| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
A look at the long-term opening combinations and their partnership records in different regions
January 27, 2012
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
Numbers Game : Last week's column: England's problems in Asia
Players/Officials:
Alastair Cook
| Andrew Strauss
Series/Tournaments:
England tour of United Arab Emirates
Teams:
England
|
|||
Only three other opening pairs have achieved the mark that Alastair Cook and Andrew Strauss reached when they opened the batting in the first innings of the Abu Dhabi Test. The England pair haven't been opening the batting for as long as Greenidge-Haynes, Jayasuriya-Atapattu or Hayden-Langer, but despite being an opening combination for less than six years, they have already reached the 100-innings mark. That's a function of the amount of Test cricket that England play, but it also shows that they have been a pretty reliable pair at the top of the order - no other opening pair from England have been together for as many innings.
The fact that only three opening combinations have played together for more than 100 innings out of the 1312 pairs that have opened the batting in Test cricket (a percentage of 0.23) shows how difficult a feat this is. Cook and Strauss have had their ups and downs since they began opening the batting: in the 19 series in which they have batted together before the ongoing one against Pakistan, they have both averaged more than 40 in only four series (including one against Bangladesh). (Click here for Strauss' series-wise averages during this period, and here for Cook's.) Strauss had a terrible time in the Ashes in 2006-07, and then in series against West Indies (2007), South Africa (2008), Pakistan (2010) and Sri Lanka in 2011, when he scored 27 in four innings. Cook struggled too in the Ashes in 2006-07 (average 27.60) and 2009 (average 24.66), as also against Pakistan in 2010, but despite some hiccups, mostly one opener has covered for the other: only in three series have both Cook and Strauss averaged less than 40.
The table below looks at the opening pairs who have batted together in at least 75 innings at the top of the order. Only six pairs make the cut, and in terms of averages, three - Hayden-Langer, Slater-Taylor and Gambhir-Sehwag - have 50-plus averages. Cook-Strauss have a lower average, but they have done a pretty good job of occupying the crease: the average balls per dismissal for their partnership is 81, which means they bat, on average, for 13.3 overs, which is usually about an hour in a Test match (especially when new-ball bowlers are bowling early in the innings). Gambhir-Sehwag average 53.58, but their quicker rate of scoring also means they get those runs in 69 balls (11.3 overs).
| Pair | Innings | Runs | P'ship average | 100/ 50 stands |
| Gordon Greenidge/ Desmond Haynes | 148 | 6482 | 47.31 | 16/ 26 |
| Marvan Atapattu/ Sanath Jayasuriya | 118 | 4469 | 40.26 | 9/ 24 |
| Matthew Hayden/ Justin Langer | 113 | 5655 | 51.88 | 14/ 24 |
| Alastair Cook/ Andrew Strauss | 99 | 4190 | 42.75 | 11/ 16 |
| Michael Slater/ Mark Taylor | 78 | 3887 | 51.14 | 10/ 16 |
| Gautam Gambhir/ Virender Sehwag | 77 | 3965 | 53.58 | 10/ 23 |
The Gambhir-Sehwag pair has the highest average among the list above, but that's also a function of the conditions in which they have played most of their games. Of the 77 times when they have opened the batting, 56 have been in the Asian subcontinent, and in those outings, Gambhir and Sehwag have been outstanding, averaging 60.64 per partnership, with nine century stands and 20 half-century ones. In fact, no opening pair has scored as many partnership runs in Asia as the 3275 that Gambhir and Sehwag have added.
However, outside the subcontinent they are a considerably lesser force: in 18 innings outside Asia (excluding Zimbabwe), they have only averaged 28.22. Their only century stand in those 18 innings was in Centurion in 2010, when they added 137 in the second innings. Since that stand, though, their opening acts outside Asia read thus: 19, 27, 8, 3, 22, 17, 0, 18, 4, 24, 26 - 168 runs in 11 innings at 15.27, with a highest stand of 27.
The table below lists the opening pairs from the subcontinent who have scored more than 500 partnership runs outside Asia, and most of them have better numbers than Gambhir-Sehwag. Gavaskar and Chauhan, for instance, averaged 47.92, with four century stands in 25 innings. The stats for Bangladesh's Imrul Kayes and Tamim Iqbal are even better: they average 53.50 in 14 innings outside Asia; in their last six such stands they have notched up the following partnerships: 79 and 35 (Hamilton), 88 and 185 (Lord's), 126 and 2 (Old Trafford). Bangladesh have struggled in most aspects of their game in Test cricket, but their opening batting has been one of their huge redeeming features.
Among the 12 opening pairs in the list below, Pakistan's Mudassar-Mohsin partnership is the only one with an average below that of Gambhir-Sehwag.
| Pair | Innings | Runs | Ave stand | 100/ 50 p'ships |
| Sunil Gavaskar/ Chetan Chauhan | 25 | 1198 | 47.92 | 4/ 3 |
| Imran Farhat/ Salman Butt | 24 | 855 | 35.62 | 2/ 5 |
| Marvan Atapattu/ Sanath Jayasuriya | 28 | 779 | 31.16 | 1/ 4 |
| Imrul Kayes/ Tamim Iqbal | 14 | 749 | 53.50 | 2/ 3 |
| Majid Khan/ Sadiq Mohammad | 18 | 728 | 45.50 | 2/ 5 |
| Wasim Jaffer/ Virender Sehwag | 18 | 643 | 35.72 | 2/ 4 |
| Mohsin Khan/ Mudassar Nazar | 22 | 607 | 27.59 | 0/ 6 |
| Vijay Merchant/ Mushtaq Ali | 7 | 584 | 83.42 | 2/ 3 |
| Sunil Gavaskar/ Kris Srikkanth | 10 | 565 | 56.50 | 1/ 4 |
| Aamer Sohail/ Rameez Raja | 19 | 525 | 30.88 | 2/ 1 |
| Aamer Sohail/ Saeed Anwar | 14 | 512 | 36.57 | 3/ 0 |
| Gautam Gambhir/ Virender Sehwag | 18 | 508 | 28.22 | 1/ 1 |
Coming back to Cook and Strauss, they have done reasonably well in most of the countries they have played in. Asia has been a bit of a problem - they average 36.36 in 11 innings - while in South Africa they average 30 in seven innings. However, they have managed a century stand in each of those countries/ continents. In Australia they had plenty of problems in 2006-07, scoring 270 runs in ten innings, but they did much better in 2010-11, putting together 549 runs in just seven innings.
| Country/ Continent | Innings | Runs | Average | 100/ 50 stands |
| West Indies | 9 | 531 | 66.37 | 2/ 1 |
| Australia | 17 | 819 | 48.17 | 2/ 2 |
| England | 56 | 2230 | 40.54 | 5/ 10 |
| Asia | 11 | 400 | 36.36 | 1/ 2 |
| South Africa | 7 | 210 | 30.00 | 1/ 1 |
| Career | 100 | 4190 | 42.75 | 11/ 16 |
Cook and Strauss have scored the most runs of any opening pair in England, but there are several other pairs who have had higher averages. The Hobbs-Sutcliffe combination is beyond compare, but even other pairs - incuding Strauss-Trescothick, Atherton-Gooch and Trescothick-Vaughan - have been far more productive per innings.
The surprise, though, is the pair right at the bottom of this list. Graham Gooch and Geoff Boycott were both fantastic openers, yet on the 23 occasions when they opened the batting in Tests in England, they averaged a mere 28.36 per partnership. Much of the reason for that, though, was the fact that 20 of those 23 partnerships were against the might of West Indies and Australia.
| Pair | Innings | Runs | Average | 100s/ 50s |
| Cook-Strauss | 56 | 2230 | 40.54 | 5/ 10 |
| Hobbs-Sutcliffe | 23 | 2047 | 93.04 | 9/ 8 |
| Strauss-Trescothick | 38 | 2039 | 55.10 | 6/ 11 |
| Atherton-Gooch | 30 | 1910 | 63.67 | 6/ 9 |
| Hutton-Washbrook | 26 | 1368 | 59.47 | 4/ 6 |
| Trescothick-Vaughan | 19 | 1020 | 60.00 | 2/ 7 |
| Atherton-Butcher | 18 | 833 | 46.27 | 3/ 0 |
| Boycott-Edrich | 24 | 813 | 36.95 | 2/ 5 |
| Atherton-Stewart | 17 | 762 | 44.82 | 2/ 4 |
| Atherton-Trescothick | 18 | 707 | 39.27 | 2/ 5 |
| Boycott-Gooch | 23 | 624 | 28.36 | 1/ 3 |
Here's a look at how three of the other pairs have fared in different conditions. The two Australian pairs have done fairly well in most of the regions across the world, but the Greenidge-Haynes combination have a huge home bias: in the West Indies, they have averaged more than 65, but in Asia their average stand drops to 28.65. In fact, their numbers are very similar to those of Gambhir-Sehwag in the subcontinent and outside. Greenidge and Haynes haven't done too well in Australia either, averaging 34 in 28 outings. In 54 innings in Australia and the subcontinent, the Greenidge-Haynes pair had only two century stands; in contrast, they had ten such partnerships in 63 stands at home.
| Region | Slater-Taylor:Inngs/ Ave | Hayden-Langer:Inngs/ Ave | Greenidge-Haynes:Inngs/Ave |
| Asia | 18/ 37.27 | 18/ 39.66 | 26/ 28.65 |
| Australia | 39/ 57.71 | 61/ 56.06 | 28/ 34.00 |
| England | 10/ 67.60 | 11/ 60.00 | 19/ 37.42 |
| New Zealand | - | 5/ 36.20 | 12/ 52.18 |
| South Africa | 4/ 33.00 | 10/ 41.22 | - |
| West Indies | 7/ 35.83 | 8/ 60.87 | 63/ 65.44 |
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.

Aakash Chopra: Apart from luck, you need to pick your team wisely, get to bat at the top, and have your captain's support
Fixing? It's people like us doing it
Ed Hawkins: It's convenient to blame the underworld for every instance of fixing, but it's ordinary punters behind many of them
The perils of scoffing at failure
Rob Steen: Excessive success can destroy inhibition, and hence the capacity for shame
New Zealand shaken and stirred
Andrew Alderson: The second-innings collapse at Lord's has revived concerns about New Zealand's top order
'Being an NZ fan is like being in an abusive relationship'
Beige Brigade: Taylor Swift's songs would speak to any Kiwi cricket fan right now
A talent that didn't know its own worth
Sreesanth wasn't the most likeable team-mate or opponent, but he had skill beyond doubt, which we might have seen the last of
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
Pollard sledges Watson, Dravid is angry
Plays of the day from the IPL match between Mumbai Indians and Rajasthan Royals in Mumbai
A time for anger, a time for action
Out of the shattered lives of three young men caught up in allegations of fraud, newer and stronger players must emerge
Mumbai Indians still have a better head-to-head record against Chennai Super Kings, but once again on the big occasion, they came second
Mumbai Indians still have a better head-to-head record against Chennai Super Kings, but once again on the big occasion, they came second
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
Spirited Sunrisers exceed expectations (53)
Sunrisers began this tournament as one of the underdogs, but fought impressively to reach as far as the Eliminator
Anderson's magic not to be missed (50)
None of the other three England bowlers with 300 Test wickets - or many other of the game's finest swing merchants - could have bowled better than James Anderson at Lord's
A case of peaking too early (41)
Royal Challengers began the season in full steam, but failed to replicate their consistency away from home
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
and guys just go back and look what happened to England O mighty England in Desert :)
Posted by nzcricket174 on (January 28, 2012, 12:59 GMT)@drinks.break sorry what was that again?
Posted by drinks.break on (January 28, 2012, 10:22 GMT)Excellent work, mikey76 ... you've managed to talk eloquently about one-eyed supporters while your own pirate patch is super-glued firmly in place! Where to start? 1. Aus is now equal 3rd with Ind, and moving up (victory against WI in April will put them in outright 3rd); 2. The last Ashes in UK was a close series, only being decided in the last couple of days; 3. Australia batted and bowled better than Eng for much of the series, but lost the crucial sessions - and that's when Aus was in the dumps and sinking further ... let's wait for next time and see! 4. Eng is justifiably #1, but 19 centuries at 41.6 in this day and age of flat wickets and short boundaries makes Strauss a very middle-of-the-pack opener, way behind Sehwag, Smith and Gambhir (not to mention greats like Hayden and Langer, even Tresco and Katich) and on a par with Umar and Dilshan; 5. If a thrashing in the 1st test with the 2nd in the balance is doing OK, then I'll look forward to Eng doing OK next Ashes!
Posted by mikey76 on (January 28, 2012, 3:40 GMT)More hilarious comments from our one eyed Australian friends. Hobbs and Sutcliffe average 93 as a pair so that makes them the best opening combo of all time DUH!! Strauss isn't South African, he was born there thats all. They call him Lord Brockett because of his posh english accent! Usman Khawaja was born in Pakistan but you conveniently forget that don't you.And he has scored 19 test hundreds at over 40 which qualifies him as a good opener.If our win against India was average then so was yours. We rolled them over far more cheaply than you have and we scored more runs against them. And the last time I looked we were doing OK against Pakistan. Were so far ahead in the ICC rankings its not even funny, where are Austalia??? ooh 5th I believe!! Can't wait to turn you clowns over in the ashes....AGAIN!
Posted byWow. Surprised to see Tamim Iqbal and Imrul Kayes doing so well outside of Asia especially considering the teams the are being compared to.
Posted by viswanav on (January 27, 2012, 21:24 GMT)Brilliant article...It's interesting to note that, despite the long history of test match cricket, only four opening partnerships have achieved the feat of batting together in 100+ innings...Two of the other three opening partnerships were part of two of the best teams to have played in the history of the game...So, this just goes on to show the importance of having a steady and long-term opening partnership...But one surprise is the performance of Greenidge-Haynes outside the WI...I always thought they were the best opening partnership, but seems like I was wrong...Your numbers prove that Hayden and Langer were the best...It's a pity that the careesr of both Hayden and Langer got a kickstart around the agre of 30 years...Had they managed to settle into the side much earlier, God knows how many they would have scored together...
Posted by Kaze on (January 27, 2012, 19:06 GMT)Hayden/Langer are the best and Taylor/Langer are second, some people seem surprised, it isn;t surprising at all.
Posted by ChulaW on (January 27, 2012, 18:15 GMT)actually the article mentions what's obvious.. Hobbs & Sutcliffe are the greatest openers.. 2000 runs @ 93 avg. damn.
Posted byEven though Hayden & Langer's average is better than Haynes/Greenidge, I think Haynes/Greenidge were the best. Batting wasnt as easy in their era as it became in the 2000s...
Posted byif u call the indian pitches as batting tracks then would the touring teams find it difficult to win matches in india against india.every player has their strengths in their home conditions thats the reason why many opening players have done well in their home conditions.i would like to tell here that sehwag/gambhir overseas record is poor because they were out of form in many of their recent matches