Sri Lanka series review November 30, 2012

Batting woes continue to hurt Sri Lanka

As they did against England earlier this year, Sri Lanka failed to hold onto a series lead at home as New Zealand's pace bowlers delivered victory in Colombo to reignite debate about the home side's frailties

Even before Mahela Jayawardene admitted Sri Lanka were the less happy side with a 1-1 result in the Test series their dismay was obvious, and perhaps justified, given the context. The last time New Zealand visited, the hosts recorded two crushing wins. They had Muttiah Muralitharan in their ranks then, but this New Zealand side arrived had arrived in Sri Lanka with a significantly poorer reputation. Sri Lanka's comfortable victory in the ODI series only frayed their opponents' esteem further, and a rapid loss for the visitors in Galle saw them plummet to rock bottom.

Perhaps there was some complacency in the Sri Lanka performance at the P Sara, but the primary reason for their failure in the second Test had already appeared in the first. In Galle, Sri Lanka seemed destined for a first innings deficit at 50 for 5, before Jayawardene and Angelo Mathews added 156 together to lift Sri Lanka out of distress.

Dimuth Karunaratne can be forgiven for a first innings duck on debut that almost seems a rite of passage now for Sri Lankan openers, but Tharanga Paranavitana's technique against the moving ball had seemingly not improved since being dropped from the side, largely for that reason. Kumar Sangakkara and Thilan Samaraweera also failed to show the judgement necessary to survive quality new-ball bowling, though to be fair to Samaraweera, he was set up beautifully by Tim Southee, who trapped him with one that jagged in after having bowled several overs of outswing.

At the P Sara Oval, on the same pitch that Sri Lanka's seam bowlers had managed only 2 for 165, the top order folded again, sinking to 12 for 3 in less than six overs. This time there was no vicious swing to blame, though New Zealand's bowlers certainly achieved as much movement as the conditions allowed and did so at sharp pace and with discipline.

Tillakaratne Dilshan was undone by a straight ball - perhaps one that surprised him with its speed - Sangakkara failed to control Southee's bounce, though even he will wonder why he was hooking so early in his innings, and Jayawardene fell having misjudged a Trent Boult delivery that moved away from him. The second innings was even worse for Sri Lanka's top four, who again failed to counter the moving ball and were reduced to 46 for 4 as their side sought a series-saving draw.

Sri Lanka's batsmen have never been comfortable against pace, movement and bounce, and on the last occasion in which they had encountered high quality fast bowling in Tests, they capitulated similarly. Save for that famous victory on a dry Durban surface, an innings loss and another defeat as close to an innings loss as it is possible to get, were their returns from a tour of South Africa. Even at home, Sri Lanka played James Anderson poorly in March, when England levelled their series at the P Sara, as New Zealand did.

It is becoming a weakness Sri Lanka must urgently address as international pitches at home become more seamer friendly with each series and they can no longer rely solely on their considerable skill against spin to win Tests at home. Even during the World Twenty20, teams expressed their surprise at the amount of movement available at Pallekele, while Hambantota is even more helpful, though that venue has not seen a Test match yet. At the P Sara, the bounce which made New Zealand's batsmen more comfortable added to Sri Lanka's woes. It is a worrying sign as Sri Lanka prepare to depart to Australia for a full tour which includes their first Boxing Day Test in 17 years.

To add to the concerns Sri Lanka's seam bowlers also emerged from the series looking lacklustre, despite a creditable first-up performance in Galle. Chanaka Welegedara, the left-armer, is still coming back from a shoulder injury. His absence was felt at the P Sara where the seam attack was woefully short on penetration and at times could not even hold down an end while Rangana Herath attacked from the other. A return of 12 wickets between Nuwan Kulasekara and Shaminda Eranga, in which New Zealand's new-ball pair plundered 21 scalps, illustrates how far they have to go to become a good all-round Test bowling unit.

Herath and Mathews were two major positives for the hosts, but meaningful contributions from elsewhere in the side were limited to a single innings or a lone spell. New Zealand was an opponent Sri Lanka could have boosted their confidence against with the sterner challenges ahead, but instead they have finished on a deflating note with only two of their players truly in form.

Andrew Fernando is ESPNcricinfo's Sri Lanka correspondent

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • narbavi on December 3, 2012, 16:52 GMT

    @Sinhaya: So much talk for a team which is yet to register their first win in Aus and their first series win in ENG which will never happen!! Yes we lost 0-8 but atleast we won tests in our previous tours in 2007 against both ENG and AUS. infact against ENG we went on to win, even in SA in 2011 we would have won if it wasn't for that monumental effort from Kallis, We dominated the Saffers in the second and third test, finally managing to draw the series 1-1

  • narbavi on December 3, 2012, 12:03 GMT

    @Sinhaya: We didn't win in durban because of absence of DRS, it is actually srilanka who beat pakistan because of absence of DRS and in your series against england only one test didn't have rain interruption which was the first test in cardiff and you lost, the other two were constantly disturbed by rain, if it hadn't happened we would have seen a 3-0 result!!

  • Prashan on December 2, 2012, 14:51 GMT

    @Narbavi, yeah you all beat South Africa for the first ever time in 2007. Remember in 2010 Durban test it was umpires who helped you to win it as if DRS was there, De Villiers and Boucher would have batted on and chased the target. You all got thrashed 4-0 in England last year and we managed to restrict it to just 1-0. If we batted sensibly on the last day in Cardiff, we could have kept it to 0-0. That is how it is my friend.

  • Dru on December 2, 2012, 14:28 GMT

    I am afraid SL were poor (again!) and if not for a spectacular NZ collapse in the second innings in Galle, may have even lost the series. SL's batting didnt reach 300 in any completed innings and the top order knocked over in all three against a decent (not a top quality) attack. I am not sure why Para is pursued with - he was dropped a while ago for doing nothing, now recalled and still doing nothing and now picked for Aus! The blunt reality is the odds are neither test in Aus will reach the 5th if the SL batting continues the way it has in the recent past.

  • Hitwicket99 on December 2, 2012, 11:54 GMT

    I totally agree with James Anderson. I'll have to run for cover from my Aussie workmates who will give me an earful. I must see if I can apply for my annual leave to coincide with the SL tour. I don't think Aus will need to bat twice in any match. The only positive aspect is that we have been spared the agony of playing in Perth or Brisbane. MCG and SCG are less hostile towards our batters.

  • Prashan on December 2, 2012, 11:32 GMT

    @Narbavi, yeah you all beat South Africa for the first ever time in 2007. Remember in 2010 Durban test it was umpires who helped you to win it as if DRS was there, De Villiers and Boucher would have batted on and chased the target. You all got thrashed 4-0 in England last year and we managed to restrict it to just 1-0. If we batted sensibly on the last day in Cardiff, we could have kept it to 0-0. That is how it is indeed.

  • narbavi on December 2, 2012, 9:54 GMT

    @Sinhaya: I will help you with that, the thing is that was the first ever time your team beat south africa in a test match in their home, then you managed to draw against england in tests in your home, you beat pakistan to win a test series after 3 long years, this is how it is!!

  • Dummy4 on December 2, 2012, 9:49 GMT

    I am an Australian citizen of SriLankan origin. I love SL and its cricket team.I think SL is in for a real tharshing over here in Australia. I am sure most tests will be finished within 3-4 days. I sincerely hope they will put up a good fight. We saw what Aussies did to India recently. SL cricket is fast declining since the appointment of De Mel to the board of control. If you cant win at home against Kiwis then ??? Paranawithan cluless against any type of bowling. Enjoy the trip.

  • Prashan on December 2, 2012, 8:47 GMT

    @Hitwicket99, I think you are exaggerating. If we are so bad how come we are the last team to beat South Africa in a test match and that too in December last year in South Africa. If we are so bad how did we manage to beat England in a test match this year. Sorry I disagree.

  • Hitwicket99 on December 2, 2012, 8:03 GMT

    Sorry to be blunt but SL are in for an absolute trashing here in Australia. Not that the the Aussies are good either, but still they are far better than SL and still hovering around no 3/4 spot. Its just that England and South Africa are miles ahead of the pack and we SLs are at the bottom of that pile.

    The present line-up is not even a shadow of what we had between 1996-2001. To be honest SL should be ranked alongside Bangladesh as we are just hopeless. After Sanga and Mahela retire we will be on par with Namibia, Kenya and Ireland.

  • No featured comments at the moment.