Ian Chappell August 13, 2009

'Talking on the field doesn't make you tough'

Interview by Simon Lister
One of cricket's most outspoken players and most acclaimed captains talks frankly about Bradman, Vic Richardson, and starting and going at the right time
20

Ian Chappell was never a shrinking violet. Born into a cricketing family, he played Tests over 16 years and captained Australia for four, in which he never lost a series. Tough, even curt, but articulate and thoughtful, he was passionate about Australia playing great cricket. Decent legbreaks supported fine batting. Run-ins with officialdom led to involvement with World Series Cricket but he returned for more Tests before taking his forthright views to the airwaves.

Tell me about your maternal grandfather, Victor Richardson.
Vic was a pretty big influence on me. First, he had played Test cricket and had captained Australia. At some point it struck me that if there was somebody in our family who had played Test cricket, why couldn't I? I liked him and I admired him. When I was older we went drinking and I listened to all his stories. He was a great raconteur. When I was a schoolboy my mum would tell me that he'd been to see me play cricket, even though I hadn't spotted him at the ground because he'd parked down the drive and then stood behind a tree.

He hated the phone, really hated it, but he would ring me up if I'd done all right and he'd say, "Well played today". Then before you could reply, you'd hear boom! and the phone would be put down. But it meant a lot because he wasn't the sort of bloke who'd ring up just because I was his grandson. It meant that I had played well.

He lived long enough to see me play for Australia and he gave me three pieces of advice: "If you can't be a good cricketer, at least you could try to dress like one." Second: "Nine times out of 10 when you win the toss, bat first, and on the 10th occasion think about it, then bat." And the third bit was: "If you ever get the chance to captain Australia, don't captain like a Victorian."

It has been said that you were brash and self-confident when you first played for South Australia.
Absolutely not. Not at all. I had opinions but not self-confidence. I mean there were more opinions around the Chappell breakfast table than there was orange juice. Once on a bus trip up country, I disagreed with Barry Jarman about how I should bowl legspin. The point was that, when I threw it up I got less spin on it. Jar said I should flight it more, because like most keepers he wanted a stumping. Anyway, I kept saying, "No I need to put it through for the ball to spin." We'd both been having a beer, and in the end he said: "You're just like your bloody old man - you think you know everything."

Your Test career started slowly. Did you begin to doubt that you had the necessary skills?
Definitely. I hadn't had a lot of success and always seemed to get out stupidly. Then I had a bolt-of-lightning moment. It was the last Sheffield Shield match of the season at the MCG before the '68 tour of England. I was going really well, but then got myself out twice. I was really cursing myself as I walked off, thinking I'd cost myself a trip to England.

We were in these temporary dressing rooms, which were locked, so I had to sit outside with my bloody pads on. And for some reason as I was sitting there I made a deal with myself. I said: "Mate - you've got to relax a bit. If you get picked, treat it like it's your last tour. Have a good time, take your cricket seriously but enjoy it." And that was the best thing I ever did. I had a good tour and things went from there.

"If I am asked a direct question about Bradman, I say exactly what I have experienced"

The 1969-70 tour to India was pretty grim. Did the discontent felt by the team play a part in your agreeing to sign for Kerry Packer a decade later?
There's no doubt that the bulk of us were pretty pissed off. The board refused to put us in good hotels, just to save money. We didn't blame the Indians but the ACB. We knew there were much better hotels there because we went and bloody drank in them. Then we heard that [Donald] Bradman, who was certainly a selector, if not chairman of selectors, had spoken about my brother, Greg. He was asked why Greg wasn't on the tour, and he replied: "He's better off making runs in Australia, not getting ill in India." We all thought that was a pretty tactless comment. Then we found out that if we died on the tour our families would be offered something like 400 dollars. There was a whole bunch of other stuff too. We were sold up the river, and the board didn't give a damn. Certainly the seeds of disenchantment were sown there, but you know, the history of Australian cricket is littered with blues between the players and the administrators.

Does the Australian public's deification of the Don leave you irritated?
Well, I understand it, because they didn't have to deal with him. But whatever I've said about Bradman since he died, I made very sure that I had said the same things when he was alive, because to have done otherwise would be pretty gutless.

What opened the door for me was a statement from Bradman in the early 1980s. He replied to a question about his career with, "I managed to do it all without getting my hair permed or getting divorced". Now I took that to be a direct shot at me. I had a couple of perms during World Series Cricket, for the simple reason that when I asked the bloody hairdresser what the perm involved, he said: "Well, you won't have to comb your hair anymore," and I thought, "That'll do me!" The perm part from Bradman didn't bother me, but the divorce bit did, because I wasn't the only Australian cricketer to get divorced, and I wasn't even the only Australian captain to have got divorced. Richie [Benaud] was divorced, you know. I thought, "Bugger you, mate. It's personal now." And from then on, if I was asked a direct question about Bradman, I would say exactly what I had experienced.

When you captained Australia, did you consciously try to give the side a tougher image?
Nah. There's a lot of crap talked about toughness, mental disintegration. Talking on the field doesn't make anyone tough. One of the toughest cricketers I ever played against was Andy Roberts and he never said a word. I've even read that I shaped the team in my own likeness, moulded to my personality. You're talking about Rod Marsh, Dennis Lillee, Doug Walters, Ian Redpath - very, very strong characters. To think that I'd be able to shape them into something they didn't want to be is absolute codswallop.

We were just a very competitive bunch of guys, and I was lucky that they were so skilful and such a decent bunch. Dennis Lillee? There's no way in the wide world that Dennis will do anything other than what Dennis wants to do.

You could have gone on longer as captain of Australia, but you didn't want to suffer the same fate as your predecessor, Bill Lawry.
Well, that's what I told my wife when I was given the job: "The bastards won't get me that way." [When Lawry was sacked in 1971, he found out from team-mates who had been told by a reporter.] So I guess that indicated that I would go early rather than too late. But actually, after The Oval Test here in '75, I was done. I knew I wasn't in the right frame of mind to lead the side against the West Indies so soon afterwards. If I'd had six months off, I would have gone one more, but I was mentally done. I was thinking I wasn't aggressive enough any more. I didn't have it.

It's interesting, though. I remember speaking to Richie soon after I got the job, and I said that stepping down as captain must be a pretty tough decision to take. And he replied: "No, Ian. It's the easiest decision you'll ever make." And he was exactly right - as Richie is 99% of the time. It was easy. I just walked off the field at The Oval, and I was going to the press conference with the tour manager, Fred Bennett, and I said, "I'm gonna go" and he said, "You're tired. Why don't you think about it?" And I said, "Fred, it won't make any difference," and I just did it.

Your brother Trevor played much less Test cricket than you and Greg. Tell me one thing he's better at than you.
Oh, he could run so much faster than us. There's nine years' difference between him and me. We all used to play this backyard soccer game we'd dreamt up. Now I was about 20, I'd left home and Trevor was about 11 and I'd come back to visit and we were playing our soccer game. If Trevor was dribbling and took it past me I would just trip him up because I knew that he was so fast he'd be away: I couldn't catch him. He was a pretty talented sportsman - great at baseball too.

You see, I've always said if you want a reason why boys should play men's cricket as soon as they can, look at our family. When Greg and I were at our school, it was always entered in the local grade competition - club cricket. We were 14 or 15. But when Trevor came along, the school reverted to playing only schools. So he got a lot more runs than us, and they all said, "Oh, he's the best of the three" but they didn't look who the runs were made against. Get kids with ability playing against men as soon as possible. I've always said it.

This article was first published in the August 2009 issue of the Wisden Cricketer. Subscribe here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Rickaby on August 16, 2009, 12:07 GMT

    @IlMagnifico, I happen to agree with your comments but, I suspect, for opposite reasons. Tactless? Definitely - but I don't think Ian would rank "tact" very highly on a list of required personality traits. Egotistical? Well, he has a very clear sense of who he is and what he believes and is not afraid of sharing his opinions - if you can't handle that, don't listen (and go and take a look at yourself in the mirror and wish for the same clarity). Mellowing with age? Probably just clearer than ever. Believes his own hype? You bet! Although he doesn't really "hype" as such. He just says what he believes and leaves it at that. BTW I find it interesting that you make such comments under the name of "IlMagnifico." Is someone just a little bit envious of Ian's position and ability to be heard?

  • Panther_Ourimbah on August 16, 2009, 10:55 GMT

    Ian Chappell was a tough cricketer his performance in the 6th Test at Adelaide in 1971 (Bill Lawry's last test) was a gutsy performance, Chapelli & Keith Stackpole kept the series alive with hundreds in Australia's 2nd Innings.

    As soon as he took over he attacked & he continued in that vein throughout he's captaincy. I captained teams at school & in senior cricket. Chappelli certainly influenced the way I captained teams. I liked hi smantra, regarding fast bowlers. When you've got 'em make sure you use 'em. I always looked to attack.

    If Ian Chappell was captain of the Australia team to-day, Australia would already have won the Ashes. That's no disrespect to Ricky Ponting, he's a great player.

    In the last 30 years only Mark Taylor has come close to Chappelli's captaincy capabilities.

    All the test players since 1977 should get down & kiss the ground that he walks on as there certainly wouldn't have been the conditions that the players enjoy to-day if it wasn't for Chappelli.

  • IlMagnifico on August 14, 2009, 17:19 GMT

    As tactless and egotistical as ever. Some people mellow with age. Others go to their grave believing their own hype.

  • Jarr30 on August 14, 2009, 17:11 GMT

    Ian Chappell indeed was one of the toughest cricketers during the 70's era. During those days mostly all the players came through really tough times. Players like Gavaskar & V Richards never wore helmets and still had the mental toughness to face one the the fastest bowlers who had all the privileges to bowl 6 bouncers in an over. In the 70's specially Aussies & WI players had extreme mental toughness which other countries like England,India,Pakistan & NZ lacked. Nowadays players try hard to act tough but they are not tough at all. Tendulkar,Lara,Kallis,Dravid,Chanderpaul are mentally tough players under any situation or pressure and I haven't ever seen them swearing but they let their bat do the talking. Players like Warne,McGrath, Donald did talk trash to the batsmen very often but they backed it through their performances. Among the current crop of young players who are mentally tough and only a few names come to mind, they are JP Duminy,S Katich, MS Dhoni & D Bravo.

  • Gazza1955 on August 14, 2009, 5:06 GMT

    Ian Chappell was a man's man. I remember reading Ian Redpath's Book "Always Reddy" & one of the many paragraphs Ian Redpath wrote in that book on Ian Chappell included:- "A great player & a great captain, Chaps was always there to give you that extra bit of encouragement to get over the line."

  • ganeshholla.v on August 13, 2009, 16:48 GMT

    As forthright as ever...you are one man who can be trusted to walk the talk!!!

  • lazo on August 13, 2009, 14:18 GMT

    Apart from being a good cricketer and great captain what I also remember about Ian Chappell is how a lot of guys in our school cricket team would imitate him. Walking out to bat looking up at the sky, collar turned up, taking guard, adjusting the box, smiling back at the bowler after receiving a rib tickler,,,,all good stuff.

  • vumpire-republic on August 13, 2009, 14:12 GMT

    Now if only all cricketers (especially bowlers...also keepers and close-in fielders) realized the truth about toughness. Always admired bowlers like Walsh, Ambrose, Flintoff, Kumble and Lee, just to name a few. Tough competitors all...never had to rely on mouthing off.

  • Skywalker1977 on August 13, 2009, 13:52 GMT

    A very candid conversation with one of the finest cricketer and thinker of all times. Awesome knowledge of the game coupled with lucid articulation makes him a listener's privilege and joy.

  • Avid.Cricket.Watcher on August 13, 2009, 13:04 GMT

    Always very interesting to read or listen to Ian's thoughts on cricket. Thoughtful, insightful, balanced and forthright (without being disrespectful). Not that his opinions / assessments are necessarily always right (he felt England had a better bowling attack at the start of the Ashes...to be fair to Ian, they have probably underperformed), but they are typically well thought out. And usually sprinkled with enjoyable little bits of wisdom (pertaining just as much to life) and world awareness.

  • Rickaby on August 16, 2009, 12:07 GMT

    @IlMagnifico, I happen to agree with your comments but, I suspect, for opposite reasons. Tactless? Definitely - but I don't think Ian would rank "tact" very highly on a list of required personality traits. Egotistical? Well, he has a very clear sense of who he is and what he believes and is not afraid of sharing his opinions - if you can't handle that, don't listen (and go and take a look at yourself in the mirror and wish for the same clarity). Mellowing with age? Probably just clearer than ever. Believes his own hype? You bet! Although he doesn't really "hype" as such. He just says what he believes and leaves it at that. BTW I find it interesting that you make such comments under the name of "IlMagnifico." Is someone just a little bit envious of Ian's position and ability to be heard?

  • Panther_Ourimbah on August 16, 2009, 10:55 GMT

    Ian Chappell was a tough cricketer his performance in the 6th Test at Adelaide in 1971 (Bill Lawry's last test) was a gutsy performance, Chapelli & Keith Stackpole kept the series alive with hundreds in Australia's 2nd Innings.

    As soon as he took over he attacked & he continued in that vein throughout he's captaincy. I captained teams at school & in senior cricket. Chappelli certainly influenced the way I captained teams. I liked hi smantra, regarding fast bowlers. When you've got 'em make sure you use 'em. I always looked to attack.

    If Ian Chappell was captain of the Australia team to-day, Australia would already have won the Ashes. That's no disrespect to Ricky Ponting, he's a great player.

    In the last 30 years only Mark Taylor has come close to Chappelli's captaincy capabilities.

    All the test players since 1977 should get down & kiss the ground that he walks on as there certainly wouldn't have been the conditions that the players enjoy to-day if it wasn't for Chappelli.

  • IlMagnifico on August 14, 2009, 17:19 GMT

    As tactless and egotistical as ever. Some people mellow with age. Others go to their grave believing their own hype.

  • Jarr30 on August 14, 2009, 17:11 GMT

    Ian Chappell indeed was one of the toughest cricketers during the 70's era. During those days mostly all the players came through really tough times. Players like Gavaskar & V Richards never wore helmets and still had the mental toughness to face one the the fastest bowlers who had all the privileges to bowl 6 bouncers in an over. In the 70's specially Aussies & WI players had extreme mental toughness which other countries like England,India,Pakistan & NZ lacked. Nowadays players try hard to act tough but they are not tough at all. Tendulkar,Lara,Kallis,Dravid,Chanderpaul are mentally tough players under any situation or pressure and I haven't ever seen them swearing but they let their bat do the talking. Players like Warne,McGrath, Donald did talk trash to the batsmen very often but they backed it through their performances. Among the current crop of young players who are mentally tough and only a few names come to mind, they are JP Duminy,S Katich, MS Dhoni & D Bravo.

  • Gazza1955 on August 14, 2009, 5:06 GMT

    Ian Chappell was a man's man. I remember reading Ian Redpath's Book "Always Reddy" & one of the many paragraphs Ian Redpath wrote in that book on Ian Chappell included:- "A great player & a great captain, Chaps was always there to give you that extra bit of encouragement to get over the line."

  • ganeshholla.v on August 13, 2009, 16:48 GMT

    As forthright as ever...you are one man who can be trusted to walk the talk!!!

  • lazo on August 13, 2009, 14:18 GMT

    Apart from being a good cricketer and great captain what I also remember about Ian Chappell is how a lot of guys in our school cricket team would imitate him. Walking out to bat looking up at the sky, collar turned up, taking guard, adjusting the box, smiling back at the bowler after receiving a rib tickler,,,,all good stuff.

  • vumpire-republic on August 13, 2009, 14:12 GMT

    Now if only all cricketers (especially bowlers...also keepers and close-in fielders) realized the truth about toughness. Always admired bowlers like Walsh, Ambrose, Flintoff, Kumble and Lee, just to name a few. Tough competitors all...never had to rely on mouthing off.

  • Skywalker1977 on August 13, 2009, 13:52 GMT

    A very candid conversation with one of the finest cricketer and thinker of all times. Awesome knowledge of the game coupled with lucid articulation makes him a listener's privilege and joy.

  • Avid.Cricket.Watcher on August 13, 2009, 13:04 GMT

    Always very interesting to read or listen to Ian's thoughts on cricket. Thoughtful, insightful, balanced and forthright (without being disrespectful). Not that his opinions / assessments are necessarily always right (he felt England had a better bowling attack at the start of the Ashes...to be fair to Ian, they have probably underperformed), but they are typically well thought out. And usually sprinkled with enjoyable little bits of wisdom (pertaining just as much to life) and world awareness.

  • whodovodooo on August 13, 2009, 11:01 GMT

    If England want tough characters they need look no further than Kent's underrated allrounder Mark Ealham. The way the selectors treated him is a crime. Anyone with information should contact Barnes Flying Squad or Crimestoppers.

  • sushantsingh on August 13, 2009, 10:00 GMT

    @ sramesh_74 if merv hughes was an average player than you need to know one thing mate 95% cricketer who have played for india are below average & they are worshipped in india as a great player, we need to change our mindset first . Rightly said that mental toughness has nothing to do with your behaviour on the field & the coming generation of indian players should learn it , because its nothing good for them.

  • NeilCameron on August 13, 2009, 8:25 GMT

    "You had an average cricketer like Merv Hughes who was worshipped across the playing fields of Australia. His only claim to fame was bad mouthing the opponent and the Aussies loved it."

    His "claim to fame" also included 212 wickets at 28.38 (which also includes 23 wickets at 27.56 against India), which was pretty darn important to his fame in Australia.

  • NeilCameron on August 13, 2009, 8:00 GMT

    The older I get the more I appreciate Chappell's candid nature. Look at how he spoke about Lillee, Marsh, Walters and Redpath. Not only does he play down his own role their success, he implicitly boosts their own ability. After all, if Chappell wasn't responsible for Lillee's success, then who is? Lillee of course! Chappell makes it clear that the only reason why these players succeeded under his captaincy is because they went out there and did it! To say otherwise would be to argue that Lillee (and the others) owed Chappell for their success. This is a very simple form of captaincy and something which not many leaders are willing to admit. Chappelli is most certainly not from the Mike Brearley school of captaincy.

  • DontGoogleMe on August 13, 2009, 7:59 GMT

    Mental disintegration doesn't have to be all swearing and puffing your chest out at your opponents. A good sledge can easily involve something else. Example. Warnie was fielding at silly point against a batsmen who he knew had gone to a psychiatrist because of him. He asked him what the colour of the couch in his psychiatrists was. That batsmen was out a couple balls later.

    It really depends on the batsmen though. You wont get a Tendulkar or Bradman out by sledging them, they have to much concentration

  • dsig3 on August 13, 2009, 7:08 GMT

    The Indian mindset has indeed changed sramesh_74 and I certaintly dont begrudge them for that. I just dont think its going to help you very much. You may be more aggressive and nasty but your team still has underachieved. Making faces and swearing at the opposition is nothing new. The circle you talk about still has not improved your cricket to the extent you believe. Biggest talent pool, biggest market but still yet to dominate any form of cricket for any period of time.

  • sramesh_74 on August 13, 2009, 5:29 GMT

    There you go again about the Indians. Get over it my friend. The Indian mindset has changed. They will no longer smile and bear any hogwash. And it is not that everybody in the team is into verbal aggression. You have guys like Sachin and Rahul who are tougher than any Aussie you can think about. They dont say a word. The Aussies need to understand..times change. You had an average cricketer like Merv Hughes who was worshipped across the playing fields of Australia. His only claim to fame was bad mouthing the opponent and the Aussies loved it. When Steve Waugh called this mental disintegration, he was hailed as a visionary. Ganguly returns the favor and you go crying to the press...

    Circle of life my friend...

  • avssrs on August 13, 2009, 5:24 GMT

    The thing about Ian is what he says can be easily applied to other areas of life. A very inspirational figure that Australia have very been lucky to have.

    "Seems like bowling fast and intimidating batsmen is all new to them."

    dsig3, you're right it isn't really part of our culture. The Aussies did it for 10-15 years while they were doing very well. So our boys said hey if we do the same we'll do well too.Well India has done well over the last 10 years in Test cricket, but most of it has been due to Rahul, Sachin, VVS and Anil who hardly say a word to opponents. I really wish the new boys would shut up a bit more. It's embarrassing watching them mouthing off just so they can be seen as tough.

  • dsig3 on August 13, 2009, 3:56 GMT

    Ian always tells it like it is. Australia needs a hard nosed captain again. We have had a few, Allan Border and Steve Waugh to name names. The current Australian squad seems a bit soft these days. More photo shoots and haircuts. I really wish fast bowlers wouldnt talk so much these days. I get embarrassed watching it. When guys like Johnson and Broad are pouting and mouthing off you wonder how effective it really is. Indians are the worst these days at mouthing off. Seems like bowling fast and intimidating batsmen is all new to them. BTW the most intimidating bowler in the last 20 years was a Aussie leg spinner.

  • dyogesh on August 13, 2009, 3:35 GMT

    The Bradman part is certainly interesting. Probably, a little more thought the team being shaped in his image being codswallop should have been so obvious !! Ian Chappell doesn't hide behind diplomatic answers like many others and that certainly makes any piece or interviews of Ian more interesting than others. He might be wrong but is never shy of his opinion. One of the more interesting interviews.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • dyogesh on August 13, 2009, 3:35 GMT

    The Bradman part is certainly interesting. Probably, a little more thought the team being shaped in his image being codswallop should have been so obvious !! Ian Chappell doesn't hide behind diplomatic answers like many others and that certainly makes any piece or interviews of Ian more interesting than others. He might be wrong but is never shy of his opinion. One of the more interesting interviews.

  • dsig3 on August 13, 2009, 3:56 GMT

    Ian always tells it like it is. Australia needs a hard nosed captain again. We have had a few, Allan Border and Steve Waugh to name names. The current Australian squad seems a bit soft these days. More photo shoots and haircuts. I really wish fast bowlers wouldnt talk so much these days. I get embarrassed watching it. When guys like Johnson and Broad are pouting and mouthing off you wonder how effective it really is. Indians are the worst these days at mouthing off. Seems like bowling fast and intimidating batsmen is all new to them. BTW the most intimidating bowler in the last 20 years was a Aussie leg spinner.

  • avssrs on August 13, 2009, 5:24 GMT

    The thing about Ian is what he says can be easily applied to other areas of life. A very inspirational figure that Australia have very been lucky to have.

    "Seems like bowling fast and intimidating batsmen is all new to them."

    dsig3, you're right it isn't really part of our culture. The Aussies did it for 10-15 years while they were doing very well. So our boys said hey if we do the same we'll do well too.Well India has done well over the last 10 years in Test cricket, but most of it has been due to Rahul, Sachin, VVS and Anil who hardly say a word to opponents. I really wish the new boys would shut up a bit more. It's embarrassing watching them mouthing off just so they can be seen as tough.

  • sramesh_74 on August 13, 2009, 5:29 GMT

    There you go again about the Indians. Get over it my friend. The Indian mindset has changed. They will no longer smile and bear any hogwash. And it is not that everybody in the team is into verbal aggression. You have guys like Sachin and Rahul who are tougher than any Aussie you can think about. They dont say a word. The Aussies need to understand..times change. You had an average cricketer like Merv Hughes who was worshipped across the playing fields of Australia. His only claim to fame was bad mouthing the opponent and the Aussies loved it. When Steve Waugh called this mental disintegration, he was hailed as a visionary. Ganguly returns the favor and you go crying to the press...

    Circle of life my friend...

  • dsig3 on August 13, 2009, 7:08 GMT

    The Indian mindset has indeed changed sramesh_74 and I certaintly dont begrudge them for that. I just dont think its going to help you very much. You may be more aggressive and nasty but your team still has underachieved. Making faces and swearing at the opposition is nothing new. The circle you talk about still has not improved your cricket to the extent you believe. Biggest talent pool, biggest market but still yet to dominate any form of cricket for any period of time.

  • DontGoogleMe on August 13, 2009, 7:59 GMT

    Mental disintegration doesn't have to be all swearing and puffing your chest out at your opponents. A good sledge can easily involve something else. Example. Warnie was fielding at silly point against a batsmen who he knew had gone to a psychiatrist because of him. He asked him what the colour of the couch in his psychiatrists was. That batsmen was out a couple balls later.

    It really depends on the batsmen though. You wont get a Tendulkar or Bradman out by sledging them, they have to much concentration

  • NeilCameron on August 13, 2009, 8:00 GMT

    The older I get the more I appreciate Chappell's candid nature. Look at how he spoke about Lillee, Marsh, Walters and Redpath. Not only does he play down his own role their success, he implicitly boosts their own ability. After all, if Chappell wasn't responsible for Lillee's success, then who is? Lillee of course! Chappell makes it clear that the only reason why these players succeeded under his captaincy is because they went out there and did it! To say otherwise would be to argue that Lillee (and the others) owed Chappell for their success. This is a very simple form of captaincy and something which not many leaders are willing to admit. Chappelli is most certainly not from the Mike Brearley school of captaincy.

  • NeilCameron on August 13, 2009, 8:25 GMT

    "You had an average cricketer like Merv Hughes who was worshipped across the playing fields of Australia. His only claim to fame was bad mouthing the opponent and the Aussies loved it."

    His "claim to fame" also included 212 wickets at 28.38 (which also includes 23 wickets at 27.56 against India), which was pretty darn important to his fame in Australia.

  • sushantsingh on August 13, 2009, 10:00 GMT

    @ sramesh_74 if merv hughes was an average player than you need to know one thing mate 95% cricketer who have played for india are below average & they are worshipped in india as a great player, we need to change our mindset first . Rightly said that mental toughness has nothing to do with your behaviour on the field & the coming generation of indian players should learn it , because its nothing good for them.

  • whodovodooo on August 13, 2009, 11:01 GMT

    If England want tough characters they need look no further than Kent's underrated allrounder Mark Ealham. The way the selectors treated him is a crime. Anyone with information should contact Barnes Flying Squad or Crimestoppers.