S Rajesh
Numbers Game Numbers GameRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
ESPNcricinfo's stats editor S Rajesh looks at the stories behind the stats

Friday night lights

Over the last six years, batting second in day-night matches has been much more profitable than before

S Rajesh

March 23, 2012

Comments: 4 | Text size: A | A

Shakib Al Hasan loses his leg stump, Bangladesh v Pakistan, Asia Cup final, Mirpur, March 22, 2012
Despite Bangladesh's defeat in the Asia Cup final, Mirpur remains an excellent venue to bat second under lights © AFP
Related Links

Pakistan batted first and squeaked through in the final of the Asia Cup, but one of the features of the tournament was the advantage that the team chasing seemed to have. The ball seemed to come on to the bat in the evening under lights making strokeplay much easier, and it showed in the results through the round-robin stage of the tournament. After falling short in the first two matches, the teams chasing won each of the next four - it started with Pakistan's easy win against Sri Lanka, and then continued as Bangladesh shocked India, who in turn beat Pakistan in a stunning chase of 330. Not to be outdone, Bangladesh chased down 212 with 17 balls out of their 40 overs remaining to sail into the final, and then nearly pulled off the run-chase in the decider as well.

Going back a little further, these last few months have been excellent ones for teams chasing, especially in day-night ODIs: India pulled off that incredible chase against Sri Lanka in Hobart, while Sri Lanka have been terrific themselves, chasing down a target of 300 in Kimberley, and then beating Australia in tough run-chases in Hobart and Adelaide. All these results have made 2012 one of the best years for the team batting second in day-night ODIs: in 34 such matches so far this year, the teams chasing have won 18 and lost 15, a ratio of 1.20.

Batting second in day-night ODIs has been a pretty successful formula recently, but it wasn't always so. The overall numbers, in fact, remain favourable for the team batting first in these matches: the team batting second has lost more often than it has won (507 wins, 584 defeats). In comparison, chasing has historically been a more profitable option in day games (1108 wins, 933 defeats).

Even in the period between 2000 and 2005, batting first was clearly the better option when playing under lights. As compared to a 237-175 win-loss ratio for the teams chasing in day games, in day-night matches the ratio was 138-197. In percentage terms, only 40% of the day-night games during this period were won by the team batting second; on the other hand, 57% were won by the team batting first. In 2005, for example, there were only 14 successful run-chases under lights in 49 matches, while in 2001 there were 19 in 59 games. (Click here for the win-loss ratios each year in day-night ODIs since 2000.)

Overall stats for teams batting second in ODIs
Match type ODIs Won Lost Ratio
Day 2087 1108 933 1.18
Day-night 1121 507 584 0.86
Overall 3207 1615 1516 1.06
Teams batting 2nd in ODIs, between Jan 2000 and Dec 2005
Match type ODIs Won Lost Ratio
Day 419 237 175 1.35
Day-night 346 138 197 0.70
Total 765 375 372 1.01

More recently, though, the results are a lot more even in matches played under lights. In fact, since the beginning of 2006, the win-loss stats for the team batting second are 204-202. Since 2009, it's 128-115, suggesting that the balance is slowly shifting.

In day games, on the other hand, the advantage has always been with the team batting second. There are some venues, especially in the subcontinent, where batting first is an advantage - in India, for example, teams batting first have won 21 and lost 15 in 36 day games since January 2006 - but overall, batting second has been the better option. In South Africa, the ratio is favour of the team batting second by as much as 29-13 margin, which means the side chasing wins more than two games for every one it loses. (Click here for the results in each country in day games since 2006.)

Teams batting 2nd in ODIs, since Jan 2006
Match type ODIs Won Lost Ratio
Day 522 288 223 1.29
Day-night 415 204 202 1.01
Total 936 492 424 1.16

Under lights, though, the country where the results have undergone a huge change is Bangladesh. Between 2000 and 2005, only ten out of 27 day-night matches were won by the side chasing; in the last six years, though, the ratio has turned around completely, to 25 wins and 14 defeats for the team chasing.

In fact, in many of the other host countries too, the ratios have changed significantly. In New Zealand, it has increased by about 45%, in England by 50%, and in Australia by almost 54% (though in Australia teams batting second still lose more than they win). In India, though, the change is pretty insignificant, while in South Africa, the ratio remains almost exactly the same.

Results by host country for teams chasing in d/n games, between 2000 and 2005, and 2006 onwards
Host country 2000-2005 - ODIs Won/ lost Ratio 2006- ODIs Won/ lost Ratio
New Zealand 36 20/ 16 1.25 31 20/ 11 1.81
Bangladesh 27 10/ 17 0.58 39 25/ 14 1.79
England 17 7/ 8 0.87 24 13/ 10 1.30
India 19 10/ 9 1.11 76 40/ 34 1.17
Pakistan 27 12/ 15 0.80 35 17/ 18 0.94
UAE 45 18/ 27 0.67 33 16/ 17 0.94
Australia 76 26/ 48 0.54 81 35/ 42 0.83
South Africa 56 21/ 30 0.70 41 17/ 24 0.70
Sri Lanka 43 14/ 27 0.51 46 18/ 28 0.64

And finally, a look at the venues with the best and worst win-loss ratios for the teams batting second. Not surprisingly, the ground which has most favoured the team batting under lights is the Shere Bangla Stadium in Mirpur. Had Bangladesh won the Asia Cup final, the ratio would have been exactly two wins to a defeat for teams chasing under lights in Mirpur. As it is, the ratio is still an impressive 1.75. Among the 12 venues which have hosted ten or more day-night matches during this period, only in four have the teams batting second won more than they've lost.

On the other hand, in eight grounds the teams batting first have had the upper hand. It's most pronounced at the Gaddafi Stadium in Lahore, where the team chasing has a 2-9 win-loss ratio in 11 matches. At Sydney, Brisbane and the Premadasa are three of the other venues where teams batting first still have the advantage. Overall, though, the gap has close considerably.

W/L ratios for team chasing at each venue in d/n ODIs since Jan 2006 (Qual: 10 matches)
Venue ODIs Won Lost Ratio
Shere Bangla, Mirpur 33 21 12 1.75
MCG 14 8 6 1.33
Adelaide Oval 17 9 7 1.28
National Stadium, Karachi 15 7 8 0.83
WACA, Perth 11 5 6 0.83
Rangiri Dambulla International Stadium 16 7 9 0.77
Sheikh Zayed Stadium, Abu Dhabi 19 8 11 0.72
Gabba, Brisbane 15 5 8 0.62
R Premadasa Stadium, Colombo 22 8 14 0.57
SCG 18 6 11 0.54
Gaddafi Stadium, Lahore 11 2 9 0.22

S Rajesh is stats editor of ESPNcricinfo. Follow him on Twitter

RSS Feeds: S Rajesh

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (March 23, 2012, 13:37 GMT)

It is frequently easier to chase these days

Posted by 9ST9 on (March 23, 2012, 10:48 GMT)

I think the most horrendous place to chase in ODI's is Dambulla.

Posted by   on (March 23, 2012, 5:11 GMT)

While your stats do prove that chasing has been better of late, your examples in the article are a little dicey.

In the first 2 matches of the recently concluded series, the team batting first won, then 4 matches were won by chasing sides, then the final was won by Pakistan who batter first. Thats just 4-3 in favour of chasing. Not really a "trend" one can make inferences from. Also, Pakistan was the one winning after batting first (2 out of 3) - so maybe they are just a side that defends totals well.

In the commonwealth bank series - 8 matches out of 15 were won by the side batting first. One match was tied, only 6 were won by the team chasing. So really, your examples were flawed.

Posted by Meety on (March 23, 2012, 4:25 GMT)

I think sides turn a chase into a T20 match, by not worrying if a run rate gets to 8 rpo with 20 overs to go (Dhoni likes that strategy in particular), - as long as either they have two set batsmen, or 8 or more wickets in hand.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
S RajeshClose
S Rajesh Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.

    Last ball, last wicket, and Northants' parched spell

Ask Steven: Also, Vijay Manjrekar's nickname, Abid Ali's no-ball, oldest double-centurions, and this decade's leading players

    'I ensured there was no regionalism in selection'

Couch Talk: Former India batsman Chandu Borde reflects on his career as a player, mentor, manager and selector

Lehmann enters uncharted territory

Daniel Brettig: The Pakistan Tests provide the first significant juncture of his new phase as Australia's established coach

    The man who pulled New Zealand from the precipice

Brendon McCullum's runs and leadership have rescued New Zealand cricket from its lowest ebb. By Andrew Alderson

Cricket: complex, unknowable cricket

Jon Hotten: We, as players and spectators, are finite, but cricket, utterly brilliant in its design, is not

News | Features Last 7 days

How India weeds out its suspect actions

The BCCI set up a three-man committee to tackle the problem of chucking at age-group and domestic cricket, and it has produced significant results in five years

A rock, a hard place and the WICB

The board's latest standoff with its players has had embarrassing consequences internationally, so any resolution now needs to be approached thoughtfully

Kohli back to old habits

Stats highlights from the fourth ODI between India and West Indies in Dharamsala

West Indies go AWOL

West Indies may have formally played the fourth ODI in Dharamsala but their fielding suggested their minds were already on the flight back home

KP and the green-eyed monster

Individual rivalries in team sports can be productive or destructive. Jealousy may have spurred Pietersen the batsman, but at the cost of the team's image

News | Features Last 7 days