Sri Lanka news February 25, 2013

Sangakkara defends role of player agents


Kumar Sangakkara believes the role of player agents has been misunderstood by Sri Lanka Cricket and said they were not a detriment to the game. His comments came after the Sri Lankan board had said it will not recognise agents any more and will deal directly with the players instead.

"There is a lot of misunderstanding and an even bigger case of miscommunication as to what the role of a player-manager or agent is," Sangakkara said. "They are not here for the detriment of the game."

SLC secretary Nishantha Ranatunga had said agents "bring more negatives than positives" to Sri Lanka cricket, but Sangakkara said that was not the case. He said that if there were issues with the role of agents, there should be a provision for dialogue where problems could be solved.

"If at anytime the player manager issue has a massive negative impact on the game, it is important there is a forum where it can be discussed with the players and Sri Lanka Cricket and then come to an understanding and a decision taken," Sangakkara said. "There has been quite a lot of media pressure as well, and pressure from former players on player management, so Sri Lanka Cricket has taken a stand where they will avoid any complications or misunderstandings that can arise in the future by saying we will communicate directly with the players. I don't see anything wrong in that. A statement was also made that the players can go ahead and employ anyone of their choosing, which is of course their freewill and their right to do so."

Sangakkara said he had benefitted from having an agent manage his off-field affairs during his career because it had freed him up to focus on his cricket.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Dummy4 on February 27, 2013, 10:20 GMT

    I think that some players can use player agents for their benefits.As a example,players like Kumar,Mahela and Dilshan.They are very experienced players not only inside the ground but also outside from the ground.They know how to use a player agent.But the newcomers don't know how to use them.Some of them don't know even what is the role of a agent.So we must look at this from two sides.

  • Dummy4 on February 27, 2013, 7:29 GMT

    Agents should be prohibited! Just because Sanga defends it, it can't be right all the time. He probably gets things right most of the time, but not all the time. He too is no saint!

  • udendra on February 26, 2013, 5:46 GMT

    After Sanga has spoken on the matter, people seem to comment in favour of player agents. Even in this forum.

  • Asanka Sharmal on February 26, 2013, 4:34 GMT

    Sanga is correct. Oh discussions! What else can we expect in a state where democracy is rapidly deteriorating....... Definitely players should be allowed to concentrate on the game and manager/agents should take care of the management. This simply a move by the SLC to manipulate the players. The recent non payment of player fees due to bad management of the boards affairs is a good example of mismanagement of SLC and to expect SLC to take care of the players would be a joke! Hope this state affairs would not lead SLC on the path of Zimbabwe cricket!

  • Miles on February 26, 2013, 2:33 GMT

    I think this is not an issue that SLC should be concerned about. SLC should be more concerned about building cricket in the country especially in the villages, investing on building sporting facilities for youngsters, creating fast/bouncy wickets, encouraging fast bowlers, investing on nutritional food & supplements,fitness coaches rather than worrying about player agents. SLC spent more time on political issues and less time in building cricket in the country. Player agents are not the reason why we don't have wicket taking fast bowlers in test cricket. Player agents are not the reason why we didn't have a strong senior middle order. Player agents are not the reason why we mentally struggled and gave away 4 world cups. Hope they will worry about more important things in the future.

  • Dummy4 on February 26, 2013, 0:21 GMT

    I have to agree the agent has a role to play in the management of modern sportsmen. With a relatively short careers, it is imperative player income is maximised and every opportunity fully utilised. it is an extremely arduous task for a sportsman to manage the training / playing side and the lucrative financial benefits. This is where the agent / player-manager comes in - taking away the burden of a player having to respond to all the offers, legitimate or not, deal with the negotiation process and agree the best deal for the player - leaving the player to concentrate his energies on playing. Every major sport has to work with agents - so the negative line taken by Sri Lanka Cricket will alienate players as they could potentially be "screwed" by uncompetitive contracts of the Board whilst having to refuse lucrative contracts to play overseas cricket due to clashing schedules. How else would Thilan Samaraweera have earned the contract with Worcestershire were it not for agents ???

  • Khondker S on February 25, 2013, 21:17 GMT

    It's time to limit the role of agents but I agree, agents helps players to concentrate more on games and avoid unnecessary stress.

  • Dummy4 on February 25, 2013, 20:52 GMT

    I think players should have agents. The last thing you want players to waste their time on is worrying about money and negotiating with the SLC board. Player time would be better spent training, studying the game and strategising for opponents. Plus the SLC has a bad reputation and record when it comes to players payments. Player agents have their place and purpose and the senior players should make sure the board understand. Once again Sanga is spot on off the field and on!

  • chami on February 25, 2013, 20:35 GMT

    Having agents should be more beneficial for cricketers, also SL cricket does not recognize players union this is not good for players , this manner SL cricket can dictate terms. Now who is going to negotiate players terms … caption, senior players ... no one have the right they will call individually and say this is what you get.

  • Gamini on February 25, 2013, 19:01 GMT

    I agree that issues can be sorted out through discussion and negotiations. However on this issue of agents I for once agree with the SLC. Cricketers may have agents for their 'non cricket' pursuits, sponsorship negotiations etc, but as far as cricket is concerned it has to be directly player and board. SLC on the other hand has to be firm on its priority for Sri Lankan Cricket and not cater to financial benefits and compromise on meeting requirements of other tournaments at the expense of Sri Lankan Cricket's tests and one day plans.

  • No featured comments at the moment.