April 25, 2012

Put Your House In Order, Team England

Kenny Shovel

I am becoming increasingly concerned that Team England is failing in its duty to develop batsmen who can succeed in county cricket.

The combined contribution of 40 runs from four completed innings made by Andrew Strauss and Ian Bell during the latest round of Championship matches is just the tip of the iceberg. How many runs has Eoin Morgan scored for Middlesex since the end of the Sri Lanka tour? How far back would your regression therapy have to take you before suppressed memories emerged of Kevin Pietersen playing match-winning innings for whichever county he was contracted to at the time?

Let us be clear on this: enormous amounts of time, money and specialised coaching have been made available to the national set-up, yet we fail to see a consistent return on that investment when international players are asked to make the step up to Championship cricket.

I can, of course, appreciate the difficulty in adjusting from conditions found on a tour of the sub-continent to those when you play in England during monsoon season. In Sri Lanka, the intense humidity demands prolonged periods of concentration from batsmen as they try to spell out the full names of opposition players for their forthcoming tour diaries. By contrast, a game against Durham leaves you facing highly experienced opening bowlers who are rendered immune to sledging by years of mentally disintegrating encounters with the hen parties that terrorise Newcastle’s Bigg Market on a Friday evening.

But the fact remains that too many England batsmen are being selected for county cricket before they have developed the technique to cope at that level. Clearly this situation is unacceptable. Put your house in order, Team England. Otherwise we need to reduce the number of international matches and give your players an opportunity for the increased rest and practise that will improve their county game.

Not that suspect technique against the seaming ball has been restricted to returning Test players. I’ve already witnessed several innings this season by senior county pros that appeared to be a tribute to the Two Ronnies, as they kept using the footwork required to play the delivery they had just received, rather than the one they were actually facing. The results, as you might imagine, were complete bill hooks.

This is partly the legacy of a domestic schedule that is a muddled, over-extended compromise and an ECB marketing department that believes it can rebrand early April as ‘Summertime Lite’.

The underlying problem is Twenty20 cricket. Not the game itself, but the way it is integrated into the season. With late September being kept clear for participation in the Champions League and the qualifying rounds for that competition, also known as the Friends Life t20, draped across mid-summer like a Bayer Leverkusen beach towel across a sun lounger, Championship cricket has no option but to spill ever earlier into weather as unpredictable as a pub dog and as helpful to seam bowling as, well, spring time in England.

This is why the current argument over how many domestic T20 games should be played is missing the point. Sixteen, ten or next year’s proposed 14 match programme is not the problem. It is having that amount of games crammed together in a short period of time that is causing concerns of overkill. Two or three home games a week at £15-20 a throw is unrealistic when mass unemployment, a double-dip recession and the financial demands of the school holidays are affecting everyone’s disposable income.

The ECB should be applauded for the innovation of T20 cricket; it may well be a financial lifeline that saves the game. The blueprint they created back in 2003 for a competition played over a brief, dedicated period of time, has been copied and improved by the IPL, the Big Bash, and a number of other domestic competitions. It is a format of that allows for high-profile specialist Twenty20 players to be brought in on short-term contracts to both improve the standard of play and to market the competition itself.

But it is time for a rethink of that blueprint. It is time for ‘Friday night is Twenty20 night’ to run throughout the season, with wallets given chance to recover in between Twenty20 games and all competitions of the domestic season given an opportunity to avoid the worst of the English weather. Some big-name players would be lost, but so would the impression that the middle of summer is set aside for supporters to be milked for every possible penny.

The ECB had the forethought to innovate with Twenty20 cricket. Now is the time for them to innovate once again by breaking away from the competition format they created almost a decade ago.

Kenny Shovel has never sat in a press box or charged a match programme to expenses

RSS Feeds: Dave Hawksworth

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Anonymous on (May 23, 2012, 12:21 GMT)

I could not agree more. Thursday and/or Friday nights throughout the season would be absolutely perfect. Even if I didn't go and watch one at the ground, at least I would know that there would be one on the tv in the pub to watch.

Posted by njr330 on (May 4, 2012, 12:44 GMT)

'...Like a Beyer Leverkusen beach towel on a sun longer..' Classic !!

Posted by George Clarke on (April 27, 2012, 19:08 GMT)

Completely agree.

I also would like to see the end of weekend Twenty20 games, why put your showcase event at a time when a large percentage of your customers are playing cricket themselves? I agree a regular weeknight slot would work best, and help attendances.

This could also make counties invest in season long overseas players, i understand this is difficult due to other short format tournaments, but i'd imagine many cricket fans would go to more Championship matches if they could watch a Ricky Ponting bat for the day. You could work it so it helps all formats of the game.

Posted by Kenny Shovel on (April 26, 2012, 13:29 GMT)

Julian:

The original tournament back in 2003 lasted less than a fortnight with the finals day a month later. It was short, entertaining but didn’t interfere with the rest of the season.

Since then 2020 has become a significant source of income, the number of games have multiplied and the competition’s dedicated window has grown, pushing aside the championship as it expands.

We need 2020 - its income is vital - but much of the resentment towards it from county supporters would be eased if it were better integrated into the season. There are a number of ways of doing that, but I would go for playing a 2020 game immediately before each championship game. Perhaps on a Friday night, perhaps on a Wednesday. That way you eliminate all the travelling required by the current 2020 format, plus you can use the 2020 games to promote the upcoming Championship match – your 2020 ticket could get you into a day of the Championship game for £5 for example.

K_S

Posted by Julian Dawson on (April 26, 2012, 11:51 GMT)

Excellent piece. One has the feeling that the County Championship is being sacrificed on the altar of T20.

Comments have now been closed for this article

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Dave Hawksworth
Dave Hawksworth has been in a relationship with cricket for over 30 years. During that time he's seen Ken Rutherford score 300 before tea, Geoff Boycott hit the first ball of the day for a boundary, and drunk a lot of beer. He's never sat in a press box or charged a match programme to expenses.

All articles by this writer