Peter Roebuck
Peter Roebuck Peter RoebuckRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Former captain of Somerset; author of It Never Rains, Sometimes I Forgot to Laugh and other books

Twelve years after

A dasher, a spinner, a grafter, a keeper: a look back to 1996, when India and Australia last met in a Test in Delhi

Peter Roebuck

October 29, 2008

Comments: 12 | Text size: A | A



India celebrate Michael Slater's wicket in the second innings of the 1996 Delhi Test © Action Photographics
Enlarge

Memories of Australia's last Test match at Kotla are hazier than the smog that holds the capital city in its grip. Certain things linger in the mind: the result, a catch, an opening batsman's fate, two trenchant innings, and a wonderfully innovative and sustained piece of cricket writing, but all else has faded from memory. Doubtless the players themselves recall the event. Not that they have brains quite the size of Mr Anand's but even so cricketers seldom forget important matches, especially those in which they did well or made fools of themselves. Glenn McGrath could describe every wicket he ever took and, pressed, Shane Warne could do the same.

Actually another thing does stick in the head. Kotla was a rundown ground in urgent need of the tender loving care recommended for orphans and abandoned pets. Estate agents would have listed it as suitable for a renovator. Certainly it was not the sort of place to include on a tourist's itinerary or a Test match schedule. But there was some sort of anniversary, or it might have been a festival, and the players were duly given the honour of representing their country and the dubious pleasure of spending five days at Kotla.

Nowadays the ground looks altogether more spic and span. Not that it will be quite ready till the first ball has been bowled. Even now, Australian supporters turn up a few days before the match begins and walk around with bemused looks on their faces, wondering how on earth a five-day match is going to be staged amid such chaos. Older hands know that it is as foolish to look at an Indian ground a day before play as it is to study an incomplete painting. Still, the stands look brighter, bigger and cleaner, and the field itself appears more loved.

Returning to 1996, the starkest memory concerns Michael Slater, or rather the wild slash that undid him in the second innings. Throughout his career Slater was a dasher. At his best he was an adventurous and engaging batsman, at his worst a frantic performer tapping the drums of doom. Hereabouts he was enduring one of his more frenzied spells and team-mates were worried about his state of mind. Opening the Australians' second innings after an Indian team that included the current captain and three members of the Fab Four - namely George, Paul and John; everyone except VVS - had taken a first-innings lead of 179 on a dusty deck, Slater threw himself at the first ball aimed in his direction. Opening his shoulders and lifting his head, he flung the bat but succeeded only in edging a ball he could barely reach.

On another day the mistake might not have proved costly, but the gods were offended by his liberty and sent the ball soaring only a few feet above the heads of the Indian slip fieldsmen. Had anyone except Mohammad Azharuddin, or possibly Mark Waugh, been occupying this patch of ground, the opener's life might have been spared. Indeed he might have collected a boundary, because the ball was travelling at roughly the speed of light (by now it is assumed that readers do not take figures mentioned in this column seriously, let alone literally). Instead it cost him his wicket, and for the time being his place. Naturally David Johnson, a pace bowler destined soon to return to the obscurity from which he had unexpectedly been summoned, was as delighted as Slater and his colleagues were dismayed. For Slater it was rough justice. He had scored 44 in the first dig and ended the match with more runs than six colleagues, including Ricky Ponting. Steve Waugh scored 67 in the second innings and his praises were sung to the high heavens. Such are the perils of the cavalier. And it confirmed that even one-off matches of little apparent significance can have lasting consequences for those taking part.

 
 
For Slater it was rough justice. He had scored 44 in the first dig and ended the match with more runs than six colleagues, including Ricky Ponting. Steve Waugh scored 67 in the second innings and his praises were sung to the high heavens. Such are the perils of the cavalier
 

Among the Indians, Nayan Mongia played the most notable innings. Given the dual roles of gloveman and opening batsman, Mongia first guarded the stumps while the Australians battled for runs, and then himself occupied the crease for over eight hours as he constructed a defiant and ultimately decisive 152. As far as style is concerned, the innings has left little of the aftertaste by which vignerons set such store, but it was rugged and paved the way for brighter contributions from Rahul Dravid and Sourav Ganguly, both at the start of their distinguished careers. Mongia was helped by the limitations of an Australian spin attack that included Peter McIntyre and an inexperienced Brad Hogg. Not that the local spinners were all that much more convincing, Kumble apart.

Australia seemed bound for heavy defeat, an impression reinforced by Slater's rashness. In the first innings Steve Waugh recorded a rare duck. By now the ball was jumping around like firecrackers on Diwali. In those days, too, Kumble was even more of a worn-pitch specialist than he subsequently became. Over the years he added a few tricks to his repertoire, deliveries that made him a better bowler on all surfaces but not quite as deadly on dustbowls. In 1996 he was relentless, pinning the batsmen down with fast and dangerous deliveries, working them over, drying up the runs, building the pressure, denying them the chance to attack for fear that the ball might skid or leap, that the temptation was a trap.

Waugh might easily have buckled. Instead he reviewed his failure in the first innings, realised he had allowed himself to be distracted by the whirl of dignitaries bobbing about in the rooms, disconcerted by the grumbles of team-mates, and discouraged by the sight of the other batsmen struggling to meet the challenge. In short, he had omitted to focus on matters in hand. Determined to show that runs could be scored on this track, committed to eradicating excuses and other indulgences from his outlook, he put his head down, grafted for runs, defending with soft hands and pouncing on occasional wayward deliveries. Rather than admit defeat he brought the entire power of his personality into play. At the crease he became an immoveable object. Hard as they tried the Indians could not take his wicket. Colleagues came and went and when the last wicket fell Waugh was left stranded with 67 runs to his name, the product of four-and-a-half hours of intense concentration and superb defensive skills.

That much is known about Waugh's preparation and attitude during this innings is entirely due to an exceptional piece of writing it threw up. By chance Waugh had agreed beforehand with Australian journalist Greg Baum to talk at length about his batting in the match. Baum's idea was to get inside the head of a top batsman, the better to illuminate the thought processes involved in creating an innings. By all accounts Waugh was so forthcoming that Baum ended up with 10,000 words, of which space could be found for only half. The ensuing article offered a fascinating insight into the outlook of a major sportsman. Throughout Waugh emphasised that his way was not a blueprint, that other batsmen of equal merit might go about things in a totally different manner. Indeed he said he'd be interested to read about that. But there has not been much follow-up. Dudley Doust wrote about Derek Randall's famous innings in the centenary Test but otherwise the field has been neglected. Baum's article is recommended reading for all aspiring batsmen and sports journalists.

These are the things that remain from 1996. Time alone will tell what is left of the forthcoming scrimmages by the time 2008 turns into 2020.

Peter Roebuck is a former captain of Somerset and the author, most recently, of In It to Win It

RSS Feeds: Peter Roebuck

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by goutham.chakravarthi on (October 31, 2008, 8:58 GMT)

Hey bignohaley, I have no business to be fooling around. Roebuck, in his column on 29th October says:

"Harbhajan provokes wildly different reactions in different quarters. To some, he is a "sardar with nothing in his head", to others a scallywag, while enemies cast him as a scoundrel."

URL: http://www.smh.com.au/news/sport/cricket/going-toe-to-toe-with-australia-never-scares-harbhajan/2008/10/28/1224956038864.html

Posted by Caffers494 on (October 30, 2008, 2:23 GMT)

Where can I find the article by Greg Baum about Steve Waugh as mentioned in the story above?

Posted by henchart on (October 30, 2008, 2:09 GMT)

Those were the days when pitches in India used to be dustbowls.There was a one-day tri-series after this test and South Africans were thrashing both India and Australia in the league games.Final was played at a deteroirating Wankhede pitch and Indians beat South Africa .Toss used to play a crucial role on such wickets and Tendulkar was at the peak of his batting prowess and used to shoulder the team 's burden and expectations single-handedly .Less said about other batsmen of those times viz Azhar,Jadeja and Rathore the better.

Posted by bingohaley on (October 29, 2008, 20:19 GMT)

Hey goutham.chakravarthi, don't make a fool of yourself. Roebuck did NOT call Harbhajan a "scoundrel" in his column for Sydney Morning Herald.

Posted by neel219 on (October 29, 2008, 19:11 GMT)

Does anyone remember the wicket of Taylor? its strange, but apart from sachin lifting a weired trophy, thats the only memory i have of this match.

Prasad was bowling from round the wicket and bowled a beautiful leg cutter, taylor came on the front foot, and left the ball. The ball came back to hit the top of OFF STUMP. will never forget the look on Taylor's face.

Posted by Ragc on (October 29, 2008, 17:44 GMT)

Good article!!.This is the first test match I remember following it ball by ball during my vacation at school.I remember mongia's innings and kumble's spell that helped india win the match.

Posted by goutham.chakravarthi on (October 29, 2008, 10:57 GMT)

If memory serves me right, it was also Tendulkar's first Test as captain. I also wonder why Roebuck has good things to say here, but calls Harbhajan a "scoundrel" in his column for Sydney Morning Herald. Why doesn't he do it here on Cricinfo or in his night time talk show with CNN IBN?

Posted by Vivek.Bhandari on (October 29, 2008, 8:06 GMT)

I remember that test match for various reasons. First things first, it was the first test match for Sachin as a captain and the first ever Border-Gavaskar test. Then, there was much expectation from Ganguly to get his 3rd ton in as many matches to emulate Azhar. Ganguly indeed played very well for his 66 and was unlucky to be dismissed by a Brad Hogg special, another special talent. Hogg bowled from round the wickets to Ganguly who swept him only to be taken at first slip by Mark Waugh. For us, Hogg was something that I had never seen in my life by then. I imagined him as watching Shane Warne in a mirror, without his tongue out though. Then, there was one more debutant in David Johnson who was fiery and had raw pace, and had a bowling action like Shoaib Akhtar. The catch taken by Azhar to dismiss Slater was indeed special. Don't know why Johnson couldn't continue for long. Then, Mongia was an integral part to that team as he often doubled up as an opener that allowed to play 5 bowlers.

Posted by Davesh_cricket_analyst on (October 29, 2008, 7:53 GMT)

I disagree with Majr that no one really know the inside story of Mongia's ouster. Well his role is pretty well documented in CBI report on match fixing. Its available on web and i promise one read through it would convince you that he was very lucky to escape with a simple punishment of being dropped from the team.

Posted by ppsingh on (October 29, 2008, 7:31 GMT)

I remember the Ponting dismissal vioa Prasad Legcutter. Infact, prasad had a wide 2nd slip in place.....almost near gully and Shastri was on mike. He said that we could expect some legcutters to get and edge into the wide slip. However, on ver next delivery prasad clean bowled ponting with his famous legcutter.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Peter RoebuckClose
Peter Roebuck He may not have played Test cricket for England, but Peter Roebuck represented Somerset with distinction, making over 1000 runs nine times in 12 seasons, and captaining the county during a tempestuous period in the 1980s. Roebuck acquired recognition all over the cricket world for his distinctive, perceptive, independent writing. Widely travelled, he divided his time between Australia and South Africa. He died in November 2011
Related Links

    It's not the plan, stupid

Ed Smith: Good performances make all plans look good. The better team on the day always wins, irrespective of what was strategised in the dressing room

    Original hits

ESPNcricinfo XI: A look at some of cricket's most memorable strokes - and their makers

    What is Rohit Sharma's role?

Should India have practised slip catching in the nets? Who will play at the G?

    'I'd like to have faced the West Indies quicks'

Northamptonshire's David Willey picks his ideal partner for a jungle expedition, and talks about his famous dad

The charm of the Boxing Day Test

Jonathan Wilson: It's special not just for the cricket, but also because it satisfies one of the tenets of Christmas - bringing people together

News | Features Last 7 days

What ails Rohit and Watson?

Both batsmen seemingly have buckets of talent at their disposal and the backing of their captains, but soft dismissals relentlessly follow both around the Test arena

Hazlewood completes quartet of promise

Josh Hazlewood has been on Australian cricket's radar since he was a teenager. The player that made a Test debut at the Gabba was a much-improved version of the tearaway from 2010

Australia in good hands under proactive Smith

The new stand-in captain has the makings of a long-term leader, given his ability to stay ahead of the game

Karn struggles to stay afloat

The failed gamble of handing Karn Sharma a Test debut despite him having a moderate first-class record means India have to rethink who their spinner will be

Vijay 144, Ganguly 144

Stats highlights from the first day of the second Test between Australia and India in Brisbane

News | Features Last 7 days