Ed Smith
Ed Smith Ed SmithRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Former England, Kent and Middlesex batsman; writer for the New Statesman

What makes cricketers superstitious?

In a game where so many variables are outside a player's control, the value of superstition as a crutch cannot be overestimated

Ed Smith

March 28, 2012

Comments: 41 | Text size: A | A

Steve Waugh packed his kit, and put away that red rag forever, Australia v India, 4th Test, Sydney, 5th day, January 6, 2004
Steve Waugh's red rag is probably the most famous of a host of cricketer superstitions Hamish Blair / © Getty Images
Related Links
Players/Officials: Neil McKenzie | Ed Smith | Steve Waugh

Sixteen years ago - almost exactly - I made my first-class debut. I was 18, and the memories of that day are so clear that it could be yesterday. I bought a can of Lucozade and a copy of the Times from the shop across the road in Cambridge, then cycled the mile or so to Fenner's, the famous old ground where the Cambridge University "Blues" play against the inevitably much stronger county teams. I sat in a corner of the dressing room before opening the batting, collecting my thoughts; I walked out to bat to the left-hand side of my opening partner; I didn't take strike, so I was No. 2 on the scorecard; I grounded my bat in the batting crease at the end of every over - even if there had been a boundary.

What I didn't know, on that very first morning of my career, was that my footsteps - so utterly humdrum and banal - would become fixed in stone by my own chronic addiction to superstition. I got a hundred against Glamorgan in that first innings, a blessing in many ways. But I was so superstitious that I couldn't change the routine I had stumbled upon entirely by accident - the Lucozade, the Times, the same corner of the dressing room, the left pad on first, the velcro straps adjusted just the right number of times, the bats lined up on the table, bat-faces staring out into the room.

I try to be a rational person, and I knew, of course, that it was absolutely ridiculous to think there was any correlation between my choice of soft drink and the number of runs I scored. But the rituals became fixed. I was learning the tip of a hard lesson: batting drives everyone a little bit mad, however sane and well-adjusted you start out.

At least I was in good company. Neil McKenzie, the South African batsman, went though a spell of attaching his cricket bats to the ceiling of the dressing room before he went out to bat. Obviously, I can sympathise with the sentiment. But how did he stumble upon the routine in the first place? Was he tinkering around with a bit of interior decorating - would my bat look good dangling here? - immediately before he scored one of his hundreds?

That is how superstitions arise: you have some success and search for explanations in the recent past. Don't be fooled into thinking that superstition only affects the weak-willed. Steve Waugh was the archetypal Aussie battler, but he carried a small red rag in his pocket when he was batting. "It started at the Leeds Test match in 1993, when I was in the 60s," he explained. "I brought it out as a sweat gatherer and I went on to score a hundred." He kept it for the rest of his career.

Superstition doesn't respect rank or stature. Sir Frank Worrell was one of cricket's great statesmen. But when he was out for a first ball duck against Australia in 1951, Worrell changed every stitch of clothing, fitting himself out in a completely new gear. "He walked to the wicket hoping that by discarding his old clothes he would change his luck," we learn from Sir Learie Constantine's obituary of Worrell on ESPNcricinfo. "Not a bit of it! He was out for another first baller!"

Superstition affects great athletes in other sports, of course. You'd expect that most sportsmen would be able to find time to meet the Queen. But the usually unfailingly courteous Rafael Nadal had to skip his royal appointment during Wimbledon because he hadn't met the Queen the day before. He couldn't face interfering with a winning pattern of behaviour. Given the choice between the Queen and his winning routine, routine won in straight sets.

If you really mess up and miss the middle of the bat by a foot, then the ball travels safely through to the wicketkeeper. But if you only mess up by a small amount, and miss the middle of the bat by half the width of the bat face, then the ball catches the edge and you trudge back to the pavilion

But cricket, surely, remains the most superstitious of all sports. Why? Partly because there is more time to observe - well, invent - correlations between patterns of behaviour and runs scored. The Indian psychologist Ashis Nandy has a different theory: superstition is built into the structure of the game because there is such a high degree of luck. Nandy explores the theory in his left-field book The Tao of Cricket: "It is a game of chance and skill which has to be played as if it is wholly a game of skill… Cricket is nearly impossible to predict, control or prognosticate. There are too many variables and many of the relationships among the variables are determined by chance."

It's not all about luck, of course. You need a lot of skill to make a hundred. But you almost certainly need luck as well. After all, how many hundreds are reached without a single play-and-miss? Not many. And yet, as we all know, a play-and-miss is a worse shot than an edge to the slips. Not a worse outcome. But worse in terms of the degree of distance from the batsman's intention (which is hitting the ball with the middle of the bat) and the end result (an air shot). In cricket, if you really mess up and miss the middle of the bat by a foot, then the ball travels safely through to the wicketkeeper. But if you only mess up by a small amount, and miss the middle of the bat by half the width of the bat face, then the ball catches the edge and you trudge back to the pavilion. Go figure.

No wonder cricketers lean on superstition as a crutch. They cannot accept the awful truth - that the game is governed by erratic umpiring decisions, random tosses and unpredictable seam movement - so they invent a coping strategy to persuade themselves they are in control. The umpire won't give me out because I've got my red rag; I'll win the toss because it's my father's lucky coin; I'll make runs today because I've taped my spare bats to the ceiling.

Nandy's thesis goes further. He believes cricket's metaphysics is uniquely well adapted to the superstitious tendencies of the most cricket-mad of all nations: India. As he writes in the famous first line of The Tao of Cricket: "Cricket is an Indian game accidentally discovered by the English."

I'll raise a can of Lucozade to that.

Former England, Kent and Middlesex batsman Ed Smith's new book, Luck - What It Means and Why It Matters, is published in March 2012. His Twitter feed is here

RSS Feeds: Ed Smith

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by S305 on (March 30, 2012, 1:54 GMT)

Superstitions make for unnecessary thought processes......... that take away the concentration that is needed for a player to focus on the ball that's being bowled. I cannot see a point in entertaining a distracting thought like a superstition and can't see how it helps................. unless superstitions ease the ensuing anxiety within...............

Posted by vkkossery on (March 29, 2012, 19:18 GMT)

Why only players? The spectators are also very superstitious. During the last period of the test series with Australia I sat on the floor leaning against the sofas and watched cricket on TV and when Virat Kohli scored a century.Now My mom asks me to sit on the floor every time India does badly so that the luck would change!

Posted by smgarge on (March 29, 2012, 11:58 GMT)

No one mentioned Tendulkar so I thought I would do so.

Posted by kurups on (March 29, 2012, 11:08 GMT)

and yet how many times do we (me included!) curse or blame a batsman for getting out at a critical time..in a game with so many uncertainities just imagine there would have been so many things that are not in the player's control. one other thing Ed brought out well is batsmen getting out edging. I used to hear Sachin in his early days getting out a lot more behind the wicket which only happened because he is technically a great player and gets in line and closer to the ball more often than others, just as most good batsmen do.

Posted by   on (March 29, 2012, 10:07 GMT)

What about superstitious Umpires? If umpire Shepherd was on duty in the current SriLanka vs England match, he would have had to stand one-legged for the whole night yesterday since England was stuck on Nelson (111/2) !

Posted by ToTellUTheTruth on (March 29, 2012, 1:56 GMT)

Nothing can beat the superstition of the ONE-AND-ONLY....Tiger Woods. Always in Red and black on sunday. He did confess to this besides saying his mind is his greatest strength.

Posted by vertical on (March 29, 2012, 1:54 GMT)

@Natesan333,right on buddy.Not to mention Sachin looking up the sky(heaven) remembering his dad. Now Virat Kohli is a naturalist(philosophy) after his century!!

Posted by McGorium on (March 29, 2012, 0:55 GMT)

In many ways, this states the obvious. In fact, one could extend this (correct) logic to life. The reason we find solace in a divine entity is fundamentally the same: the vagaries of life are tough, and so its easier to go through life believe someone is watching out for you. There are too many parameters out of your control, and so you throw some of it up to a higher power. Life must have meaning, so we have an afterlife. Whether it's demonstrably true is of no relevance. Ultimately, we need emotional crutches to live our lives: even atheists believe in something... it might be something as simple as optimism. The superstitions of cricketers are just extensions of that basic need to create an illusion of control.

Posted by Natesan333 on (March 28, 2012, 22:07 GMT)

@newnomi sorry pal, just because it is o.k in your religion doesn't make it not superstitious. The defenition of superstition is, "a belief or practice resulting from ignorance, fear of the unknown, trust in magic or chance." So it doesn't matter, when you practice the act or for what purpose. People saying thanks to god before a meal, or saying thanks after a century or carrying a picture of a god during a game, guess what they are all superstions.

Posted by HyderabadiFlick on (March 28, 2012, 21:15 GMT)

On the eve of India-B'desh match of WC2011 I ate food at the B'desh restaurant in NYC and India beat B'desh the next day. Then until the final of the WC2011 I did not realize that and before the final I ate at a Sri Lankan restaurant in NYC and India won the WC2011. So, I too played my part in my country's triumph. :) Jai Hind

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print

    Ronchi's blitz, and remarkable ODI recoveries

Ask Steven: Also, the fastest ODI 150s, and the highest Test totals without a half-century

    Penalty runs the best punishment for slow over rates

Ashley Mallett: Fines and suspensions have had no effect. Awarding the opposition runs for every over a team falls short in a Test innings will definitely bite harder

    Pietersen stars in his own muppet show

David Hopps: KP's rubbishing of many aspiring English county professionals brings to mind the belief of Miss Piggy that "there is no one in the world to compare with moi"

    How to construct an ODI chase

Michael Bevan: Focus on targets smaller than winning the match, and back your tailenders to deliver for you

The many crickets of an Indian boyhood

Sankaran Krishna: Growing up in India, you play a number of varieties of the game, each developing a certain skill

News | Features Last 7 days

Kohli at No. 4 - defensive or practical?

It seems Virat Kohli is to not bat before the 12th or 13th over to strengthen the middle and the lower middle order. It suggests a lack of confidence in what was supposed to be India's strength in their title defence: their batting

Open with Rohit and Binny, with Kohli at No. 3

India's batting is going the way of their bowling in Australia, and they need get their order sorted before the World Cup

Off-stump blues leave Dhawan flailing

The out-of-form Shikhar Dhawan still has the backing of his captain, but there's no denying his slump has arrived at an inconvenient time for India and his technical issues have to be sorted out before they attempt to defend the World Cup

On TV it looks uglier than it actually is

Often reasonable arguments on the field look nasty beyond the boundary and on camera

'Teams can't have set formula' - Dravid

In the first episode of Contenders, a special ten-part buildup to the 2015 World Cup, Rahul Dravid and Graeme Smith discuss the impact of local conditions on team compositions and the issues surrounding the format of the tournament

News | Features Last 7 days