Australia v England, 2nd Test, Adelaide, 5th day December 7, 2010

Swann wins his battles against lefties

Stats highlights from the second Ashes Test in Adelaide

England's innings win was their first in Australia in nearly 24 years and their third in the last 40. Here are more stats highlights from the game:

  • Only five times in their entire Ashes history have England achieved a more comprehensive innings victory in Australia. The last time they won by an innings in Australia was in the Boxing Day Test in 1986, when a first-innings total of 349 was enough to secure victory by an innings and 14 runs. For Australia, it was their fourth innings defeat since 1990, and their third in a live series. And the last time they lost by an innings at the Adelaide Oval was - hold your breath - 118 years ago, when England beat them by an innings and 230 runs. This is only their second innings defeat ever at this ground.

  • The gulf between the two teams can be seen in their series batting averages so far: England's overall average is 87.31 runs per wicket; Australia's is 36.67. Four England batsmen - Alastair Cook, Ian Bell, Kevin Pietersen, and Jonathan Trott - have 100-plus averages, while only Michael Hussey has managed it so far for Australia.

  • Graeme Swann was England's best bowler in the match, and he continued his domination of Marcus North and Simon Katich. North was dismissed by him for the fifth time, and Katich for the fourth. Both have struggled to counter Swann - North averages 26 against him and Katich 18.75. With Katich ruled out and North likely to be dropped, Swann might have to miss out on bowling to his two favourite batsmen.

  • Of the five batsmen Swann has dismissed most often, four are left-handers. Swann's overall average against left-handers is 21.86; against the righties he averages 33.78. With Phillip Hughes or Usman Khawaja likely to replace Katich, Swann will still have enough left-handers to bowl at.

  • Swann's second-innings figures of 5 for 91 are the best by an England spinner in Adelaide since Derek Underwood's 7 for 113 in 1975. In fact, those are the only two instances of England spinners taking five-fors at this ground since 1930.

  • One of the few silver linings for Australia was the form of Michael Hussey and Shane Watson. Both scored fifties in each innings - the fourth time they've made 50-plus scores in each innings of a Test - but none of those knock were converted into hundreds. In fact, that's been another big difference between the two teams: Australia have scored only two hundreds and eight fifties in the series so far, while England have five centuries - two of them being double-hundreds - and four fifties. Clearly, when the batsmen have got their eye in, Australia's bowlers have struggled for penetration.

For more stats nuggets from the Test, read Andy Zaltzman's Confectionery Stall

S Rajesh is stats editor of Cricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Nadeem1976 on December 8, 2010, 7:05 GMT

    Awsome england. awsome. keep on doing it. This will be the end of ponting and a great australian team for next five years. Wo ho...cricket will see other teams to dominate too. Luckily in our lives.

  • MinusZero on December 8, 2010, 5:18 GMT

    Watson isn't a test class opener. He should move down the order.

  • smudgeon on December 8, 2010, 0:13 GMT

    I agree Chris_Howard - Watto has done a good job, but he just doesn't capitalise on those starts. He's a clayton's opener.

  • Chris_Howard on December 7, 2010, 22:22 GMT

    That last stat is the most telling. Watson just isn't good enough to be an opener. He just doesn't have the concentration for the big innings, Australia's form has slipped even further since he became an opener - as has Katich's and Ponting's. Watson and Katich regularly put on 50 to 100 opening partnerships, but rarely more. And Watson himself rarely turns a 50 into a 100. Consequently we're not able to exert scoreboard pressure on the opposition, often being 2 or 3 down before reaching 200. Get Watson down to no 6, where, with Haddin's regular good scores, and Hussey's return to form, will give us a very strong middle order. Plus it will allow us to bowl Watto more. And bring in some genuine batsmen.

  • thebrownie on December 7, 2010, 15:45 GMT

    my bad about the last one, melbourne got into the way. But India followed the sydney test with 675/5 @ multan. That beats the 1137 by a long way !

  • thebrownie on December 7, 2010, 15:39 GMT

    233/6 705/7 211/2 India vs Australia 2003 :)

  • on December 7, 2010, 11:04 GMT

    And all hail England's biggest win down under since Bob Barber's match at Sydney in 1965-66!! Now here's a test: have England - or any side - ever achieved a composite score of 1137 for 6 between all-outs. In 1938-39 they made 654-5 v SA and 404-5d v WI in successive innings but that only makes 1058; in 1997, SL made 952-6d then reached 197 before their 4th 1st-inns wicket fell in the next match for a total of 1149 for 9, but they were dismissed in that innings, so I don't suppose that really counts...

  • Nadeem1976 on December 8, 2010, 7:05 GMT

    Awsome england. awsome. keep on doing it. This will be the end of ponting and a great australian team for next five years. Wo ho...cricket will see other teams to dominate too. Luckily in our lives.

  • MinusZero on December 8, 2010, 5:18 GMT

    Watson isn't a test class opener. He should move down the order.

  • smudgeon on December 8, 2010, 0:13 GMT

    I agree Chris_Howard - Watto has done a good job, but he just doesn't capitalise on those starts. He's a clayton's opener.

  • Chris_Howard on December 7, 2010, 22:22 GMT

    That last stat is the most telling. Watson just isn't good enough to be an opener. He just doesn't have the concentration for the big innings, Australia's form has slipped even further since he became an opener - as has Katich's and Ponting's. Watson and Katich regularly put on 50 to 100 opening partnerships, but rarely more. And Watson himself rarely turns a 50 into a 100. Consequently we're not able to exert scoreboard pressure on the opposition, often being 2 or 3 down before reaching 200. Get Watson down to no 6, where, with Haddin's regular good scores, and Hussey's return to form, will give us a very strong middle order. Plus it will allow us to bowl Watto more. And bring in some genuine batsmen.

  • thebrownie on December 7, 2010, 15:45 GMT

    my bad about the last one, melbourne got into the way. But India followed the sydney test with 675/5 @ multan. That beats the 1137 by a long way !

  • thebrownie on December 7, 2010, 15:39 GMT

    233/6 705/7 211/2 India vs Australia 2003 :)

  • on December 7, 2010, 11:04 GMT

    And all hail England's biggest win down under since Bob Barber's match at Sydney in 1965-66!! Now here's a test: have England - or any side - ever achieved a composite score of 1137 for 6 between all-outs. In 1938-39 they made 654-5 v SA and 404-5d v WI in successive innings but that only makes 1058; in 1997, SL made 952-6d then reached 197 before their 4th 1st-inns wicket fell in the next match for a total of 1149 for 9, but they were dismissed in that innings, so I don't suppose that really counts...

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • on December 7, 2010, 11:04 GMT

    And all hail England's biggest win down under since Bob Barber's match at Sydney in 1965-66!! Now here's a test: have England - or any side - ever achieved a composite score of 1137 for 6 between all-outs. In 1938-39 they made 654-5 v SA and 404-5d v WI in successive innings but that only makes 1058; in 1997, SL made 952-6d then reached 197 before their 4th 1st-inns wicket fell in the next match for a total of 1149 for 9, but they were dismissed in that innings, so I don't suppose that really counts...

  • thebrownie on December 7, 2010, 15:39 GMT

    233/6 705/7 211/2 India vs Australia 2003 :)

  • thebrownie on December 7, 2010, 15:45 GMT

    my bad about the last one, melbourne got into the way. But India followed the sydney test with 675/5 @ multan. That beats the 1137 by a long way !

  • Chris_Howard on December 7, 2010, 22:22 GMT

    That last stat is the most telling. Watson just isn't good enough to be an opener. He just doesn't have the concentration for the big innings, Australia's form has slipped even further since he became an opener - as has Katich's and Ponting's. Watson and Katich regularly put on 50 to 100 opening partnerships, but rarely more. And Watson himself rarely turns a 50 into a 100. Consequently we're not able to exert scoreboard pressure on the opposition, often being 2 or 3 down before reaching 200. Get Watson down to no 6, where, with Haddin's regular good scores, and Hussey's return to form, will give us a very strong middle order. Plus it will allow us to bowl Watto more. And bring in some genuine batsmen.

  • smudgeon on December 8, 2010, 0:13 GMT

    I agree Chris_Howard - Watto has done a good job, but he just doesn't capitalise on those starts. He's a clayton's opener.

  • MinusZero on December 8, 2010, 5:18 GMT

    Watson isn't a test class opener. He should move down the order.

  • Nadeem1976 on December 8, 2010, 7:05 GMT

    Awsome england. awsome. keep on doing it. This will be the end of ponting and a great australian team for next five years. Wo ho...cricket will see other teams to dominate too. Luckily in our lives.