June 11, 2010

The contrasting fortunes of West Indies and South Africa

West Indies' win-loss ratio will slip below one if they lose the series against South Africa, while the reverse will be true for the visitors
23

To say that West Indies have been in the throes of a slump for the last decade and more is to state the obvious. The team and the fans are used to losing, and expectations are pretty low, but another Test defeat against South Africa will mean a new statistical low: for the first time since 1976, their overall win-loss ratio will diminish to less than one. Currently they have won and lost exactly 152 Tests apiece.

For South Africa, on the other hand, the graph has been moving in exactly the opposite direction since their return to Test cricket in 1992, and a win in the first Test in Trinidad will take their overall ratio to one, a mark it has intermittently touched over the last year and a half.

Going by recent form, the visitors have to be odds-on favourites to join Australia, England and Pakistan as the teams with a win-loss ratio of more than one by the time this series is done. Australia's consistently high standards show clearly in their ratio of 1.82, which is well clear of England's 1.21. India have exactly as many wins as Pakistan, but they've taken far more matches to get there, which is reflected in their ratio.

Win-loss ratios for each team in Tests
Team Tests Won Lost Ratio
Australia 721 339 186 1.82
England 899 315 259 1.21
Pakistan 346 104 95 1.09
West Indies 462 152 152 1.00
South Africa 350 122 123 0.99
Sri Lanka 192 60 69 0.86
India 437 104 137 0.75
New Zealand 359 68 145 0.46
Zimbabwe 83 8 49 0.16
Bangladesh 68 3 59 0.05

But let's return to West Indies' sorry story. Their numbers over the last 15 years make for shocking - and very depressing - reading. When they beat England in the third Test of the 1994 home series - incidentally also in Trinidad - their win-loss ratio climbed to 1.67, with 119 wins offset by only 71 defeats. At the end of that Test, West Indies sat proudly as the team with the best overall stats in Test cricket; Australia were next with a ratio of 1.46, while England remained at 1.21. At that point West Indies had won 48 more Tests than they'd lost, and they more or less maintained that difference till April 1996, when they beat New Zealand 1-0 in a two-Test series at home.

The 3-2 series defeat to Australia at the end of that year started the slide, which gathered momentum and assumed alarming proportions in the next decade.

The table below illustrates how quickly things have gone completely pear-shaped for West Indies. Till mid-July 1976, they had won, on average, about as much as they'd lost, though obviously that ratio was much poorer in their early days. The third Test against England in 1976 was the last time their win-loss ratio was less than one. The next 20 years were glorious ones for the Caribbean, as they won far more than they lost, averaging only slightly more than one defeat per year.

While they won about three Tests per defeat during those peak years, the ratio has almost exactly reversed since 1997. In these last 15 years, West Indies have averaged about three defeats per win, which has ensured that the cushion of 48 extra wins they had in 1996 has been completely wiped out.

West Indies' win-loss ratio over the years
Period Tests Won Lost Ratio in that period Overall ratio
Till July 15, 1976 171 53 54 0.98 0.98
July 16, 1976 to Oct 1996 151 72 23 3.13 1.62
Nov 1996 onwards 140 27 75 0.36 1.00

South Africa's case is exactly the opposite. Till they were banished from international cricket, they lost two games, on average, per win. Since their return, the ratio has almost reversed, with 84 wins and only 46 defeats. During this period South Africa did manage to achieve the ratio of one very briefly, when they beat Australia 2-1 in Australia in 2008-09. After that heady win, though, they came crashing back to earth, losing 2-1 in the return series at home. The win against India in the Nagpur Test earlier this year meant they had 122 wins and as many defeats, but defeat in the next game brought the ratio back below one. If they do beat West Indies, South Africa will want that ratio to stay above one for a little longer.

South Africa's win-loss ratio over the years
Period Tests Won Lost Ratio in that period Overall ratio
Till 1970 172 38 77 0.49 0.49
Since 1992 178 84 46 1.82 0.99

Slow dance
The rhythm of Test cricket has generally increased the world over with batsmen scoring more quickly due to the influence of the limited-overs game, but in the West Indies things have moved the other way. Slow pitches and heavy outfields have made run-scoring in the West Indies more difficult than in any other country. Since 2000, batsmen have scored at about 46 runs per 100 balls in Tests in the Caribbean, which is the lowest among all hosting nations. In terms of number of balls per four or six, the West Indies again lag behind other nations, with an average of one every 17.52 balls.

Results and run rates in each country in Tests since 2000
Host country Tests Results Draws Draw % Bat ave Strike rate Balls per 4 or 6
Australia 61 52 9 14.75 34.00 52.25 15.57
England 72 55 17 23.61 32.07 52.19 14.03
South Africa 56 47 9 16.07 30.53 50.71 14.15
Pakistan 32 22 10 31.25 35.04 50.30 15.23
New Zealand 45 32 13 28.89 30.68 49.62 14.30
Bangladesh 33 29 4 12.12 30.02 49.41 15.18
India 49 31 18 36.73 35.12 48.50 15.80
Sri Lanka 54 43 11 20.37 30.50 48.06 16.87
Zimbabwe 22 18 4 18.18 31.24 47.55 15.72
West Indies 51 31 20 39.22 32.28 46.16 17.52

Looking at the numbers over the previous two decades, it's also obvious that the run rates have gradually been declining, almost in sync with West Indies' status in world cricket. In the 1980s, when the team was in its pomp, the run rate for matches in the West Indies was the highest; in fact it was the only venue with a rate of more than three runs per over. (Batting strike rate hasn't been used since the data for balls faced isn't complete during this period.) Back then the pitches were much quicker and West Indies had a power-packed batting line-up, which obviously helped lift the run rate in matches played in the region.

In the 1990s, the rate dropped a bit even as West Indies' status as the best team in the world was challenged. In the 2000s, the run rate and the rank have slipped considerably. Both urgently need a lift.

S Rajesh is stats editor of Cricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • spiritwithin on June 13, 2010, 18:20 GMT

    since 2000 india only played 49 tests at home which is less than what australia,SL,WI,SA and england played in their home,so dont understand y ppl still say that india is doing great at present only bcoz they r playing at home..infact india has won the maximum away tests after australia since 2000 and so their no.1 ranking at present is no fluke

  • sajjodaalman on June 13, 2010, 16:55 GMT

    west indies should pick imran khan! he is the best new all-rounder in the caribbean. this season he was the domestic leading wicket taker also.. he deserves a chance!

  • kelbov on June 13, 2010, 1:32 GMT

    the sad thing for west indies.. is not that the wicb has not been trying but its just the total attitude of the players... the pride of playing for the west indies team is no longer there...the love for the game has desolved and this affects the mental strength and skill levels of the players. Honestly i dont see west indies getting any better anytime soon, unless this group of players are wiped out of the team.

  • sboyce on June 12, 2010, 23:54 GMT

    West Indies failure goes far beyond cricket, it's systemic in societies where people are paid by label rather than results. Whether it's a lawyer, a doctor or a labourer, those societies lack the understanding or will to perform. I have often said that to expect 11 citizens from such lack lustre societies to perform at any reasonable level when it's counter-cultural to do so is a false expectation - it just won't happen in the mental bubble those people live in - it's also largely true of the West Indians wherever they reside. If anyone dares disagree, show me, and not with words. I say this as a West Indian..

  • Reggaecricket on June 12, 2010, 18:37 GMT

    Having lived in the West Indies for 8 years, I feel so sad that WI cricket has sunk to a level below Zimbabwe and Bangladesh. I think they saw it coming, but shone in past glory for way too long after the big boys had come and gone. I really don't see how things can change for them unless the WICB can think of something extraordinary. When we tried to get coaching camps organized for youngsters, the only kids who showed any interest in the game were the expatiate kids. That tells a tale, doesn't it? It breaks my heart to see how easily the West Indies are beaten time after time.

  • sajjodaalman on June 12, 2010, 18:04 GMT

    why does everyone go on about gayle? as if he is our west indian saviour or something>?? he is very inconsistent.. our best and only world class batsmen are shivnarine chanderpaul and ramnaresh sarwan.. if nash had come in before he might have been. and brian lara of course when he was playing.. please stop boasting gayle, he is not a test batsman and he is even a much worse captain!

  • Bilal_Choudry on June 12, 2010, 14:00 GMT

    its amazing how SL has managed to get the win loss ratio up well done to them as for the indians i think they need another 10 good years to get the ration right thats cause they were the whipping boys for such a long time and had they not prepared dead wickets this difference would have been greater

  • on June 12, 2010, 9:53 GMT

    The stats have revealed the decline in WI cricket and I agree to it. Batsman who couldn't stay at the crease during the ODI series against SA (also not to forget home conditons), then there is very little hope for them to battle for longer time in test series.

  • vigneshenoy on June 12, 2010, 8:29 GMT

    These stats are since the birth of test cricket...v need to respect these stats..but if u look at the winning ratio in last decade or so i think India r far ahead n almost equal wid Australia,Proteas n England,atleast much better than the yesteryear greats like Windies n Pakistan.....especially India,South Africa n England are the only 3 teams who have won a test match in Australia since 2000,

  • cric4india on June 12, 2010, 5:47 GMT

    @Farukafaj: It think you don't seem to get even simple hings straight! India never boasted they were the best test side till even 2 years before. The stats there are from the start of test matches!

  • spiritwithin on June 13, 2010, 18:20 GMT

    since 2000 india only played 49 tests at home which is less than what australia,SL,WI,SA and england played in their home,so dont understand y ppl still say that india is doing great at present only bcoz they r playing at home..infact india has won the maximum away tests after australia since 2000 and so their no.1 ranking at present is no fluke

  • sajjodaalman on June 13, 2010, 16:55 GMT

    west indies should pick imran khan! he is the best new all-rounder in the caribbean. this season he was the domestic leading wicket taker also.. he deserves a chance!

  • kelbov on June 13, 2010, 1:32 GMT

    the sad thing for west indies.. is not that the wicb has not been trying but its just the total attitude of the players... the pride of playing for the west indies team is no longer there...the love for the game has desolved and this affects the mental strength and skill levels of the players. Honestly i dont see west indies getting any better anytime soon, unless this group of players are wiped out of the team.

  • sboyce on June 12, 2010, 23:54 GMT

    West Indies failure goes far beyond cricket, it's systemic in societies where people are paid by label rather than results. Whether it's a lawyer, a doctor or a labourer, those societies lack the understanding or will to perform. I have often said that to expect 11 citizens from such lack lustre societies to perform at any reasonable level when it's counter-cultural to do so is a false expectation - it just won't happen in the mental bubble those people live in - it's also largely true of the West Indians wherever they reside. If anyone dares disagree, show me, and not with words. I say this as a West Indian..

  • Reggaecricket on June 12, 2010, 18:37 GMT

    Having lived in the West Indies for 8 years, I feel so sad that WI cricket has sunk to a level below Zimbabwe and Bangladesh. I think they saw it coming, but shone in past glory for way too long after the big boys had come and gone. I really don't see how things can change for them unless the WICB can think of something extraordinary. When we tried to get coaching camps organized for youngsters, the only kids who showed any interest in the game were the expatiate kids. That tells a tale, doesn't it? It breaks my heart to see how easily the West Indies are beaten time after time.

  • sajjodaalman on June 12, 2010, 18:04 GMT

    why does everyone go on about gayle? as if he is our west indian saviour or something>?? he is very inconsistent.. our best and only world class batsmen are shivnarine chanderpaul and ramnaresh sarwan.. if nash had come in before he might have been. and brian lara of course when he was playing.. please stop boasting gayle, he is not a test batsman and he is even a much worse captain!

  • Bilal_Choudry on June 12, 2010, 14:00 GMT

    its amazing how SL has managed to get the win loss ratio up well done to them as for the indians i think they need another 10 good years to get the ration right thats cause they were the whipping boys for such a long time and had they not prepared dead wickets this difference would have been greater

  • on June 12, 2010, 9:53 GMT

    The stats have revealed the decline in WI cricket and I agree to it. Batsman who couldn't stay at the crease during the ODI series against SA (also not to forget home conditons), then there is very little hope for them to battle for longer time in test series.

  • vigneshenoy on June 12, 2010, 8:29 GMT

    These stats are since the birth of test cricket...v need to respect these stats..but if u look at the winning ratio in last decade or so i think India r far ahead n almost equal wid Australia,Proteas n England,atleast much better than the yesteryear greats like Windies n Pakistan.....especially India,South Africa n England are the only 3 teams who have won a test match in Australia since 2000,

  • cric4india on June 12, 2010, 5:47 GMT

    @Farukafaj: It think you don't seem to get even simple hings straight! India never boasted they were the best test side till even 2 years before. The stats there are from the start of test matches!

  • vichan on June 11, 2010, 22:05 GMT

    Interesting that England were the 3rd worst side in 1990s, but the 3rd best in the 2000s. In fact when the 1990s had begun, England's ratio was 1.29 and was in 3rd place behind West Indies and Australia. But after their "worst decade ever", by 2000 their ratio had gone down to 1.15 and behind Pakistan, into 4th place. Since then they have climbed back above Pakistan and the West Indies to 2nd spot overall...so hope for the West Indies fans still, as the turn-around can happen relatively quickly.

  • on June 11, 2010, 14:31 GMT

    The sad thing for Pak fans is after the england tour Pak team will fall below both W I and South Africa.

  • zak123kaif on June 11, 2010, 13:42 GMT

    @ Farukafaz India's W/L ratio is less because they lost many matches in the period 1960-1990.Since then India's ratio is more than one due to batting heavyweights and that is why they are now the best team in tests

  • google_123 on June 11, 2010, 12:37 GMT

    @farukfaj itz now when India has strtd thinkng dat it is d best test side (even icc ranking proves it). i think it itself is an achievment for a team which is 7th in d overall list is heading the current charts........... kudos to team INDIA nd 2 all its supporters

  • _NEUTRAL_Fan_ on June 11, 2010, 12:30 GMT

    Oh and credit to SL, they apparently know how to prep result pitches as well. Their curators should teach the Ind n Pak curators a thing or 2 since they are also sub-continental.

  • _NEUTRAL_Fan_ on June 11, 2010, 12:22 GMT

    Too me the most disturbing stat is that the draw percentage post 2000 in W.I., Ind and Pak are all > 30%! Surely ICC can confront the curators in these countries. This is almost pathetic to be honest and after seeing this stat I do not want to hear the so-called cricket experts complaining about persons criticizing sub-continental pitches because they favour spin more so than pace(so the experts claim)....THEY FAVOUR NO TYPE OF BOWLING. W.I. have no excuse because they used to have several result pitches and the current match in Trinidad where the ball is turning on the first day proves that they still can produce them! That pitch has real turn without being a dust-bowl and is definitely a RESULT PITCH.

  • Farukafaj on June 11, 2010, 11:35 GMT

    LOL , then why India thinks that they are very good test side. they are sitting at 7th position among top 8 teams

  • shivam1987 on June 11, 2010, 11:05 GMT

    I think India's low ratio is due to their less tests wins uptill 1970's

  • josephg1981 on June 11, 2010, 10:56 GMT

    SL was awarded Test Status in 1981. India's W/L ratio pre-1981 was a pathetic 0.48. Thats the reason why India are lingering below SL in the overall stats. Since 1981, India's W/L ratio is 1.04

  • on June 11, 2010, 9:35 GMT

    India has lost plenty of tests starting from 1976 to 1996, till the likes of Sachin, Dravid, Ganguly and Sehwag came. Indian batting got bolstered to balance out their mediocre bowling. India is no. 1 in Tests currently all because of their batsmen, as they post sufficient for their average bowlers to defend.

  • on June 11, 2010, 9:26 GMT

    @faisal.jaan

    its no surprise. the pakistan team definetly has a better win/loss ratio compared to india bcos pak team was much stronger during the 80s and 90s. but india played (and lost) many matched before independence too, and thos also add into the stats. I am not sure how many matches were played befre 1947.....

  • Saim93 on June 11, 2010, 9:14 GMT

    Pakistan have slipped too I remember in 2006 they had won 100 and lost 82. That means since then they have won only 4 and lost 13. I hope from this year we can get back to winning ways and up the win percentage back.

  • MFNadeem on June 11, 2010, 7:54 GMT

    Nice to know that PAKISTAN is among those elite teams who have won more matches than they lost. Surprised to see INDIA even below SL. Strange.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • MFNadeem on June 11, 2010, 7:54 GMT

    Nice to know that PAKISTAN is among those elite teams who have won more matches than they lost. Surprised to see INDIA even below SL. Strange.

  • Saim93 on June 11, 2010, 9:14 GMT

    Pakistan have slipped too I remember in 2006 they had won 100 and lost 82. That means since then they have won only 4 and lost 13. I hope from this year we can get back to winning ways and up the win percentage back.

  • on June 11, 2010, 9:26 GMT

    @faisal.jaan

    its no surprise. the pakistan team definetly has a better win/loss ratio compared to india bcos pak team was much stronger during the 80s and 90s. but india played (and lost) many matched before independence too, and thos also add into the stats. I am not sure how many matches were played befre 1947.....

  • on June 11, 2010, 9:35 GMT

    India has lost plenty of tests starting from 1976 to 1996, till the likes of Sachin, Dravid, Ganguly and Sehwag came. Indian batting got bolstered to balance out their mediocre bowling. India is no. 1 in Tests currently all because of their batsmen, as they post sufficient for their average bowlers to defend.

  • josephg1981 on June 11, 2010, 10:56 GMT

    SL was awarded Test Status in 1981. India's W/L ratio pre-1981 was a pathetic 0.48. Thats the reason why India are lingering below SL in the overall stats. Since 1981, India's W/L ratio is 1.04

  • shivam1987 on June 11, 2010, 11:05 GMT

    I think India's low ratio is due to their less tests wins uptill 1970's

  • Farukafaj on June 11, 2010, 11:35 GMT

    LOL , then why India thinks that they are very good test side. they are sitting at 7th position among top 8 teams

  • _NEUTRAL_Fan_ on June 11, 2010, 12:22 GMT

    Too me the most disturbing stat is that the draw percentage post 2000 in W.I., Ind and Pak are all > 30%! Surely ICC can confront the curators in these countries. This is almost pathetic to be honest and after seeing this stat I do not want to hear the so-called cricket experts complaining about persons criticizing sub-continental pitches because they favour spin more so than pace(so the experts claim)....THEY FAVOUR NO TYPE OF BOWLING. W.I. have no excuse because they used to have several result pitches and the current match in Trinidad where the ball is turning on the first day proves that they still can produce them! That pitch has real turn without being a dust-bowl and is definitely a RESULT PITCH.

  • _NEUTRAL_Fan_ on June 11, 2010, 12:30 GMT

    Oh and credit to SL, they apparently know how to prep result pitches as well. Their curators should teach the Ind n Pak curators a thing or 2 since they are also sub-continental.

  • google_123 on June 11, 2010, 12:37 GMT

    @farukfaj itz now when India has strtd thinkng dat it is d best test side (even icc ranking proves it). i think it itself is an achievment for a team which is 7th in d overall list is heading the current charts........... kudos to team INDIA nd 2 all its supporters