March 7, 2014

'He had a feel for the energy of the team'

Self-belief, presence and a feel for his players - Gary Kirsten on why Graeme Smith was a natural-born leader

Gary Kirsten played his final few Tests for South Africa under the leadership of 21-year-old Graeme Smith. In 2011 the pair reunited when Kirsten took over as South Africa's coach, a post he held for two years. Here Kirsten talks about what made Smith the best captain he played under.

The first things I noticed about Graeme was, he had the self-belief and courage at a very young age to want to do the job. I remember at the time Eric Simons was the South African coach and he was considering a new captain. The name Graeme Smith came up although he had been in the team for a very short time. And he was 21 years old. Eric asked him and Graeme said, absolutely, he would love to do it. So the self-belief to be able to do the job and also to have the confidence and courage to accept the responsibility I can never forget.

My last Test was against New Zealand in Wellington. It was the final Test of the three-match series and we were 1-0 down. At Basin Reserve, we went to stumps on the fourth evening at 82 for 3, chasing a target of 234. Graeme was batting on 46 and I was on 19. On the eve of that match Graeme had delivered a motivational speech with tears in his eyes. It struck me that we had a guy leading the team that players have to go out and play for. The way he spoke that day awakened me to the fact that here is a 22-year-old with limited captaincy experience at the highest level, and yet he could deliver a speech like that.

The gist of the speech was to say: we are one down in the series against New Zealand. We need to deliver here. We need to deliver on the promises, deliver on our ability, our potential. The speech was less about content to me, and more about the authenticity of what he was saying. You could see it seeping through his bones, how he felt about it. For me that is the essence of leadership: if you are going to be believable and credible to your players, they have got to see you actually feel it more than they do. And I certainly saw that in him.

I went out the next day and I played for Graeme Smith. That was the bottom line. I played my last Test specifically to respond to his call to his troops. That was for me an incredibly powerful acknowledgement of his natural-born leadership tendencies. That was what he was - a natural-born leader.

The best thing about presence in leadership is, you can have credibility from your players. MS Dhoni has that presence. Graeme had the same. They don't have to say much. Great leaders display this presence. They don't have to stand up and shout and scream and say, this is the direction we are moving as a team. Just their presence, their body language, tells you where we are. With Graeme, the one thing he always had was he was a big guy. And because he was the in-your-face type guy, you knew he was ready for the battle. In addition he was a very good orator. Then he had the courage and determination to do the job.

The frontman
He was the man who was always at the front of the row. And as an opening batsman we know how tough it is opening in Test match cricket, especially in South Africa, which potentially can present some of the toughest conditions for openers. It was an important example to set: that he was always the one accepting the highest pressure, and accepting the responsibility that came with it. So it was a comfort zone for players knowing that their leader was a guy accepting the pressure and the heat at the highest level.

"I played my last Test specifically to respond to Smith's call to his troops"
Gary Kirsten

There is no other job in cricket mentally tougher than opening the innings and doubling up as a captain. So for Graeme to end up with an average of above 48 and then to have the type or leadership success he did have is absolutely a massive achievement. You look at his record in the fourth innings and his ability to make important contributions. That gave the team a lot of confidence. It gives your team a lot of comfort to know that the captain is walking the talk.

A feel for people
His man-management abilities were really strong. He had a great feel for where the players and his team were mentally. He had a feel for the energy of the team, where it was, and when he needed to provide inputs and when it was not needed. As a leader you've got to know firstly when to say something to an individual and then how to say it. So if there is a piece of information you want to give someone, you've got to know what is the right moment to do that. I used to watch Graeme walk around during training and watch him have one-on-one chats with a player. Without knowing the specifics I know the chat would have centred around giving the guy confidence, to know that his captain was backing him. The most important thing about man management is taking the time to do it. He cared about his players. He had instinct about when to chat to his players.

The team's sponge
He was very good with the media. He learnt how to deal and talk to the media. He knew what to do and how to do it. He fended off a lot of negativity that came via the media or he took it upon himself. He always tried to protect his team in that space - if there was anything that was levelled at the team or if the team was criticised, he was prepared to take that on. So in a true sense of the word he was a leader who was prepared to accept the responsibilities that came with the job.

Nagraj Gollapudi is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Dummy4 on March 9, 2014, 15:36 GMT


    1) His record in winning games from nearly impossible situations speaks for itself. Most centuries as a captain in wins? Second innings hundreds?

    2) SA has never been good at ICC events, even and especially prior to Smith. How do you pin this on him? think Pollock and DL method, think Donald and Klusener run-out, think Kallis destroying momentum. Also, he averages 40 in 50 OD WC and Champions trophy. 52 batting second. And If you think that Players like Andrew Hall, Andre Nel, Boeta Dippenaar, etc puts SA on a par with Ponting's Aus, you are deluded

    3) "Leadership" is not about how many wins. When you compare wins you compare the abilities of a team, not only the captain. Warne, McGrath, Gilchrist, Hussey might think differently about Pontings success as captain. 4) same as above

    5) Gibbs' poor form destroyed the career of Gibbs.

    Facts don't lie. Nothing you said is fact, though.

  • Philip on March 9, 2014, 7:45 GMT

    I've heard more than once Graeme Smith's large physical size mentioned in relation to his leadership. This might make a good sound-bite or quote but is spurious rubbish. True leadership comes from the "heart" and the head, not the biceps and shoulders. Maturity, oration, courage and determination are indeed what matters. Praise these traits in Smith certainly, but leave the "big guy" stuff out. It's just a mawkish macho mishmash.

  • usman on March 9, 2014, 6:23 GMT

    I absolutely agree with Ahmad. Excellent points! Kirsten seems to be getting sanctimoniously mawkish as his praise for a largely defensive-mindset skipper who commanded some of the fittest and best players of the era, is clearly over the top.

  • Dummy4 on March 8, 2014, 9:24 GMT

    idk much about what he did to Gibbs..but what about LANCE KLUSENER. cricket lost this great all-round talent due to mismanagement and I believe Graeme was at the helm during that a captain he should have tried to retain this guy in the squad..but apart from that whatever traits that Gary mentioned was definitely there in doubt he is one among the greats but definitely not the greatest..

  • Pritam on March 8, 2014, 6:58 GMT

    @ahmad Uetian 2007 world cup they made it into the semis. The main fact is, during his captaincies the Saf Team rose down to top. That's what i have to say about Smith and i have many more......

  • David on March 8, 2014, 6:46 GMT

    @ Ahmad Uetian claims " Unfortunately this generation has tendency to praise mediocrity & take greatness for granted."

    Ahmad, I would like to praise you for the stunning mediocrity of your entirely out of context posts. The article on which we are commenting is specifically the opinion of the most successful modern cricket coach. I have a gut feeling that Gary Kirsten knows a hell of a lot more about cricket, and Graeme Smith, that do you.

    This article does not mention Ponting, never mind compare them, so why do you? I smell the distinctive odour of sour grapes here. No doubt Smith battered the team you support.

  • Lourens on March 7, 2014, 20:17 GMT

    @Ahmed Uetian We get it, you have a personal issue with Smith. You do not like him. We also get that you don't know cricket or much about leadership either. Now we've heard enough.

  • Dummy4 on March 7, 2014, 12:54 GMT

    Great leaders lead from front in big games but he had poor avg in WC & tournament finals

    Captaincy wise he was very poor compared to Ponting who won 2 WCs out of 3 with no losses in 2 of them. Smith's team never made it to even semis of any ICC event, despite SA always being at par with AUS in terms of batting, bowling & fielding capacity. Even Dhoni won 3 ICC titles despite weak bowling. Similarly in tests his win rate was meager 45% @ 1.8 W/L compared to Ponting's 62% @ 3 W/L.

    For a captain main deliverable is win % & W/L ratio (given team with same credentials as the ones compared against). That's why I chose Ponting that had team with same credentials as SA, captained in the same era as Smith (hence opposition's faced had similar capacity) & captained weak team during late phase of captaincy yet Ponting's captaincy record far superior to Smith in both formats.

    He wasn't even SA's best Captain. Cronje had equivalent win rate in test & far better: 2.8 in ODI's against Smith's 1.8

  • Dummy4 on March 7, 2014, 11:02 GMT

    1). Smith was always overrated as player& as Captain

    2). He was one of the reasons behind SA being chokers as he & Amla always choked in big games with pathetic averages in WCs & tournament finals

    3). Leadership wise he was very poor compared to Ponting, as Ponting won 2 WCs out of 3 with no losses in 2 of them. Smith's team never made it to even semis of any ICC event, despite SA always being at par with AUS in terms of batting, bowling & fielding capacity. Even Dhoni won 3 ICC titles despite weak bowling

    4). Similarly in tests his win rate was meager 50% @ 1.8 W/L compared to Ponting's 62% @ 3 W/L

    5). He wasn't even SA's best Captain as Cronje had equivalent win rate in test of 50% & far better 2.8 in Odi's vs 1.8 of Smith

    6). He destroyed career of big match player: Gibbs

    LOOK PEOPLE, Facts don't lie. If your perception is that he was a great leader, correct your perspective. Unfortunately this generation has tendency to praise mediocrity & take greatness for granted

  • David on March 7, 2014, 9:46 GMT

    Well said Gazza (The Banker)

  • No featured comments at the moment.