April 30, 2014

Let's talk about Mumbai

Andrew Hughes
The Pollard problem: he throws his bat around but not quite like you wanted him to  © BCCI
Enlarge

By the time you read this, Mumbai may not be bottom of the IPL, although if they are not bottom of the IPL, they will certainly be next to bottom.

Wednesday's game with Hyderabad is a clash of the fallen titans, a primeval mud-wrestling match in which two lightly armoured, medium-sized dinosaurs squabble ineffectually to see who will be last out of the tar pit. As heavyweight bouts go, it's not so much a rumble in the jungle as a rustle in the undergrowth.

So what has gone wrong? Why are last year's all-conquering Intergalactic Champions of T20 rooting around at the foot of the table, hoping that a good showing in the Pepsi Play Nice Politeness League might offset their lack of proper points?

This blog doesn't often dabble in technical cricket analysis, because my credentials in the field of technical cricket analysis are somewhat lacking. I haven't ever played for England. I haven't even played for Worcestershire, and I was thrown out of cricket journalism college for misplacing an apostrophe in a Duncan Fletcher quote.

I have spent a decade or three watching cricket, but then I've also spent a lot of time over the years watching sparrows, and that hasn't helped me to attain more than a shaky grasp of the rudiments of flying, egg-rearing and nest-building.

Still, as a decadent capitalist, I recognise a gap in the market when I see one. ESPNcricinfo is full of qualified people offering informed opinions, but who is catering for those who are looking for uninformed speculation and uneducated guesswork? No one.

So, Mumbai: what's the problem?

Well first of all, there has been a 100% drop in the Sachin quotient. Without him, there is no wind in Mumbai's sails, there is no air in their blue balloon, there is no music in their hearts, there is no seasoning in their sandwiches… well, you get the idea.

Then there's the Pollard problem. This is similar to the predicament of the man who bought Damien Hirst's diamond-studded skull. It's an eye-bogglingly expensive conversation piece, one of the world's top conversation pieces, in fact. But where to put it?

If you mount it over your front door, you get the conversation out of the way early, which is a bit of a waste. On the other hand, if you wait until the guests are leaving before bringing out the skull, then the brilliance of the diamond-skull related conversation is squeezed into the last moments of the evening and you end up wondering what might have been as you tidy away the dips and the untouched champagne bottles.

In fact, Mumbai have a double problem, because as well as a diamond-encrusted skull, they also have a peculiar object d' art from New Zealand: an over-stuffed Kiwi bird that was purchased at the height of the market in a storm of publicity, but which, on closer examination, looks a little dull and ordinary. Do you bring out the work of obscure New Zealand taxidermist Corey J Anderson before the diamond Pollard or after?

Thirdly, Mumbai have contracted a nasty case of the shuffles, an infectious disease common in T20 teams, with symptoms including confusion, indecision, and the overwhelming desire to move Mike Hussey up and down the batting order.

It has also been said that they have too many old players. This is nonsense. Younger cricketers, prone to throwing themselves around with hamstring-endangering abandon can learn much from the way that the older professional conserves energy by refraining from such reckless activities as sprinting, running, bending, jumping or stretching.

So what can Mumbai do about it? Nothing. Not only can they do nothing about it, but they don't need to either, because there's nothing wrong with Mumbai.

All the IPL teams are the same: stuffed with big biffers and wily ball flingers, taking turns to be awful and brilliant, according to the law of cricket averages. Look at Delhi. Complete duffers last season; only partial duffers this year. All Mumbai have to do is pick a team and stick to it and they are bound to start winning sooner or possibly later.

And even if they don't, at least they'll be keeping us entertained.

RELATED LINKS

Andrew Hughes is a writer currently based in England. He tweets here

RSS Feeds: Andrew Hughes

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by common9 on (May 1, 2014, 15:08 GMT)

Nice one Andrew. The Indian Express summarized the Mumbai situation today in its title of the story: "Maximum city minimum points".

Posted by Rally_Windies on (May 1, 2014, 5:25 GMT)

everyone is looking to Pollard to win it for Mumbai ...

but lets be honest ..

not even Gayle or Maxwell can come in the 15th over and win it for you when your top5 have already lost the game ....

Pollard is capable of pulling off miracles 1 out 4 games that he is put in such a situation !

If MI WON this last game, it would have been because of 1 player performing a miracle ...

If MI wanted Pollard to average 40-50 and give them decent starts,.. like Gayle and Maxwell he would be batting at 4 or higher ...

Pollard is in the team to perform miracles ....

That is how MI use him ...

And today the Miracle did not come ..

Of course for a guy recovering from Knee surgery and a year of no cricket..

Pollard makes the rest of the MI batting look like they are ALL over paid !

Posted by nareshgb1 on (May 1, 2014, 1:17 GMT)

the irony is, there will be plenty of people living in Mumbai (I lived there once) who might be saying - well what the hell who cares? is this really Mumbai team?

Rahane and Kulkarni play for RR, couple of others play elsewhere. And with Sachin gone - who cares for these outsiders really?

Posted by   on (April 30, 2014, 15:09 GMT)

Andrew you are my second favorite English cricket writer after Zaltzmann! May your tribe grow. Reminds me of Wodehouse when I read you.

Posted by   on (April 30, 2014, 13:41 GMT)

i think mumbai made a mistake by leaving dinesh karthik,dwayne smith,and johnson.....they were d ones who performed for them

Posted by   on (April 30, 2014, 13:40 GMT)

Brilliant article, I love the watching birds comparison, how true. May I am humbly submit that the Pollard problem is not competence but more of a confused mind. He is faced with the same problem as the prince in the harem, he knows what to do but does not know where to start. A decision must be made for Polly to bat one down, he should face no less than 8 to 10 overs and not brought in at the end in a confused state , do I build the inning or do I slog every ball because the team is woefully behind the run rate.

Posted by Nampally on (April 30, 2014, 13:23 GMT)

The problem with Mumbai is one of neglecting their local youngsters. There have been some fine players like Zol, Suryakumar Yadev who have been let go & play for other teams. Players like Tendulkar - born locally- brought loyalty to Mumbai. In fact if you turn the clock few decades back, Mumbai was always the heart of Cricket in India. Indian Test squad contained 75% of players from Mumbai. Bombay won the All India Schools, University & Ranji Trophy Championships consistently over the years. The IPL team of Mumbai today has very few local players. Hence there is no passion or intensity as needed for Team Pride. Secondly, the pro's hired are based on names & past reputation. Even the local content has aging stars like ZAK & Harbhajan- past their best.Their current form & performance record is poor despite their past. So we have a disjointed team of individual stars with no binding force or team work so essential in T20. SRH & MI are fighting to avoid the basement- Lottery Winners!

Posted by Speng on (April 30, 2014, 13:07 GMT)

Dunno about Corey Anderson yet but Pollard is an overrated basher. He can't play up in the order because he can't deal with swing (or turn). He also doesn't like back of a length or width either. So anything but straight, length in the slot and you've got him sorted.

Posted by Tambapani on (April 30, 2014, 11:24 GMT)

Bottoms-up! A Fantastic article . Cannot wait to see whether Mumbai will be at the bottom, or next to bottom!!

Comments have now been closed for this article

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Andrew Hughes
Andrew Hughes is a writer and avid cricket watcher who has always retained a healthy suspicion of professional sportsmen, and like any right-thinking person rates Neville Cardus more highly than Don Bradman. His latest book is available here and here @hughandrews73

All articles by this writer