England v Australia, 2nd Investec Test, Lord's, 1st day

Cowan, Starc dropped for Lord's

Daniel Brettig at Lord's

July 18, 2013

Comments: 88 | Text size: A | A

Ed Cowan edges a drive to slip, England v Australia, 1st Investec Test, Trent Bridge, 4th day, July 13, 2013
Ed Cowan had a poor Test at Trent Bridge, managing only 14 runs in two innings © Getty Images

Ed Cowan and Mitchell Starc have been dropped for Usman Khawaja and Ryan Harris in Australia's XI for the second Investec Ashes Test at Lord's.

The changes were not unexpected, after Cowan struggled through arguably the poorest of his 18 Tests at Trent Bridge in the unfamiliar No. 3 position and Starc's form oscillated throughout.

Khawaja's inclusion provided him with the first chance to show his improvement as a batsman since he was left out of the Test team in late 2011, serving consistently as a reserve since.

Harris was always a likely call-up for Lord's, as his consistent line, swing and skiddy pace appear ideally suited to the ground and its idiosyncratic slope. Importantly, Harris has played twice at the venue before, and as a senior bowler his temperament will be useful for the tourists as they seek to reverse a 1-0 series deficit.

While Starc can be expected to come back into the team at a later date, Cowan may have played his last Test. He had taken part in 18 consecutive matches since his debut on Boxing Day 2011, but a record of only one century and an average of 31.28 always left him vulnerable to omission.

Australia: 1 Shane Watson, 2 Chris Rogers, 3 Usman Khawaja, 4 Michael Clarke (capt), 5 Steve Smith, 6 Phillip Hughes, 7 Brad Haddin (wk), 8 Ashton Agar, 9 Peter Siddle, 10 James Pattinson, 11 Ryan Harris

Daniel Brettig is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

RSS Feeds: Daniel Brettig

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Mandini on (July 19, 2013, 4:33 GMT)

Following up my previous. I wonder what criteria are used when selecting Australian batters. In 32 innings Cowan has averaged over 31.2 and at times looked like he could bat, while Hughes in his last 32 innings has averaged just under 29.2 has been shifted down the order and rarely if ever looks like he can bat. In his last 10 innings Hughes has had 6 scores of 6 or less while Cowan has had 6 scores of 24 or more. I am not saying Cowan is good enough but surely he must get a place before Hughes.

Posted by RandyOZ on (July 18, 2013, 22:22 GMT)

Good selections, I'd say we have our strongest team out there.

Posted by   on (July 18, 2013, 20:35 GMT)

Honours about even so far, I'd say - AUS needs to make around 450 in their first innings to off-set the disadvantage of batting fourth on a probably wearing track ...let's hope for an interesting match like the first !

Posted by sportofpain on (July 18, 2013, 16:58 GMT)

England will win this 5-0. Australia overachieved in the first test to get so close but man for man there is no comparison. The Aussies are outclassed in every department. If you had Punter and Hussey in the side I'd say the series would be tight but Usman is not Punter and Steve Smith is not Hussey so there is really no chance for this Aussie side. @brotherswaugh - your point about Watson is well made. No specialist bat would survive with a track record of that kind. England are missing a trick by not playing Monty - with Monty and Swann plus Anderson and Finn you have 4 matchwinning bowlers but formulaic thinking prevents an outstanding left arm spinner from getting a game. Still 5-0 England unless weather intervenes.

Posted by thebrotherswaugh on (July 18, 2013, 15:29 GMT)

@David_Boon - interesting point, but isn't that why we select batsmen - to score the runs. @offkey - yep, Finn was definitely unlucky not to be picked - Trent Bridge didn't suit his style of bowling - it'll be interesting to see how he goes in OZ later this year - he should be a handful providing he bowls smart.

Posted by YorkshirePudding on (July 18, 2013, 13:32 GMT)

@Chris_P, no problem, Aus also show that they can dig in and put up a fight when the chips are down.

I've had the series marked as a 1 game win to england possibly 2 if that had some luck.

In the way series Aus are going to be even stronger, so I expect Aus to win by a similar margin down under.

Posted by johnnycash on (July 18, 2013, 12:28 GMT)

@Tony Sadgrove-if Matthew Wade was keeper at Trent Bridge, the 'missed chances' would have been at least double that number. Did you count Broads edge as one? I hope not.

Posted by Mitty2 on (July 18, 2013, 12:26 GMT)

@dr, thirsty, Patto was very unlucky - he bowled very well without getting the rewards, whereas with Starc, every other balls other than the wicket balls were innocuous and/or pressure releasing. Regardless, Patto averages under 25 in both tests and FC; whereas Starc averages above 30 in both FC and tests at an average economy rate and strike rate. Compare their Indian series on those terrible, negating wickets, Starc averaged over 100, whereas Patto 27. Although right now, Patto's pace is considerably down from his previous tests

Posted by Chris_P on (July 18, 2013, 12:23 GMT)

@Gareth_Bain. Sure, as long as you offer a retraction when he doesn't. The only time he has broken down in a match was a small matter of a broken foot! What chances of that happening again? HUGE odds. He should leave his mark in this match, although not sure if he'll play again in the series, perhaps one more.

Posted by AltafPatel on (July 18, 2013, 12:12 GMT)

they were too late to include experienced like Siddle, Harris. It already cost them 4-0 in India.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Daniel BrettigClose
Daniel Brettig Assistant editor Daniel Brettig had been a journalist for eight years when he joined ESPNcricinfo, but his fascination with cricket dates back to the early 1990s, when his dad helped him sneak into the family lounge room to watch the end of day-night World Series matches well past bedtime. Unapologetically passionate about indie music and the South Australian Redbacks, Daniel's chief cricketing achievement was to dismiss Wisden Almanack editor Lawrence Booth in the 2010 Ashes press match in Perth - a rare Australian victory that summer.
Tour Results
England v Australia at Southampton - Sep 16, 2013
Australia won by 49 runs
England v Australia at Cardiff - Sep 14, 2013
England won by 3 wickets (with 3 balls remaining)
England v Australia at Birmingham - Sep 11, 2013
No result
England v Australia at Manchester - Sep 8, 2013
Australia won by 88 runs
England v Australia at Leeds - Sep 6, 2013
Match abandoned without a ball bowled
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days