Canada / News Analysis

Uncertain times as Canada looks to move on

Reeling after the loss of ODI status, and with no prospect of big-stage international cricket to come, Canada is looking to get its administrative house in order

Faraz Sarwat

April 12, 2014

Comments: 8 | Text size: A | A

Raza-ur-Rehman goes on the attack, Canada v Nepal, ICC World Cup Qualifier, Group A, Christchurch, January 21, 2014
Raza-ur-Rehman was one of the few players to survive the recent shake-up © IDI/Getty
Enlarge

Canadian cricket has entered a post-apocalyptic phase. After participating in four World Cups, including the last three, there is no berth for the team in the next edition. ODI status has been meekly surrendered, reducing Canada to the ranks of the also-rans. A place in the World T20 remains as elusive as ever. Canada's cricket team is now not only beaten and bruised but broken.

While some in the board who presided over the decline are now gone, others have gone on to bigger and better things at Cricket Canada. A new board rises, as a president and CEO leave. And nobody seems to know what the next Canadian team that takes the field will look like, and which players are gone for good. (Translation: who the board has had enough of, and more worryingly, who has had enough of Cricket Canada.)

Raza-ur-Rehman, one of the few players in the mix with a definite Canadian cricket career ahead of him, reckons that the coming season will see a depletion in cricketers seriously challenging for a national spot, given that a trip to the World Cup is not on offer. Rehman makes no bones about the fact that those who play for Canada now are the ones who will have to earn the team's place in the cricketing world back, rather than coasting on the hard work of an earlier generation of cricketers.

Ravin Moorthy did not have the votes to retain the presidency and exits while he was still growing in his role. "I regret that we didn't have more time, that we couldn't finish all of what we started," he said. "To not conclude commercial deals that are still under negotiation is disappointing."

Moorthy says he was slowed down by having to do repair work on Cricket Canada's reputation with the ICC, Sport Canada, and existing and potential sponsors. "Our history was of over-promising and under-delivering. Nobody took us seriously and it was hard work to get people to give us a second chance."

Moorthy cites governance reform as his greatest accomplishment. He tackled the thorny issue of Canada's poor team selection practices (long a bugbear for the ICC), revamping the qualifications for being on the selection panel, and making experience of having played first-class or international cricket a central criterion.

Quite literally the most visible of Moorthy's accomplishments was to get Canadian domestic cricket, as well as home series against USA and UAE on local television, raising the profile of the sport substantially during the season.

Moorthy, who hails from the smaller cricketing province of Alberta, opened the door wider for administrators from other provinces to have more of a stake in Canadian cricket. "We got Cricket Canada away from being Toronto-centric. But at the same time you need a strong team in Toronto to manage cricket affairs, and we maintained that."

 
 
"The two most important things for me will be to leave the organisation in healthy financial shape and to have programmes that are well-guided and self-ruling" Vimal Hardat, Cricket Canada's new president
 

The inclusiveness that Moorthy sought to bring to Canadian cricket was laudable in terms of its intent, but it ultimately proved to be a double-edged sword. Cricket Canada's voting structure means that Ontario, where an estimated 80% of the country's cricket is played, has the same number of votes as the provinces of Alberta and British Columbia. It is a system that naturally breeds deal-making among the smaller players in the boardroom, and there has been a steady marginalisation of Ontario, which was already reeling from having two rival administrative bodies that can be played off against each other. The new board's president, vice-president and head of selection are all from outside Ontario, and it was little different under Moorthy.

"We're very disappointed," Mohammad Sheikh, president of the Toronto and District Cricket Association (TDCA), the largest league in the country, says. "All the cricket is played here and the best players come from here. There is no prominent person from Ontario in Cricket Canada, and the one that they do have did not go through the protocol of being nominated by his provincial body".

That person is the former coach of the Indian domestic side Baroda, Mukesh Narula, whose involvement with Canadian cricket is relatively recent, but who is already carving out a worthy resume on the local scene. He is spoken of as being a contender for the post of the national team coach.

Sheikh is of the view that Ontario has been knocked out of cricket administration through backroom deals. "They [the members of the board] don't really understand the magnitude of cricket in Ontario, where we have a number of leagues and divisions, and a credible juniors programme and women's cricket."

Another issue is of Cricket Canada seeming to assume that they can play at the Maple Leaf Cricket Club (MLCC). "We're being approached about the use of the ground for the coming season," Sheikh says, "and our response is, 'Pay us for use of the facility from last year', whereas in the past we took a different tone. TDCA members are the ones funding it and with the ICC complaining about the ground, what can we do to improve it if Cricket Canada doesn't pay?"

Enter new Cricket Canada president Vimal Hardat. His tasks are monumental and include overseeing the rejuvenation of Canada's cricket team, and showing leadership by helping to forge a meaningful role for Canada's most important - and some might argue only - cricket province.

For all of that, Hardat cites restoring the financial health of Cricket Canada as his first priority: "We're in the red. We're not generating funds. Somehow we need to get out of that, and the first step is to reduce expenditures."

Less than a week into his presidency, Hardat has no specific plans for rebuilding the team, but he does say that regaining ODI status and qualifying for the next World T20 are ultimate goals for the board.

"I'll leave it to the high performance committee to sort out how to get the team back on track", he says. With that, there is already a sense that Hardat will take the macro view as Cricket Canada president, and to that end, he does not see being away from Ontario's cricket scene as a bad thing. "As a leader it's my job to appoint experts to do business in their areas of expertise. I do not need to physically be there. There is no point in micro-managing."

It is early days and Hardat is cautious about saying what he hopes he can accomplish in his term as president. "The two most important things for me will be to leave the organisation in healthy financial shape and to have programmes that are well-guided and self-ruling."

What about the World Cup, World T20, ODI status, the Intercontinental Cup?

"Of course", says Hardat. "The goal is to get ODI status back and qualify for World Cups, but there is no quick fix. I don't want to promise something I can't deliver."

At least some lessons seem to have been learned.

Faraz Sarwat is the cricket columnist for the Toronto Star and the author of The Cricket World Cup: History, Highlights, Facts and Figures

RSS Feeds: Faraz Sarwat

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (April 13, 2014, 23:54 GMT)

The problem is that cricket here in Canada is almost exclusively played by South Asians, in my cricket club everyone is South Asian with the exception of one Australian coach. That's pretty hard to believe looking at the multiculturalism here.

Posted by CheemaR on (April 13, 2014, 22:04 GMT)

I am glad to see that new board represent Canada and not the Just Ontario. This will eliminate favoritism. I also looked at the cricketing stats of Mukesh Narula. It is impressive. The current president of TDCA is occupying the position for 4 years flouting the rules which mandates only a 2-year tenure. Looks like we now have a board that has the right intent, competent directors and board members, people who place Canada's interest above self interest.

Posted by gnat9 on (April 13, 2014, 12:59 GMT)

It is difficult not to notice the fact that all the players in the Canadian team are of South Asian origin and that is really strange in a sportive and multicultural country like Canada. It makes one wonder if there is some sort of cartelization happening, which is preventing the search for real talent beyond ethnic lines. Are only the South Asians in Canada playing cricket?

Posted by Norm_Baldwin on (April 12, 2014, 22:26 GMT)

Always good to see some coverage of Canadian cricket, even if sometimes the news isn't the best, but thanks anyways to Faraz for the article. I would like to know, however, who are the "some" that might argue Ontario is Canada's only cricket province. In 2013 the British Columbia Mainland Cricket League had over 70 teams. That's not as many as in Toronto, of course, but more than enough to flush that argument where it belongs.

Posted by   on (April 12, 2014, 22:14 GMT)

Mukesh Narula is a Level III and established coach. He carried Baroda to runners up position in Ranji Trophy. There is no one in Canada with much better credentials.

The new "Directors at Large" positions in the new bay-laws are meant to bring in experts in the area High Performance, Marketing & Branding..and one other area...these are not provincial protocol positions and never were...Any Canadian may run for any of these positions....

I don't see nothing better to happen that a person like Mukesh Narula run the high performance program for Canada... Much better than a volleyball or baseball coach for cricket?

First and foremost thing will be an independent administrative as well as financial audit of Cricket Canada. How can a registered charity has close to $300,000 deficit? What was done with all this money? Was the executive and directors aware of all the decisions? Do they actually understand the meaning of the word governance?

Posted by android_user on (April 12, 2014, 10:21 GMT)

It is depressing to see the individuals like Muhammad Sheikh aren't the part of Cricket Canada. We need individuals who are not only very well aware of domestic cricketing structure but also know every single performing individual. There are more than 11000 regd cricket players with TDCA and that makes it the largest cricketing league in North America. We need dedicated and clean individuals who have a vision but unfortunately the office bearers don't have attachments with grass root cricket. We need good coaches and an administration that could actually think about cricket not cricket politics.

Posted by Nutcutlet on (April 12, 2014, 7:20 GMT)

The faith is failing. Send missionaries!

Posted by android_user on (April 12, 2014, 5:08 GMT)

Trust me school cricket this season in TDSB will see a lot of amazing guys from satec, Thomson, R.H.King and Wolburn. powerhouses in cricket. guys recruited from here in a A and B squad system will allow 30 guys to get trained and slotted for a position. We can do much better than 80% of the players.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Faraz SarwatClose
Country Fixtures Country Results
No fixtures scheduled
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days