ICC news

FICA boss reiterates security concerns

ESPNcricinfo staff

February 18, 2011

Comments: 4 | Text size: A | A

Haroon Lorgat chats with Tim May at the ICC Committee meeting, Lord's, May 11, 2009
Tim May, FICA's chief executive, pictured with Lorgat, says security issues remain 'very serious' © Getty Images
Enlarge
Related Links
Players/Officials: Haroon Lorgat | Tim May
Series/Tournaments: ICC Cricket World Cup

Tim May, the chief executive of the players' body, FICA, has said that security remains a "very serious" concern for all players, officials and spectators at the World Cup, despite a claim of the eve of the tournament from the ICC's CEO Haroon Lorgat that it was a "non-issue".

When questioned about the security ahead of the tournament, Lorgat told reporters in Dhaka: "We're mature in our processes, we're very robust and as a consequence of our experiences, we've got systems and personnel in place. It's in fact a non-issue."

May responded in a FICA press release, stating that while he was satisfied that their appointed security consultants, Eastern Star International, had found the proposed arrangements to be sound, the onus remained with the ICC to ensure that they are carried out to the letter.

"I have spoken recently to Haroon, so as to gain an understanding of the context of his comments, and remain confident that the ICC shares FICA's concerns regarding the importance of security measures at the World Cup," said May.

"The continued focus on the implementation of security plans is still a very serious and relevant issue and is far from 'a matter that is not an issue to anyone'. The plans are only a part of the security solution, and now it is up to the ICC and World Cup security personnel to ensure that the plans are implemented as laid down."

The final, on April 2, is scheduled to take place at the Wankhede Stadium in Mumbai, which has yet to be passed off as fit for purpose following a fire safety check, while Mumbai itself was the venue for a terrorist attack in November 2008 that led to the postponement of England's Test and one-day tour.

Pakistan had been due to co-host the World Cup, but no international cricket has been able to take place in the country since an attack on the Sri Lanka team bus in Lahore in March 2009. And in the 1996 World Cup, the last to be staged in the subcontinent, Australia and West Indies forfeited group matches in Colombo following bombings and security concerns.

"Provision of security in the World Cup is a massive challenge to the organisers of the event, with 14 teams moving around three countries," said May. "It is a significant and complicated task to protect players, officials and spectators.

"There is no place for complacency in the delivery of these plans and we trust that the importance of the issue of security remains the highest priority of the ICC, event hosts and security forces."

© ESPN EMEA Ltd.

Posted by Matricfail on (February 21, 2011, 16:50 GMT)

What concern? FICA (whatever it is) have been raising concerns ever since Mumbai was attacked, But that does not change anything. Tons of matches since then have been held and organized successfully. So it is time for FICA to give its hoot. India and the others can organize events and they are doing so. In this part of the world we don't give penny-worth value to organizations like these, They can raise concerns and re-schedule events when world cup is in England. Ta ta bye bye..

Posted by Harvey on (February 18, 2011, 16:36 GMT)

I can only hope that security for this tournament is better organised than the ticketing arrangements, which are an absolute shambles.

Posted by   on (February 18, 2011, 14:23 GMT)

@ Cricket_Fan_007 As Tim May is FICA's chief executive of the players' body he must speak out on this issue on behalf of all his members. To not do so would void his duty of care to the players covered by his role. Unfortunately security is a very important issue. If you had read the article correctly he was in fact just checking up as to what Haroon Lorgat meant when he said it was a 'non issue' as saying security is a 'non issue' is a very poor choice of words.

He was satisfied with them after clarification in the end, so what harm is done by your logic. I would be questioning them myself given the same situation and being in the same role as Tim May.

Posted by Cricket_Fan_007 on (February 18, 2011, 12:40 GMT)

It will be best if Tim May stays in his cocoon in Australia - so as not to be caught in the unsafe world. Hope he doesn't get out of his home - coz almost every country can be a target of terrorism in today's world. Of course his home will be the safest place.

Wonder what people will not do to get attention!

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
ESPNcricinfo staffClose
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
Sponsored Links

Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!

Available now at Cricshop