September 14, 2011

Maths 1, India 0

Andrew Hughes
Munaf Patel celebrates dismissing Ravi Bopara for 96, England v India, 4th ODI, Lord's, September 11, 2011
Munaf Patel was understandably jubilant, having dismissed Ravi Bopara by virtue of knowing the 16 times table by heart  © AFP
Enlarge

RELATED LINKS

Sunday, 11th September The forces arrayed against India this summer have been formidable. The fixture list, the England team, the fragility of the human body, and the weather have all conspired to make this the least successful visit to these islands since Julius Caesar spent a late summer break shivering in a tent on the Sussex coast.

And now even mathematics has turned its back on the tourists. Anyone who has tried to dry their washing in England in September knows how umpires Erasmus and Illingworth felt today. Is it really raining? It is just spitting? Is it worth fetching your underpants in again? Is it brightening up over there?

But amidst all the traipsing in and out, the shaking of umbrellas and the holding out of rainfall-measuring palms, India appeared to have won. That was, until maths jumped out from behind the scoreboard and yelled “Surprise! You got it wrong!” before stamping all over their victory cake and high-fiving Alastair Cook.

I know how they feel. Maths was always doing that to me. No matter how hard you think you’ve studied the equation, there is always something you’ve missed. It wasn’t quite as wince-inducing as Shaun Pollock’s numerical faux pas in 2003, when he failed his maths GCSE live on national television, but you had to feel sorry for India.

Now personally I like Duckworth Lewis. Its very complexity is reassuring. After all, something that complicated must be accurate. And it has succeeded in making precipitation entertaining - a godsend for a game so frequently plagued by the wet stuff. But this messing about with bits of paper full of numbers is all a bit old school.

What we need is an entirely separate scoreboard; the Duckworth Lewis-ometer. It could be concealed below ground, rising like the Lord’s floodlights should it be required, to keep us all updated, ball by ball, on the D/L situation. And Ravi Bopara could even have the numbers beamed directly onto the inside of his helmet so he could choose just the right moment to play that pointlessly risky match-turning slog.

Monday, 12th September Today’s ICC awards were, quite rightly, dominated by the modern game’s titans of crease-occupation, Mr Trott and Mr Cook. Despite an apparently shaky microphone technique and uncertain podium footwork, the England vice-captain kept up a dogged acceptance speech and proved difficult to remove, though after two hours, officials did finally persuade him to leave by tricking him into believing it was the tea interval.

Having kept the audience waiting while he scraped an immaculate line in the carpet, Trott’s speech was a risk-free affair, featuring no expansive verbiage, just a careful accumulation of thank yous and platitudes. He left the stage to enthusiastic applause, as the rumour that KP was on next brought people back from the bar .

And amidst all the high-profile winners, it is worth mentioning some of the unsung heroes. The Sir Humphrey Appleby Award for Administrator of the Year was announced towards the end of proceedings, though it was delayed for several minutes as Haroon Lorgat had to ask the cleaning lady to turn off her vacuum cleaner.

Sadly none of the nominees for the award could be present. Dr Julian Hunte had caught the wrong flight and ended up in London, Ontario. Mr Ijaz Butt had accidentally locked himself in his pantry, and Mr James Sutherland was detained in his hotel room, having caught his Cricket Australia tie in the executive trouser press. In the opinion of the judges, there were no winners in this category, only losers, and the award was held over.

Andrew Hughes is a writer currently based in England

RSS Feeds: Andrew Hughes

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Alex on (September 17, 2011, 9:31 GMT)

In Port Elizabeth when rain is threatening they show a three column table on the scoreboard. The first column shows the ball number, eg. 20.1, 20.2, through to 21. the second column shows the score required to win after each ball, the third shows the score required to win after each ball should a wicket fall. Something like this system should be implemented globally to avoid confusion.

Posted by raja on (September 15, 2011, 7:16 GMT)

This is raja from CF. Lovely piece, Andrew. Thoroughly enjoyed it. :-)

Posted by Deval on (September 15, 2011, 6:37 GMT)

Yes India played very bad in the series, I admit that and every Indian/Indian player should. But for the one who said "Maths doesn't deserve to be insulted like that. India on the other hand.." in his comment should mind his language, talk about team's performance but you are too small to talk about India it self. Best reply to your comment will be, Don't forget India is the country where even Zero was discovered! With out India's history there won't be no maths.. Anyways everyone is just keep talking about the lost series from Indian cricket team that shows how eagerly people were waiting for a chance like this.. and that again shows how important is Indian team in cricket :P Anyways they were at the top for long time, and I think England can stay there for quit long as well, lets see how it goes..

Posted by sideshowbob on (September 15, 2011, 4:34 GMT)

scoreboards should show 2 numbers; a) how many runs must be scored on the next ball to be ahead, and b) how many runs you'd be ahead if you lose a wicket on the next delivery. Examples: -2/-18. -2 is good. It means you'll be 2 ahead if the next ball is a dot. -18 is bad. It means if you lose a wicket on the next delivery, you'll be 18 runs behind.

Another example; 4/-25 4 means you need a 4 off the next ball to be ahead. -25 means if you lose a wicket next ball you'll be 25 runs behind.

-23/-4 -23 means you'll be 23 runs ahead if the next ball is a dot. -4 means you'll be 4 runs BEHIND if the next ball is a wicket.

The signing must be worked out to be less confusing, but something like this would be good.

Posted by Gaurav on (September 15, 2011, 2:12 GMT)

@zaky - India is birthplace of Maths.. And I am quoting Einstein here.

Posted by Laki on (September 15, 2011, 0:57 GMT)

I love that first comment xD

Posted by babu on (September 14, 2011, 19:19 GMT)

Andrew, I could not laugh at all ... all are dry wits and pretty much highly one sided and can sense height of mediocrity in your writing, especially this.

Posted by Imran Khan on (September 14, 2011, 18:38 GMT)

Great Work Dude Nature's best way of telling the Indians "you are not the boss of everything".....

Posted by vik on (September 14, 2011, 18:35 GMT)

Man , Looks like you are overtly carried away by ENG victory.Oh ya why no you have a reason to get carried away too as of ENG have never won any major title so this sure feels you good to be No 1 before ENG soon looses it.Just on one defeat how come u are coming up with so many articles.Had to understand.You need to see the highlights of Indian victory in WC.Soon India will be inform and would be ready to beat ENG the same way as they did to them in the lousy Eng weather and Lousy DRS rules favoring them.Good luck.

Posted by Karthik on (September 14, 2011, 18:08 GMT)

that was the best in a while............Ijaz butt had locked himself in the pantry.....:):)HILARIOUS...!!!

Comments have now been closed for this article

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Andrew Hughes
Andrew Hughes is a writer and avid cricket watcher who has always retained a healthy suspicion of professional sportsmen, and like any right-thinking person rates Neville Cardus more highly than Don Bradman. His latest book is available here and here @hughandrews73

All articles by this writer