Ian Chappell
Ian Chappell Ian ChappellRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Former Australia captain, now a cricket commentator and columnist

Sehwag must resist middle-order temptation

His request to move down the order may not necessarily be beneficial for him or the team

Ian Chappell

September 22, 2013

Comments: 65 | Text size: A | A

Virender Sehwag hits out during his 38 off 33, India v New Zealand, 2nd Test, Bangalore, 4th day, September 3, 2012
Much of Virender Sehwag's aura as a batsman is bound up in his aggressive approach, which a move down the order would probably diminish © Associated Press
Enlarge

Despite his early history as a middle-order batsman, Virender Sehwag's request to finish his career there, rather than opening, may not necessarily be beneficial for him or the team.

For starters, Sehwag is ignoring his own advice. He once told the dashing young Australian opener David Warner he would eventually become a better Test player than a T20 batsman. Warner, playing for the aptly named Delhi Daredevils, seemed surprised at the suggestion and asked for his reasoning. "Because," replied Sehwag, "in a Test match the field is 'up' for the new ball and there are plenty of gaps to hit through."

That situation also means there are fewer infielders in position to take catches, and for a player like Sehwag, who hits the ball in the air regularly, that's a major consideration.

Then there's the not-so-minor matter of Sehwag setting the pattern of play at the top of the order. When you come in lower down, the rhythm of the innings is already established, and with a few wickets down, a batsman's approach may need to alter. He no longer starts on an equal footing with the bowlers.

Take the way Sehwag plays spinners, for example. In the past he has shown little respect for spinners and, upon their introduction, he has set about trying to drive them into oblivion via the farthest reaches of the grandstand. As an opener, when he has already pummelled the faster bowlers for a quick-fire 60 and got the team off to a flying start, Sehwag is afforded some leniency when he then holes out in the deep.

However, when Sehwag is dismissed in the middle order for a low score and sets off a batting collapse by attempting an outlandish onslaught on a spinner, it's likely to test the selectors' patience.

Sehwag will have to take these and other matters, like having to wait to bat, into account if he returns to the middle order. Nevertheless, the most important aspect of any experienced player looking to slide down the order is his mental state; such a request is generally an admission the player is starting to have misgivings.

Ricky Ponting made that mistake late in his career and his move was only minor, going from No. 3 to No. 4. Nevertheless, it was a major move mentally and sent a signal to the opposition that Ponting, for so long a dominant batsman, was feeling vulnerable.

 
 
The most important aspect of any experienced player looking to slide down the order is his mental state; such a request is generally an admission the player is starting to have misgivings
 

Like for Ponting, much of Sehwag's aura as a batsman is bound up in his aggressive approach to the bowling. Once that is diminished with a move down the order it's like being a wounded animal; the predators smell blood.

Sachin Tendulkar, on the other hand, has never wavered; he has batted at No. 4 for the bulk of his career and has remained resolute in not moving lower down the order. In his mind he's a No. 4 and that's the way he wants to finish his career.

Part of being a long-term Test player is knowing where you want to bat. The captain may not always see things the same way, but a batsman must be clear in his own mind what position he thinks suits him best. The Australian selectors of the time had the misguided idea that I should open, and skipper Bill Lawry asked me for my thoughts. I replied: "Bill, you're the captain and if you tell me I'm opening then I'll do it, but if you're asking for my preference then it's to bat at three." In my mind I was a No. 3 and I wanted to remain in that position until I retired.

There have been suggestions that India will need some experience in the middle order when Tendulkar retires, and that Sehwag may provide the answer. India already have plenty of talent and not inconsiderable experience in Murali Vijay, Shikhar Dhawan, Cheteshwar Pujara and Virat Kohli.

That makes a strong top four when Tendulkar decides to retire. To then replace a middle-order player in his 40s with one in his mid-30s, who is struggling as an opener, doesn't sound like a progressive move.

Former Australia captain Ian Chappell is now a cricket commentator for Channel 9, and a columnist

RSS Feeds: Ian Chappell

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (September 25, 2013, 16:23 GMT)

Nobody from the Now Left Out Or Struggling Members Of The Team Deserves and Demand A Respectable Comeback Than The Maverick & Charismatic YUVRAJ SINGH. No Doubt KAPIL Won Us The 1st World Cup But Would That Have Been Possible Without MOHINDER AMARNATH. Likewise DHONI Conquered It Again for Ur Homeland But Would That Have Imagined Without YUVRAJ. Its A Payback Time And Definitely The Right Time To Acknowledge Our WARRIOR PRINCE Enjoys A Long Run In Tests. If He Had A Temperament To force Us In Conquering The Game He Definitely Has In Him To Guide Our Youngsters In The Era When The final Wicket Of The 'FAMOUS 4' Falls. He Has Been Understudy To All Of These 4 Since Long And Has Proved Himself Again And Again As Their Trusted Lieutenant. With Him Re-inventing Himself Proves His Desire And His Attitude Towards The Game. A Fighter By Attitude (Remember His Catch In His Debut Series) .. He Has Lived Upto It Till Date. Reflexes Gone .. The Heart & The Attitude Still Stick To Him !!! WHY ???

Posted by andrew27994 on (September 24, 2013, 11:32 GMT)

The reason I still think Sehwag has it in him to make a strong comeback is because of his fearlessness. Even if India are 40/4 and struggling he might be very capable of a counter-attack and get India to a comfortable position, say 200-6. MS Dhoni had so many critics regarding his batting in Tests but he has silenced his critics by playing his natural game. No more does he look tentative with the moving ball and plays to his strength and limitations.

Posted by andrew27994 on (September 24, 2013, 11:27 GMT)

Sehwag has all the talent in the world to make a comeback. He has been a far better player of spin than most Indian batsmen. Eg :- His 201* against SL in Galle while the rest of the batsmen fell apart by the "mystery spinner" Mendis. I think the ideal spot for him would be at No.4/ No.5

Posted by   on (September 24, 2013, 0:43 GMT)

Yeah he wants an easy served dish, let him play in middle order in few First class matches, I bet he will soon demand to play as a tail-ender.

Posted by nyc_missile on (September 24, 2013, 0:27 GMT)

A nice one by Ian but Sehwag's problem is existential..the ONLY spot he can fit in now is in middle order. So its almost a courtesy if selectors do pick him there coz as an opener he's had far too many failures to be even considered esp since Dhawan and Rohit are starting to be a solid,reliable pair. I still can't trust Vijay abroad we need Rohit there to stabilize the inns just like he did in WI. And since it would be unfair and ridiculous to just pick him for ODIs and dump him in tests,selectors should see him as a long-term option for both formats.But Sehwag's importance in middle order is being under-estimated..after SRT retires (hopefully soon) Viru will have a role to play in balancing a young but talented middle order. Dhawan Rohit Pujara Kohli Sehwag Tiwary Rahane will make a formidable batting unit with a bit of experience shielding the rollicking young guns!

Posted by akpy on (September 24, 2013, 0:00 GMT)

IC should resist writing or commenting about indian cricket

Posted by ProdigyA on (September 23, 2013, 18:55 GMT)

The current openers Vijay and Dhawan have done a good job so far and deserve to get a long shot. Even if there is any problem, Rohit is also there as an alternative. So either Sehwag, has to wait or give him a shot in the middle order. We have seen in thast few years, he has been a big flop at the top so taking him there again at the expense of the current openers is not fair. I think if he gets a chance, then it should be in the middle order as a last chance before he is dropped forever.

Posted by Temuzin on (September 23, 2013, 17:29 GMT)

Good article but sehwag should get first in the team. It is highly unlikey that either he or gambhir will be able to get in. Youngsters have all cemented their places. Only Yuvraj may be able to be in at no.6 in current team.

Posted by   on (September 23, 2013, 17:08 GMT)

I think major concern is Sehwag's fielding. Even if he come out of batting form, he should be aiming for one of top 5 fielders in the side. A batsman should not be a liability if he fails in the batting. That is the reason the 30+ players like Robin Singh, Dilshan, Ponting or Afridi had better chances of coming back/staying in team even when they had lean patch in batting. It is always how much add value a player can give to the team - which indirectly affects his form and confidence. Good luck Sehwag.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Ian ChappellClose
Ian Chappell Widely regarded as the best Australian captain of the last 50 years, Ian Chappell moulded a team in his image: tough, positive, and fearless. Even though Chappell sometimes risked defeat playing for a win, Australia did not lose a Test series under him between 1971 and 1975. He was an aggressive batsman himself, always ready to hook a bouncer and unafraid to use his feet against the spinners. In 1977 he played a lead role in the defection of a number of Australian players to Kerry Packer's World Series Cricket, which did not endear him to the administrators, who he regarded with contempt in any case. After retirement, he made an easy switch to television, where he has come to be known as a trenchant and fiercely independent voice.

'Gilchrist always looked to take on the spinners'

Modern Masters: Rahul Dravid and Sanjay Manjrekar discuss Adam Gilchrist's adaptability

    'It's up to the WICB to win the players over'

Bowl at Boycs: Geoffrey Boycott talks about the troubles in West Indian cricket, Steven Smith's recent catch against Pakistan, and fast bowling in India

    No time for India and West Indies to squabble

Mark Nicholas: Why the BCCI should use a carrot, not a stick, in its approach to the WICB

    'When I became an umpire, I didn't realise how complicated this game was'

Peter Willey on suiting up against '80s West Indies, and umpiring in England

All hail the Phantom

Bill Lawry was a technically correct opener who took on some of the best fast bowlers with distinction over a ten-year career. By Stuart Wark

News | Features Last 7 days

How India weeds out its suspect actions

The BCCI set up a three-man committee to tackle the problem of chucking at age-group and domestic cricket, and it has produced significant results in five years

A rock, a hard place and the WICB

The board's latest standoff with its players has had embarrassing consequences internationally, so any resolution now needs to be approached thoughtfully

Twin Asian challenges await Australia

What Australia have not done since returning a fractured unit from India is head back to Asia to play an Asian team. Two of their major weaknesses - handling spin and reverse swing - will be tested in the UAE by Pakistan

Kohli back to old habits

Stats highlights from the fourth ODI between India and West Indies in Dharamsala

West Indies go AWOL

West Indies may have formally played the fourth ODI in Dharamsala but their fielding suggested their minds were already on the flight back home

News | Features Last 7 days