S Rajesh
Numbers Game Numbers GameRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
ESPNcricinfo's stats editor S Rajesh looks at the stories behind the stats

The fourth-innings story for Pakistan and Younis Khan

A look at how no other Pakistan batsman has managed 1000 fourth-innings runs in Tests

S Rajesh

June 29, 2012

Comments: 36 | Text size: A | A

Younis Khan punches one through the off side, Sri Lanka v Pakistan, 1st Test, Galle, 4th day, June 25, 2012
Younis Khan has scored 15.58% of his total Test runs in the fourth innings; the corresponding percentage for Zaheer Abbas was only 5.79 © AFP
Enlarge
Related Links

When Younis Khan eased Rangana Herath past mid-off for a single to reach 72 in Pakistan's second innings of the Galle Test, he became the first Pakistan batsman to reach the 1000-run mark in fourth innings of Tests. In terms of overall aggregate, Younis is only fourth on the all-time list of run-getters for Pakistan: he's more than 2300 runs behind Javed Miandad and Inzamam-ul-Haq, and more than 1000 behind Mohammad Yousuf. Yet, in fourth innings he has been more prolific, scoring 1015 runs at an outstanding average of 59.70, and is one of only five batsmen to score four hundreds in the last innings. It's obvious that fourth-innings batting brings out the best in him, but has he also benefited from Pakistan's tendency to leave themselves with a lot to do in the last innings in recent times? How have the stats for fourth-innings batting changed over the decades - has it become easier now, compared to the 1980s and '90s? Here's an attempt to answer some of those questions.

First, a look at fourth-innings averages over the decades: like all batting stats, these numbers too have seen an upward trend since 2000, with the average in the 2000s going up to 29.36 from 25.72 in the 1990s. However, the difference between averages in the first three innings and the fourth has largely stayed within a narrow band since the 1970s. It dropped to 3.04 in the 2000s, a reflection of the fact that batting last became a slightly easier proposition during this period: 20 out of 57 successful 250-plus chases in the fourth innings of Tests came during this period. The average number of innings per century has also stayed in the 40s through most of the last four decades. Also, in no decade has the fourth-innings average touched 30 - the highest it has been is 29.36, in the 2000s. (These averages have been calculated using runs scored off the bat only, excluding extras.)

The percentage of runs scored in the fourth innings is also an interesting stat. The last column in the table below shows that number as a percentage of the runs scored in the first three innings during each decade. In the 1980s, that percentage dropped to 9.28 (because so many drawn Tests didn't even go into a fourth innings?), but generally it has stayed at around 12-13% through most of the decades.

Decade-wise fourth-innings batting stats in Tests since 1950
Decade Innings Average 100s/ 50s 1st 3 inngs ave Ave diff % of runs
1950s 691 25.42 11/ 55 27.61 2.19 10.57
1960s 923 28.84 13/ 107 31.08 2.24 12.48
1970s 1040 27.17 27/ 99 31.31 4.14 13.29
1980s 1040 26.22 21/ 68 30.92 4.70 9.28
1990s 1715 25.72 37/ 163 29.99 4.27 12.51
2000s 2315 29.36 53/ 277 32.40 3.04 13.06
2010s 554 28.67 13/ 62 32.65 3.98 13.74

Since the difference in averages between the first three and the fourth innings have been fairly constant since the 1970s, let's look at the stats for each team between 1970 and 1999 - which was also a period of much success for Pakistan's Test side. The fourth-innings averages for all sides are pretty similar for most teams, with only West Indies and Australia going beyond 26.20; for the others, it ranges between 23.79 and 26.15. The difference is more in the averages in the first three innings - the better batting sides averaged in the early 30s.

Pakistan's batsmen scored most of their runs in the first three innings, with fourth-innings runs at about 10% of the runs they scored in the first three. These stats, combined with their high win-loss ratio during this period - they won 37 Tests and lost 24 - indicates that Pakistan's batsmen did most of their work in the first three innings during this period.

In these 30 years, the only Pakistan batsman who scored more than 500 fourth-innings runs was Miandad - he scored 765 in 20 innings at an average of 51. The next-best run-getter was Moin Khan, with 493. (Click here for the full list of batsmen.) Zaheer Abbas, for instance, scored only 293 fourth-innings runs in his entire career, which is a mere 6% of the runs he scored in the other three innings. His was an extreme case, however: he averaged more than 55 in the first innings, and only 22.53 in the fourth.

Fourth innings batting stats for all teams between 1970 and 1999
Team Innings Average 100s/ 50s 1st 3 inngs ave Ave diff % of runs
Zimbabwe 66 23.79 1/ 7 24.46 0.67 8.89
Sri Lanka 215 26.15 5/ 22 27.49 1.34 12.25
England 691 26.12 12/ 64 28.81 2.69 11.45
New Zealand 491 24.81 9/ 33 27.61 2.80 13.99
West Indies 568 29.07 13/ 62 31.87 2.80 13.16
Australia 676 27.03 19/ 54 32.35 5.32 11.05
India 489 25.72 13/ 40 32.64 6.92 11.37
Pakistan 443 24.98 10/ 32 32.58 7.60 10.38
South Africa 156 24.97 3/ 16 33.03 8.06 9.95

Looking at the same numbers since 2004, however, a few differences emerge, especially with respect to Pakistan. To begin with, their winning percentages have dipped considerably - they have a 23-27 win-loss record during this period, compared to an 18-12 record between 2000 and 2003. Clearly their batting in the early part of matches has dipped, leaving them with plenty of work to do in the fourth innings. As the table below shows, Pakistan's fourth-innings runs as a percentage of their first three amount to 20.15; in the period between 1970 and 1999, it was 10.38, which means the percentage has almost doubled.

Some of that is also because of the times they've fielded first in a Test during this period: in 69 Tests, they've fielded first 44 times, which means their batsmen have had to bat fairly often in the fourth innings. Then there's the matter of their first-innings scores: in the 1970-1999 period, their average in the first three innings was among the top ones, at 32.58. Since 2004, their average has remained more or less the same, at 32.79, but the other sides have improved their numbers significantly, with South Africa, Australia, England and India all averaging more than 36. Thus Pakistan's below-par batting performances early in matches have left them with more to do at the finish. Younis has scored 926 fourth-innings runs in 21 innings during this period alone, while Yousuf and Imran Farhat have also scored more than 400.

Fourth innings batting stats for all teams since 01 Jan 2004
Team Innings Average 100s/ 50s 1st 3 inngs ave Ave diff % of runs
Bangladesh 107 28.46 5/ 12 21.34 -7.12 15.60
Zimbabwe 22 23.30 1/ 3 22.24 -1.06 7.62
New Zealand 181 28.44 3/ 21 29.18 0.34 16.39
Australia 201 36.22 7/ 26 37.09 0.87 10.89
West Indies 275 26.59 5/ 32 28.83 2.24 19.01
South Africa 225 34.60 7/ 38 36.95 2.35 15.96
Sri Lanka 158 30.95 5/ 21 35.41 4.46 10.65
Pakistan 281 26.67 6/ 30 32.79 6.12 20.15
England 276 29.75 7/ 30 36.37 6.62 12.73
India 255 28.93 4/ 33 37.40 8.47 12.84

All these second-innings opportunities, though, have given Younis the chance to hoard fourth-innings runs, and he has done a superb job of it. He has scored 15.58% of his total runs in the fourth innings; for Zaheer, the corresponding percentage was 5.79. Among batsmen who've scored at least 1000 fourth-innings runs, Younis' average is the highest, while he is also among the rare breed of batsmen whose fourth-innings average is better than his average in any other innings, even if marginally. (In second innings, he averages 59.12.) Geoff Boycott is another batsman in this group.

Batsmen with 1000-plus runs at 50-plus averages in the fourth innings in Tests
Batsman Innings Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Younis Khan 25 1015 59.70 4/ 5
Geoff Boycott 34 1234 58.76 3/ 7
Sunil Gavaskar 33 1398 58.25 4/ 8
Graeme Smith 35 1504 57.84 4/ 9
Gordon Greenidge 38 1383 53.19 3/ 6
Ricky Ponting 42 1454 51.92 4/ 6
Mahela Jayawardene 29 1006 50.30 3/ 5

Pakistan's recent tendency to bat in fourth innings also means that Taufeeq Umar and Mohammad Hafeez are among their top seven all-time run-getters in the last innings. Hafeez has scored 503 of his 1668 Test runs in the fourth innings - a staggering 30%. In the all-time run-getters' list for Pakistan, Hafeez is only 32nd, but in the fourth-innings list, he vaults into seventh place. Younis is currently 20th in the all-time fourth-innings runs list, but given Pakistan's tendency to bat last, he should end up much higher in the chart by the time he is done.

Highest run-getters for Pakistan in the fourth innings
Batsman Innings Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Younis Khan 25 1015 59.70 4/ 5
Inzamam-ul-Haq 30 867 39.40 1/ 6
Mohammad Yousuf 25 817 43.00 0/ 6
Javed Miandad 22 816 54.40 2/ 5
Moin Khan 17 514 36.71 1/ 3
Taufeeq Umar 22 511 28.38 0/ 3
Mohammad Hafeez 18 503 38.69 1/ 2

S Rajesh is stats editor of ESPNcricinfo. Follow him on Twitter

RSS Feeds: S Rajesh

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by harshthakor on (July 1, 2012, 12:37 GMT)

Tribute to Younus Khan,one of the greatest batsmen to have played for Pakistan and in his peak,the best Pak batsman in a crisis.The analysis proves how great Sunil Gavaskar was as a batsman.I also place Greenidge in the same light,though Boycott however much a master was a bit too selfish.Justice is done to Javed Miandad who was a champion in a crisis.Sachin Tendulkar hardly consistently excelled in the 4th inings of test matches and V iv Richards,and Brian Lara performed better,or even Gary Sobers.

In the 4th innings the wickets deteriorate and it is on many occasions a greater test than the 1st innings.

Posted by Zahidsaltin on (June 30, 2012, 1:34 GMT)

Although in my books Sunil Gavesker is the best test batsman from India who averaged 50+ while facing the new ball and played in a bowling era when only 4 players could touch an average of 50+, I think the discussion here is out of contest. Tandulkar is one of the greatest batsmen ever to play this game, and that assessment is not because of his centuries at all. A batsman with a average of 50 with 7 hundreds in 100 innings is much better than another who also averaged 50 in 100 innings but with 20 centuries. The first one is more consistent and reliable. If you judge Sachine by any means he will stand taller than other players of his time. But that doesn't mean that no other player could be better than him in one specific facit of batting. Some one could be better than him while batting in 4th innings, another can be better than him in playing hook shot etc. But overall younis or any other player doesn't come close to him in batting.

Posted by   on (June 30, 2012, 0:46 GMT)

Yes Younis has been great and he does not just have 50 average in 4th innings but his overall ave in test cricket is 52.23 (before the current series). He is certainly one of the greatest batsmen of modern cricket.

To all those Indians jumping around on Sachin's worth; yes he has been great but please don't just grab one person and bring him in on every discussion. Ask yourself this: Pakistan has produced five bowlers who have been able to maintain an average of early 20z (20-25) and strike rate of early 40z (40-45) in test cricket: Imran Khan, Wasim Akram, Waqar Younis, Saqlain Mustaque and Muhammad Asif (who have taken more then 100 wickets). Has India produced a single bowler with these stats? NONE so please stop jumping

Posted by   on (June 29, 2012, 20:39 GMT)

to be fair sachin has played in 63 win matches averaged 60.75 against australia n 38.1 against s.africa has played 188 tests compared to inzis 119 for pakistan srt overall avg in winning matches is 66.59 inzi avged 78.16, avg against pak in win is 65.16 compared to inzi's 98.5 against india, against bangladesh sachin avg in win is 172.0, inzi avg in win against bangladesh is 80.8, total 100's by tendulkar in wins are 20 but remember he has played 69 tests more than inzi for india, all stats courtesy of stats guru.

Posted by   on (June 29, 2012, 20:19 GMT)

You the maaaan he is a true hero for Pakistan

Posted by   on (June 29, 2012, 19:49 GMT)

please all of u get stats straight for inzamam its very easy to use statsguru inzi played in 49 tests that pakistan won he scored 17 hundreds, yes he did not score a hundred vs aussies n s.africa but he averaged 55 vs aus when won and 93.0 againsr s.africa, he helped pakistan win the series against australia by adding more than 50 for the last wicket in karachi and in sydney scored a rescuing 50+ in the second innings. he had a phenomenal avg of 78.16 in those winning matches, there are many biased opinions here all you have to do is check statsguru at this wonderful site. Average wise Inzi is the best batsman of modern times whilst playing in a winning match period, not even lara, tendulkar or kallis matches him, the flip side was if inzi failed so did pakistan too miserably that is.

Posted by sony111 on (June 29, 2012, 17:33 GMT)

Guys everyone knows Sachin Tendulkar only plays for records...their is no point of fighting over it when things are so clear !!

Salute to younus khan,he truly is one of the great batsman of Pakistan.....when team needs,he fights like a warrior on the cricket field...!!

Posted by spiritwithin on (June 29, 2012, 16:49 GMT)

@boomboom560..>>Sachin has never scored a triple hundred in tests so it show Younis is better batsman than Sachin in tests>>Sehwag & Gayle has two triple centuries,may be they r the greatest batsman ever after Don & Lara in ur book..

Posted by   on (June 29, 2012, 16:24 GMT)

@GerrardLK who are those 'everyone' ? ALL SRT HATERS ARE STUCK IN THE GANGULY ERA WHERE SRT FAILED. SRT's maiden ton was saving a match in the 4th innings, if you don't know that then you should not make claims about him. Ponting's best 4th innings came in a lost cause in the 3rd ashes test, rest were barely challenging, he RARELY chased 250+ , RARELY faced quality spinners in 4th innings, NONE OF HIS SO CALLED BETTER 4th INNINGS HAVE COME IN SL,INDIA,AND PAK WHERE PITCHES ARE TOUGHEST TO BAT IN LAST INNINGS.

Posted by spiritwithin on (June 29, 2012, 16:22 GMT)

surprising how so many hawks started targeting sachin out of nowhere,a batsman becomes great by playing well consistently for long period of time plus playing well in all the innings be it 1st 2nd 3rd or 4th innings..just 4th innings is not the only indicator to judge a batsman if thats the case then in the above list even Viv Richard,Len Hutton,Lara and many other great batsman r also not in the list,Younis khan is a good batsman but does having 50+ average in 4th innings makes him better than Lara,sachin,Viv etc??answer is definitely no so stop targeting sachin everytime for no reason...

Posted by MasudRUETeee091040 on (June 29, 2012, 16:21 GMT)

It is really very tough to bat at fourth innings.

Posted by   on (June 29, 2012, 16:16 GMT)

@KiwiRocker Also check Lara's avg.against those players you listed. It is downright poor. It is Cronje and Razzaq who troubled SRT and his avg.is not a bad. Inzi was errible against the 'best'NOT listed in the world list , only in the Pakistan list. Inzi wa a BIG UNDERACHIEVER, fans like you feel very proud to overrate those matchwinning tons which are mostly against lower ranked teams.

Posted by spiritwithin on (June 29, 2012, 16:15 GMT)

@KiwiRocker>>Inzemam Ul Haq's 15 centuries resulted in a victory for Pakistan. Tendulya and all his team meats combined together did not win 15 test matches>>not really,sachin has 20centuries in winning cause,if u add dravid,laxman etc and it swells to a number which is beyond any pak batsman,also cricket is a team game and an individual cant win the match alone, bowler wins matches bcoz unless they take 20wkts the team will either lose or draw a match,also Lara had just nine centuries in winning cause whereas Slater had 12 of his 14 centuries in winning cause,does it make Slater a better batsman than Lara??NO..similarly Inzi has 15centuries resulted in victory bcoz pak has bowling lineup to take advantage of if their batsman scores big,when u say sachin averages only 35 against mcgrath,donald & wasim it means only those matches in which he got out to those bowlers i.e if he gave his wicket to other bowler his run wont count,so try to speak sense& dont bring sachin everywhere everytime

Posted by ani. on (June 29, 2012, 15:59 GMT)

news is about younis khan surprising to see members are still discussing about India's 2 whitewashes in last 2 tours ...sachin etc...as if Pakistan team never got whitewashed out side sub Continent .for the record .pakistan holds unique record of facing Four continues whitewashes in the hands of Australia before their last win .. what was pakistan's perforamce in 2 previous tours of england 3-0 loss and 3-1 hardly anything to proud of..

Posted by shooting0987 on (June 29, 2012, 15:07 GMT)

First of all Sachin just play for him self and his centuries he doesn't care if his team wins or loses and second of all Sachin has never scored a triple hundred in tests so it show Younis is better batsman than Sachin in tests Younis is a true match winner unlike Sachin

Posted by CRKS on (June 29, 2012, 15:01 GMT)

@KiwiRocker

why are you giving all wrong information here .sachin has 20 match winning centuries Dravid has 14 . if sachin has 5 hundreds against zim and bangladesh Inzi has 4. all are top players . Don't degrade players.

Posted by   on (June 29, 2012, 14:40 GMT)

Yonus khan should be given credit as he is continuously playing well in test with no other experience batsmans in support with him..You people are talking about tendulkar who was always supported from other end by dravid & laxshan like players ..

Posted by serious-am-i on (June 29, 2012, 14:01 GMT)

ah! another discussion which is a comparison to SRT, looks like you guys don't go beyond it. To have an excellent track record on Indian pitches for the 4th innings is next to impossible when the pitch would be turning square, you need to have lots of luck or a really flat deck to have a good score. If u have a mountain to climb in the 4th innings its because of your own bowlers. Most of the 4th inning centuries usually result in draws or losses, only when a team wins you could call it a match winning knock else you call it a fighting knock period.

Posted by InsideHedge on (June 29, 2012, 13:16 GMT)

So Zaheer Abbas scored only 5.7% of his runs in the 4th inns, Younis has scored 15%. This is an indication of how Pak batting has gone downhill since the 70s, previously they would not be in a position where they needed to score a huge number of runs to either draw or win. Note how Gavaskar appears in this list, again an indication of how he was a lone ranger fighting the cause. Finally, only a fool born in the 80s would rate Younis higher than Zaheer.

Posted by Noball_Specialist on (June 29, 2012, 12:17 GMT)

The lost cause great.

Posted by KiwiRocker- on (June 29, 2012, 11:17 GMT)

Inzemam Ul Haq's 15 centuries resulted in a victory for Pakistan. Tendulya and all his team meats combined together did not win 15 test matches. A prime example of Tendulya being useless in 4th innings was when India lost 8-0 agaisnt England and OZ. This is worse any test playing nation has done in living memory! Two white washes are rare. This article is NOT about centuries winning 4th inning test matches but it is about overall fourth inning performance and Younis Khan is head and shoulders above anyone! Younis Khan scored 83 in last test against SL, now it did not win match for Pakistan but it showed his fighting abilities..When was last time Tendulya did anything? He averages miserable 35 against McGrath, Wasim and Donald! You can not become the best unless you score against the best when it matters...

Posted by GerrardLK on (June 29, 2012, 10:47 GMT)

@mrgupta- Pl don't don't cry mate. I'm sure you guys always try to prove Sachin is the best batsman, unfortunately everyone knows that Sachin is just a match loser & scores runs only for his personal achievement. Let him score a century & you will see India losing the match, but you guys call him 'The God' (lol).

Posted by   on (June 29, 2012, 10:47 GMT)

@getsetgopk: Yea, a match winner who has scored all of his 4 centuries in 4th innings in loses and draws. What a true match winner!

Posted by   on (June 29, 2012, 10:45 GMT)

@GerrardLK: It's better to check facts before speaking nonsense. Tendulkar has scored more than 1500 runs in 4th innings of Tests, only 1 of 3 batsman to do so. He has 3 centuries in 4th innings chases. As for Ponting, he'd be lucky if he finishes his career with an average above 50 with the way he's been playing since 2007.

Posted by   on (June 29, 2012, 10:36 GMT)

@KiwiRocker: Oh, really? How many of Younis Khan's centuries in 4th innings came in wins? ZERO!! All of those centuries came in loses or dull draws on flat subcontinent wickets. He along with Inzamam defines the term 'flat track bully'.

Posted by A-Zee on (June 29, 2012, 10:22 GMT)

The only thing of value is how many of these 4th innings scores resulted in Pakistan either saving or winning a match- my hunch is that despite the total number of runs scored during the 4th innings, Inzi served Pakistan better in that respect- ie his larger 4th innings contributions were more relevant to the match outcome. Would be good to see some stats on that.

Posted by AlbertEinstein on (June 29, 2012, 10:08 GMT)

I still remember Pakistan playing a test match against South Africa having been batted out of the game by A.B de Villiers brilliant 278* and were given a target of around 500 on the 4th innings on a dying pitch. It was obvious that South Africa had sealed the game, but Younis Khan's unbeaten century of several hundred balls ensured that the match -which was a foregone conclusion -was saved in one of the most heroic fashion..........I wonder if Tendulya's CV has even half of that.

Posted by keptalittlelow on (June 29, 2012, 9:25 GMT)

No matter what stats you talk about, the fact remains that Pakistan batting is now one of the poorest among test playing countries and PCB has to find a solution to our batting woes.

Posted by ani. on (June 29, 2012, 8:52 GMT)

interestingly Pakistan has not won any match out of those four 4th innings centuries of younis khan

Posted by hamqad on (June 29, 2012, 7:43 GMT)

mrgupta has raised a very interesting question. I would love for the writer to shed some light on it. i have a strong suspicion that most of younis khan's 1000 odd 4th innings runs came in hopeless situations, similar to his recent innings against Sri lanka.

Posted by getsetgopk on (June 29, 2012, 7:06 GMT)

Take bow Younus Khan! that there is a match winner for you, unlike that over rated Tendulkar that amasses useless runs that only counts for record books decoration not necessarily winning Test Matches.

Posted by mrgupta on (June 29, 2012, 6:53 GMT)

@GerrardLK: You really need to use Statsguru and see for yourself that Sachin has scored 3 centuries (One match winning 103 against Eng) and has scored 2nd highest runs in 4th innings by any batsmen ever, among only 3 batsmen to score more than 1500 runs in 4th innings. FYI Lara has a batting avg of 35 in 4th innings. @KiwiRocker: By the way, how many of Younis's 4th innings centuries have won Pakistan a test match?

Posted by Syed_imran_abbas on (June 29, 2012, 6:34 GMT)

Great Test Batsmen.. wonderfull sportsman.. honest and pride of pakistan

Posted by GerrardLK on (June 29, 2012, 6:27 GMT)

Sachin has not even scored 1000 runs in 4th innings after playing the most no. of test matches of all time & scoring the highest total runs by an individual batsman. That says Sachin cannot handle pressue situations & never proved to be a match winner. There is no argument that Ponting is far away the best batsman of all time.

Posted by KiwiRocker- on (June 29, 2012, 5:28 GMT)

This is yet again an excellent analysis by Rajesh. It confirms number of things. Firstly, Younis Khan is a true match winner. It is a long held belief that 4th innings is one of the toughest tests for any batsman. Reasons are simple as batsmen are either facing a situation to save the test match OR they are chasing a win. Younis Khan has excelled. I am also not surprised to see Inzemam there as he was surely one of the most under rated batsmen. Lets do not forget that 4th inngs also presents a challange when pitch might be taking turn, showing an uneven bounce, wear and tear affecting the players. Real test! I am also not surprised to see that Tendulya is not even close to the top 4th innngs batsmen. He averages a poor 38 runs. It shows that he has neither won, nore saved any test matches when it really mattered. Same applies for flat track bulley Sehwag who is not even on the list. The great S.Gavaskar is on list as he like Younis Khan was a true match winner who scored against best!

Posted by   on (June 29, 2012, 4:17 GMT)

Younis Khan is a fantastic test batsman.....no discredit to his performance.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
S RajeshClose
S Rajesh Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.

'Brilliant at keeping the good balls away'

Modern Masters: Rahul Dravid and Sanjay Manjrekar discuss Steve Waugh's adaptability

    'I'd like the World Cup to be shared if the final is tied'

Bowl at Boycs: Geoff Boycott on the Super Over, and how England will do in Sri Lanka

    Give cricket's best brains a say in the game's future

Mark Nicholas: What if former players, broadcasters, journalists etc pool their ideas and present them to the ICC?

    'I'm a bit disappointed not to get that Test average up to 50'

Mahela Jayawardene reflects on his Test career, and the gap between international and club cricket in Sri Lanka

Fix the West Indies problem once and for all

Roger Sawh: Enough has been said about West Indies' countless player-board sagas. Just find a solution already

News | Features Last 7 days

The costliest drop in ODIs

Plays of the day from the fourth ODI between India and Sri Lanka in Kolkata

Contrite Kohli, apoplectic Kohli, and a Dhoni impersonator

Plays of the day from the fifth ODI in Ranchi

'I don't blame Arjuna for my early retirement'

Former Sri Lanka batsman Asanka Gurusinha talks about playing and coaching in Australia, and tactics during the 1996 World Cup

Pakistan should not welcome Amir back

The serene team culture cultivated by Misbah and his men shouldn't be allowed to be disrupted by a player with a tainted past

Rohit or Rahane for overseas opener?

Rohit Sharma has been outstanding as an opener in home ODIs, but his overseas numbers don't look quite as good

News | Features Last 7 days