June 18, 2014

Let's hear it for the glorious five-day draw

Andrew Hughes
Don't make any sudden movements when approaching these endangered creatures  © Getty Images
Enlarge

I think we're all agreed that Test cricket is on the way out. It twitches occasionally, but this is no more than the last spasm of a fly that has banged its head on the cold uncaring window of commercial fate one hundred times in a row and is now expiring on the same dusty window ledge where all dodgy insect-sport metaphors go to die. Test cricket is a goner, and will soon be as extinct as the pterodactyl, monetarism, and the penny-farthing.

Or is it? Fear not, cricket fans, because although the ICC is showing the same urgency in saving Test cricket that the Emperor Nero did upon hearing that there was a conflagration in the Roman precincts, the thrilling inconclusiveness of Monday's play at Lord's showed why the format must endure, and how we can help to save it.

Conventional attempts to save Test cricket have depended on making it more like other sports: gladiator contests where one side is crushed and the other triumphant. A modern audience doesn't insist on literal blood and gore, but they do like to savour the sight of players enduring the agony of defeat, or worse still, the agony of fearing defeat.

Test cricket isn't really like that. It's the sort of fight in which the fallen gladiators can hide behind their shields for four days then walk away feeling pleased with themselves.

Perhaps somewhere in an ECB filing cabinet is a mouldy manila folder containing a hand-written proposal to introduce Test match sudden-death. In the event of a draw in which one team has been losing for four days, upon the bowling of the final ball the players will look to the pavilion balcony where a toga-wearing Michael Atherton will extend a stately arm to determine the their fate. Thumbs up and its handshakes all round. Thumbs down and the dominant side get to beat their opponents to death with the stumps.

Non-cricket folk may deride the phenomenon of the five-day draw, but we should celebrate it. Thanks to the possibility of the futile stalemate, Test cricket is one of few pastimes that can disprove George Orwell's theory about sport being war minus the shooting (the others being professional Hand-Shaking and Association High-Fiving).

Admittedly, to accept this proposition, you have to overlook a few things: Bodyline, Sydney 2008, The Oval 2006, the career of Dennis Lillee, sledging, ball-tampering, jelly beans, Murray Mints, Vaselinegate and so on. But set aside these few isolated dozens of incidents and you will see that Test cricket, thanks to the titanic draw, offers the chance for both sides to leave the dusty/soggy/blood-soaked field of battle with honour intact: five whole days of sport untainted by the tawdry business of defeat.

And to promote this essential joy of Test cricket, we should get all those players who say they are keen to preserve it to contribute a percentage of their IPL wages/supermarket endorsement fees to pay for an advertising campaign:

Poster One: A section of the Bayeaux Tapestry showing William the Conqueror and King Harold sharing a post-battle flagon of mead at the Hastings Arms, with the caption: "Shake Hands on a Draw - Enjoy Test Cricket".

Poster Two: A picture of an MCC member snoozing during the afternoon session at Lord's, his face covered with a newspaper showing stories of death and destruction from around the globe. The poster reads: "Make Draws Not War - Give Tests A Chance".

Poster Three: A photograph of the exhausted players leaving the field after the conclusion of the last timeless Test in Durban in 1939 underneath the heading: "Test Cricket: Ten Days. Sixty Hours. No Losers".

RELATED LINKS

Andrew Hughes is a writer currently based in England. He tweets here

RSS Feeds: Andrew Hughes

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (June 19, 2014, 0:01 GMT)

If draws are popular does that mean I have to go to some more extreme position to be a cricket purist? Damn it!

Posted by   on (June 18, 2014, 19:26 GMT)

Monday was superb (not that my wife is any closer to understanding just how exciting that last day / hour / over, was). Long live the purest form of our great sport. 20:20 cricket (under it's various guises)? A bar of snack food. Test cricket? The finest of fine dining.

Posted by cricket-india on (June 18, 2014, 17:18 GMT)

the third poster would be epic:-)

Posted by SURYA.K.R on (June 18, 2014, 8:36 GMT)

Superb article. Test cricket is the ultimatum of cricket to test skills, temprament, stamina. Got to remember the 5-day draw between Australia and England in the Ashes 2005 at Old Trafford. One of the geatest!!!

Posted by   on (June 18, 2014, 6:35 GMT)

Great point; some of the best matches of recent times have been 5-day draws: Australia vs South Africa in Adelaide 2012, South Africa vs India 2013 at Jo'burg (both largely engineered by AB de Villiers and Faf du Plessis), NZ vs England at Eden Park 2013, and of course England vs Sri Lanka at Lords.

The best cricket happens when it is impossible to predict the outcome of a match, but not as in the usual T20 where the match is unpredictable because of the shorter format. Unpredictability must come from both sides putting their all to grab victory, or stave off defeat.

Comments have now been closed for this article

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Andrew Hughes
Andrew Hughes is a writer and avid cricket watcher who has always retained a healthy suspicion of professional sportsmen, and like any right-thinking person rates Neville Cardus more highly than Don Bradman. His latest book is available here and here @hughandrews73

All articles by this writer