| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Video & Audio | Games | Mobile | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Let's have fewer series but make the best ones last
May 13, 2008
|
|
![]()
|
South Africa visit England later this summer and that normally means we're in for something portentous. In 1998 England were a Test down against Hansie Cronje's side and Old Trafford was half-empty while the football World Cup held the nation's attention. We were in the midst of a DOEC (Death of English Cricket) moment, of which we usually get one a summer. England turned that series around but there was another DOEC the following summer when they lost to New Zealand, which just goes to show fickle these deaths and Lazarusian comebacks can be.
South Africa's last tour to England in 2003 contained a proper defining moment when Nasser Hussain resigned as captain one match into the series, launching the Michael Vaughan era.
Both those series showcased Test cricket warts and all: there were DOEC moments, there were enthralling bits, dull bits and viscerally exciting bits. For the partisan Pommie eye, both series infuriated the hell out of us, but on reflection they were both absolute belters.
They were also both five-Test series and that might be the one thing that prevents the 2008 rubber being as memorable as the previous two. How much better would it be if England were in the middle of a five-Test series against New Zealand (split home and away) rather than two back-to-back best-of-threes? The game in England needs a great summer of Test cricket to reassert the pre-eminence of the five-day game to ward off the not-so-evil spirit of Twenty20.
South Africa are not considered glamorous tourists to the UK (though next to a Bond-less and Fleming-free New Zealand, they look pretty tasty). Without a world-class spinner and a batting line-up of substance rather than style, they tick the "tough opponents" box rather than "must-see". But with their pace attack, and the first proper chance for England supporters to see Dale Steyn in the flesh, it is still a mouth-watering series.
England are hardly stacked full of household names themselves but the punters should still fill the grounds. Test matches, especially at Lord's, are a social event as much as sporting contests. The packed houses in England are indicative, too, of an affluent society as much as an unquenchable thirst for the game.
If there are empty seats - and Lord's did announce some late availability for this week's New Zealand Test - then the navel-gazing might begin in earnest. England's absence from the European football championship leaves football-obsessed newspaper sports editors with large holes, and highly paid columnists with jobs to justify. Expect plenty of DOEC moments if England cock it up against New Zealand or if the grounds aren't chocker.
I usually buy tickets to the main Lord's Test of the summer but this year I baulked at the £75 price tag. At The Oval there are £100-plus tickets for an ODI against New Zealand. These are not corporate-jolly tickets with lunch and booze, but normal - though very decent - public stand tickets.
For the ECB (and MCC) to market England (and Lord's) as the home of Test cricket - a great idea in principle - the game must showcase itself to the max and that means playing to packed houses. In these febrile times, it's important to remember why Test cricket is so great: it's the ebb and flow, the evolving human dramas. Let's have fewer series but make the best ones longer. Five-match series and four-day matches - back to the future anyone?
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
John Stern is editor of the Wisden Cricketer, the world's largest selling cricket magazine. Having cut his journalistic teeth at the legendary Reg Hayter's sports-writing academy in Fleet Street, he spent four years on the county treadmill for the London Times. He joined Wisden in 2001 and was deputy editor of Wisden Cricket Monthly at the time of its merger with the Cricketer in 2003 to form TWC.

Watson should remain at the top of the order
Ian Chappell: His batting skills are too good for him to be saddled with a frontline bowler's job too
You may not get many homegrown cricketers in Canada but you can get a homegrown bat. By Liam Herringshaw
'I did not have a lethal weapon'
Sarfraz Nawaz mastered the art of swing - conventional and reverse - by trial and error, and formed a formidable partnership with Imran Khan
Aakash Chopra: Why the idea of having those in the top order take turns at playing is flawed
The myth of 'bowling in the right areas'
Inbox: There is no perfect ball that claims a wicket every time
Afghanistan's remarkable rise achieves new heights
Afghanistan cricket will reach a new high when they take on an ICC Full Member for the first time
Which teams are the worst travellers?
A look at how Australia, South Africa and England have fared in Asia, and vice versa
Plays of the Day from the second ODI of the CB series, between India and Sri Lanka at the WACA
Unravelling the mystery of Ajmal
The ICC have explained the science behind the offspinner's action after a TV interview caused confusion
Plays of the Day from the third ODI of the CB series, between Australia and Sri Lanka at the WACA
Which teams are the worst travellers? (144)
A look at how Australia, South Africa and England have fared in Asia, and vice versa
Pakistan rewarded for smart rebuilding (137)
After the events of 2010 Pakistan cricket could have withered away, but due to a combination of determination and desire they are now flourishing
Unravelling the mystery of Ajmal (115)
The ICC have explained the science behind the offspinner's action after a TV interview caused confusion
India beaten in battle of strategies (101)
The plan to go in with a spin-strong attack is fraught with risk in Australian conditions, as India were made to realise at the MCG
Does rotation work for India? (96)
Why the idea of having those in the top order take turns at playing is flawed
Access your Indian Rupee earnings from anywhere in the world.
ICICI Bank Money2India brings " locked exchange rate" and a free gift
on registering and transfer of USD 250 and above.
FREE copy of Playfair with Wisden pre-order
At Cricshop.com
Why not have 5 test series based on rankings. if you're in the top 4 you can have 5 test series wherever you travel. If you are lower ranked than 4 you can be "demoted" to 3 or 4 test status according to the discretion of the host nation. I want to see the best play, not those that are mediocre.
Posted by BigRedCandle on (May 13 2008, 12:23 PM GMT)A home and away Test series sounds like a great idea but I dont really see how it could work with a Northern hemisphere summer/Southern hemisphere winter. I'd like to see Australia vs South Africa or West Indies in a 6 Test home and away series instead of two 3 Test series, but I cant imagine Australian cricket fans watching a Test series that ends with a 'to be continued' instead of a result. I have to agree that a 5 Test series is much more of a contest than 3.All too often the results of playing 3 Tests in 3 weeks don't reflect who was the better team,if you lose the 1st Test you only have a few days till the next one. Maybe if Tour itineraries weren't so packed with 50 and 20 over series that most fans will have forgotten the results of by next month things would be different.But it it really just comes down to money doesn't it, quality finishes a distant 2nd to quantity and I don't see this changing anytime soon.
Posted by acg_DPC on (May 13 2008, 09:41 AM GMT)Well 5 test series are pretty long. It can affect the health of players. New Zealand and England players got a break in between both tours. English got to go back home and practise their game while some of the Kiwis were busy playing in the IPL. Kiwis also got a chance to play warm-up matches against teams like Sussex, England Lions, etc. It's some-kind of revenge. English guyz who were somewhat interested didn't get to see their country stars playing in New Zealand as Kiwiland is 13 hours ahead of England (13 hrs in Summer ahead of GMT). So a match starting at 10am in New Zealand would be 11pm the previous night and by time they would wake up the match would be over. So now New Zealand will have the same problem. A match starting at 10am in England would be 9pm in New Zealand the same day (due to DST, England is 1 hr ahead while New Zealand come back to normal, so 11 hrs. Back to cricket, England will show that home advantage counts in England while New Zealand will oppose it.