Emirates

Australia v England, 4th Test, Melbourne, 2nd day

Time running out for Collingwood

Almost everything has gone right for England in Melbourne, but Paul Collingwood's poor form continued with another failure

Andrew Miller at the MCG

December 27, 2010

Comments: 29 | Text size: A | A

Paul Collingwood's miserable run with the bat continued when he was out hooking for 8, Australia v England, 4th Test, Melbourne, 2nd day, December 27, 2010
Paul Collingwood's struggle suggest the end of his Test career is coming near © Getty Images
Enlarge
Related Links
Players/Officials: Paul Collingwood
Series/Tournaments: England tour of Australia
Teams: England

"I'm probably not the best-looking batsman in the middle, and that has gone against me in the past, but my job is a run-getter not a batsman. Sometimes people forget that it is the scoring the runs that is the most important thing, and not how you get them. That is how I've always approached it."

Paul Collingwood said those words in Chittagong back in March, as he basked in the occasion of his tenth Test century, a long-since-forgotten 145 against Bangladesh that turned a strong position into an impregnable one. At the time his achievement was dismissed as a reward for services rendered, for rare has been the occasion in which Collingwood has indulged in soft runs. Take that trio of famous rearguards at Cardiff, Centurion and Cape Town, for example, where his influence in the middle had been of fundamental value to the cause. His scores in those fixtures - 74, 26 not out and 40 - were of unquantifiable consequence, even if the statistics stand out only to those in the know.

But when pressed on the subject at Chittagong, the man himself refused to denigrate his own achievement. "To get ten centuries is something I thought I'd never achieve when I first started the game," he said, as he became the 25th England batsman to reach a milestone that eluded such notables as Robin Smith and Ted Dexter, among others. It was that very determination to treat every international appearance as an end in itself, and an honour rather than a right, that turned a nuggetty county pro with a workmanlike technique into a critical component of England's post-2005 resurgence.

Nine months down the line, however, neither the "how" nor the "how many" are ticking the boxes for the doughtiest batsmen in England's line-up. Since that innings, Collingwood has led England to their maiden ICC trophy, the World Twenty20 in the Caribbean, and remains an indispensable cog in a 50-over line-up that could surpass expectations in the subcontinent come February. But at Test level he's a fading force, and at 34, and with England in sight of an Ashes-sealing innings victory, it could that the final curtain is drawing ominously nigh.

In his last 13 Test innings, Collingwood has passed 11 just three times, although true to his reputation, his only innings of note was a hard-earned 82 against Pakistan at Trent Bridge, which came with England on the brink of a crisis at 118 for 4. Either side of that, however, he's been incapable of resistance. The wiles of Mohammad Asif and Mohammad Amir proved too much for a succession of players in a particularly swing-heavy English summer, but whereas Alastair Cook in particular has been a batsman reborn in Australia, the same cannot be said of his team-mate.

Collingwood has looked ponderous in his five innings to date, with his 42 at Adelaide coming on the flattest deck of the series and with the score ramped up towards 400 by Kevin Pietersen's double-century. On a flyer at Perth, however - and in precisely the scenario for which he has habitually earned his keep - Collingwood missed a Mitchell Johnson inswinger by nearly a foot to be pinned lbw for 5, and then fell for 11 to the final ball of the third day's play, as England were hustled to a thumping defeat.

There was no clamour for change at the MCG because that is not England's way - under the leadership of Strauss and Flower, loyalty is of paramount importance. Privately, however, Collingwood must have recognised that he was facing another Edgbaston moment, a time in his career when a life-saving performance was required, just as he produced in his last-chance saloon against South Africa in 2008. Back then he had admitted that one slip would have meant he was a "goner", but he responded with a brilliantly bold 135 in the second innings.

This time, however, he couldn't do it, and he never looked like doing it either, not even on a slow deck that suited his low backlift and crease-bound style. He got off the mark with an inside-edge to short fine leg, his solitary boundary was an edge through gully, and though he threaded Ryan Harris through the covers for an attractive three, he fell without addition three balls later when he swiped a Johnson bouncer to Peter Siddle at fine leg.

Given the service that Collingwood has provided, he doubtless deserves the chance to leave on a high in the fifth Test at Sydney, and England's refusal to push him down the order for this contest suggests that they could yet allow him that grace. But with Eoin Morgan itching for a game after playing just one first-class innings all tour, the unsentimental - and, dare one say it, Australian - option would be to starting the planning for 2013 in the first week of 2011, and bid farewell to a battler whose journey in five-day cricket looks to have run its course.

And were he to miss out at Sydney, it would provide a strangely appropriate closure to a remarkable Test career. To all intents and purposes, Collingwood's true Test debut came at The Oval in 2005, when he was recalled to the team for the Ashes decider after a two-year gap between appearances, following the loss of Simon Jones to injury. A bowler would have been the logical selection, but England wanted a character for the toughest challenge of their careers to date.

Shane Warne famously scoffed at the awarding of an MBE on the strength of Collingwood's twin scores of 7 and 10 in that match, but looking back now from the safe distance of half-a-decade, it's easier to appreciate the discipline he brought to that performance, particularly the 72 minutes he endured on the final day, in which he drew the sting of England's pre-lunch collapse and provided Kevin Pietersen the ballast he needed for a counterattack.

Times have moved on since that series, however. England have regenerated and matured. Bell now demonstrates an ability to endure as well as sparkle, while Cook and Jonathan Trott showed at Brisbane and beyond that they can tough it out with the best of them. For another England nugget, Nasser Hussain, the realisation dawned in 2004 that his time had passed, and he retired upon completing his 14th and final Test century. For Collingwood, the ultimate team man, the retention of the Ashes, in the country in which he made his highest and most poignantly overshadowed century in 2006-07, would be every bit as fitting a finale. Especially with his unfinished business remaining in one-day cricket.

Andrew Miller is UK editor of Cricinfo.

RSS Feeds: Andrew Miller

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by malcwest on (December 28, 2010, 0:28 GMT)

Andrew, nice article, good to meet you in Brisbane...a nice view up in the gods. Shame to be home now.

Collingwood has for some time been my favourite England player...nothing flashy but grit where required and totally committed. Perhaps it is right that with the lengthening of the tail, the suprising improvements of Bell's resiliance and the addition of Trott there is certainly more backbone but they would miss the catching and the usefull occasional bowling. I remember doing the Lords tour about 4 four years ago and the old guy doing the tour who worked as a steward during tests said that Collingwood was the most down to earth test cricketter of the recent generation always talked to fans, stewards and was polite and not "up himself" like many of the rest..really quite refreshing when you see Peterson who almost revels in getting out in silly ways because that is the way he plays...

It may well be a time for a changing of the guard but it will be a pity and he will be missed

Posted by   on (December 27, 2010, 22:11 GMT)

Collingwood has been a great servant to the English game but there can be no sentiment when it comes to winning a test series. England need to pick six batsmen that it can have confidence will score the neccesary runs to wins. How can the selectors have confidence in Collingwood. I am afraid that time must be called on an admirable test career. I am not sure if Morgan is the long term solution however after his decent record in the summer he deserves his chance.

Posted by OW-ZAAT on (December 27, 2010, 21:53 GMT)

Look it's not the end of Colly, but chuck the Irishman in there let him have his baptism now if u're looking at 2013.

Posted by Finn92 on (December 27, 2010, 21:37 GMT)

I don't think he is done, he still has a lot to offer especially in the shorter formats for England but I do think he should definitley drop down the order at the minute he's a walking wicket! However I don't think Morgan is the right solution, he's a brilliant batter in limited overs cricket but I don't think he has the right mindset for Tests, I may be wrong but I would love to see James Hildreth or even James Talyor taking up his role and even further down the line the promising James Vince could be a part of our middle order

Posted by landl47 on (December 27, 2010, 21:16 GMT)

Collingwood is a team man above all. He's inspirational in the field, handy to have to fill a gap in the bowling line-up and always tries 100%. However, being a good team man, I'm sure he wouldn't want to be kept in the side for sentimental reasons. The emergence of Trott and Cook on this tour has lessened England's need for his talents. With Bell finally fulfilling his potential, now might be the time for Collingwood to be rested for a younger player. I'm not sure I'd do it at Sydney, though if England win the Melbourne test then the risk isn't great. Personally, I'd leave him in the side for Sydney and start trying new test players in the next English Summer. Whatever happens, Collingwood has made a place for himself in the game's history as a member of (hopefully) 3 Ashes-winning sides and captain of the T20 World Cup winners. He leaves a considerable legacy.

Posted by Podarite on (December 27, 2010, 21:09 GMT)

I disagree with Andrew Miller that Colly should retire from Test Cricket...Colly is a Fighter& he will revive his Test Career!

Posted by   on (December 27, 2010, 18:56 GMT)

simple..... give chance to morgan and drop collingwood as he s not test specialist....and morgan.... i think best batsman in england.......

Posted by Merri on (December 27, 2010, 18:34 GMT)

I can't understand what's intended here.

Here we have an out-of-form batsman, who you can't pretend will remain in that state, who should be replaced until he comes back into form, and the suggestion is just the contrary : to let him play the next match when still out of form and to drop him next when he can hope to come back into form. What's the logic behind this ?

Posted by phoenixsteve on (December 27, 2010, 18:28 GMT)

Such a shame that Collys having a lean run... it happens though. Fortunately he has contributed some breathtaking fielding - just ask Ricky! If England go on the win this test, then maybe there's a case for bringing in Morgan. I don't believe it's time to discard Colly though - he's got plenty of cricket and fight lleft in him. Batting 5/6/7 makes it's own pressure when those before you are in such sublime form and let's not forget that even Belly (who has been in great from) failed too! So come on England, cut Colly some slack and maybe give him some early R+R? Now, back to business England SMASH THOSE AUSSIES! 2-1 going into Sydney will be nice and I'm sure Colly will enjoy the beach! COME ON ENGLAND!!!

Posted by topeleven on (December 27, 2010, 17:31 GMT)

Colly will come back .Give him one final chance in Sydney and he will bounce back. He is a fighter. Many would have forgotten the 2006-07 one day series in Australia after the thumping they received in the test and also in the ODI's Collingwood scored 2 centuries and a 70 to secure the tri nation tournament. Eoin Morgan is definitley a good prospect and deserves a game in Sydney. But i would say Colly should be playing as a mark of repsect for his prev performances.

Posted by appreciator on (December 27, 2010, 16:55 GMT)

If this indeed turns out to be Collingwood's last test series, his contributions still will have been enormous. It is a great tribute to the man that he must have been the least naturally gifted player on just about every eleven he has played for; and still he has contrived -- through hard work and bloody-mindedness -- to deliver massively for the team. It cannot be a coincidence that his most unquestioned ability is as a fielder. As my under-13 coach used to say, "Batting and bowling call for talent, but anyone can be a good fielder -- as long as they're willing to graft their arses off in practice." Collingwood sets a wonderful example for youngsters learning the game; and I very much hope that predictions of his demise as a test cricketer (yet again) will turn out to be premature.

Posted by   on (December 27, 2010, 16:50 GMT)

While Collingwood has been an integral and invaluable member of the England team since 2005, it must be realised that the chance of him returning to Australia in four(?) years' time are slim whereas Eoin Morgan will almost certainly be in the reckoning. For this reason, England must not repeat Australia's mistakes but choose to give youth a chance to prove and establish itself over loyalty to old campaigners.

Posted by RohanMarkJay on (December 27, 2010, 16:17 GMT)

Paul Collingwood has admirably played the role for England's batting through much of the last decade, just like Mike Atherton did for England in the 1990s. A batsman you can rely on, he very much has been the backbone of England's batting since at least 2005. As they say all good things must come to an end. If this is indeed Collingwood's last test series, he will be sadly missed and fondly remembered for the excellent cricketer that he was. Well Played Paul Collingwood!

Posted by   on (December 27, 2010, 16:11 GMT)

It would be a SAD day if an Englishman gets dropped from the National team for an Irishman

Posted by simon_w on (December 27, 2010, 15:50 GMT)

Oh strewth, are we writing the obituaries on Colly's carreer.... again? Have we learnt nothing from the previous umpteen times he's be written off? Let's wait and see, eh? Colly is the most under-rated, under-appreciated, and under-estimated cricketer of his generation. His influence on the team is far more than the figure in the runs column. The fat lady will sing for Colly's Test career at some point, of course, but I, for one, won't believe it till I see (hear?) it :)

Posted by 2.14istherunrate on (December 27, 2010, 15:44 GMT)

I do not see why 34 is now too old. Surely this merely denotes experience. Youth does not have all the answers. Collingwood could still play for 4 or five years. This should simply be treated as a loss of form not of capability. Hobbs made 100 100's after 40. Illingworth played till he was 52/3. I am not sure I would keep him for the next match but certainly he would stay in the squad for a long while yet- I think his story goes on.

Posted by amanroy on (December 27, 2010, 15:25 GMT)

NO Please don't make him retire, just give him a break for sometime..He is a great player as well as a person. Colly u will be in good touch I am sure! Good Luck..Please don't criticize him!

Posted by   on (December 27, 2010, 15:24 GMT)

England could still manage to carry an out-of-form batsman like Collingwood while it is winning. But he has proven so far that his form is far from improving any sooner. He lofted the ball straight into the fine leg today, and this proves the point that he had no idea where the fielders were placed nor he could keep the ball down like Trott did.

He has to be replaced with Morgan next test, but hi's form is yet to be tested.Here's a new batsman joining in the final test, which will make it difficult to get used to a pitch and conditions he never played before.

Posted by righthandbat on (December 27, 2010, 14:31 GMT)

Collingwood has to bat at number 6 next game or Morgan has to play at number 6. Either way, Bell should be at 5.

Posted by   on (December 27, 2010, 14:05 GMT)

I agree with Najid and Saket. He's been such a fantastic player for England! He has always come good when his back's against the wall and I'm sure he will this time too.

Posted by EVH316 on (December 27, 2010, 13:02 GMT)

It`s entirely plausible that, as an honourable man, Collingwood takes the decision away from the selectors and walks from Test cricket at the end of this series. I feel this is only likely though if he plays at Sydney, and scores some runs too. Whilst I`ve been known to leave the room when he`s batting, his value has exceeded the reading of pure statistics. It`s important to note though that an improved Cook, a Pietersen who seems to have regained his determination, the redoubtable Trott and newly-impressive Bell have probably reduced the need for England to play someone who has these long runless stretches. I`d be quite happy to try Morgan for a similarly lengthy run in which to establish himself. His skills might be different to Colly`s, but they might be what England need to reach the next level: consistent high-class performances.

Posted by Chris_Howard on (December 27, 2010, 12:29 GMT)

"under the leadership of Strauss and Flower, loyalty is of paramount importance" Loyalty is stupid when it goes on too long, and cost matches and series, as Australia did with Hayden, Hussey, North, and Johnson, to name a few. It cost us three Ashes series (if you include this one, which Australia could yet win, but that would be a fluke, and a misleading Indian Summer).

Posted by   on (December 27, 2010, 12:27 GMT)

I think it would be unfair on Collingwood if England were to drop him based on his batting in this series. Besides i feel bad for Collingwood because he always has to prove himself! a slight slip up and he finds his place on the line.....to his credit he has always managed to rise like a pheonix! He has played the role of a Firefighter to perfection and yet he always finds himself playing for his place in the side.

His contribution to the side is not just restricted to this batting capabilities, he is no newcomer who has to prove himself! We should not forget that he won the T20 World Cup for England, obviously this guy knows what he is doing and what needs to be done! He is arguably the best fielder in the world and add to that his bowling and you begin to see the importance of this guy in the England setup. Colly may not be the most talented in the side but he knows how the get the best out of him and always puts his team before anything else. Such class of players are rare!

Posted by 5wombats on (December 27, 2010, 12:16 GMT)

Mmmm.... I like Colly's attitude and approach....... but, I don't think the current England management will allow for any sentimentality - and there is a good replacement in Morgan waiting in the wings. It may depend on whether England can go on to win at the MCG; if Aus tough it out for a draw - Englands approach will be; "we want to win this series by winning here at the SCG". If that happens then Colly may get dropped in favour of a more attacking option in Morgan. But if England win in Melbourne that will mean the Ashes are safe, and any win in Sydney would be a bonus. That way Colly gets to play at Sydney (do a Steve Waugh last hundred) and retire there. A fitting finale for a good servant of England cricket.

Posted by Paul.Power on (December 27, 2010, 12:02 GMT)

It's true he's not done much with the bat lately, but I'd stick with Colly a while longer - after all, he's still a fantastic catcher, and gives us a settled slip cordon with Strauss and Swann. I would swap him and Bell in the order, though - and should England require five bowlers at any stage, Colly would be my batsman to make way.

Posted by jimbond on (December 27, 2010, 11:03 GMT)

Bowlers in places like India, Pakistan and Srilanka would be rubbing their hands in glee; if Austrlia could finish off Collingwood's career, it would be good for other countries. One of the few English batsman really comfortable against good spin bowling and also against good swing bowling, Collingwood has been a thorn for several sides. When he calls it a day, possibly Eoin Morgan can try to fit into his shoes.

Posted by Chapelau on (December 27, 2010, 10:45 GMT)

If Colly were a useless captain, average fielder and argued with everyone... oh and Australian, then I guess we would be considering his departure but as he is a world class fielder, useful change bowler and a gentleman, I think he will play at Sydney. Beyond that, it depends on the form of would-be replacements like Morgan.

Posted by anver777 on (December 27, 2010, 10:37 GMT)

I wish " Mr.Cricket" for Eng Collingwood gets his form back during this Ashes & retire gracefully from test cricket..........& prolong his career by playing only overs format. Certainly T20 Champions Eng need his positive captaincy & services in T20 & ODI for few more years!!

Posted by   on (December 27, 2010, 10:15 GMT)

atleast another 1 or 2 series should be given to colly everyone knows what type of cricketer he is... for england

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew MillerClose
Andrew Miller Andrew Miller was saved from a life of drudgery in the City when his car caught fire on the way to an interview. He took this as a sign and fled to Pakistan where he witnessed England's historic victory in the twilight at Karachi (or thought he did, at any rate - it was too dark to tell). He then joined Wisden Online in 2001, and soon graduated from put-upon photocopier to a writer with a penchant for comment and cricket on the subcontinent. In addition to Pakistan, he has covered England tours in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand, as well as the World Cup in the Caribbean in 2007
Tour Results
Australia v England at Perth - Feb 6, 2011
Australia won by 57 runs
Australia v England at Sydney - Feb 2, 2011
Australia won by 2 wickets (with 4 balls remaining)
Australia v England at Brisbane - Jan 30, 2011
Australia won by 51 runs
Australia v England at Adelaide - Jan 26, 2011
England won by 21 runs
Australia v England at Sydney - Jan 23, 2011
Australia won by 4 wickets (with 24 balls remaining)
More results »
Ashes Videos
Tremlett not blaming fatigue

Tremlett not blaming fatigue
(01:24) | Jan 28, 2011
Andrew Strauss: 'Fatigue no excuse'

Andrew Strauss: 'Fatigue no excuse'
(00:39) | Jan 23, 2011
Ashes post mortem

Ashes post mortem
(04:13) | Jan 18, 2011
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days