November 21, 2011

One and done

Players who only got to play a Test apiece for Australia
30

Stuart Law
Is he the unluckiest of all the world's one-Test wonders? Law made more than 27,000 runs in first-class cricket at an average of more than 50, including 79 hundreds... but played just the one Test, against Sri Lanka in Perth in 1995-96, scoring 54 not out. Despite a decent run in the one-day side, he never pulled on the baggy green again - it seems that his face just didn't fit in the Waugh era. Australia's other debutant in that Perth game had a rather longer career: Ricky Ponting is currently playing his 156th Test match.

Bryce McGain
They say that everything comes to those who wait... and the Victorian legspinner McGain waited rather longer than most. He was 36 when he won his first Test cap, against South Africa in Cape Town in March 2009. But the batsmen refused to let him settle, biffing eight sixes in all as he returned the sorry-looking figures of 0 for 149 from 18 overs. He never got another sniff of a cap, and recently criticised coach Tim Nielsen for not making him feel part of the dressing room.

Arthur Coningham
Pace bowler Coningham took a wicket with his first ball in a Test - Archie MacLaren with the first delivery of the second Ashes Test in Melbourne in December 1894 - but he struck only once more, and never played again. Still, Coningham packed a lot else into his life: on tour in England in 1893 he supposedly lit a fire in the outfield during one match to keep warm, and he also saved a child from drowning. Later in life he became embroiled in a scandalous divorce case in which he accused a priest of having an affair with his wife.

Pud Thurlow
Fast bowler Hugh "Pud" Thurlow produced some decent figures for Queensland at a time when they were the rather poor relations of Australian cricket, but his one and only Test appearance - against South Africa in Adelaide in 1931-32 - did not bring him a wicket. Then, batting at No. 11, he failed to make his ground after being called through for a quick single. This wouldn't have mattered much... if the batsman doing the calling hadn't been Don Bradman, who was on 299 at the time. Thurlow's dismissal meant the Don was stranded one short of another triple-century.

Ken Eastwood
When Bill Lawry was sacked as Australia's captain towards the end of the 1970-71 Ashes series, most people expected him to be kept on as a player, but the selectors went the whole hog and dropped him. Lawry's replacement was as like-for-like as you could get - another Victorian left-hander. But although Eastwood had been in fine form that season, at 35 he was even older than Lawry, and struggled in the final Test in Sydney, where Australia surrendered the Ashes. Eastwood made 5 in the first innings, and was bowled for a duck by John Snow in the second - and never played for Australia again, even though he had scored 177 in the innings immediately before his Test appearance, and 221 in his first one after it.

Roy Park
When Charlie Macartney went down with gastritis shortly before the second Ashes Test of 1920-21 in Melbourne, his replacement was a local doctor, Park. With the "Governor-General" likely to make a rapid return, Park needed to make an instant mark - but instead, batting at No. 3 on New Year's Eve, he was bowled by his first ball, from England's Harry Howell. It was his only chance, as Australia won by an innings, and Park never played again. Legend has it that Park's wife was sitting in the stands when he came in, but dropped her knitting at the vital moment as he prepared to receive the fateful first ball. She bent down to pick it up... and missed her husband's entire Test career.

Mick Malone
Western Australia fast-medium bowler Malone played only one official Test - the last one of the 1977 Ashes series at The Oval - before signing for Kerry Packer's World Series Cricket. He was a back number when peace broke out a couple of years later - but he had made the most of his debut, wheeling down 43 overs on the first day (his only break was two overs around lunchtime) and finishing with 5 for 63 from 47 overs. Then, though not considered much of a batsman, he made 46 in an unlikely century stand with Max Walker.

Sam Morris
The Victoria allrounder Morris holds a special place in Australia's Test history, as the first black man to play for them. A groundsman at St Kilda in Melbourne, Morris - whose parents are believed to have emigrated from the West Indies - was drafted in for the second Test against England at the MCG in January 1885, one of 11 replacements after the entire team from the first match refused to play after a pay dispute. Morris made 4 and 10 not out and took a couple of wickets, but his makeshift side lost by 10 wickets, and he was one of the casualties when the first-choice players made their peace.

John Watkins
A legspinner from up-country New South Wales, Watkins had played only a handful of matches when he was pitchforked into the Australian side for the final Test against Pakistan in Sydney in 1972-73. His bowling was unimpressive, but an important 36 with the bat helped Australia to a narrow victory. That earned Watkins a tour to the West Indies, where Keith Stackpole remembered that in one of the tour games "he almost hit the square-leg umpire with the widest full-toss I've seen". Watkins - rated by Stackpole as "possibly the luckiest player ever to represent Australia" - never played first-class cricket again after the tour.

George Thoms
Thoms, another Melbourne doctor, played his only Test in the final match against West Indies in Sydney in 1951-52, when his fellow debutants were Richie Benaud and Colin McDonald. Thoms and McDonald also opened for the University club in Melbourne, and they duly went in first for Australia at the SCG too. Their selection ahead of two New South Welshmen enraged a local Sydney reporter, who wrote that "Stodge and Splodge will open the innings for Australia". McDonald observed later, "We never did find out who was Stodge and who was Splodge." Thoms retired after that season, and became one of Australia's foremost gynaecologists.

Roley Pope
Another doctor, although this time from Sydney, Pope accompanied several Australian tours to England as a sort of general factotum. He also played a few matches for New South Wales, and was on the scene when the pay dispute which gave Sam Morris his only cap (see above) decimated the team against England in 1884-85. Pope won his only cap in that second Test in Melbourne, scoring 0 and 3 and not bowling, and returned to his more familiar cheerleader role for the rest of the series.

Steven Lynch is the editor of the Wisden Guide to International Cricket 2011.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Stevo_ on November 23, 2011, 0:14 GMT

    QLD unbeaten in Shield and One Dayers yet only 1 player selected in Australia A

  • Stevo_ on November 23, 2011, 0:09 GMT

    stuartk319 - I certainly do. The fact that he did well doesn't mean he wasn't selected due to the selector's NSW bias (which he clearly was). Look at the numbers and efforts of both men and come back and honestly tell me that Cummins was front of the line for fast bowlers in Australia. Good on him for taking his chance and I hope he keeps it up. The fact of the matter is if Cutting was from NSW he would have already played a test.

  • stuartk319 on November 22, 2011, 18:43 GMT

    SFay; so you think Cummins was a purely biased selection even though he was Man of the Match on Test debut! Interesting.

  • dwblurb on November 22, 2011, 14:48 GMT

    The amount of petty state-based parochialism one sees on boards such as this really is quite depressing in this day and age. As a West Australian, I can say that it is not difficult to see that NSW has been the only state producing good young talent in any quantities in recent years. You only have to look at the players who have become important players for other states having left NSW because they couldn't secure a place there - Forrest in Qld, Cowan in Tasmania, Hogan in WA, and Tom Cooper and Christian in SA - to see how strong NSW are. What's more, they tend to promote young players rather than hang onto dead wood who may help them win a Shield but who will never play for Australia. Nor do they produce 'result' wickets which, again, may help a side win a Shield but are not in the best interests of the national team.

  • tfjones1978 on November 22, 2011, 8:51 GMT

    I dont think that selectors select based upon State but by how a particular player presents infront of the camera. I think that selectors should be pulled infront of the equal employment opportunity tribunal over the way that they select players. Chris Rogers is a player who was not given an even chance. Not so many seasons ago he got 1200 runs at average of 80, but didnt make an Australian side without the greats! I havent checked his recent form (or even if he is still playing) but I havent heard that he is in top form now days. The problem is that selectors select players based on "I like the look of that player" and not how they are performing. Players should get "Value Points" by the selectors with (for example) two first class runs = 1 test match run. Hughes shouldnt have been dropped for 2009 ashes tour, should not have been picked for 2010/11 ashes tour and has only recently been performing. Hughes was dropped for "not displaying correct technique!" ... nor did Bradman!

  • on November 22, 2011, 8:06 GMT

    John Watkins was in fact selected for the WI tour before playing what proved to be his only Test. For whatever reason, the team for that test and the touring squad to depart to the WI shortly after the test finished were picked at the same time. No doubt that seemed like a good idea at the time. Whether his handy knock (as part of a partnership with Bob Massie which gave Australia just enough runs to win) would have offset the impression his bowling must have made can only be guessed at - although I'm betting not.

    Supposedly Otto Nothling opened the bowling in his one game and hit the opener's (Hobbs' ?) pads first ball, but didn't appeal. The umpire later asked him why he hadn't appealed, since he (the umpire) thought it was plumb.

  • Stevo_ on November 22, 2011, 0:42 GMT

    NSW bias is well established. Why does Cummins get a run in front of Cutting who was the leading wicket taker last season and has continued his form this year? I'll bet my bottom dollar that they pick Starc in fron tof Cummins if they replace Johnson. How can Cutting be third in line if he is the top wicket taker (by ten wickets)? Oh thats right he isn't from NSW

  • Rowayton on November 21, 2011, 23:25 GMT

    There are plenty of others. One of my favourites was Les Joslin. Unlike Roy Park's wife, I saw Joslin's entire batting career, not that it took long. Not sure why they thought he was good enough - his first class, not just Test, career was over by the time he was 22. Phil Emery, Graham Manou, Blocker Wilson, Dan Cullen, Ashley Woodcock, Jeff Moss, Ian Callen, Wayne Phillips (the Victorian one) - lots of them fairly recently.

  • on November 21, 2011, 16:58 GMT

    Agree with AlanHarrison Chris Rogers needs to be included here.

  • kenjai on November 21, 2011, 16:15 GMT

    OOps,apologies for previous comment,didn't realise article was about one-Test Australian cricketers.Apologies again.

  • Stevo_ on November 23, 2011, 0:14 GMT

    QLD unbeaten in Shield and One Dayers yet only 1 player selected in Australia A

  • Stevo_ on November 23, 2011, 0:09 GMT

    stuartk319 - I certainly do. The fact that he did well doesn't mean he wasn't selected due to the selector's NSW bias (which he clearly was). Look at the numbers and efforts of both men and come back and honestly tell me that Cummins was front of the line for fast bowlers in Australia. Good on him for taking his chance and I hope he keeps it up. The fact of the matter is if Cutting was from NSW he would have already played a test.

  • stuartk319 on November 22, 2011, 18:43 GMT

    SFay; so you think Cummins was a purely biased selection even though he was Man of the Match on Test debut! Interesting.

  • dwblurb on November 22, 2011, 14:48 GMT

    The amount of petty state-based parochialism one sees on boards such as this really is quite depressing in this day and age. As a West Australian, I can say that it is not difficult to see that NSW has been the only state producing good young talent in any quantities in recent years. You only have to look at the players who have become important players for other states having left NSW because they couldn't secure a place there - Forrest in Qld, Cowan in Tasmania, Hogan in WA, and Tom Cooper and Christian in SA - to see how strong NSW are. What's more, they tend to promote young players rather than hang onto dead wood who may help them win a Shield but who will never play for Australia. Nor do they produce 'result' wickets which, again, may help a side win a Shield but are not in the best interests of the national team.

  • tfjones1978 on November 22, 2011, 8:51 GMT

    I dont think that selectors select based upon State but by how a particular player presents infront of the camera. I think that selectors should be pulled infront of the equal employment opportunity tribunal over the way that they select players. Chris Rogers is a player who was not given an even chance. Not so many seasons ago he got 1200 runs at average of 80, but didnt make an Australian side without the greats! I havent checked his recent form (or even if he is still playing) but I havent heard that he is in top form now days. The problem is that selectors select players based on "I like the look of that player" and not how they are performing. Players should get "Value Points" by the selectors with (for example) two first class runs = 1 test match run. Hughes shouldnt have been dropped for 2009 ashes tour, should not have been picked for 2010/11 ashes tour and has only recently been performing. Hughes was dropped for "not displaying correct technique!" ... nor did Bradman!

  • on November 22, 2011, 8:06 GMT

    John Watkins was in fact selected for the WI tour before playing what proved to be his only Test. For whatever reason, the team for that test and the touring squad to depart to the WI shortly after the test finished were picked at the same time. No doubt that seemed like a good idea at the time. Whether his handy knock (as part of a partnership with Bob Massie which gave Australia just enough runs to win) would have offset the impression his bowling must have made can only be guessed at - although I'm betting not.

    Supposedly Otto Nothling opened the bowling in his one game and hit the opener's (Hobbs' ?) pads first ball, but didn't appeal. The umpire later asked him why he hadn't appealed, since he (the umpire) thought it was plumb.

  • Stevo_ on November 22, 2011, 0:42 GMT

    NSW bias is well established. Why does Cummins get a run in front of Cutting who was the leading wicket taker last season and has continued his form this year? I'll bet my bottom dollar that they pick Starc in fron tof Cummins if they replace Johnson. How can Cutting be third in line if he is the top wicket taker (by ten wickets)? Oh thats right he isn't from NSW

  • Rowayton on November 21, 2011, 23:25 GMT

    There are plenty of others. One of my favourites was Les Joslin. Unlike Roy Park's wife, I saw Joslin's entire batting career, not that it took long. Not sure why they thought he was good enough - his first class, not just Test, career was over by the time he was 22. Phil Emery, Graham Manou, Blocker Wilson, Dan Cullen, Ashley Woodcock, Jeff Moss, Ian Callen, Wayne Phillips (the Victorian one) - lots of them fairly recently.

  • on November 21, 2011, 16:58 GMT

    Agree with AlanHarrison Chris Rogers needs to be included here.

  • kenjai on November 21, 2011, 16:15 GMT

    OOps,apologies for previous comment,didn't realise article was about one-Test Australian cricketers.Apologies again.

  • kenjai on November 21, 2011, 16:12 GMT

    You omit Andy Ganteaume of Trinidad who,on Test debut,scored 112 unbeaten for the West Indies v England in 1947-48 Test series but never played on a Test team again.

  • jonesy2 on November 21, 2011, 15:44 GMT

    graham manou??????????????????????????

  • on November 21, 2011, 15:26 GMT

    Greg, got a lot chances in the Waugh era, but he "blew et"

  • NALINWIJ on November 21, 2011, 13:45 GMT

    Another fascinating one test wonder who was also a doctor was Otto Nothling. He was also a one test wonder in rugby and therefore the only dual international from Australia. He came in when Bradman was dropped and when he was dropped Bradman returned never to be dropped. He did not actually replace Bradman as Vic Richardson[Chappell''s grandfather] replaced Bradman and he replaced Gregory[great allrounder] .He was dropped and Richardson remained with Bradman returning.

  • on November 21, 2011, 13:17 GMT

    @Rohit: he's english and it's a list of Australians!

  • AlanHarrison on November 21, 2011, 13:13 GMT

    @ Rohit Gopalan: Arnie Sidebottom was not on that list because it was a list of Australia one-test wonders. They published one of England one-test wonders last week and I agree Sidebottom would have been a candidate for inclusion there. Here, I would suggest Chris Rogers pushes Stuart Law as one of the unluckiest of one-test wonders. He's very unlikely to get another chance.

  • Biggus on November 21, 2011, 13:01 GMT

    Mick Malone was particularly unlucky, remaining perhaps THE biggest swinger of a cricket ball I've ever seen, and seemed to be able to do it at will under almost all conditions. Admittedly it was real banana swing right from the hand but being able to pick up the swing early didn't seem to help the batsmen much since it was so prodigious. It is worth noting that he outperformed Terry Alderman most of the time in the domestic game, and we know how effective he was, even post his shoulder injury. Mick would have been a real asset in my opinion in the post Packer era but for some reason he didn't get another look in. As for Stuart Law, well we'd kill for one of him now.

  • Okakaboka on November 21, 2011, 11:38 GMT

    Um, didn't Richie Robinson only play one test...not as a keeper but opening batsman.

  • on November 21, 2011, 11:29 GMT

    @Rohit Gopalan: More importantly, Robin Singh from India is also missing.

  • jazzaaaaaaaa on November 21, 2011, 10:35 GMT

    @SFay and Dr_Van_Nostrand. And you know this how? Greg Blewett got an extended run in the side despite finishing with an average of 34, and he's from SA. Which NSW batsman debuted for Aus in the 90s? Slater, M Waugh, Bevan. Not many NSW players by the look of it. As for now, well maybe thats because NSW are the only team producing decent young players in a transitional period for the National side. Hughes and Khawaja have the best records in Shield cricket. Ferguson, Marsh and Klinger all average in the high 30s, Hughes = 50, Khawaja = High 40s, and Steve O'Keefe can't even get in the side ahead of Lyon and Beer who have poorer records. Throw all the national players into their state sides and see who would dominate, NSW im sure. Where's the NSW bias from selectors?

  • on November 21, 2011, 9:50 GMT

    Isn't there a tale around the selection of Wayne Phillips (WN not WB) for one test at the WACA in 1992?

  • stuartk319 on November 21, 2011, 9:41 GMT

    Oops, Waugh twins as well, so yes, you can argue that the odd spell in Shield might not have hurt ME Waugh, though he did maintain a career average of 42 to 45 during the second half of the 90s.

  • HatsforBats on November 21, 2011, 9:33 GMT

    Yes, it really is a shame we NSWelshman keep having to do all the hard work isn't it.

  • stuartk319 on November 21, 2011, 9:33 GMT

    Dr_Van_Nostrand & SFay you are talking thru your hats. Law was unlucky, could have played 20 to 40 Tests and deserved it, but the truth was ALL BATSMEN in Aus had to fight really hard for their spots at this time. Only NSW batsmen about permanently in the mid-late 90s were Slater and Taylor; argue with their records at your peril. Bevan and Blewett were lucky to get as many games as they did in the late 90s due to playing well against a just OK West Indies team in 96/97.

  • NALINWIJ on November 21, 2011, 9:23 GMT

    Apart from Law and possibly Malone the rest of the one test wonders were ordinary. Law was unfortunate to be born between 1970 and 1971 when Australia produced over X1 good to great test players. With the WAUGHs in the side Langer, Hayden, Slater,Elliott,Blewett,Bevan,Leahman,Law,Gilchrist,McGrath, McGill, Bichel and Dale were part of this cohort and Warne was only 2 months older. Ponting did well to break into the side and stay there. This is also why Australian side declined after 2007 world cup as this cohort gradually retired.

  • warrenwhite on November 21, 2011, 9:19 GMT

    What about Les Joslin? 7 and 2?

  • on November 21, 2011, 8:09 GMT

    The only reason Law played a test was because he filled in for an injured Steve Waugh. He was never going to take Waugh's spot. He had his chance in the ODI squad and didn't really impress. 1237 @ 26 in 51 innings over 4 years is not really impressive.

  • on November 21, 2011, 7:26 GMT

    Just Wondering why Arnie Sidebottom (father of ex-England left arm quick Ryan) was not on that list?

  • Dr_Van_Nostrand on November 21, 2011, 5:25 GMT

    @SFay - Totally agreed. And it's still happening!

  • Stevo_ on November 21, 2011, 3:08 GMT

    If Law was from NSW he would have been a permanent fixutre in the test team.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Stevo_ on November 21, 2011, 3:08 GMT

    If Law was from NSW he would have been a permanent fixutre in the test team.

  • Dr_Van_Nostrand on November 21, 2011, 5:25 GMT

    @SFay - Totally agreed. And it's still happening!

  • on November 21, 2011, 7:26 GMT

    Just Wondering why Arnie Sidebottom (father of ex-England left arm quick Ryan) was not on that list?

  • on November 21, 2011, 8:09 GMT

    The only reason Law played a test was because he filled in for an injured Steve Waugh. He was never going to take Waugh's spot. He had his chance in the ODI squad and didn't really impress. 1237 @ 26 in 51 innings over 4 years is not really impressive.

  • warrenwhite on November 21, 2011, 9:19 GMT

    What about Les Joslin? 7 and 2?

  • NALINWIJ on November 21, 2011, 9:23 GMT

    Apart from Law and possibly Malone the rest of the one test wonders were ordinary. Law was unfortunate to be born between 1970 and 1971 when Australia produced over X1 good to great test players. With the WAUGHs in the side Langer, Hayden, Slater,Elliott,Blewett,Bevan,Leahman,Law,Gilchrist,McGrath, McGill, Bichel and Dale were part of this cohort and Warne was only 2 months older. Ponting did well to break into the side and stay there. This is also why Australian side declined after 2007 world cup as this cohort gradually retired.

  • stuartk319 on November 21, 2011, 9:33 GMT

    Dr_Van_Nostrand & SFay you are talking thru your hats. Law was unlucky, could have played 20 to 40 Tests and deserved it, but the truth was ALL BATSMEN in Aus had to fight really hard for their spots at this time. Only NSW batsmen about permanently in the mid-late 90s were Slater and Taylor; argue with their records at your peril. Bevan and Blewett were lucky to get as many games as they did in the late 90s due to playing well against a just OK West Indies team in 96/97.

  • HatsforBats on November 21, 2011, 9:33 GMT

    Yes, it really is a shame we NSWelshman keep having to do all the hard work isn't it.

  • stuartk319 on November 21, 2011, 9:41 GMT

    Oops, Waugh twins as well, so yes, you can argue that the odd spell in Shield might not have hurt ME Waugh, though he did maintain a career average of 42 to 45 during the second half of the 90s.

  • on November 21, 2011, 9:50 GMT

    Isn't there a tale around the selection of Wayne Phillips (WN not WB) for one test at the WACA in 1992?