Rewind to Rewind toRSS FeedFeeds


Playing two Tests in a day

In the first month of 1930 England found themselves playing simultaneous Test series in New Zealand and the Caribbean

Martin Williamson

February 1, 2014

Comments: 6 | Text size: A | A

The advance guard of the England  team heading to the Caribbean, Paddington Station, September 28, 1929
Heading west... the advance guard of the England team at Paddington Station as they set off for the Caribbean © ESPNcricinfo Ltd

Unforgiving scheduling of international cricket is an almost ever-present complaint in the modern game, with players scrambling around the world to fulfil often ill-planned and unwanted commitments. But in January 1930 England managed to do something that never happened before or since - they agreed to play two Tests on opposite sides of the world on the same day.

In the 1920s the Imperial Cricket Conference - the forerunner of the modern International Cricket Council - recognised the need to expand Test cricket outside England, Australia and South Africa. At a meeting in May 1926 West Indies and New Zealand were elected to the ICC, making them eligible to play Tests.

West Indies made their Test debut in England in 1928. It was an inauspicious start - they lost all three three-day Tests and were largely outplayed - but they had displayed their huge potential on a series of reciprocal tours in the decade before.

The MCC, who governed English cricket and sent sides abroad (until 1977 Tests overseas were officially played by the MCC and not England) realised that it was important to send a representative team to the Caribbean to help further promote the game there. While there had been several tours by strong sides from England, none had featured official Tests.

New Zealand had also hosted many England sides - although much stronger ones - who traditionally visited at the end of the Ashes series in Australia. It provided a perfect and convivial low-key conclusion to an intense tour and allowed locals to watch - and play against - top cricketers.

The MCC wanted to send sides to both new countries as soon as possible but had to work around already-agreed series in Australia (1928-29 and 1932-33) and South Africa (1930-31). Those were both long tours, with players who went to Australia away from home from September to April. Few amateurs wanted to do back-to-back tours - even if they could afford the time away - and even then the administrators acknowledged the need for the leading talent to be rested.

Doubling up

Frank Woolley with his wife and daughter  as he sets off on tour to New Zealand, St Pancras Station, London, September 29, 1929
Frank Woolley bids farewell to his family. He did not arrive back home for six months
© ESPNcricinfo Ltd
  • On January 11, 1930 history was made when 8700 miles apart in Christchurch and Bridgetown two England sides took to the field on the same day. That has not happened again since that series and is almost certain never to happen again.
  • But when were the Englands actually in action simultaneously? The second day of the Test in New Zealand on January 11 was washed out and in both matches the next day, a Sunday, was a rest day. Because of that, play in Christchurch on Monday, January 13, would have been over by the time the second day started in Barbados.
  • The sides were not scheduled to play a Test at the same time again so that might have been that but for the Auckland washout. That meant that the third Test in Georgetown and the fourth Test at Eden Park both started on February 21.
  • The time differences meant that it was not until the second day in New Zealand - February 22, 1930 - that the start of play coincided with the last session of the first day's play in the Caribbean (where it was still February 21!) . With February 23 a Sunday, the final day in Auckland on the Monday would have coincided with the rest day in Guyana.
  • So thanks to time differences and weather, two England sides were simultaneously in action for less than two hours.

The decision was taken to send sides to both West Indies and New Zealand in 1929-30. For New Zealand, especially, the fact that an English team was touring in its own right and not as an add-on to an Ashes series was acknowledgement they had joined the ranks of the Test elite.

The problem those picking the sides had was that none of the first-choice amateurs or professionals were interested straight after an Ashes tour.

Arthur Gilligan, the England captain, withdrew on health grounds and so his older brother, the 34-year-old Harold, was appointed captain for the New Zealand tour. Harold was in his final year as a first-class cricketer and had never played for England; he had only captained Sussex for the first time in 1929. There was a feeling it was a reward for his services to the game, but it was an astute choice. Wisden noted; "He proved himself not only an astute captain but also a diplomat of considerable ability. His charming and likeable personality was, in large measure, responsible for this tour being remembered to this day with affection by many New Zealanders."

The 14-man squad he took with him was decent but aside from the 42-year-old Frank Woolley, there was scant international pedigree. Only four others had played for England before - KS Duleepsinhji, Ted Bowley, Fred Barratt and Geoffrey Legge - and even then all had just the one cap to their name, three of the four having debuted the previous summer.

The squad for the Caribbean was, deliberately, of a better quality as it was recognised West Indies would be a tougher opposition. Even then, it was heavy on experience although that was countered with a slightly pioneering approach. "A special effort is evidently being made to take a most attractive side," wrote the Daily Mirror the previous July, "and cricket spectators there will have the opportunity of seeing several of our grandest veterans."

The one in most demand was Jack Hobbs, so much so that representatives of the Jamaican board travelled to London in June 1929 to try to persuade him to tour. But he would have been 47 by the time the trip started and the England selectors wanted to rest him ahead of the 1930 Ashes series.

The comment about the tourists including "veterans" was no understatement. George Gunn, 51, had last played for England in 1912; Nigel Haig, 42, in 1921; Jack O'Connor, 32, had made his debut the previous summer; Ewart Astill, 41, in 1928; Andrew Sandham, 39, in 1925; and Ronald Stanyforth, 38, in 1927 when he led England to South Africa despite never having played a County Championship match.

Patsy Hendren was 40 but was still a regular in the England side and had enjoyed a good series in Australia the previous year. Taking him to bolster the batting proved a wise decision. He scored four double-hundreds on the tour and averaged 115.50 in the Tests.

The grandest of them all was Wilfred Rhodes at 52. He had made his debut for England in the previous century and, aside from one fairytale recall to help win the Ashes in 1926, had not played for England since 1921. Only Bill Voce (20), Les Ames (24) Leslie Townsend (26), Bob Wyatt (28) and Greville Stevens (29) were under 30.

Leading them was the comparatively youthful Freddie Calthorpe. At 39, like Gilligan, he had never played for England - and never did again - but was an amateur and had the diplomatic skills to handle the trip. He also knew the region as he had led an MCC side there in 1922.

Age shall not weary them

Wilfred Rhodes, June 2, 1919
Wilfred Rhodes
© PA Photos
  • On April 12, 1930, the last scheduled day of the final Test, Wilfred Rhodes was 52 years and 165 days old, the oldest man ever to play Test cricket. George Gunn was 50 years 303 days, the fourth oldest
  • The average age of the England side at the start of the Kingston Test was 37 years 188 days, the highest in Tests
  • The top four oldest Test teams of all times are held by England in the four Tests in this series - Bill Voce (20) and Rhodes played in all four, and the gap between them of 21 years 283 days is another record
  • Andrew Sandham remains the oldest man to score a Test triple hundred (39 years 271 days at the start of the Kingston Test)

England played four Tests in the Caribbean. The first - and West Indies' first Test on home soil - was drawn, England won the second, West Indies the third and then came the historic fourth at Sabina Park.

The ten- day "Timeless Test" at Durban in 1938-39 has gone down in history, but the nine-day slog in Jamaica deserves an honourable mention. As in South Africa, it too was drawn. England made 849 - including a then world record 325 from Sandham, the first Test triple-hundred - and established a first-innings lead of 563. Calthorpe was criticised for not enforcing the follow-on but the age of his side, who had been in the field for a day, had to have been a major factor.

West Indies were set 836 with time seemingly unlimited. They closed the seventh day on 408 for 5 - two late wickets by Wyatt tipped the balance - but then two days of rain followed. As was the case in Durban, England's ship was about to sail and so the game had to be left drawn.

Calthorpe's side had a hard time, winning four and losing two of their 13 first-class games. In New Zealand, the other England tour was a more relaxed affair. It is perhaps indicative of how New Zealand were viewed that the Wisden report concentrated more on the five matches the team played against Australian states en route.

As with Hendren in the Caribbean, Woolley underpinned some of his more limited team-mates, averaging 51 with the bat and taking 68 wickets. Duleepsinhji gave him excellent support with 1,421 runs.

The Tests were also over three days whereas those in the West Indies were five-day games. Despite that, England won the first - New Zealand's Test debut - by eight wickets in under two days' playing time. The second was drawn and rain washed out the first two days of the third, rendering it meaningless. An extra fourth Test was agreed to compensate the Auckland authorities for the washout but that too was drawn after England amassed 540.

The team played 17 matches in New Zealand, winning nine and drawing eight; in Australia they won two, lost two and drew the other.

What happened next?

  • Calthorpe's side returned home via the Panama Canal and sailed close to the Caribbean as the final Test was taking place there. At the same time the 1930 Australian tourists were steaming towards Europe to start their tour
  • In mid February another side from England - Julien Cahn's XI - set sail for a tour of Argentina, playing two unofficial first-class "Tests" against Argentina. The squad was almost entirely made up of county players and included future England captain Walter Robins
  • Sandham's world record lasted a little over four months, until Don Bradman scored 334 against England at Leeds. Sandham never played Test cricket again

Martin Williamson is executive editor of ESPNcricinfo and managing editor of ESPN Digital Media in Europe, the Middle East and Africa

RSS Feeds: Martin Williamson

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by espncricinfomobile on (February 2, 2014, 10:45 GMT)

I may have got this wrong but i always thought that until 1977, the banner was MCC just for the tour games, not the Tests?

Posted by   on (February 2, 2014, 5:00 GMT)

Nobody mentioned the fact that George Gunn had a very good chance of registering himself as the oldest test centurion. He threw his wicket when he was at 85 in the same test in which Sandham scored the first 300 of test cricket. That opening pair of Gunn+Sandham can very well be the oldest(in terms of sum of their ages) opening pair in test cricket, though I am not absolutely sure of this. Also, I look at Sandham scoring his 300 away from home as a sort of poetic justice as Murdoch had hit test cricket's first 200 in English soil(though Sandham obviously didn't score his 300 on Australian soil, but the fact that he scored that in a comparatively cricketing environment can very well be taken as some sort of cricketing genius).

Posted by espncricinfomobile on (February 1, 2014, 14:00 GMT)

In 1998,the commonwealth games cricket was unofficial matches,while the Sahara cup was common wealth games India played teams like Antigua , Guyana etc...except sachin ,most of the seniors played in Sahara cup.sachin went for those unofficial matches because IOC insisted that if sachin is not send to Malaysia ,they will not allow the cricket team to play

Posted by Cricketfan23 on (February 1, 2014, 12:45 GMT)

In 1998, the Indian team was split into 2 as one team had to play in the Sahara cup against Pakistan & other team had to play the commonwealth games in Malaysia. The main players were divided with Sachin playing in the commonwealth side & Ganguly playing in the Sahara cup. The matches didn't coincide though.

Posted by Romanticstud on (February 1, 2014, 9:38 GMT)

I reckon the ICC should give Test Status to 24 Teams ... India, India A,Australia, Australia A, England, England A, SA, SA A, Pakistan, Sri-Lanka, WI, NZ, Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, Ireland, Afghanistan, Kenya, Scotland, Netherlands, Canada, UAE, PNG, Nepal, Hong Kong. The teams must then be divided into 3 groups of 8 - current top 8 in the Premier League, The A sides with Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, Ireland and Afhhanistan in Division 1 and The rest in Division 2. The teams remain for 4 years. after the four years ... The promotion relegation will be as follows ... the bottom 2 and top 2 in each division will swap divisions ... with the bottom 2 of division 2 revised with a mini-tournament with 2 non-playing test sides like USA, Bermuda, etc... ie. the top 6 in the premiership will remain for the following 4 years whilst the bottom 2 go to division 1 ... and the bottom 2 of division 1 go to division 2 ...

Posted by sifter132 on (February 1, 2014, 5:21 GMT)

No reason this can't happen again to help the new teams in world cricket. It's called "A" team tours, and the big 3 (and maybe others) should have no problem regularly sending "A" teams to Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, Ireland and more!

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Martin WilliamsonClose

    What is Rohit Sharma's role?

Should India have practised slip catching in the nets? Who will play at the G?

    'I'd like to have faced the West Indies quicks'

Northamptonshire's David Willey picks his ideal partner for a jungle expedition, and talks about his famous dad

    Benn shows up in body and spirit

Tony Cozier: The spinner has brought in a sense of discipline into his bowling and behaviour on the field since his Test comeback

    The return of Bob Simpson

Rewind: When the 41-year-old former captain came out of retirement to lead Australia against India

Bowling to blame for India's poor overseas record

Kartikeya Date: The inability to build pressure by denying runs, even on helpful pitches, is India's biggest problem

News | Features Last 7 days

What ails Rohit and Watson?

Both batsmen seemingly have buckets of talent at their disposal and the backing of their captains, but soft dismissals relentlessly follow both around the Test arena

The perfect Test

After the tragedy of Phillip Hughes' death, this match showed that cricket and life will continue to go on. This time Test cricket dug in and got through to tea.

Hazlewood completes quartet of promise

Josh Hazlewood has been on Australian cricket's radar since he was a teenager. The player that made a Test debut at the Gabba was a much-improved version of the tearaway from 2010

Australia in good hands under proactive Smith

The new stand-in captain has the makings of a long-term leader, given his ability to stay ahead of the game

Karn struggles to stay afloat

The failed gamble of handing Karn Sharma a Test debut despite him having a moderate first-class record means India have to rethink who their spinner will be

News | Features Last 7 days