November 19, 2012

The bowler who wiped the smile off batsmen's faces

Waqar Younis made a young English fan believe that the opposition could be dismissed in the space of balls, not days

A good deal of my formative cricket-watching took place in the nineties, and an England supporter needed one quality more than any other during this time: blind optimism. Blind optimism was how you managed to endure your favourite sport. You needed hope that there could be more to cricket than a slow, predictable slog to a long-foreseen conclusion, and more specifically, you needed hope that the opposition's 200 for 0 could become 250 all out. Waqar Younis gave me that hope.

I first became aware of Waqar in 1991, in that most old-fashioned way - by looking in the paper. I was only 13 and I didn't exactly read the paper - I just looked at the scorecards and the averages. I always read the bowling averages from the bottom up, saving the best until last. The averages slowly descended by fractions of a run, then suddenly, right at the business end of the table, there was a massive drop. Attached to this ludicrously low bowling average was always the same exotic name: Waqar Younis (Surrey).

Waqar took 113 Championship wickets at 14.36 that year, but I didn't see him play once, which only added to the sense of mystery. My team, Lancashire, had Wasim Akram. I'd seen him and he was awe-inspiring. What the hell could Waqar do that was even better? When Pakistan toured England in 1992, I found out.

That series didn't start with a bang, largely because Waqar was only just returning to action following the small matter of a broken back. In the first Test, he was understandably cautious and the match was drawn. Pakistan won the second Test and he got a five-wicket haul, but it wasn't until the fourth Test, at Headingley, that he created the small shred of hope that was to falsely sustain me for the next ten years.

England actually won the Test, but little things like that don't matter a jot. England were 270 for 1 in their first innings, already 73 ahead, when Aaqib Javed dismissed Robin Smith. At this point Pakistan unleashed Waqar, who had taken no wickets and conceded over a hundred runs. Bowling obscenely fast, he took 5 for 13 in 38 balls and England were all out for 320. Three batsmen were bowled and two unfortunates endured the not-uncommon physical pain of being dismissed lbw Waqar Younis. England had fielded a horses-for-courses attack of Chris Lewis, Neil Mallender, Derek Pringle and Tim Munton. Waqar came on first change.

With just a cursory look, the most striking batting collapses are those when a whole side's been bowled out for double figures. What Waqar did was create batting collapses where none should have occurred. How many times during that largely miserable decade did I watch English seamers potter in under a clear blue sky and think to myself, "If we could get a quick seven wickets, we'd be right back in this"? Waqar Younis showed me that, actually, this wasn't a totally delusional line of thinking, and he therefore gave me the priceless gift of mindless optimism.

It was a virtually unstoppable delivery, and one of Waqar's greatest strengths was that he acknowledged that fact and was perfectly happy to bowl it again and again and again, where other bowlers might have held it in reserve as a surprise weapon

Yet watching Mark Taylor, Michael Slater and David Boon all hit hundreds in the same innings before Mark Waugh "fails" with 99 does more than just create a desperate longing for a bowler who's at his best with the old ball on a dry day. It also creates a pretty deep-seated loathing of batsmen in general. If you've spent whole days watching them gambol about without a care in the world, waving their bats to the crowd with smiles plastered across their smug little faces, then you want to see them knocked down a peg or 40. You want to see their precious stumps spread from third man to fine leg, and you want them to be lying on the ground, not knowing what happened, with their dignity in tatters, when it happens. I don't enjoy seeing batsmen hurt, but the occasional broken toe was collateral damage in an ongoing war.

International batsmen generally have half-decent balance, but the Waqar Younis inswinging yorker made fools of them all. Given a choice between losing their toes or losing their dignity, most batsmen opted for falling flat on their face, a position from where they could better hear their middle and leg stumps going their separate ways. Where Wasim was an expert lock pick with a wide array of tools at his disposal, Waqar just burst through doors with a battering ram so immense he could just as easily have gone through the wall. Wasim could do a million and one devious things with a cricket ball, but Waqar essentially just did one. And he only needed to do one. The Waqar Younis reverse-swinging yorker might just be the most destructive delivery in the history of cricket.

Maybe all of this is painting him as one-dimensional, but it was that yorker that grabbed me when I finally got to see him bowl, and it was that yorker that largely explains his phenomenal ability to run through a batting order in the time it took a dismissed opening batsman to say, "Mind your toes." Delivered with a different, more round-arm action to the one he used when opening the bowling, it was a virtually unstoppable delivery, and one of Waqar's greatest strengths was that he acknowledged that fact and was perfectly happy to bowl it again and again and again, where other bowlers might have held it in reserve as a surprise weapon. It didn't need to be a surprise, because knowing what was coming simply didn't help the batsman all that much.

Waqar Younis cemented my enduring love for bowlers over batsmen. When batsmen are on top, the game develops. When bowlers are on top, the game changes, and it only takes a handful of searing inswingers to turn a match. By applying such mindless optimism whenever England were getting the runaround in the field, I managed to watch far more cricket than I should have done and got hooked on a wonderful game that was trying its damnedest to drive me away.

This article first appeared in the Cricketer magazine. Subscribe here

Alex Bowden blogs at King Cricket

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Dummy4 on November 22, 2012, 16:33 GMT

    i cant forget the roarrrrrrrrrrr of the crowd which would get louder and louder once waqar started running towards the pitch..never ever the public got bored..that roarrrrrrrrr remained their forever as long as waqar bowled..i never heard that roar in any other bowlers like wasim or was that run-up and the skills that brought enthusiasm in the crowds

  • Jonathan on November 21, 2012, 14:32 GMT

    Part II: Such was the aura of these fine battle-hardened warriors that, there was no "New kid on the block" feeling about them even at their career beginning. It was sad to see Waqa getting injured hence losing speed but what it worth's it was amazing to see him bowling the first three or four years before injury. Post injury sometime he seemed to be a shadow of himself but still had the venom left in him for some sporadic joyous occasions for the crowd who loves their fast bowlers. In the end I want to give a standing ovation and say many thanks to both the fine craftsmen - for giving the spectacular views, which would be hard to come by even in future - especially Waqa as he bowled his heart out in batsmen favoring era while Marshall had other fearsome partners in crime to keep constant pressure on batsmen in more even if not conducive era for bowling.

  • Jonathan on November 21, 2012, 14:30 GMT

    Part I: Since the 70s, no other bowlers has their career taken off as Maco & Waqa and by saying that I don't mean their debut. They both were head & shoulder above the rest of very fine bowlers around them. Both had the air full of unflinching confidence about them. Even when wicket seems hard to come by their way, they still looked aggressive, imposing, intimidating to the very fine batsmen. Both were belligerent not by mouth but by their craftsmanship. Their glorious run-up especially Waqar's gave away some anxiety to the spectators, as they always anticipated booming deliveries blasting wickets out of the ground splitting them in half. Quite a few times the furniture would be disturb yards above & away from their footing. Waqar's LBWs were not any less spectacular then his Clean Ups. Pound for pound, stone for stone Maco & Waqa was the best in business.

  • Anwar on November 21, 2012, 13:34 GMT

    that belief of being in game even in worst situations due to W's..... good old days....... hope we can half someone half as good now :(

  • abdul on November 21, 2012, 0:52 GMT

    @cricindia208 fast bowling needs guts and glory where you come from fast bowling is unheard of your india still has to produce bowlers like Afridi whose leg break is faster then any of your mediocre bowlers.

  • david on November 21, 2012, 0:43 GMT

    @traveler yeah i remember Waqar sustained a back injury before that kolkata test its not surprising in a place like india where pitches are dead as dead you will put extra pace in to get some result of course you will get hurt no wonder why india have'nt produced any quick bowler, afridi's leg break is probably faster then any indian bowler, btw is'nt this same shoaib akhtar who made the batting god shiver in his legs?

  • Zam on November 20, 2012, 19:18 GMT

    @CricIndia208, Wasim and Waqar were a an awesome twosome and though i'm Indian I still rate this pair as the best in history. Actually I had said so back in the 90s but was actually scoffed at by my uncles and cousins, but back then there wasn't any cricinfo or internet to verify or compare. But now its all there - the stats, I mean. Pakistan also won the 1999 Test series in India. Actually it was three tests but then the last was later cut out from this series and made a one-off for the Asian test championship. But nevertheless their team did win it. @ criclover 1969, i recall that match. Was actually in Bangalore when it all happened. Can say the backfoot six by Jadeja was marvellous, but that is perhaps a rare occasion when somebody could hit somthing like that and not a frequent event. Give due credit mate.

  • Santosh on November 20, 2012, 19:14 GMT

    Waqar has better record than Wasim in ODI's and Tests.

  • Stark on November 20, 2012, 17:21 GMT

    A legend of the game and most definitely underrated!!

  • Arosha on November 20, 2012, 16:27 GMT

    @"Jstreeter on (November 19 2012, 15:40 PM GMT) ": Yes, if anyone had seen Waqar during 1990-1994 era, he was the world's fastest available bowler by then. That had been the common acceptance by then, his pace was through the air, that's why even on some dead tracks like what we see here in the sub continent, he could simply go flatout fast. Donald was being constant mentioned as the fastest of the white bowlers, not the fastest in the world. Ian Bishop in early 90s generated some serioud pace, but due to the fitness issues etc. he couldn't maintain the same pace thereafter. But I do believe both Aktar & Lee at their peak were 5+ kmph faster than waqar at his peak, both Aktar & Lee operated around 155-160 kmph at their peak. But Waqar's trajectory at his peak (1990-1994) was much more deceptive, so that coupled with 150 kmph speed was something quite serious. He was certainly not like a few of those bowlers availble today who'd operate in 140 kmph & on their best day would reach 150.

  • No featured comments at the moment.