. after that - 51 aus, 53 eng mainly - he repeatedly got out to bedsar, usually for low scores. 1 century in 10 tests, and a lot of low scores. thats when the "problem" began (as you noted, they only met once in 54 before bedsar was dropped) aussies like Miller and Monty Noble noted a difference in Morris technique at the time of his problems. they said he shuffled across too much (makes sense if he was being bowled behind his legs) and playing across the line too much to straight balls (also makes sense, if he's going across a lot, he's looking to score on the leg side) after his first three series, morris' average was sky high - probably in 60s or 70s. ever after, he was not only less effective, but his record wasn't great. (continued)

  • kr_graj on May 18, 2010, 17:40 GMT

    Such wonderful candour marks Arthur Morris's comments. Especially the one about people coming to see Bradman bat, not him. You can't help but be reminded of W.G. Grace's - "People have come to see me bat, not you bowl", except that it was the Don bat, not Morris! Sunil Gavaskar might possibly understand Morris's opening batsmen's hassle-description even better.

  • kr_graj on May 18, 2010, 17:38 GMT

    Such wonderful candour marks Arthur Morris's comments. Especially the one about people coming to see Bradman bat, not him. You can't help but be reminded of W.G. Grace's - "People have come to see me bat, not you bowl", except that it was the Don bat, not Morris! Sunil Gavaskar might possibly understand Morris's opening batsmen's hassle-description even better.

  • dyogesh on May 18, 2010, 9:49 GMT

    The interviews with the oldies seem more interesting than the cliched ones of the modern day stars. Even the reaction to Laker's 10-for was amazing. Today we have people posing for taking wickets for tailender and yet Laker just walked away doffing his hat after taking all the 10 to go with the 9 in the first innings.

    The comments section is one of the more mature ones seen even in cricinfo without degrading quickly into a dogfight between fans. Thanks to Wapsting & Bayman for their interesting inputs. But what Bayman pointed out seems a part of a more general malaise in cricket stats. When people look for bunnies, they don't check actually the average of the batsman in those matches. It would be interesting to see some of the other bunnies in this light.

  • Bayman on May 18, 2010, 6:50 GMT

    Waspsting, Morris' "troubles" with Alec Bedser are simple enough to understand. Morris was an opening batsman and Bedser the opening bowler in 21 Tests opposed to each other. Bedser got Morris 16 times in 35 completed innings. Morris got 2010 runs at 57.42 with eight hundreds in those games. Now that's a weakness I would not have minded having myself. Neil Harvey happily reckons Bedser the best bowler he faced, no doubt Morris the same, so getting knocked over by AB in his prime was probably no great surprise. Throw in eight fifties with those hundreds and wouldn't you know, 16 all. Morris was much less a "bunny" than some people think. In the last Test they opposed each other, Morris got 153 and Bedser was dropped. I don't think Arthur need be too embarrassed by his record against Bedser. They both did pretty well, as you would expect from two players of such class. And two gentlemen to boot!

  • Mark00 on May 18, 2010, 1:33 GMT

    Old school Australian.

    I'm 100% in agreement with him in regard to cultural degradation. Sadly, this is true not only in Australia but many other countries as well. The shameless self-promotion and self-aggrandizing hasn't, yet, reached American proportions but, sooner or later, it's sure to get there.

  • ElectronSmoke on May 17, 2010, 19:18 GMT

    Lovely piece! All these good or great cricketers from the past are so much more easy to respect because they forever remain 'students' of the game... always willing to learn and treat the game as bigger than self - not the other way 'round :)

  • on May 17, 2010, 16:52 GMT

    Arthur Morris was of the best opener that cricket has seen,his article is a real eye opener....today you have a Test match/ODI/T20 weekly; so scoring 40-50 hundreds is nothing great.Bradman's 1948 Invincibles are still the greatest...........

  • waspsting on May 18, 2010, 18:16 GMT

    @kr_graj - Grace's comment was even better than the one you mentioned.

    an umpire gave him out, and he told the white coat - "the crowd have come to watch me bat, not watch you umpire!"

  • waspsting on May 18, 2010, 18:15 GMT

    Besdar intrigues me because as a modern cricket watcher (80s to present) - i've never seen a match winning strike bowler who was only medium paced (besdar's keeper used to stand up to him - pace bowlers like that are never match winners now). having never seen it, i'd love to hear more about it.i understand he bowled a lot of unplayable inswinging-leg cutters. thats an explanation for his greatness. I don't see simple inswing troubling top batsmen too much. even leg cutters (at that pace) wouldn't be TOO troublesome.but Morris usually lost his wicket to out and out inswingers on leg stump - which is curious. Modern batsmen like nothing better than that line - they'll flick it all day. what do you think? quick anecdote - the day morris scored 206 in adeilade, one of the fielders asked Bedsar why he got him out, after all, he is your 'bunny'. Bedsar replied - "Bunny? He's batting more like a hare today!"

  • waspsting on May 18, 2010, 18:07 GMT

    Bayman - thanks for the reply! Morris scored heavily in 46 in aus and 48 in eng - thats when the bulk of his runs against bedsar were scored. i don't think he got out to him all that often in those two series either. after that - 51 aus, 53 eng mainly - he repeatedly got out to bedsar, usually for low scores. 1 century in 10 tests, and a lot of low scores. thats when the "problem" began (as you noted, they only met once in 54 before bedsar was dropped) aussies like Miller and Monty Noble noted a difference in Morris technique at the time of his problems. they said he shuffled across too much (makes sense if he was being bowled behind his legs) and playing across the line too much to straight balls (also makes sense, if he's going across a lot, he's looking to score on the leg side) after his first three series, morris' average was sky high - probably in 60s or 70s. ever after, he was not only less effective, but his record wasn't great. (continued)

  • kr_graj on May 18, 2010, 17:40 GMT

    Such wonderful candour marks Arthur Morris's comments. Especially the one about people coming to see Bradman bat, not him. You can't help but be reminded of W.G. Grace's - "People have come to see me bat, not you bowl", except that it was the Don bat, not Morris! Sunil Gavaskar might possibly understand Morris's opening batsmen's hassle-description even better.

  • kr_graj on May 18, 2010, 17:38 GMT

    Such wonderful candour marks Arthur Morris's comments. Especially the one about people coming to see Bradman bat, not him. You can't help but be reminded of W.G. Grace's - "People have come to see me bat, not you bowl", except that it was the Don bat, not Morris! Sunil Gavaskar might possibly understand Morris's opening batsmen's hassle-description even better.

  • dyogesh on May 18, 2010, 9:49 GMT

    The interviews with the oldies seem more interesting than the cliched ones of the modern day stars. Even the reaction to Laker's 10-for was amazing. Today we have people posing for taking wickets for tailender and yet Laker just walked away doffing his hat after taking all the 10 to go with the 9 in the first innings.

    The comments section is one of the more mature ones seen even in cricinfo without degrading quickly into a dogfight between fans. Thanks to Wapsting & Bayman for their interesting inputs. But what Bayman pointed out seems a part of a more general malaise in cricket stats. When people look for bunnies, they don't check actually the average of the batsman in those matches. It would be interesting to see some of the other bunnies in this light.

  • Bayman on May 18, 2010, 6:50 GMT

    Waspsting, Morris' "troubles" with Alec Bedser are simple enough to understand. Morris was an opening batsman and Bedser the opening bowler in 21 Tests opposed to each other. Bedser got Morris 16 times in 35 completed innings. Morris got 2010 runs at 57.42 with eight hundreds in those games. Now that's a weakness I would not have minded having myself. Neil Harvey happily reckons Bedser the best bowler he faced, no doubt Morris the same, so getting knocked over by AB in his prime was probably no great surprise. Throw in eight fifties with those hundreds and wouldn't you know, 16 all. Morris was much less a "bunny" than some people think. In the last Test they opposed each other, Morris got 153 and Bedser was dropped. I don't think Arthur need be too embarrassed by his record against Bedser. They both did pretty well, as you would expect from two players of such class. And two gentlemen to boot!

  • Mark00 on May 18, 2010, 1:33 GMT

    Old school Australian.

    I'm 100% in agreement with him in regard to cultural degradation. Sadly, this is true not only in Australia but many other countries as well. The shameless self-promotion and self-aggrandizing hasn't, yet, reached American proportions but, sooner or later, it's sure to get there.

  • ElectronSmoke on May 17, 2010, 19:18 GMT

    Lovely piece! All these good or great cricketers from the past are so much more easy to respect because they forever remain 'students' of the game... always willing to learn and treat the game as bigger than self - not the other way 'round :)

  • on May 17, 2010, 16:52 GMT

    Arthur Morris was of the best opener that cricket has seen,his article is a real eye opener....today you have a Test match/ODI/T20 weekly; so scoring 40-50 hundreds is nothing great.Bradman's 1948 Invincibles are still the greatest...........

  • ankursachinislife on May 17, 2010, 16:39 GMT

    seriously man the quoate in which he said i was at the other end..then i am a batsman i was like thrilled to read what sir bradman said him how can a batsman get to 60 n not get an hundred..seriously at 88 he still remebers a lot ..i wished i could him and sir bradman bat coz i am only 19 till now..n this is one of the best piece of interview i hve read on cricinfo..

  • waspsting on May 17, 2010, 16:11 GMT

    reading about those days, it seems there was a lot more modesty in Austrlia (cockiness is whats associated with aussies now).

    but its not all that way. Hammond wrote about how australian boys would taunt the english players in the nets. Hobbs mentioned how an aussie called him "Hobbsy" (it would have been "Mr. Hobbs" in England). Jardine didn't like the barracking, and others have noted that barracking went on on tours before bodyline.

    morris though sounds like a simple kind of guy.

    Wish the interviewer had asked him about his troubles with Alec Bedsar - it seems bizarre to me that a man can develop that kind of a weakness (he'd go too far across and get bowled behind his legs to the inswinger). Don't think you can blame the negative leg side field for that - thats a technical weakness.

  • zak123kaif on May 17, 2010, 15:38 GMT

    Seems like Mr Morris was a very un-australian kind of person as to listen the word modesty from an Australian cricketer now a days sounds ridiculous.

  • nabingiri on May 17, 2010, 11:53 GMT

    Coolest piece of interview I've read till date..I m sure this could teach present day cricketers a bit about modesty and humility..way to go Cricinfo..keep coming back with such amazing stuffs. Kudos!!

  • Vivek.Bhandari on May 17, 2010, 6:46 GMT

    The last para clearly indicates how times have changed...these days people like Freddie, Afridi, Bhajji etc turn super gladiators whenever they take a wicket...comm'on get me a life...you're supposed to take wickets...

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Vivek.Bhandari on May 17, 2010, 6:46 GMT

    The last para clearly indicates how times have changed...these days people like Freddie, Afridi, Bhajji etc turn super gladiators whenever they take a wicket...comm'on get me a life...you're supposed to take wickets...

  • nabingiri on May 17, 2010, 11:53 GMT

    Coolest piece of interview I've read till date..I m sure this could teach present day cricketers a bit about modesty and humility..way to go Cricinfo..keep coming back with such amazing stuffs. Kudos!!

  • zak123kaif on May 17, 2010, 15:38 GMT

    Seems like Mr Morris was a very un-australian kind of person as to listen the word modesty from an Australian cricketer now a days sounds ridiculous.

  • waspsting on May 17, 2010, 16:11 GMT

    reading about those days, it seems there was a lot more modesty in Austrlia (cockiness is whats associated with aussies now).

    but its not all that way. Hammond wrote about how australian boys would taunt the english players in the nets. Hobbs mentioned how an aussie called him "Hobbsy" (it would have been "Mr. Hobbs" in England). Jardine didn't like the barracking, and others have noted that barracking went on on tours before bodyline.

    morris though sounds like a simple kind of guy.

    Wish the interviewer had asked him about his troubles with Alec Bedsar - it seems bizarre to me that a man can develop that kind of a weakness (he'd go too far across and get bowled behind his legs to the inswinger). Don't think you can blame the negative leg side field for that - thats a technical weakness.

  • ankursachinislife on May 17, 2010, 16:39 GMT

    seriously man the quoate in which he said i was at the other end..then i am a batsman i was like thrilled to read what sir bradman said him how can a batsman get to 60 n not get an hundred..seriously at 88 he still remebers a lot ..i wished i could him and sir bradman bat coz i am only 19 till now..n this is one of the best piece of interview i hve read on cricinfo..

  • on May 17, 2010, 16:52 GMT

    Arthur Morris was of the best opener that cricket has seen,his article is a real eye opener....today you have a Test match/ODI/T20 weekly; so scoring 40-50 hundreds is nothing great.Bradman's 1948 Invincibles are still the greatest...........

  • ElectronSmoke on May 17, 2010, 19:18 GMT

    Lovely piece! All these good or great cricketers from the past are so much more easy to respect because they forever remain 'students' of the game... always willing to learn and treat the game as bigger than self - not the other way 'round :)

  • Mark00 on May 18, 2010, 1:33 GMT

    Old school Australian.

    I'm 100% in agreement with him in regard to cultural degradation. Sadly, this is true not only in Australia but many other countries as well. The shameless self-promotion and self-aggrandizing hasn't, yet, reached American proportions but, sooner or later, it's sure to get there.

  • Bayman on May 18, 2010, 6:50 GMT

    Waspsting, Morris' "troubles" with Alec Bedser are simple enough to understand. Morris was an opening batsman and Bedser the opening bowler in 21 Tests opposed to each other. Bedser got Morris 16 times in 35 completed innings. Morris got 2010 runs at 57.42 with eight hundreds in those games. Now that's a weakness I would not have minded having myself. Neil Harvey happily reckons Bedser the best bowler he faced, no doubt Morris the same, so getting knocked over by AB in his prime was probably no great surprise. Throw in eight fifties with those hundreds and wouldn't you know, 16 all. Morris was much less a "bunny" than some people think. In the last Test they opposed each other, Morris got 153 and Bedser was dropped. I don't think Arthur need be too embarrassed by his record against Bedser. They both did pretty well, as you would expect from two players of such class. And two gentlemen to boot!

  • dyogesh on May 18, 2010, 9:49 GMT

    The interviews with the oldies seem more interesting than the cliched ones of the modern day stars. Even the reaction to Laker's 10-for was amazing. Today we have people posing for taking wickets for tailender and yet Laker just walked away doffing his hat after taking all the 10 to go with the 9 in the first innings.

    The comments section is one of the more mature ones seen even in cricinfo without degrading quickly into a dogfight between fans. Thanks to Wapsting & Bayman for their interesting inputs. But what Bayman pointed out seems a part of a more general malaise in cricket stats. When people look for bunnies, they don't check actually the average of the batsman in those matches. It would be interesting to see some of the other bunnies in this light.