Aakash Chopra
The Insider The InsiderRSS FeedFeeds
Aakash Chopra looks at various aspects of cricket from a player's perspective

What Mitch does

Johnson has picked up his pace, and his bounce and late movement have got batsmen wary too

Aakash Chopra

October 28, 2013

Comments: 44 | Text size: A | A

Hashim Amla took a blow on the helmet from Mitchell Johnson, South Africa v Australia, 3rd ODI, Durban, October 28, 2011
Mitchell Johnson's action makes it difficult for batsmen to gauge the bounce he will generate after pitching © Getty Images
Related Links
Rob Steen : Harder to get to the top or to stay there?
Players/Officials: Mitchell Johnson
Series/Tournaments: Australia tour of India
Teams: Australia

The bowler runs in hard, sends down a bouncer and makes the batsman hop and duck. With his feet in the air from the hop, and his head tucked into his chest from the attempt at ducking, he manages to stay away from the line of the ball. The wicketkeeper, standing close to the 30-yard circle, makes a futile attempt to get an outstretched hand to the ball, which thuds into the sightscreen after bouncing once inside the rope.

The bowler is Mitchell Johnson and the batsman Sanju Samson during a Champions League match in Jaipur.

The sight of a fast bowler making a batsman hop gets you to sit up and watch intently. And if the bowler makes some of the best batsmen in the world duck and sway on docile Indian pitches, you hold your breath in anticipation whenever that bowler runs in to bowl.

It's evident that Johnson has picked up his pace over the last year. And while the pace is visibly upsetting batsmen, the late inward movement into right-handers, and the bounce, are also playing havoc.

In the ODI series against India, Johnson has troubled the Indian batsmen with that extra bounce and pace, on pitches where totals of 300-plus have been par for the course. It's not that the Indians haven't faced this kind of pace or bounce; on the contrary, they have played it with authority and even dominated it in the past. But Johnson is a slightly different proposition.

He isn't the typical left-arm fast bowler who bowls with a high-arm action and relies mostly on exploiting the natural angle lefties create while bowling to right-handers. His bowling arm is some distance away from his left ear, and that makes it difficult for batsmen to gauge the bounce he will generate after pitching.

For bowlers with high-arm actions, the bounce off the surface is directly related to their point of release, which makes for a certain predictability. But with bowlers who have a slinging action, it's relatively difficult to assess how much bounce they'll get after pitching. Such bowlers skid the ball off the surface, unlike the ones with high-arm actions. When you bowl with a high-arm action the bounce you get is like that you get when a tennis ball bounces on a dry surface, and with a slingy action it's a bit like the bounce of a plastic ball on a wet surface.

Have you ever tried making a stone skip on water? The lower the arm while throwing, the more times the stone bounces off the surface of the water. Another key difference with regard to bounce is the trajectory of the ball after pitching - for bowlers with a high-arm action, the ball gains considerable height right after pitching, but for someone with a round-arm action, the path is more gradual, similar to an airplane taking off: it's not easy to gauge when the ball has reached the peak of its bounce. (This is why even wicketkeepers don't know how far back they should stand.)

A round-arm action puts severe pressure on the lower back and hips, which could lead to serious injuries. Mitchell Johnson's impact comes with a disclaimer: try to imitate it at your own peril

Then there's the small matter of whether the ball lands on the seam or on the shine. If it lands on the seam, it bounces considerably more than it would if it lands on the leather. When a bowler delivers with a round-arm action, even he can't be 100% sure of making the ball land on the seam, so what chance does the poor batsman have?

Johnson's natural bowling action is designed to make the ball curve in to the right-hand batsman, and when he's on top of his game (he has been there and thereabouts in this series), the ball comes in sharply. While the ball that moves laterally creates its own challenges - the batsman must not commit, must play close to the body and in the second line - in Johnson's case the ones that don't move create similar problems as well.

Given his round-arm action, which makes the ball curve in mostly, batsmen tend to play inside the line most times, so the ones that hold their line and go across cause trouble. When the ball doesn't come out right from Johnson's hand, it doesn't swing, and carries on across and away from the right-hander. Also, even when it comes out right, if Johnson has started a little too far outside off, the ball doesn't swing, and carries on across the right-hander. There's a thin line outside the right-hander's off stump that the bowler must stay within to make the ball curve in effectively. Johnson inadvertently crosses that line from time to time, keeping the batsman guessing.

Won't rookies be tempted to start out bowling with a round-arm, slingy action, given the obvious benefits of doing so? My advice in this regard is that it's important to know the flip side of such an action before taking the plunge. We only hear about the ones who have fought the odds and reached the top. It's important to know the rules to break them. Many bowlers with similar actions have ended up with severe back problems. A round-arm action puts severe pressure on the lower back and hips, which could lead to serious injuries. Also, it's not easy to be accurate regularly with such an action. Mitchell Johnson's impact comes with a disclaimer: try to imitate it at your own peril.

Former India opener Aakash Chopra is the author of Out of the Blue, an account of Rajasthan's 2010-11 Ranji Trophy victory. His website is here and his Twitter feed here

RSS Feeds: Aakash Chopra

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by vik56in on (October 29, 2013, 20:03 GMT)

Mitch is the fastest bowler on the planet at the moment !

Posted by Front-Foot-Sponge on (October 29, 2013, 15:55 GMT)

I hate stats but why are people complaining about Johnson's average? It's the same as Anderson's and Broad's and you keep telling us how amazing they are. Johnson is the only one of the three that can really rough up a batsman and he has done it to far better players than the England ones coming for a visit.

Posted by Amit_13 on (October 29, 2013, 14:04 GMT)

Some of your articles are quite fascinating Akash. Sadly, this isn't one of them. I am a left armer as well and I would have liked to know of the skill. All you've done is that you have unpicked piece by piece what his natural action is.

No one can deny that an action comes naturally to a bowler. We just spend entire lives learning about it and increasing the efficiency of it. If an action could be learned, we would have had two bowlers with atleast similar actions, if not the same. Hence the focus on learning the skill of making it international grade. If you consider there are only a handful of people who can hurl the ball at 90mph or above out of 7 billion, they surely know something we don't.

Posted by Front-Foot-Sponge on (October 29, 2013, 12:52 GMT)

Johnson is capable of seriously troubling any batsman in the world and has a nice collection of broken batsman and bones to boot. Mock him for sure England supporters but you wouldn't want to face him would you? Anderson takes a few wickets but no one loses any sleep over him. Johnson is pretty much the most threatening bowler going at the moment.

Posted by   on (October 29, 2013, 12:28 GMT)

Johnson has been a different bowler since shortening his run up. He hasn't sacrificed pace as a result of the change, and hasn't been out with injury. I would love to watch him run in during the Ashes; whatever happens would be interesting, if not necessarily good for Australia.

Posted by espncricinfomobile on (October 29, 2013, 11:56 GMT)

I would love to bowl in tandem with Mitchy as we are twins when it comes to the game of cricket. I'm sure we would be able to scare other teams if we managed to get the ball in the right spot all the time

Posted by Bonehead_maz on (October 29, 2013, 10:13 GMT)

@ Clavers on (October 28, 2013, 20:18 GMT) hehe, yeah, I know...... I was impressed, and it's well less than a year ago. Numbers wise Johnson is just a little superior to Broad over all. Somehow the latter's inconsistencies don't get pilloried as much. "Bowls short all the time with very little might ....... "etc LMAO

Posted by OneEyedAussie on (October 29, 2013, 3:03 GMT)

@ xtrafalgarx on (October 28, 2013, 12:37 GMT) : I agree with your comments. Side-by-side it is hard to tell Johnson's record from Brett Lee's. The difficulty with being that kind of bowler is that when it doesn't come off 0-180 off 40 overs tends to look pretty awful. Lee also had the benefit of having McGrath and Gillespie at the other end for most of his career - a luxury Johnson doesn't have and almost certainly never will. It may keep him out of the test team for good.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Aakash ChopraClose
Aakash Chopra Aakash Chopra is the 245th Indian to represent India in Test cricket. A batsman in the traditional mould, he played 10 Tests for India in 2003-04, and has played over 120 first-class matches. He currently plays for Delhi in the Ranji Trophy; his book Beyond the Blues was an account of the 2007-08 season. Chopra made a formidable opening combination with Virender Sehwag, which was believed to be one of the reasons for India's success in Australia and Pakistan in 2003-04. He is considered one of the best close-in fielders India has produced after Eknath Solkar.

    Ronchi's blitz, and remarkable ODI recoveries

Ask Steven: Also, the fastest ODI 150s, and the highest Test totals without a half-century

    Penalty runs the best punishment for slow over rates

Ashley Mallett: Fines and suspensions have had no effect. Awarding the opposition runs for every over a team falls short in a Test innings will definitely bite harder

    Pietersen stars in his own muppet show

David Hopps: His rubbishing of many aspiring English county professionals brings to mind the belief of Miss Piggy that "there is no one in the world to compare with moi"

    How to construct an ODI chase

Michael Bevan: Focus on targets smaller than winning the match, and back your tailenders to deliver for you

The many crickets of an Indian boyhood

Sankaran Krishna: Growing up in India, you play a number of varieties of the game, each developing a certain skill

News | Features Last 7 days

Kohli at No. 4 - defensive or practical?

It seems Virat Kohli is to not bat before the 12th or 13th over to strengthen the middle and the lower middle order. It suggests a lack of confidence in what was supposed to be India's strength in their title defence: their batting

Open with Rohit and Binny, with Kohli at No. 3

India's batting is going the way of their bowling in Australia, and they need get their order sorted before the World Cup

Off-stump blues leave Dhawan flailing

The out-of-form Shikhar Dhawan still has the backing of his captain, but there's no denying his slump has arrived at an inconvenient time for India and his technical issues have to be sorted out before they attempt to defend the World Cup

On TV it looks uglier than it actually is

Often reasonable arguments on the field look nasty beyond the boundary and on camera

'Teams can't have set formula' - Dravid

In the first episode of Contenders, a special ten-part buildup to the 2015 World Cup, Rahul Dravid and Graeme Smith discuss the impact of local conditions on team compositions and the issues surrounding the format of the tournament

News | Features Last 7 days