MCC v Durham, Abu Dhabi March 31, 2010

Bradshaw - Pink ball needs more work

Keith Bradshaw, the chief executive of MCC and one of the main pioneers of the pink ball that is currently undergoing floodlit trials in Abu Dhabi, has conceded that further tests and research will be necessary before the ball is ready for use in Test cricket, after a number of flaws were revealed during the ongoing MCC v Champion County fixture at the Sheikh Zayed Stadium.

"If you asked me for a rating I'd probably give it seven out of ten," Bradshaw told Cricinfo. "We had hoped to be able to give it ten out of ten and that, at the end of the trial, we'd be good for Test cricket, but what we have discovered is that there are a couple of improvements that need to be made. Over the coming months we will be doing that, and then we'll get ready for another trial so we can push ahead."

One of the issues raised by players during the match - including Michael di Venuto, who scored a first-innings century for Durham - was that the rotation of the seam was hard to pick when the spin bowlers were in operation. Bradshaw said that rectifying this would be a relatively simple process, but a trickier problem would be ensuring that the dye penetrates sufficiently deeply into the leather to prevent discolouration over the course of the ball's 80-over lifespan.

"Being in Abu Dhabi in such harsh conditions meant that 80 overs on that ball was very severe, so in some ways it really was the ultimate test," said Bradshaw. "[In some places] it has scuffed off, and while it's significantly better than the white ball, it would benefit from the dye being impregnated deeper into the leather. These are a couple of very useful findings, and we feel we're a long way down the road."

The trials have been closely observed by the ICC, whose headquarters are in nearby Dubai, but their general manager of cricket, Dave Richardson, said that the empirical observations from the four-day match would need to be backed up by scientific data before any further steps could be taken towards the ultimate goal of day-night Test cricket.

MCC had initially hoped to stage England's Test against Bangladesh in May under the floodlights at Lord's, but realistically any such aim will now have to be postponed by at least 12 months, after Richardson conceded that there was still too much doubt about the goals of the research for ICC to ratify any such plan.

"Ball manufacturers are saying to us 'you tell us what you need and we'll develop it for you'," said Richardson. "But the thing is we don't know what we need. We don't know if we want an orange ball against a black background or a pink ball against a white background. That is going to be the first step - the scientific approach, to go to these research guys or universities and get them to tell us what we should be asking for.

"The data collected so far is all very much on a hearsay kind of basis - what did the wicketkeeper think, what did the fielders think, what did the TV guys think. Before we even start looking at those kind of projects we need to establish from a scientific point of view what makes sense, whether it's pink or orange. There's a danger in relying on ad-hoc, hearsay-type evidence. It's good to have and it's positive progress but it needs to be backed up by scientific evidence."

Andrew Miller is UK editor of Cricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Zenon on April 7, 2010, 14:22 GMT

    Youcan, the point was that in the UAE the ball would face the harshest conditions in regards to wear and tear on the ball. 80 overs at Lords would have been interesting, yes, but would not have answered the wear and tear question and - having already been trialed in england (albeit at lower levels of the game)throughout last season, at this stage the MCC would have had sufficent data on how the ball performs in english conditions.

    don't get me wrong, i agree with you that the game - as the curtain raiser for the season - should have been played at Lords. i just disagree with you about this being an unsatisfactory test of the ball.

  • Roger on April 6, 2010, 6:15 GMT

    What is the purpose of the pink ball?

  • Paul on April 3, 2010, 0:05 GMT

    The reason this game went to the UAE was that it is perceived that the game does not get enough overs played in England. The concept of having this match in UAE is one thing, but not even telecasting it to an English audience is quite another. The traditional season county opener was played behind a curtain for no one to watch. Why is it such a necessity for the game to play out its four days and have a result if no one gets to see it? Also, Keith says that the pink ball met its match in the UAE conditions. Why was this trialled anyway? When do we have test cricket in UAE? Had the game been played under dark clouds at Lord's, then we'd know how the pink ball behaves in English conditions. Even one day's play would have revealed this much. On the whole, this was a dismal failure and onother fascinating example of both the MCC and the ECB trying to demonstrate to the non-cricketing world that they are thinking of them, again to the detriment of those who love the game!

  • Aditya on March 31, 2010, 13:23 GMT

    Test cricket has to go day and night. There is no other way it survives. The more urgency ICC shows the better it is for the game.

  • No featured comments at the moment.