March 31, 2011

Bad Pakistan triumph over Good Pakistan

Andy Zaltzman
Younis Khan drops Sachin Tendulkar, India v Pakistan, 2nd semi-final, World Cup 2011, Mohali, March 30, 2011
Bad Pakistan again proved themselves among the greatest catch-droppers ever  © AFP

The most-watched cricket match in the history of the known universe prompted probably the biggest single celebration of a victory in terms of the total number of people shouting “yippee” (or variants thereof) that sport has ever generated.

The cricket did not match up to the pre-match hype. This was inevitable. The only way it could have done so was if Virender Sehwag had scored a 25-ball century, Sachin Tendulkar had posted his 100th India 100 before being carried away into the skies in a flaming chariot, Kamran Akmal had taken a series of sensational one- and no-handed catches, Asad Shafiq had run into a phone-box, whizzed round at high speed and emerged as an at-his-peak Garfield Sobers in a superman outfit with a Pakistan passport in hand, hammered his team to the brink of victory, before Virat Kohli came steaming in like Dennis Lillee’s pet wildebeest and obliterated the Pakistan tail with a blood-curdling barrage of 100mph yorkers, bouncers and googlies, before with four needed off the last ball Saeed Ajmal danced down the wicket to Zaheer Khan and reverse-cover-drove him off one knee in the air towards a diving Ashish Nehra on the boundary who caught the ball in the tips of his fingers to prevent it going for 6 before a passing kestrel pecked it out of his hands and dropped it on the ground in front of Manmohan Singh and Yousuf Raza Gilani who then ceremonially tied their feet together and jointly kicked it over the boundary rope for the tying runs, before saying “No-one deserves to lose this match,” then holding hands and launching into a rousing rendition of ‘Love Lift Us Up Where We Belong’ while the Mohali crowd harmoniously crooned backing vocals and all cuddled effigies of Inzamam-ul-Haq.

Regrettably for cricket as a sport, the TV companies and above all the poor old sponsors, this did not happen. What did happen was a game that, for the neutral, was compelling for a long while, but ultimately a little unsatisfying.

In the Pakistan v Pakistan match that is so often a feature of Pakistan matches, Bad Pakistan’s recurring inadequacies with the bat and in the field proved decisive, aided by a one-off shocker by their previously outstanding strike bowler.

Their two most experienced batsmen, Younus and Misbah, showed that in limited-overs cricket there can be a fine line between “wise old heads” and “doddery old codgers”, combining in a pensionable display of peak-time passivity that harvested just 24 runs from the first 65 balls they faced. This ratcheted up the pressure on their younger team-mates Shafiq and Umar Akmal, who promptly perished trying to force the pace.

Bad Pakistan’s fielders jumped on the bandwagon of friendly co-operation between the nations with a consummate object lesson in the art of dropping catches. They dropped difficult ones, they dropped easy ones. No blade of grass at the PCA was safe from a surprised ball thudding onto it from a fielder’s hands, muttering “I did not expect to end up here.”

Personally, as a cricketer who himself has shelled dollies other fielders would not even have considered were droppable, I could only sit back and applaud. The greats of sport save their best for the biggest stage, and Bad Pakistan again proved themselves among the greatest catch-droppers ever to have adorned the annals of the great game.

Bad Pakistan thus comfortably defeated another excellent display of spin-strangulation by Good Pakistan and their unexpected hero Wahab Riaz, who rumours suggest may have accidentally knocked himself out after dreaming he was a golf club and trying to drive a coconut 300 yards with his head, then waking up thinking he was Wasim Akram and scything down four of India’s top six. Some Pakistan v Pakistan clashes are timeless classics. This one was ultimately a little one-sided and predictable.

India, without being as impressive as in their outstanding quarter-final with Australia, again showed the resolve and calmness of potential champions. Their batting was patchy, two ultimately crucial cameos by Sehwag, brilliantly, and Raina, with cool determination, bookending Tendulkar’s fascinating struggle, which mixed tenacity, lashings of generously donated luck, and isolated outbreaks of his trademark strokemaking genius.

In the field, where they had been rather flaccid in the group stage, they were again focused and determined. Their bowling had seemed a major and potentially costly vulnerability early in the tournament, has been excellent in the knock-out games. Nehra and Munaf, who since the latter’s 4-48 in the opening match against Bangladesh had jointly taken 4 for 264 in 40 overs in matches against Test opposition, took 4 for 73 in 20 overs of probing discipline.

Thus Mohali, and the rest of India, could celebrate the twin joys of (A) India beating Pakistan, and (B) India not losing to Pakistan. Both of which seemed equally important to the supporters. Joy C – potentially winning the World Cup for the first time in 28 years did not seem particularly high on the fans’ celebration priority list. One even said to me: “I don’t care what happens in the final, this was the only game that mattered.” Which was both wrong and silly.

I will write tomorrow on the experience of attending this uberhyped clash of fierce sporting rivals, a momentous contest with a place in a World Cup final at stake. Was it (A) Unforgettable sporting theatre played out in a febrile atmosphere of tension and excitement; or (B) an 8-hour onslaught of decibel-loaded, jingle-spewing, atmosphere shattering noise pollution from the stadium PA system? Or (C) Both? Tune in tomorrow to find out.

Andy Zaltzman is a stand-up comedian, a regular on the BBC Radio 4, and a writer

RSS Feeds: Andy Zaltzman

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by World cup on (July 2, 2011, 6:28 GMT)

In the Pakistan v Pakistan match that is so often a feature of Pakistan matches, Bad Pakistan’s recurring inadequacies with the bat and in the field proved decisive, aided by a one-off shocker by their previously outstanding strike bowler............... Thanking you sir............... ______________________________________ saritha

Posted by Vijai on (April 22, 2011, 7:55 GMT)

The only way it could have done so was if Virender Sehwag had scored a 25-ball century, Sachin Tendulkar had posted his 100th India 100 before being carried away into the skies in a flaming chariot...awesome!

Posted by Danyal on (April 5, 2011, 6:28 GMT)

Love it ... I still cant believe pakistan lost that match .....

Posted by shahrukh imtiaz malik on (April 4, 2011, 17:59 GMT)

what a pointless read. i didnt even manage to finish reading the article beacause of how childish it seemed. yes pakistan didnt have the best of games but the match was by no means one sided. we had our moments what with a fantastic five wicket haul by wahab riaz. apart from umar gul pakistans bowlers were unplayable. if any one was to be blamed for the defeat it was afridi. the decisions to give umar gul the bowl in the powerplay and not taking the powerplay when razzaq was on the field probably cost us the match. long story short, india were the better team but the match was by no means onesided!

Posted by Aneek on (April 2, 2011, 4:52 GMT)

Awesome. Your articles are so much fun to read. I end up laughing and like the humor you add. This is amazing stuff. Hope you write on and on and on for all the matches - especially in which India plays. Thanks !

Posted by Shouldas – Wouldas - Couldas ! on (April 2, 2011, 4:44 GMT)

Thanks for reducing the pain (Pak. fans) !

Crux of the matter is "THE MATCH" was another "Comedy of Errors", A FARCE !

Await your observations wrt todays final.

Posted by bilal on (April 1, 2011, 19:53 GMT)

well i personally feel my man put it very simple bad pakistan beat Good Pakistan.but as far as razzak is concern i guess he havent got his part of playing he is the one guy who wasnt been used younas and misbah are gonners now.New blood should b given a chance.

Posted by Xavier on (April 1, 2011, 19:29 GMT)

I dont understand why Andy is so upset... I belive that this match was played in the right spirt of the game. I do admit that Pak didnt play upto their mark. But dont forget the fact that the Indians lifted their game particularly against Pak and Aus to reach Semis. Dont forget the nail biting tie against Eng. Andy - u need to grow up. You are so pathetic in your sense of writing because you are upset that the Indians & Pakistanis didnt fight each other and as i said earlier the game was played in the right spirit. may be BBC & CNN didnt get enought masala story to air to keep the western world entertained and your inability to digest the fact that this final final is an all asian final. Ind ended Aus dominance since '99. SL showed Strauss men early way to flight. Let there be some unbiased approach in your way of writing - may be then the public will appreiciate you.

Posted by Ketan on (April 1, 2011, 19:03 GMT)

You manage to be funny as well as insightful at the same time.

Contrast this to the videos posted by Sid and Gokul, who are hopelessly biased against every city except Chennai. Not every Indian city can be as great as Chennai. Instead of looking for things that are good in a city like Chandigarh, they consistently try to focus on finding faults with it. Is there no city except Chennai which meets their high standards?

Posted by Qasim on (April 1, 2011, 18:47 GMT)

I was hoping you would mentioned pakistan's ultimate game plan - Let Sachin Tendulkar score a century to raise its chance of winning this match !

Comments have now been closed for this article


Andy Zaltzman
Andy Zaltzman was born in obscurity in 1974. He has been a sporadically-acclaimed stand-up comedian since 1999, and has appeared regularly on BBC Radio 4. Zaltzman's love of cricket outshone his aptitude for the game by a humiliating margin. He once scored 6 in 75 minutes in an Under-15 match, and failed to hit a six between the ages of 9 and 23. He would have been ideally suited to Tests, had not a congenital defect left him unable to play the game to anything above genuine village standard. He writes the Confectionery Stall blog on ESPNcricinfo.

All articles by this writer