Epidemic of dropped catches
Yuvraj Singh's failure to hold James Anderson at short leg right at the end of England's second innings took the missed chance count for this Test to 15 - and we've still 90 overs to play.
John Stern in Mumbai
21-Mar-2006
![]() |
![]()
|
The Ashes was such a frenetic series in which no one involved had time to
stop and think that the rash of dropped catches (42 in all) seemed a
strangely appropriate theme.
But a change down the gears in this series (the Nagpur madness aside) has
not done anything for the fielders' handling skills.
Yuvraj Singh's failure to hold James Anderson at short leg right at the
end of England's second innings took the missed chance count for this Test
to 15 - and we've still 90 overs to play.
India have spilled ten of those catches, including a missed stumping by
Mahendra Singh Dhoni, and their total spillages for the series is
approaching 20.
Assessing the damage is easily done on a bald statistical basis: India's
drops cost them about 21 runs a time, England's just under 14. But in real
terms, only hindsight and the final result can pass proper judgement on
these aberrations.
If England win, then Dhoni's horrible missed stumping of Andrew Flintoff
today - when the England captain had given Harbhajan Singh the charge -
will be viewed as a seminal moment. Flintoff, who was also dropped by
Yuvraj before he had scored, was on 14 at the time and finished on 50.
It could not be said that Flintoff took the game away from India as
England supporters kept hoping he would. His dash at Harbhajan was the
only rush of blood in a 146-ball half-century that was an exercise in
self-restraint. Such abstinence would have been inconceivable two years
ago but we've come to expect it from the new mature Fred, Captain Sensible
and father of two.
Was he too sensible? Almost certainly but you can be sure that if Flintoff
is becalmed then runs cannot be easy to come by for anyone. Paul
Collingwood matched Flintoff's scoring rate while he was in which again
shows that the tortoise beats the hare in these conditions.
If India draw or win, then it will be Dhoni's own reprieve by Monty
Panesar that history may regard as the turning point. Dhoni had 23 at the
time and hit Anderson to Panesar's left at mid-off. He certainly picked
the right fielder. Panesar never looked like taking it. It wasn't a sitter
but you would expect it to be taken at this level.
When Rahul Dravid was dropped by Matt Prior three balls later you sensed a
momentum shift which didn't materialise. Dravid did not add to his score
but Dhoni scored a further 41 and was also dropped again on 40 by Shaun
Udal off his own bowling. The time-versus-runs equation is so delicate in
a match like this and Dhoni was in for a further 30 overs.
Why so many drops? The Wankhede Stadium is considered by many to be a bad
ground for seeing the ball, possibly because it is a relatively steep
arena, the crowd is close to the field and there are no gaps between the
stands.
The heat is severe too and maybe lapses in concentration might be a factor
though whether that explains India missing ten chances on home soil is a
moot point.
Geraint Jones, a culprit in the Ashes, has been flawless here. Yuvraj, by
contrast, has put down four, three at bat-pad and one at third slip. He'll
probably hit the winning runs, just to make up for them.
John Stern is editor of The Wisden Cricketer