April 15, 2009

Flower accepts the poisoned chalice

A dogged refusal to buckle has long been a characteristic of the man who has been appointed the the new England coach
12

There was a time, not so long ago, when the job of England coach was arguably the most attractive of its kind in the world game - an enviable salary coupled with a high-profile team, and the chance to compete in some of cricket's most fabled contests. Times they have a-changed of late, and it's not just the IPL that has shifted the stumps. England's casual descent from genuine contenders to infighting also-rans has helped to cheapen the cachet.

Andy Flower, the latest man to take on a job that is beginning to seem as thankless as the football version, still hadn't decided whether he wanted it at all when he set off for the Caribbean at the end of January. His reticence was unsurprising for, amid the internecine chaos that reigned in that extraordinary month, his name had featured alongside that of Peter Moores on Kevin Pietersen's list of intended dismissals, and for a few bleak days his position seemed untenable.

Three months later, Flower has completed a remarkable reversal of fortunes. His resilience has not exactly matched the bravery he showed when standing up to Robert Mugabe at the 2003 World Cup, but a dogged refusal to buckle has long been a trait of his character. Even Pietersen was reportedly won over by his thoughtful yet stern leadership in the Caribbean, and though, when asked about their relationship, Flower could offer nothing more effusive than "we get on pretty well", communication between the two has clearly improved now that Flower has escaped Moores' shadow and been allowed to become his own man.

Odgers Ray & Berndtson, the ECB-appointed headhunting firm, apparently sifted through 30 applicants before settling, conveniently, on the incumbent, but there might well have been palpitations at Lord's had they decided anyone else fitted the bill. With a coach and three captains already written off in the past six months, and a fourth awaiting appointment for the ICC World Twenty20, the last thing that England really needed was yet another change at the top.

"We've had enough instability already this winter, and it's been a tough time for all," said Hugh Morris, the managing director of England Cricket. "We're very, very pleased with the appointment of Andy. We see him as someone to take England forward, not just in the short term but in the longer term too."

The ease with which Flower and Andrew Strauss gelled in the Caribbean was undoubtedly the clincher, even before the deal was sealed with England's unlikely last-ditch triumph in the one-day series. Two years ago to the week, the ECB valued speed over consideration, and chose to unveil Moores barely 24 hours after Duncan Fletcher's resignation in Barbados. Unease ensued thereafter - Michael Vaughan had less than a month to gel with his new coach, and never really succeeded, while Pietersen lacked the diplomacy even to pretend. Unity at the top is a very healthy starting point for England's planned renaissance.

But nevertheless, Flower's appointment is still quite a gamble - the very fact that Pietersen was oblivious to his merits throughout his first 18 months in the England set-up suggests that Flower has not yet perfected his pitch as a coach. As his former team-mate Henry Olonga told Cricinfo on Tuesday, the best players don't necessarily make the best leaders, and as Flower himself admitted today, he initially found the transition from player to watcher frustrating.

Flower has been learning to communicate his desires from the sidelines, and according to Morris, his key attributes are "vision, drive and ambition", which are precisely the sort of buzzwords that you'd find scrawled all over your average graduate CV. For all his myriad achievements as a player, Flower's coaching career is entirely in its infancy. Where most applicants would have laid out their experience, he can offer only promise and endeavour, and better things to come.

"When Moores and Pietersen fell out in India before Christmas, the root of their breakdown was Moores' inability to offer any on-field insight to a clearly struggling captain. In the heat of battle, no amount of theory or management-speak can contain Virender Sehwag in full flow."

That is not to say he is not the right man for the job, however, for if anyone in the world game knows how to make something out of nothing it is Flower, who forged an international career of sufficient brilliance to turn his home nation of Zimbabwe (alas too briefly) into one of the game's overachieving outfits. He famously made it to No. 1 in the world batting rankings, and along the way he was a part of some memorable team heists - not least against England, whom he was instrumental in embarrassing on their Test tour in 1996-97, as well as in six of the first eight ODIs between the two countries.

As Flower himself insisted, international experience is not a pre-requisite for coaching success, as John Buchanan and Troy Cooley, to name but two examples, have proven in recent years. But there's no doubt that it helps, not least when dealing with the type of cocksure characters that reside in the England dressing room. When Moores and Pietersen fell out in India before Christmas, the root of their breakdown was Moores' inability to offer any on-field insight to a clearly struggling captain. In the heat of battle, no amount of theory or management-speak can contain Virender Sehwag in full flow.

During his playing days, Flower led from the front in everything that he did - as a batsman, as a wicketkeeper, as an example for others to follow. His initial emphasis in the Caribbean was on physical fitness, and if his demand for "an ethos of constant improvement" sounds alarmingly like the sort of empty soundbite his predecessor might have come out with, then at least you can ascertain from his own indomitable career that he will walk the walk every bit as much as he talks it.

We may never know exactly who else made it to the Odgers-approved shortlist, but you could hardly blame any coach with a reputation to protect for steering well clear of England at present. With their unedifying combination of under-achievement and over-expectation, any given tenure could have been as brief and self-harming as, say, Luis Felipe Scolari's at Chelsea. Flower, on the other hand, has the opportunity to forge a reputation where none existed before. It's exactly the same challenge he faced as a player, and who's to say he cannot succeed once again.

Andrew Miller is UK editor of Cricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • mupariwa on April 17, 2009, 0:28 GMT

    Andy Flower is a man with a great attitude. I feel he is the best person who can coach the traumatized English team. He has the support of the captain strauss and what else needs for a coach of an international team.

  • tatendataona on April 16, 2009, 22:16 GMT

    only time will tell. England have been struggling since that historic Ashes and if Flower's side struggles in the summer there is nothing too much to read into. The time frame is too short and the pressure too immense. England sadly are far from being the top side in the world bt somehow manage to attract top media attention. This might just be the undoing of a team that needs regrouping and a rebirth. Give the boy a chance, ok?

  • StJohn on April 16, 2009, 18:28 GMT

    Well, he was a fantastic player and it's a great shame and loss to the game that he couldn't have played even more cricket! My tongue-in-cheek question though is whether he could also keep wicket for England?! With the possible exception of Adam Gilchrist, Andy Flower was the best international wicketkeeper-batsman in the last 15-20 years. Wouldn't it be great if he could somehow sneak onto the field?!

  • Nampally on April 16, 2009, 15:35 GMT

    No doubt any England coach will have an unenviable task of taking a number of individually brilliant players & uniting them into a team. That will be the single most important task expected of the new Coach. Ability to communicate & gain trust of all players and getting the best out of them will be the #1 task. Maintaining disciplined behaviour on and off the field is the second most important task. Some of the Key England players' actions off the field in the past lacked maturity & responsibility. Emphasis on team fitness must be ensured thru' Physios and other staff & coordinated by the coach. If Flowers can fulfill these tasks well he will make a good coach.He certainly has a tough job in controlling egotist players like KP. ECB has the responsibility to define duties of the Coach in detail along with interfacing with Captain, players & other coaching staff. Even the best coaches fail if their duties are non specific. A training course for the coaches will greatly help in success.

  • Ross_Co on April 16, 2009, 13:45 GMT

    Andy Flower was a great player cursed with having to be associated with a team that was an immense distance from greatness. And now? Well, the curse continues doesn't it. Just by the by, why doesn't he play for England? After all he's not remotely English - isn't that one of the major prerequisites?

  • TheDoctor394 on April 16, 2009, 9:30 GMT

    An excellent choice! All the best to you, Andy.

  • Nduru on April 16, 2009, 7:46 GMT

    I think Andy Flower will do an excellent job. One thing few have mentioned is his long track record of nurturing young players and bringing out their skills. For example, Tatenda Taibu learnt an enourmous amount as a batsman and wicket keeper from Flower, who deliberately nurtured him. If Taibu was not playing for a sadly diminished team, the world would appreciate what a great player of spin and reverse-sweeper he is - skills taught to him by Flower. At county level, Flower also nurtured players such as Cook. I think he will continue doing this for England and his approach will pay off. Hopefully one day he can coach Zimbabwe back to decency too!

  • Nerk on April 16, 2009, 7:27 GMT

    its not like Englands situation can get any worse...

  • Hurts_Like_Stink on April 16, 2009, 7:16 GMT

    I am happy. England may have sold the sport down the river for the BSkyB dollar at a point when it threatened a level of popularity which may never be reached again, bungled some of the sports unique prestige away for a night or two of illicit, illigitemate and ill-thought-out fun with Stanford [the ultimate portrait of modern sporting ego-greed] and shot itself in both feet with its handling of KP but...honestly, a headhunting firm to find the coach? An admission of incompetence which can now be seen in all its comedic glory now that, like Dorothy in The Wizard of Oz, lead them back to where they started for the answer. Nevermind, Flower will find the ECB's foolish ways a breeze in comparison to what he has seen in his distinguished career, I am sure he and Strauss will build the foundations of a side which can rise up the rankings and play the kind of attacking cricket which is needed in the current age - not Jelly Beans and angry poses in photographs from Ian Bell. Good luck Andy!

  • vswami on April 16, 2009, 4:14 GMT

    The biggest challenge for Flower is dealing with ECB and the media. ECB asked Pieterson for an opinion, didnt like it and taught him a lesson by cutting him to size. So my prediction is that Flower will choose to adopt a conservative path ( which goes well with Strauss's personality ), have an excuse ready for any potential failure and shun any bold decisions needed as the media/ECB will roast him for any misadventure.

  • mupariwa on April 17, 2009, 0:28 GMT

    Andy Flower is a man with a great attitude. I feel he is the best person who can coach the traumatized English team. He has the support of the captain strauss and what else needs for a coach of an international team.

  • tatendataona on April 16, 2009, 22:16 GMT

    only time will tell. England have been struggling since that historic Ashes and if Flower's side struggles in the summer there is nothing too much to read into. The time frame is too short and the pressure too immense. England sadly are far from being the top side in the world bt somehow manage to attract top media attention. This might just be the undoing of a team that needs regrouping and a rebirth. Give the boy a chance, ok?

  • StJohn on April 16, 2009, 18:28 GMT

    Well, he was a fantastic player and it's a great shame and loss to the game that he couldn't have played even more cricket! My tongue-in-cheek question though is whether he could also keep wicket for England?! With the possible exception of Adam Gilchrist, Andy Flower was the best international wicketkeeper-batsman in the last 15-20 years. Wouldn't it be great if he could somehow sneak onto the field?!

  • Nampally on April 16, 2009, 15:35 GMT

    No doubt any England coach will have an unenviable task of taking a number of individually brilliant players & uniting them into a team. That will be the single most important task expected of the new Coach. Ability to communicate & gain trust of all players and getting the best out of them will be the #1 task. Maintaining disciplined behaviour on and off the field is the second most important task. Some of the Key England players' actions off the field in the past lacked maturity & responsibility. Emphasis on team fitness must be ensured thru' Physios and other staff & coordinated by the coach. If Flowers can fulfill these tasks well he will make a good coach.He certainly has a tough job in controlling egotist players like KP. ECB has the responsibility to define duties of the Coach in detail along with interfacing with Captain, players & other coaching staff. Even the best coaches fail if their duties are non specific. A training course for the coaches will greatly help in success.

  • Ross_Co on April 16, 2009, 13:45 GMT

    Andy Flower was a great player cursed with having to be associated with a team that was an immense distance from greatness. And now? Well, the curse continues doesn't it. Just by the by, why doesn't he play for England? After all he's not remotely English - isn't that one of the major prerequisites?

  • TheDoctor394 on April 16, 2009, 9:30 GMT

    An excellent choice! All the best to you, Andy.

  • Nduru on April 16, 2009, 7:46 GMT

    I think Andy Flower will do an excellent job. One thing few have mentioned is his long track record of nurturing young players and bringing out their skills. For example, Tatenda Taibu learnt an enourmous amount as a batsman and wicket keeper from Flower, who deliberately nurtured him. If Taibu was not playing for a sadly diminished team, the world would appreciate what a great player of spin and reverse-sweeper he is - skills taught to him by Flower. At county level, Flower also nurtured players such as Cook. I think he will continue doing this for England and his approach will pay off. Hopefully one day he can coach Zimbabwe back to decency too!

  • Nerk on April 16, 2009, 7:27 GMT

    its not like Englands situation can get any worse...

  • Hurts_Like_Stink on April 16, 2009, 7:16 GMT

    I am happy. England may have sold the sport down the river for the BSkyB dollar at a point when it threatened a level of popularity which may never be reached again, bungled some of the sports unique prestige away for a night or two of illicit, illigitemate and ill-thought-out fun with Stanford [the ultimate portrait of modern sporting ego-greed] and shot itself in both feet with its handling of KP but...honestly, a headhunting firm to find the coach? An admission of incompetence which can now be seen in all its comedic glory now that, like Dorothy in The Wizard of Oz, lead them back to where they started for the answer. Nevermind, Flower will find the ECB's foolish ways a breeze in comparison to what he has seen in his distinguished career, I am sure he and Strauss will build the foundations of a side which can rise up the rankings and play the kind of attacking cricket which is needed in the current age - not Jelly Beans and angry poses in photographs from Ian Bell. Good luck Andy!

  • vswami on April 16, 2009, 4:14 GMT

    The biggest challenge for Flower is dealing with ECB and the media. ECB asked Pieterson for an opinion, didnt like it and taught him a lesson by cutting him to size. So my prediction is that Flower will choose to adopt a conservative path ( which goes well with Strauss's personality ), have an excuse ready for any potential failure and shun any bold decisions needed as the media/ECB will roast him for any misadventure.

  • KiQass on April 15, 2009, 18:53 GMT

    My comments are not about the person chosen for the job, but the ado about the process. Flower was one of the 2 most probable people for the job. Even a layman like me could see that. John Wright had a claim to the position as well but considering Flowers role in the Caribbean, it was obvious to almost everyone that Flower should get the job, if only not not cause anymore top order chaos (after all England went through 3 captains and 2 coaches). Why, then did ECB pay probably Hundreds of thousands of pounds to a headhunting firm if all the firm was supposed to do was repeat the obvious. Everyone in the cricketing world assumed Flower was 'it', and if the firm suddenly tossed up a new name at the meeting at Lords, what then? would the ECB have gone with the suggestion, ignoring all the world's intuition?..I think not..they would have told the firm thanks but no thanks, we'll stick with Flower. Did they did it to cause hype?to glamorize cricket coaching, as football coaching is?..tut tut

  • Zvakanaka on April 15, 2009, 18:29 GMT

    Well, the list of the best England coaches in the post-war era already contains, in Duncan Fletcher, one dour Zimbabwean of few words. Flower, though less jowly, is of similar make-up.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Zvakanaka on April 15, 2009, 18:29 GMT

    Well, the list of the best England coaches in the post-war era already contains, in Duncan Fletcher, one dour Zimbabwean of few words. Flower, though less jowly, is of similar make-up.

  • KiQass on April 15, 2009, 18:53 GMT

    My comments are not about the person chosen for the job, but the ado about the process. Flower was one of the 2 most probable people for the job. Even a layman like me could see that. John Wright had a claim to the position as well but considering Flowers role in the Caribbean, it was obvious to almost everyone that Flower should get the job, if only not not cause anymore top order chaos (after all England went through 3 captains and 2 coaches). Why, then did ECB pay probably Hundreds of thousands of pounds to a headhunting firm if all the firm was supposed to do was repeat the obvious. Everyone in the cricketing world assumed Flower was 'it', and if the firm suddenly tossed up a new name at the meeting at Lords, what then? would the ECB have gone with the suggestion, ignoring all the world's intuition?..I think not..they would have told the firm thanks but no thanks, we'll stick with Flower. Did they did it to cause hype?to glamorize cricket coaching, as football coaching is?..tut tut

  • vswami on April 16, 2009, 4:14 GMT

    The biggest challenge for Flower is dealing with ECB and the media. ECB asked Pieterson for an opinion, didnt like it and taught him a lesson by cutting him to size. So my prediction is that Flower will choose to adopt a conservative path ( which goes well with Strauss's personality ), have an excuse ready for any potential failure and shun any bold decisions needed as the media/ECB will roast him for any misadventure.

  • Hurts_Like_Stink on April 16, 2009, 7:16 GMT

    I am happy. England may have sold the sport down the river for the BSkyB dollar at a point when it threatened a level of popularity which may never be reached again, bungled some of the sports unique prestige away for a night or two of illicit, illigitemate and ill-thought-out fun with Stanford [the ultimate portrait of modern sporting ego-greed] and shot itself in both feet with its handling of KP but...honestly, a headhunting firm to find the coach? An admission of incompetence which can now be seen in all its comedic glory now that, like Dorothy in The Wizard of Oz, lead them back to where they started for the answer. Nevermind, Flower will find the ECB's foolish ways a breeze in comparison to what he has seen in his distinguished career, I am sure he and Strauss will build the foundations of a side which can rise up the rankings and play the kind of attacking cricket which is needed in the current age - not Jelly Beans and angry poses in photographs from Ian Bell. Good luck Andy!

  • Nerk on April 16, 2009, 7:27 GMT

    its not like Englands situation can get any worse...

  • Nduru on April 16, 2009, 7:46 GMT

    I think Andy Flower will do an excellent job. One thing few have mentioned is his long track record of nurturing young players and bringing out their skills. For example, Tatenda Taibu learnt an enourmous amount as a batsman and wicket keeper from Flower, who deliberately nurtured him. If Taibu was not playing for a sadly diminished team, the world would appreciate what a great player of spin and reverse-sweeper he is - skills taught to him by Flower. At county level, Flower also nurtured players such as Cook. I think he will continue doing this for England and his approach will pay off. Hopefully one day he can coach Zimbabwe back to decency too!

  • TheDoctor394 on April 16, 2009, 9:30 GMT

    An excellent choice! All the best to you, Andy.

  • Ross_Co on April 16, 2009, 13:45 GMT

    Andy Flower was a great player cursed with having to be associated with a team that was an immense distance from greatness. And now? Well, the curse continues doesn't it. Just by the by, why doesn't he play for England? After all he's not remotely English - isn't that one of the major prerequisites?

  • Nampally on April 16, 2009, 15:35 GMT

    No doubt any England coach will have an unenviable task of taking a number of individually brilliant players & uniting them into a team. That will be the single most important task expected of the new Coach. Ability to communicate & gain trust of all players and getting the best out of them will be the #1 task. Maintaining disciplined behaviour on and off the field is the second most important task. Some of the Key England players' actions off the field in the past lacked maturity & responsibility. Emphasis on team fitness must be ensured thru' Physios and other staff & coordinated by the coach. If Flowers can fulfill these tasks well he will make a good coach.He certainly has a tough job in controlling egotist players like KP. ECB has the responsibility to define duties of the Coach in detail along with interfacing with Captain, players & other coaching staff. Even the best coaches fail if their duties are non specific. A training course for the coaches will greatly help in success.

  • StJohn on April 16, 2009, 18:28 GMT

    Well, he was a fantastic player and it's a great shame and loss to the game that he couldn't have played even more cricket! My tongue-in-cheek question though is whether he could also keep wicket for England?! With the possible exception of Adam Gilchrist, Andy Flower was the best international wicketkeeper-batsman in the last 15-20 years. Wouldn't it be great if he could somehow sneak onto the field?!