South Africa v India, 1st ODI, Durban

India's short-ball woes continue

While the Indian bowlers and fielders had a largely forgettable day, India's fortunes in this series rest on whether their batsmen can turn things around against the short ball

Sidharth Monga at Kingsmead

January 12, 2011

Comments: 263 | Text size: A | A

Yuvraj Singh is dismissed by Morne Morkel for 2, South Africa v India, 1st ODI, Durban, January 12, 2011
The Indian batsmen once again looked suspect against the short ball © Getty Images
Enlarge
Related Links
Players/Officials: MS Dhoni
Series/Tournaments: India tour of South Africa

India's start to this ODI series has been painfully similar to many of their earlier outings in South Africa. In the 2003 World Cup, they were bundled out for 125 in their first game against a top-level team. Their 2006-07 tour got underway at the same venue, Durban, after the washout in Johannesburg, in almost identical fashion: lose the toss, concede 250-plus, and get bowled out for a paltry total to lose by more than 100 runs. In their first ODI this time around, they have managed 18 more than they did in the first innings of the Test series. Their bowling, too, looked listless as it had on their various previous starts.

After the defeat, MS Dhoni didn't waste too much time pondering over the reasons behind the slow starts. "I think we could have done better," Dhoni said. "When you play with four bowlers and part-timers, you have that pressure that if one bowler has a bad day, you have to put the rest of the overs on the part-timers. Fortunately in this game, the part-timers did a good job; they brought us back into the game, but still chasing close to 280-285 in Durban is quite a difficult task."

The bowler with the bad day today was Ashish Nehra, who looked like a man who had just got off the plane and come on to bowl. Pace, movement, sting, were all absent, and the figures of 1 for 61 in six overs were well-earned. Dhoni, though, knows that he doesn't have too many choices apart from the bowlers that are on the tour, plus the injured Praveen Kumar.

"The most important thing is, these are three or four fast bowlers that we have got," Dhoni said. "So whatever the conditions may be, we have to back them to do well. So we don't have too many options right now. We don't see too many options when it comes to fast-bowling department. Right now I am not bothered about whether they have any match practice or not, we need these four or five fast bowlers to be fit going into the World Cup."

While the bowling was a big letdown today, and India lost the game in the field, it is arguable that it can improve on short notice. What will need more work are the limited-overs batsmen, who still remain suspect on pitches with bounce. That is a shortcoming that makes coming back from this setback difficult. It will take either a lot of improvement from the batsmen or real flat pitches for them to make this more like the 2003 World Cup and the recent Test series, as opposed to the 4-0 defeat they were at the wrong end of in 2006-07.

The pitch didn't change too much in the evening; not as much as it does usually. It was just bounce, with zero swing, and not much seam movement. M Vijay played back to a full ball. Rohit Sharma was worked over by short bowling from Morne Morkel, who got the ball to straighten just a touch. The difference between Moses Mabhida and Kingsmead couldn't have been starker. Rohit's bowling made sure India didn't miss Yusuf Pathan in the field, but it was his being a specialist batsman that had made India play him on what they expected to be a tough track. Yuvraj Singh fended at a short ball without getting behind the line. By the time Suresh Raina came out the game was over.

However, it doesn't look likely that India are going to include a fifth bowler or even a bowling allrounder like R Ashwin. "People may say if six batsmen don't do the job, the seventh won't or may not do the job," Dhoni said. "You have to see if four bowlers can do the job, or if four can't do the job, how and why will the fifth do that job? I think it's debatable. It always depends on what kind of team you play with. If you see the history of Indian cricket, we have always been comfortable playing with four bowlers. One of the major reasons being we don't have a seaming allrounder."

Still there was a positive on a day that India will like to forget as quickly as they can, in Virat Kolhi, who with every game is giving the team management more and more reasons to have him in the starting XI in Mirpur on February 19. He is still unlikely to make it if the others are all fit, but at least the team management knows there is a solid back-up who is in good form and eager to take the chance.

In the absence of Virender Sehwag and Gautam Gambhir, the team once again looks overly reliant on Sachin Tendulkar, who didn't look in discomfort until a risky shot didn't come off. Tendulkar might need more than just Kohli's support if India are to turn this series around.

Sidharth Monga is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Sidharth Monga

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (January 16, 2011, 3:06 GMT)

If Indians are looking for a seaming allrounder, why not try IRFAN PATHAN???

its true man.... try him to get in the middle order....he can stabilize the order....

about bowling, get him to bowl in middle overs along with harbhajan... true bos.... combination of a spell combination of fast and spin cant stabilize even a greatest batsmen......

try this and i think INDIA will srely get a great result......

Posted by   on (January 15, 2011, 5:55 GMT)

I agree with @abhi...MSD come with some weird changes..when opposition is on the mat(3 down).... why introduce part timers? 1 more wicket might have made the difference to the match but bow down to MSD's policies...WE JUST DONT WANT TO GET TO THE TOP WE WANT TO STAY THERE!!!

Posted by akkifantastic on (January 15, 2011, 5:14 GMT)

i think indea need to have irfan pathan in the team, as he fulfill the all rounder place in and gives tha balance,,

yusuf pathan should open the batting as we need firing start.

Posted by Raj12345 on (January 15, 2011, 0:35 GMT)

Hahahaha..whoever hats Vijay blindly. I know what is in your mind Rahane. For your state partiality, don't blindly support the concept of putting Rahane as a opener. Vijay should be replaced with another opener. That is how we should think.

Rahane is future Dravid. I can't wait to see that happen. These irresponsible selectors wasting. Dravid should announce his retirement. Not sure what he is doing at 37 there.

all 10 people failed. Before dropping Vijay, first drop Raina, then come to Vijay. That is fair. Even exp bowler like Bhajji gave up 60 vital runs. it is shame on him.

Posted by AndyZaltzmannsHair on (January 14, 2011, 17:16 GMT)

India's future troubles have already started now. In 2 years time without Tendulkar, Dravid, VVS and Zaheer which of today's young Indians are going to fill their place? All of them are old, and some of them have bodies which already regularly breakdown. It's kind of funny to see people asking for Kumble and Ganguly to return. I can only think of the amount of posters who will ask for Tendulkar's return every time India loses.

Posted by Abhimanyu on (January 14, 2011, 16:22 GMT)

Its simple India lost the match because of that 130 run partnership!! between AB de Villers and JP Duminy. India were only 1 wicket away from win, but that didn't happen because of MSD's terrible policy of bowling part-timers in ODIs whenever the opposition is struggling. They were able to make those easy runs because of this....

Posted by   on (January 14, 2011, 16:03 GMT)

The so called Youngsters are no answer to fight SA's bouncy stuffs... For all away ODI... LAXMAN should hav been included...

For sub-continent any TOM(Murli), DICK(Rohit) and HARRY(Yuvraj) can do

Posted by kiday on (January 14, 2011, 15:25 GMT)

INDIA HAVE LOST THE 1ST ODI BCOZ THEY WERE DEPENDED UPON SACHIN. TO GET A GOOD OPENING PARTNERSHIP GOOD OPENERS ARE REQUIRED THAT INDIA DOESN'T HAVE. ASHISH NEHRA SHOULD NOT BE THERE IN 2ND ODI, HE HAVE BOWLED 6 OVERS AND GAVE 60 RUNS. IF HE WOULD HAVE BOWLED 10 OVERS HE WOULD HAVE GIVEN 100 RUNS. WE ARE EXPECTING BATTING FROM RG SHARMA WE DONT WAN'T RG SHARMA TO BOWL AND TAKE WICKETS.

Posted by SudeeptaMajhee on (January 14, 2011, 14:32 GMT)

There is need of some changes in current playing eleven-1.Sachin, 2.Virat, 3.Raina, 4.MS.Dhoni, 5.Yubraj, 6.Rohit, 7.Yusuf, 8.Harbhajn, 9.Zahir, 10.Sreesant, 11.Munaf. One more thing it is very very necessary for Indian team to get Yubraj in role...

Posted by   on (January 14, 2011, 13:29 GMT)

I fail to understand why Yusuf Pathan is ignored all the times? How many chances he got to play as an opener, or got to play good 30-35 overs? i can see him play in the place of sehwag? what he smack 40-70 at brisk pace in first 10 overs? Cant see any logic persisting with Sir Ravindera J / Sir Murli Vijay/ Sir Rohit. Accomplishment would complete for India with Yusuf an integral player. Suggest any view on this

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Sidharth MongaClose
Tour Results
South Africa v India at Centurion - Jan 23, 2011
South Africa won by 33 runs (D/L method)
South Africa v India at Port Elizabeth - Jan 21, 2011
South Africa won by 48 runs (D/L method)
South Africa v India at Cape Town - Jan 18, 2011
India won by 2 wickets (with 10 balls remaining)
South Africa v India at Johannesburg - Jan 15, 2011
India won by 1 run
South Africa v India at Durban - Jan 12, 2011
South Africa won by 135 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days