England in Australia 2013-14 January 10, 2014

'I'm flexible in the batting order' - Marsh

  shares 20

When you think of Shaun Marsh and one-day cricket, you think of an opening batsman, a man who builds the platform and might bat deep into the innings. It was as an opener that Marsh emerged in the ODI side five years ago. It was as an opener that Marsh last played for Australia in England this year. And it was as an opener that he made 47, 54, 84 and 119 in his only Ryobi Cup games this summer. But it may not be as an opener that he returns to the side.

The World Cup is just over a year away and finding the right opening combination looms as one of the major tasks for Australia's selectors. Over the past year Australia have used 10 different opening combinations in 23 one-day internationals: Aaron Finch and Phillip Hughes, Hughes and David Warner, Matthew Wade and Warner, Finch and Glenn Maxwell, Finch and Usman Khawaja, Finch and Shane Watson, Warner and Watson, Wade and Watson, Hughes and Watson, Finch and Marsh.

They are not short on options; in fact, there are so many top-order possibilities that Hughes, a prolific ODI scorer over the past year, was squeezed out of the squad to take on England in the series that begins in Melbourne on Sunday. Perhaps the most likely scenario is for Finch and Warner to walk out first; Marsh said he had not yet been told where he would slot in, but was confident he was adaptable enough to bat lower down if asked.

"I'm pretty flexible in the batting order," Marsh said in Melbourne on Friday. "I can bat down the order if that's the role they want me to play. Over the next few days I'll get an understanding of whether I'm in the team or what sort of role they want me to play. It's another good opportunity for me to play well and try to cement my place in the team ... there's lots to play for."

There certainly is much for Marsh to play for, given that he has managed only six ODIs in the past two years. One of those brought a mammoth innings of 151, albeit against the minnows of Scotland in September, but a hamstring injury prevented him from keeping his place for the tour of India. Now he has the chance to make himself an incumbent in the side with a possible maiden World Cup in sight after he was overlooked for the 2011 World Cup.

"I did spend a fair bit of time out of the team. I had to get a lot of runs in one-day cricket over the last 12 months to get an opportunity again," he said. "I feel like my one-day form has been pretty good. I've just got to carry that into the team now and put scores on the board if I get my chance.

"I've performed well at stages when I've played for Australia so that gives me confidence as well. I've just got to be a bit more consistent. If I do get an opportunity, I've just got to grab it with both hands. There's a lot of good players around Australia at the moment who are scoring runs and applying pressure on us guys who are in the team. It's important to take your opportunities and hopefully I can do that over the next three games."

Although Marsh believes he remains a long way from the Test team given his struggle for Sheffield Shield runs this season, he knows that at 30 he still has plenty of time to resume his Test career, given the success of older men like Chris Rogers and Brad Haddin over the past year.

"Oh definitely," Marsh said when asked if his best might still be ahead of him. "You look at a lot of the players now who are playing international cricket, they are all over 30 and they're playing really well. We've got a lot of players in our team as well who are world-class players over 30 so there's still lots of time. But I guess you've just got to take your opportunities when you are this sort of age. There's lot of younger good players coming through."

Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • POSTED BY Matt.au on | January 10, 2014, 10:07 GMT

    While at times he has done ok in the ODI format, he remains consistently inconsistent. Playing one decent innings every 4 or 5 means he may well help the side win one but leaves a hole in the other 3 or 4.

    He's going on 31, he's had lots of chances to show his wares in the Australian side. In my opinion, he simply hasn't ever done well enough, often enough, to warrant leaving out a good youngster. Or a good oldie for that matter.

    Marsh made his first class cricket debut 13 years ago and has 8 FC centries to his name. Regardless of how he does in this series his record and form show he's probably one lucky cricketer to get another chance.

  • POSTED BY on | January 17, 2014, 8:33 GMT

    I dont know why but I love this guy shaun marsh , he is so pleasing to watch when in flow, he got skills that no one has doubt , if selectors give him enough time to get settled he can turn out to be much better than hughes or ferguson .

  • POSTED BY Ms.Cricket on | January 11, 2014, 2:25 GMT

    Aaron Finch is over-rated. Very good in domestic games but performs only 1 in 10 in international games.

  • POSTED BY Unifex on | January 11, 2014, 1:44 GMT

    Marsh is a protected species. The idea that he's in for Hughes, who played really well last season, sends the message that some players are more equal than others.

  • POSTED BY on | January 11, 2014, 1:18 GMT

    my Australian odi lineup will be: 1.warner 2.finch 3.watson 4.clarke 5.bailey 6.maxwell 7.haddin 8.faulkner 9.johnson 10.pattinson 11.mckay/doherty

  • POSTED BY Shaggy076 on | January 10, 2014, 23:05 GMT

    @ 2/22 ; Shaun Marsh has had numerous opportunities to showcase his reshaped attitude they are called games for EA. Showcase your talent there before you get back into the team, so far this season there are many out performing him.

  • POSTED BY VivGilchrist on | January 10, 2014, 22:29 GMT

    If they've selected him as a middle order bat, they should've gone with Ferguson. Ferguson beats Marsh on ODI record and consistency.

  • POSTED BY SevereCritic on | January 10, 2014, 21:10 GMT

    Finch, Warner, Watson, Clarke(c), Bailey, Maxwell, Haddin/Wade(wk), Faulkner, Johnson/Coulter-Nile, McKay, Doherty. Unless Clarke gets injured I don't see Shaun Marsh fitting in anywhere at all.

  • POSTED BY CricketMaan on | January 10, 2014, 15:12 GMT

    Is Marsh the Rohit Sharma of Aus team. High on talent Low on consistency?

  • POSTED BY spongebat_squarestumps on | January 10, 2014, 13:33 GMT

    Top-flight cricketers know they are only ever one performance away from breaking records, or one series performance away from immortality. Look at Mitch J. Or Brad H. Or Chris R. All wore the "written-off journeyman' tag at some recent stage, despite showing early promise and application. Had it. Lost it. But now regained it - this time with interest. Age might not sharpen the reflexes - but it certainly can sharpen the mind. Shaun Marsh has been fighting his own battles but similarly deserves the same opportunity to allow his matured and reshaped attitude to marry with his undoubted skill, and so also rewrite the books.

  • POSTED BY Matt.au on | January 10, 2014, 10:07 GMT

    While at times he has done ok in the ODI format, he remains consistently inconsistent. Playing one decent innings every 4 or 5 means he may well help the side win one but leaves a hole in the other 3 or 4.

    He's going on 31, he's had lots of chances to show his wares in the Australian side. In my opinion, he simply hasn't ever done well enough, often enough, to warrant leaving out a good youngster. Or a good oldie for that matter.

    Marsh made his first class cricket debut 13 years ago and has 8 FC centries to his name. Regardless of how he does in this series his record and form show he's probably one lucky cricketer to get another chance.

  • POSTED BY on | January 17, 2014, 8:33 GMT

    I dont know why but I love this guy shaun marsh , he is so pleasing to watch when in flow, he got skills that no one has doubt , if selectors give him enough time to get settled he can turn out to be much better than hughes or ferguson .

  • POSTED BY Ms.Cricket on | January 11, 2014, 2:25 GMT

    Aaron Finch is over-rated. Very good in domestic games but performs only 1 in 10 in international games.

  • POSTED BY Unifex on | January 11, 2014, 1:44 GMT

    Marsh is a protected species. The idea that he's in for Hughes, who played really well last season, sends the message that some players are more equal than others.

  • POSTED BY on | January 11, 2014, 1:18 GMT

    my Australian odi lineup will be: 1.warner 2.finch 3.watson 4.clarke 5.bailey 6.maxwell 7.haddin 8.faulkner 9.johnson 10.pattinson 11.mckay/doherty

  • POSTED BY Shaggy076 on | January 10, 2014, 23:05 GMT

    @ 2/22 ; Shaun Marsh has had numerous opportunities to showcase his reshaped attitude they are called games for EA. Showcase your talent there before you get back into the team, so far this season there are many out performing him.

  • POSTED BY VivGilchrist on | January 10, 2014, 22:29 GMT

    If they've selected him as a middle order bat, they should've gone with Ferguson. Ferguson beats Marsh on ODI record and consistency.

  • POSTED BY SevereCritic on | January 10, 2014, 21:10 GMT

    Finch, Warner, Watson, Clarke(c), Bailey, Maxwell, Haddin/Wade(wk), Faulkner, Johnson/Coulter-Nile, McKay, Doherty. Unless Clarke gets injured I don't see Shaun Marsh fitting in anywhere at all.

  • POSTED BY CricketMaan on | January 10, 2014, 15:12 GMT

    Is Marsh the Rohit Sharma of Aus team. High on talent Low on consistency?

  • POSTED BY spongebat_squarestumps on | January 10, 2014, 13:33 GMT

    Top-flight cricketers know they are only ever one performance away from breaking records, or one series performance away from immortality. Look at Mitch J. Or Brad H. Or Chris R. All wore the "written-off journeyman' tag at some recent stage, despite showing early promise and application. Had it. Lost it. But now regained it - this time with interest. Age might not sharpen the reflexes - but it certainly can sharpen the mind. Shaun Marsh has been fighting his own battles but similarly deserves the same opportunity to allow his matured and reshaped attitude to marry with his undoubted skill, and so also rewrite the books.

  • POSTED BY siddhartha87 on | January 10, 2014, 11:58 GMT

    Chris LYnn deserved a spot in my opinion.Shaun Marsh Is also not bad.He averages 38.2 in ODIs.Australia should open with Warner and Marsh in my opinion.Finch and Warner sounds explosive at the beginning of the order but in truth they have struggled mostly in their ODI careers and averages much lower than Marsh.If Australia plays Maxwell at no 6 Marsh should play in the top of the order.Also back does not bother him Clarke should resume bowling his gentle left armers. He was a good little part timer when he used to bowl. Ideal XI 1.Warner 2.Marsh 3.Watson 4.Clarke 5.Bailey 6.Maxwell 7.Haddin 8.Faullkner 9.Johnson 10 .Doherty 11.Mckay

    Another option will be opening the innings with Haddin and Warner and play an extra fast bowler like Coulter -Nile

  • POSTED BY Dashgar on | January 10, 2014, 11:45 GMT

    Marsh just won't play much, simple as that

  • POSTED BY blink182alex on | January 10, 2014, 11:10 GMT

    He has played enough now that we now what he is capable of. Inconsistent player at international level who dominates domestically. Don't see why he has been selected really. Warner is having a great summer so yeah he replaces Hughes, but Finch, Watson, Voges, Bailey and Maxwell all went well in India. Haddin is an obvious selection and Clarke comes in for Voges in the middle order.

  • POSTED BY PFEL on | January 10, 2014, 10:05 GMT

    I thought it was a given that Marsh was just an extra in the squad and that he wouldn't even be close to the 11 picked to play initially.

  • POSTED BY dunger.bob on | January 10, 2014, 8:35 GMT

    @ xtrafalgarx : I think I lean more towards your pov than BBE's. I think it's easier for a youngster to come into a winning team than a losing one so, pick the players most likely to help you win is the way to go I'd say. Succession is going to happen naturally so let the young blokes really earn their spots through weight of performance rather than picking them simply because they're young. .. The old guys in this team are running around like colts at the moment so we may as well let them run themselves out. .. Ryan Harris knows the score. He's more or less said he wants to keep going until he breaks. Flog me out then throw me out is all he expects and he's more than happy to do it. .. Good on him, he's a soldier of the highest order imo.

  • POSTED BY xtrafalgarx on | January 10, 2014, 8:08 GMT

    @Bradmanbestever: I will never forget these words, "If you build for the future, you will only win in the future." In other words, stuff the future. Pick a team that can win now and the rest will take care of itself. That's what Lehmann's doing, there doesn't have to be a cycle every few years. If you are the best player, you should play regardless of age.

    If Harris, Rogers, Haddin can play for two more years plus, so be it. As long as they are performing and the team is winning, that's all that matters. The younger blokes can wait their turn until they are good enough, no free baggy greens just because you are young!

  • POSTED BY Micky.Panda on | January 10, 2014, 8:06 GMT

    S Marsh is too slow when it comes to the run rate, in the modern game. He can bat in 12th man position for entire series, for me.

  • POSTED BY dunger.bob on | January 10, 2014, 7:51 GMT

    He's a really good batsman to watch when he's playing well but seems to freeze up in the spotlight a bit too often. .. I'd actually like him to be successful because of his easy on the eye style but to do that he needs to toughen up mentally.

  • POSTED BY BradmanBestEver on | January 10, 2014, 7:38 GMT

    @Rahul Venkat - You are correct - The Aussies need to push on an develop a team for the future.

    Marsh is in the Marcus North and George Bailey category = not good enough given his age

    Players in the Chris Rogers and Ryan Harris category = old but good enough, are OK for a while but they will not be there for the long term and they are taking up space in the 11 - so we need youngsters in there - and they have to have the Aussie "grunt" - look Boone and S. Waugh had - otherwise we will regress to the meek teams of the recent past

  • POSTED BY on | January 10, 2014, 7:11 GMT

    Marsh has been too inconsistent to rely upon... Would ve been a good idea to groom someone young like Lynn for the number 6 spot !

  • POSTED BY on | January 10, 2014, 7:11 GMT

    Marsh has been too inconsistent to rely upon... Would ve been a good idea to groom someone young like Lynn for the number 6 spot !

  • POSTED BY BradmanBestEver on | January 10, 2014, 7:38 GMT

    @Rahul Venkat - You are correct - The Aussies need to push on an develop a team for the future.

    Marsh is in the Marcus North and George Bailey category = not good enough given his age

    Players in the Chris Rogers and Ryan Harris category = old but good enough, are OK for a while but they will not be there for the long term and they are taking up space in the 11 - so we need youngsters in there - and they have to have the Aussie "grunt" - look Boone and S. Waugh had - otherwise we will regress to the meek teams of the recent past

  • POSTED BY dunger.bob on | January 10, 2014, 7:51 GMT

    He's a really good batsman to watch when he's playing well but seems to freeze up in the spotlight a bit too often. .. I'd actually like him to be successful because of his easy on the eye style but to do that he needs to toughen up mentally.

  • POSTED BY Micky.Panda on | January 10, 2014, 8:06 GMT

    S Marsh is too slow when it comes to the run rate, in the modern game. He can bat in 12th man position for entire series, for me.

  • POSTED BY xtrafalgarx on | January 10, 2014, 8:08 GMT

    @Bradmanbestever: I will never forget these words, "If you build for the future, you will only win in the future." In other words, stuff the future. Pick a team that can win now and the rest will take care of itself. That's what Lehmann's doing, there doesn't have to be a cycle every few years. If you are the best player, you should play regardless of age.

    If Harris, Rogers, Haddin can play for two more years plus, so be it. As long as they are performing and the team is winning, that's all that matters. The younger blokes can wait their turn until they are good enough, no free baggy greens just because you are young!

  • POSTED BY dunger.bob on | January 10, 2014, 8:35 GMT

    @ xtrafalgarx : I think I lean more towards your pov than BBE's. I think it's easier for a youngster to come into a winning team than a losing one so, pick the players most likely to help you win is the way to go I'd say. Succession is going to happen naturally so let the young blokes really earn their spots through weight of performance rather than picking them simply because they're young. .. The old guys in this team are running around like colts at the moment so we may as well let them run themselves out. .. Ryan Harris knows the score. He's more or less said he wants to keep going until he breaks. Flog me out then throw me out is all he expects and he's more than happy to do it. .. Good on him, he's a soldier of the highest order imo.

  • POSTED BY PFEL on | January 10, 2014, 10:05 GMT

    I thought it was a given that Marsh was just an extra in the squad and that he wouldn't even be close to the 11 picked to play initially.

  • POSTED BY blink182alex on | January 10, 2014, 11:10 GMT

    He has played enough now that we now what he is capable of. Inconsistent player at international level who dominates domestically. Don't see why he has been selected really. Warner is having a great summer so yeah he replaces Hughes, but Finch, Watson, Voges, Bailey and Maxwell all went well in India. Haddin is an obvious selection and Clarke comes in for Voges in the middle order.

  • POSTED BY Dashgar on | January 10, 2014, 11:45 GMT

    Marsh just won't play much, simple as that

  • POSTED BY siddhartha87 on | January 10, 2014, 11:58 GMT

    Chris LYnn deserved a spot in my opinion.Shaun Marsh Is also not bad.He averages 38.2 in ODIs.Australia should open with Warner and Marsh in my opinion.Finch and Warner sounds explosive at the beginning of the order but in truth they have struggled mostly in their ODI careers and averages much lower than Marsh.If Australia plays Maxwell at no 6 Marsh should play in the top of the order.Also back does not bother him Clarke should resume bowling his gentle left armers. He was a good little part timer when he used to bowl. Ideal XI 1.Warner 2.Marsh 3.Watson 4.Clarke 5.Bailey 6.Maxwell 7.Haddin 8.Faullkner 9.Johnson 10 .Doherty 11.Mckay

    Another option will be opening the innings with Haddin and Warner and play an extra fast bowler like Coulter -Nile