THE CORDON HOME

BLOGS ARCHIVES
SELECT BLOG
May 23, 2014

TV innovations: enhancements or irritants?

Dave Hawksworth
The hat cam: providing you with angles you'd rather not have  © BCCI
Enlarge

For anyone who developed their love of cricket while watching the current era of retina-assaulting, all-angles-covered T20 network coverage, it might be hard to believe that there was once a simpler time when televised cricket matches would show every delivery bowled using a single camera position, placed roughly in line with the pitch and at just one end of the ground. Of course there were other cameras scattered around the boundary edge to follow the ball when it was played into the outfield, but the pitch itself was shown from a single viewpoint, with the action alternating between an over when the bowler was running away from the camera, followed by an over where the batsman had his back to you while he faced bowling from the other end.

This had the slight advantage of making it easier to identify which end of the ground a bowler was operating from, and the considerable disadvantage that for half the day's play there was a pretty good chance that the batsman would obscure your view of where the ball had pitched. And given the standard of fitness among players at the time, there were one or two batsmen who were obscuring quite an acreage.

Looking back now, it seems like an obvious and fairly straightforward move to add an extra camera that would give a consistent and clear view of the pitch. Yet despite this innovation having first been tried during the late '70s, in Kerry Packer's World Series Cricket, it was years later that the BBC came round to incorporating the idea into their coverage of the game in England. Even then, the change was announced with the same tone of earnest solemnity that a parent would use to explain the concept of death to a small child. And for some time after its introduction a caption proclaiming which end of the ground was being used would be regularly displayed to prevent viewers from becoming dangerously disorientated. Clearly this was not an era when every television network was entirely comfortable with change.

There are those watching who would appreciate the occasional wide-angle shot of the ground that lingers just long enough for you to register the field placings being used

Fast-forward to the present day and sports broadcasters now seem to be involved in an innovation arms race, each trying to outdo the other with the latest gimmick or camera angle. Much of what has been developed over the last decade has enhanced the game. Some of it having a fundamental impact - Hawk-Eye has reinvigorated the art of spin bowling, or at least a spin bowler's hope of getting an lbw; while Hot Spot has successfully spread dissent over umpiring decisions to a third official.

But there's also a fair degree of innovation just for the sake of doing something new. Last year Sky introduced their new spin-rev counter, which told us something, possibly something useful, but which was most effectively used to emasculate any spinner who couldn't regularly "get it in the red zone".

So far this English season we have already seen an umpire "hat cam", which provides high-definition close-ups of bowlers collecting their sweaters, and a shaky, slightly out-of-focus alternative view on lbw appeals. Sky has also imported a percentage win-prediction system from New Zealand called WASP. By the end of Tuesday's T20 game between England and Sri Lanka not even the Sky commentary team cheerleaders sounded convinced of its worth. Although to be fair, anyone willing to name their cricket-related product after a pointless irritant that ruins summer is showing an outrageous degree of self-confidence.

For the most part, the various innovations have vastly improved cricket coverage. But it's worth remembering that one of the reasons the BBC resisted change all those years ago was a belief that a significant part of their audience would be knowledgeable enough about the game to take a close interest in which end of a ground was being used by which bowler. That contrasts with so many modern innovations in coverage that appear designed to appeal to the casual viewer. There's nothing wrong with that instinct to explain and expand the game to a wider viewership, but it's also worth remembering that there are those watching who would appreciate the occasional wide-angle shot of the ground that lingers just long enough for you to register the field placings being used, and who, when England need 28 off 12 balls with another over from Lasith Malinga to come, can work out the odds for themselves, thank you very much.

RELATED LINKS

Dave Hawksworth has never sat in a press box or charged a match programme to expenses

RSS Feeds: Dave Hawksworth

Keywords: Trends

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Twinkie on (May 28, 2014, 12:52 GMT)

I've been lamenting about not seeing the field placings for years. Makes it difficult for one to analyze the game and make predictions. It also makes it difficult for novices to understand and appreciate what the bowler and the batsman are trying to do. Also sometimes I don't know if the batsman has played a good shot or a bad shot until it either reaches the boundary or is caught. Elementary, one would think, for anyone who knows about cricket and directing cameras and programmes to know the importance of the bigl picture.

Posted by choo_for_twenty_choo on (May 25, 2014, 17:47 GMT)

HelmetCam? Pfft! Given the propensity to be struck and the superb angle of view, why is no one investigating the intimate marvel that is BoxCam? Unparalleled views from both the strikers and non-strikers end...

Posted by srriaj317 on (May 24, 2014, 6:05 GMT)

I actually think the 'hat-cam' is a great angle to have once in a while. Last BBL, we got to see Watson pull a ball for six from his helmet cam which showed what the pace & bounce actually looked like. A bit of perspective for viewers.

I also enjoyed a SpiderCam shot during the Ashes taken from behind slips which showed how Johnson was bowling. Now the WASP...where can we find a bottle of pesticide?

Posted by dunger.bob on (May 24, 2014, 0:20 GMT)

I don't mind Spider Cam. It zips around and can give you shots from eye level right up to 25 metres above the ground. The old spider cam is alive with possibilities. One of these days a] a ball will hit it b] it will hit a player. I can't wait.

The umpire hat cam is slightly annoying and is Ok in small doses imo. It should provide an amazing view of the umpire getting smacked between the eyes by a fierce drive when that eventually happens.

I don't like in-game player interviews either. Leave them alone will you. How would you like it if a player interrupted you while you were interviewing someone. It's just rude.

Posted by py0alb on (May 23, 2014, 14:33 GMT)

I HATE in-game player interviews. Stop distracting the players, you're turning the entire game into a farce. How about actually employing someone who knows about cricket to explain the various tactical conundrums to the intelligent viewer? Every over without exception should start with a shot showing the field, it puts everything that happens in context. Now you know WHY the batsman is playing a scoop shot because fine leg is up and his preferred outlet over cover has been blocked off. Most cricket commentary is simplistic to the point where its starting to sound like a parody of british people commentating on baseball or something.

Posted by yujilop on (May 23, 2014, 10:36 GMT)

Sometimes you wish for a simpler view. Part of it is nostalgia, part of it is not wanting to be force-fed the broadcaster's opinions on every little detail.

As for the Umpire's Hat Cam, it seems the next "innovation" is going to be all the players wearing Google Glass. I'd like to see a batsman being fed real-time information as the bowler makes his approach.

Bowler: R. Player (Rt. Arm Fast, Over the Wicket) Expected pace (4th ball of 3rd over): 143.6km/h (63% probability) Length: 3.4 meters from batting crease (53%) Line: pitching 13cm outside off, angling inwards (61%) Height of bounce: 7cm below top of off stump Recommended shot: Straight drive ACCEPT? Y/N >>>Y

3 seconds later:

ERROR: UNABLE TO ADJUST FOR BOWLER'S SWEATY PALMS RESULT: EDGED TO FIRST SLIP; CAUGHT Recommended Action: Walk to Pavillion USE GOOGLE MAPS TO IDENTIFY SHORTEST PATH? Y/N

Posted by   on (May 23, 2014, 9:42 GMT)

I agree. Spacial recognition of the ground and fielders out the window with todays pitch centred technology. Also some of us would like to have the occasional clip of the bowler running in towards the batsmen with the batsman's back to us. Just to get another view in. One innovation I loved during the t20 WC and the big bash was the lighting bails. I thought it was usefull !

Comments have now been closed for this article

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Dave Hawksworth
Dave Hawksworth has been in a relationship with cricket for over 30 years. During that time he's seen Ken Rutherford score 300 before tea, Geoff Boycott hit the first ball of the day for a boundary, and drunk a lot of beer. He's never sat in a press box or charged a match programme to expenses.

All articles by this writer