Hope amidst the ruins
So India's proud record of remaining unbeaten at home for the last 13 years goes to ground and predictably it has thrown up a storm of recrimination
Sankhya Krishnan
07-Mar-2000
So India's proud record of remaining unbeaten at home for the last 13
years goes to ground and predictably it has thrown up a storm of
recrimination. A concerted effort has been launched to lay the blame
at various doors. A favourite conspiracy theory is that the groupism
among the team and the problems between the board, selectors and team
management were responsible. Here I would like to focus on some purely
cricketing reasons for the debacle.
A cursory review of the series would suggest that the prime villain of
the piece were the wickets. For ages now the Indian team has been
pampered by accommodating groundsmen who load the tracks in our
favour. The end result is that it renders us incapable of winning on
sporting wickets. For the series against South Africa this privilege
was withdrawn (in spite of the Board, not because of it) and the
result is there for all to see.
I would think that rather than feeling despondent over the result,
this particular development gives cause for hope. One of the symptoms
of the rot is the repeated failures at international level of the same
players who get tons of runs in domestic cricket. The constant
chopping and changing that these failures entail does not augur well
for the cohesiveness of the team. Conditioned as they are to the slow
wickets at home, their limitations are exposed when they climb up the
ranks and are faced with having to perform under all sorts of
conditions. Years of spoonfeeding at home have simply not equipped us
for the demands of Test match wickets that do not turn square. One is
bound to absorb a few setbacks in the process of gaining acquaintance
with unfamiliar surroundings. Losing on the kind of wickets
encountered against South Africa is certainly a step forward from
winning on underprepared pitches.
It has been repeated ad nauseam that any experimentation with the
wickets should start at the lower levels and not in the Tests where
India should not surrender the home advantage. But what is forgotten
is that if we had beaten the South African on friendly pitches, all
our failings in Australia would have summarily been swept under the
carpet. Thus it is important to have uniform pitches at all
levels. The bottomline is winning under all conditions against all
opponents and if we take a few knocks along that road there can be no
complaints. There are no short cuts to success. The weaknesses of the
Indian batsmen cannot be overcome by introducing them for brief spells
to the perils of more demanding wickets. After all, the Indians could
not acclimatize themselves to the conditions in Australia even after
spending two and a half months there. It will take a couple of seasons
at least for the results to show. Patience is the watchword.
Another aspect that has been put forward is that of player
fatigue. This was the contention trotted out by Chandu Borde, who
pronounced his helplessness about this saying that the schedule had
been chalked out long back. He then let the cat out of the bag by
adding that the schedule was brought upon the Board by the need to
meet the heavy emoluments of the players. The issue of performance
linked pay scales, as already suggested by the England and West Indies
Boards, must surely be at the top of the agenda here too.