Australia v England, 1st T20, Hobart

England's T20 batting line-up 'scary' - Broad

Andrew McGlashan

January 28, 2014

Comments: 38 | Text size: A | A

Alex Hales hits down the ground, England v Australia, 2nd T20, Chester-le-Street, August 31, 2013
Alex Hales is the world's No.1-ranked batsman in Twenty20 internationals © Getty Images
Enlarge

Stuart Broad has called England's Twenty20 batting line-up "scary" and is confident that the team still has the belief to take something from the woeful tour of Australia.

Broad is England's T20 captain and is now beginning a rare period where he will be leading the side for a concentrated period of time, beginning with the three matches in Australia followed by the tour of West Indies (where he is also likely to captain the short ODI series) followed by the World Twenty20 in Bangladesh.

England so far have a solitary international victory - the one-day win in Perth last week - to show for the trek around Australia although they should have won in Adelaide two days ago only for a late collapse to throw the game away.

There have been more changes of personnel for the T20 format with Alex Hales, Michael Lumb, Luke Wright and Jade Dernbach taking on their specialist short-form roles and it's the first three of those names who Broad believes give England an enviable batting order.

"We've got some unbelievable strikers in our side," Broad said. "If we can lay a platform with the likes of Lumb, Hales, Wright - and see how they strike a ball - then you've got Morgan and Buttler coming in. It's a pretty scary batting line up. I'd imagine the three games are going to be pretty exciting to watch and hopefully we can let our skills to do the talking because, if we do, I think there'll be some high scores."

England will be fielding a side much closer to their first-choice T20 outfit than Australia for these three matches. The home side will resemble more an Australia A line-up, which has been further hit by the withdrawal of James Faulkner due to injury.

England are also helped by the fact that three of the new faces - Hales, Lumb and Wright - have been playing in the Big Bash League over the last six weeks so are well in-tune with the format. Only Dernbach, the second-leading wicket-taker in T20 internationals last year with 13 scalps from seven matches, is coming in reasonably cold although he has been travelling with the one-day squad for the last two weeks as preparation.

"Jade's the only one who's not played a lot of cricket but all the guys have been moving and playing so that's really good," Broad said. "And there's a confidence as well; Morgan's been scoring runs, Buttler's been scoring runs and Wright's probably been one of the standout players in the Big Bash. There's a lot of confidence going into this series, and we know T20's a big confidence game. If you believe you can hit the ball over the ropes then generally you do.

"I'm really excited to captain this group of players because they are a group of players that always want to improve and I think you need that in international cricket. But also a group of players who are not shy and are not scared to take the brave options."

One player who has not featured since the Ashes, but whose name continues to dominate debate about England's future, is Kevin Pietersen. Ashley Giles, the limited-overs coach, previously called him a "million-pound asset" in the Twenty20 format and Pietersen's immediate future will be clearer a few days after his T20 series when the squads for the Caribbean and World T20 are named, but meanwhile Broad would not be drawn into discussing him.

"I think you can see from my position it would be hard to comment on that with the team I've got in that changing room with a T20 coming tomorrow to win here," he said. "The focus is purely on what we do in Australia and once we've got these three games, and hopefully a series win, under our belt we can focus on planning more on the World Twenty20."

One issue, though, that Broad was happy to talk about was the crowd reaction he has received during the tour of Australia. Before the trip, Darren Lehmann called on the local supporters to send Broad home crying, then the Courier Mail refused to use his name ahead of the first Test in Brisbane and he has been booed throughout although with a little less feeling of late.

"It's actually a bit disappointing now - it's getting less and less," Broad said. "You have to really listen for them now. In Brisbane I thought if it continued like that I wouldn't have any ear drums left. To be fair it's been quite good fun; I've enjoyed it and enjoyed the banter with the crowd. It's not been frightful general, abuse. I feel like I've embraced it okay, it's not really affected my performance particularly, I don't think. And there are not many people in the world who can say they've been called a "W" word by 40,000 people. So, I've got that one."

Andrew McGlashan is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Andrew McGlashan

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (January 29, 2014, 11:41 GMT)

English batsman are all sloggers. Not scary at all. They'll hit a six and out the next ball.

Posted by StarveTheLizard on (January 29, 2014, 11:27 GMT)

The "scary" English have struggled. I guess that is T20. Anybody can win on the night - other than Sydney Thunder.

Posted by MarshLillee on (January 29, 2014, 7:35 GMT)

Some good quality in the Poms. Looking forward to a close contest. As for Stuey Broad. Well he has (I think) gone down the W league in his time here. Although he never came and stood by the boundary when I was at the tests. He made sure he was well away from it. So a bit of a cop out from him there.

Posted by Mitty2 on (January 29, 2014, 6:39 GMT)

@JG2074, what dms1972 said. Come on mate a bit of banter! Anyway here's a few inconvenient stats for me: in the English leg of the 10 match Ashes series, England took more wickets, made more runs, Eng's batters scored at a higher average (33 vs 31 I think) and faced more balls, and Eng's bowlers bowled at a lower average. You also had most of the top wicket takers and the only stats to go our way were the much higher scoring rate, the amount of declarations, and us having I think, correct me if I'm wrong, 4 of the top 6 run scorers for the series. You won the key sessions/it was closer than 3-0 suggested blah blah blah, but from those stats yes you clearly were the deserving series winner. If I said otherwise at the time it was probably out of raw emotion.

Posted by heathrf1974 on (January 29, 2014, 5:18 GMT)

I would put England favourite for the T20s. If Warner was playing I would say it was pretty even.

Posted by jonesy2 on (January 29, 2014, 5:08 GMT)

scarily bad? lumb? really? hales? he just swings like a rusty gate. and when I saw dernbachs name I laughed and laughed. coupled with broad himself that's as poor as it gets in the bowling stakes

Posted by dms1972 on (January 29, 2014, 2:14 GMT)

@JG2704 if you actually read what Mitty2 wrote, you would have gotten what he meant. He said it's currently 9-1 and he is predicting it to be 12-1 by tour's end.

Posted by jackiethepen on (January 28, 2014, 22:33 GMT)

Something to reflect on. England beat NZ in ODIs in NZ less than a year ago. NZ beats India in NZ 2014. NZ beat England in England 2013. England beat NZ in Champions Trophy. India beat England in Champions Trophy Final. What does that tell us about ODIs?

Posted by Kapcharlie on (January 28, 2014, 21:09 GMT)

Other than Warner, I don't think Oz are missing any key players for the T20. Clarke has a T20 average that is poorer than Buttler, Hales, Root, Wright, Morgan and Stokes. Faulkner would have been an asset and maybe Johnson although he seems to be slipping back into his old ways. Dernbach (if he plays) is a mystery selection. If...yes, if..England play to their potential it is no contest

Posted by JG2704 on (January 28, 2014, 19:08 GMT)

@Matt Humphreys on (January 28, 2014, 12:20 GMT) Yeah , he's not done so well in the BBL but the ICC T20 rankings - like all ICC rankings - are formed from statistics . Still I can see you're a decent balanced writer

@Mitty2 on (January 28, 2014, 13:01 GMT) re "Trying to stay objective is impossible when it comes to England, I'll save that for other teams (except for maybe matches against Ind in Ind). 12-1, it is" England aren't up 12-1 or down 12-1 vs India in India. I know you like your stats (where they're convenient) but please at least make sure they're correct. Also in the ODI series 2 of the Aus 4 wins could (maybe should) have gone to England. I seem to remember certain Oz fans (correctly) saying that the English leg of the Ashes could have gone to Aus and the scoreline was flattering , Aus were unlucky ... And yet when Eng are in the same boat they're diabolical,chokers ....

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew McGlashanClose
Andrew McGlashan Assistant Editor Andrew arrived at ESPNcricinfo via Manchester and Cape Town, after finding the assistant editor at a weak moment as he watched England's batting collapse in the Newlands Test. Andrew began his cricket writing as a freelance covering Lancashire during 2004 when they were relegated in the County Championship. In fact, they were top of the table when he began reporting on them but things went dramatically downhill. He likes to let people know that he is a supporter of county cricket, a fact his colleagues will testify to and bemoan in equal quantities.
Tour Results
Australia v England at Sydney - Feb 2, 2014
Australia won by 84 runs
Australia v England at Melbourne - Jan 31, 2014
Australia won by 8 wickets (with 31 balls remaining)
Australia v England at Hobart - Jan 29, 2014
Australia won by 13 runs
Australia v England at Adelaide - Jan 26, 2014
Australia won by 5 runs
Australia v England at Perth - Jan 24, 2014
England won by 57 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
Sponsored Links

Why not you? Read and learn how!