|Photos||Video & Audio||Blogs||Statistics||Archive||Fantasy||Mobile|
December 19, 2007
There's a certain double irony about the USA blocking Cuba from taking part in the Stanford 20/20.
Firstly, a country that lectures all and sundry about democracy still adopts a Cold-War approach to any relations with Cuba. Much could be written about political hypocrisy, but that's for sites other than this one. After all, Guantanamo Bay, the embodiment on the bypassing of the democratic process, is located in Cuba.
However, for the USA to carry this entirely political stance to something as irrelevant as a cricket tournament in the Caribbean should embarrass everyone inside the country. The US would not have any say in who took part were it not for the fact that the man behind it, Allen Stanford, is a US citizen. Because of that, Stanford has to apply for permission from his government to involve the Cubans in his competition, and that has been refused.
The real twist is that the USA would be participating were it not for the fact that it is run by a board who in recent years have given democracy the finger and have behaved with a disregard for fairness and openness that would have shamed a banana republic.
So neither Cuba or the USA will take part in the Stanford 20/20. The bully has taken his ball and gone home.
The former Indian openers haven't been shining lately, but the IPL presents an opportunity for them to show their class
Plays of the day from the IPL match between Chennai Super Kings and Kings XI Punjab in Abu Dhabi
Having the top Associate team play the lowest-ranked Test side without the threat of relegation shows how votes mean more to the ICC than results
Brian Lara's 375 had a sense of inevitability to it, while the 400 came amid a backdrop of strikes and the threat of a whitewash
Cricket - batting specifically - defines Jonathan Trott, which makes his continued suffering all the more painful