Rewind to Rewind toRSS FeedFeeds

1999

The run-out that sparked a riot

When the first match in the inaugural Asian Test Championship descended into chaos with the controversial run-out of India's hero Sachin Tendulkar

Martin Williamson

October 30, 2010

Comments: 101 | Text size: A | A

Srinath celebrates the fall of Shahid Afridi, India v Pakistan, Asia Test Championship, Eden Gardens, Calcutta, 16-20
Before the storm: Javagal Srinath celebrates on his way to 8 for 86 in Pakistan's second innings Sajal Mukerjee / © ESPNcricinfo Ltd
Enlarge

The idea of an Asian Test Championship must have seemed good - and lucrative - to the Asian Cricket Council in the late 1990s. Keen to boost income, the region's three big teams - Bangladesh were two years from getting Test status - would all meet and India and Pakistan's resumption of cricketing relations removed the last and most significant obstacle to the event.

Even before the start the Championship was threatened by politicians as those from India and Pakistan postured and tried to use the cricket for their own purposes. In the end it was agreed the tour of India by Pakistan could go ahead, but only shortly before it was scheduled to start.

The Calcutta Test in February 1999 was originally planned as the third and final match of the series between the two. But once the idea of the Asian Championship was accepted, it became the new tournament's inaugural game. The public showed their support and around 100,000 turned up on the first four days, and 65,000 on the fifth even though India had only four second-innings wickets left. The attendance smashed the 63-year-old record for the highest aggregate at a Test.

However, the game was marred by crowd trouble and was, Wisden observed, completed in near silence, "watched by a few officials, VIPs, journalists and police, after the crowd was forcibly expelled because of a riot".

The first three days passed without incident and, initially, India appeared to be on the way to a memorable victory as Pakistan slumped to 26 for 6 on the first morning. Led by Moin Khan's 70 they recovered to 185, and restricted India to a slender first-innings lead, although the crowd were left unsatisfied when Sachin Tendulkar was bowled by Shoaib Akhtar for a first-ball duck. The two were to cross swords again in the second innings.


Sachin Tendulkar and Rahul Dravid waiting for the third umpire's decision on the fateful run out dismissal of Tendulkar, India v Pakistan, Asia Test Championship, Eden Gardens, Calcutta, February 19, 1999
Sachin Tendulkar and Rahul Dravid wait for the third umpire's decision Sajal Mukerjee / © ESPNcricinfo Ltd
Enlarge

Superb bowling from Javagal Srinath - he took 8 for 86 and 13 for 132 in the match - was matched by a brilliant innings from Saeed Anwar, who carried his bat for 188, as Pakistan made 316 second time around and set India a target of 279 with more than two days to get them.

By the fourth afternoon India were well placed on 143 for 2 when there came the incident which turned the whole game ugly.

Tendulkar, cheered to the rafters by a massive crowd when he came in, was on 7 when he clipped Wasim Akram to deep midwicket. He took two runs - completing 5000 Test runs in the process - and was on his way back for a third when substitute Nadeem Khan hit the stumps with his throw from the deep. In the ordinary course of events it was a straightforward third run even with the direct hit, but Tendulkar collided with Shoaib Akhtar, who was waiting close to the stumps to gather the return, and as a result was out of his ground, even though he may well have been just inside the crease at the moment of the collision. Steve Bucknor referred it to the third umpire, KT Francis, who, after a long delay, gave him out. This was the first series where all officials were neutral.

Who was at fault very much depends on who you support. Shoaib was doing what any fielder would have done, taking position two or three yards behind the stumps to take the return, not going close up because there was no likely run-out opportunity. He was just off the cut strip and at no time appeared to even glance at the batsman, and in fact had his back to him. Tendulkar did not seem to see Shoaib and was watching the ball on its return flight, even moving slightly and inadvertently into Shoaib as he tried to run his bat in.

The neutral's view seemed to be that it was a genuine accident, although in the Times, Richard Hobson was not sitting on the fence. "Tendulkar could blame only himself for the dismissal… he kept his eye on the throw instead of his own route to the crease. Wasim Akram, the Pakistan captain, was under no obligation to withdraw the appeal."


Tendulkar, Dalmiya and the Police officials quietening the crowd, India v Pakistan, Asia Test Championship, Eden Gardens, Calcutta, 16-20
Tendulkar along with ICC boss Jagmohan Dalmiya attempts to quieten the crowd Sajal Mukerjee / © ESPNcricinfo Ltd
Enlarge

Tendulkar headed off looking slightly bewildered and went straight to the TV umpires' room instead of the dressing room, to see the incident replayed. He said nothing but just shook his head unbelievingly as he reviewed the dismissal.

Rahul Dravid blocked the final three balls of the over but then the huge crowd erupted at what was perceived as a gross injustice to their hero and started chanting "cheat, cheat", pelting Shoaib Akhtar with bottles and other objects as he returned to his position in the deep.

Eventually the umpires took the players from the field for an early tea and it was only after personal pleas from Tendulkar and ICC president Jagmohan Dalmiya that the match was able to resume. "It was good of Sachin to go out and pacify the crowd," said Dinesh Vajpal, Calcutta's chief of police. "Fortunately we had not allowed spectators to bring in anything lethal."

At the close, Dalmiya caused more than a few raised eyebrows when he claimed the trouble had been overblown. "The crowd felt an injustice had been done, but there was no violence as such and within five minutes they held up placards saying they were sorry," he said. "There were only 20 or so mischief-mongers and the rest of the crowd sorted the matter out themselves."

The 67-minute delay affected India more than Pakistan. Within a few minutes of the resumption Dravid was dismissed by Shoaib, and when Mohammad Azhuruddin and Nayan Mongia fell within seven runs of each other near the end of the day, Pakistan were in the driving seat. By stumps, India needed 65 with four wickets in hand.

Much depended on Sourav Ganguly, and after he fell to the ninth ball of the final day the mood in the crowd again turned ugly. When 20 minutes later Srinath was caught behind off Wasim Akram to leave India 231 for 9, Wisden reported: "Spectators started burning newspapers in the stands and hurled stones, fruit and plastic bottles on to the field. The match was held up for over three hours as about 65,000 people were removed by police and security men. The crowd's anger was still concentrated on Tendulkar's run-out, but there was little viciousness in the riot; it was born of disappointment rather than anti-Pakistan feeling. There was no sign of violence outside the ground."


The Calcutta police chase spectators out of the stadium to clear the stands after trouble erupted as the spectators started throwing water bottles and stones onto the playing field during the final day of the inaugural match of the Asian Test Championship. Play was halted and finally resumed after all the spectators were sent out of the stadium. , India v Pakistan, Calcutta, February 21, 1999
The Calcutta police chase spectators out of the stadium to clear the stands on the fifth and final morning © Getty Images
Enlarge

But the Guardian was more critical of the police's tactics, saying they brought "no credit to the game or its decision-makers… they chased fans up the alleyways and elderly men, women and children were ejected, if necessary by kicking, punching and beating with lathi sticks".

It only took Pakistan 10 balls to complete their 46-run win, but they did so in a surreal atmosphere, completely in contrast to the din that had accompanied everything that had gone before. Only about 200 people were left inside the concrete bowl, although one elderly couple had refused to budge, steadfastly asserting their right to remain and watch. They stayed until the team took to the field, at which point around 50 security guards pounced and manhandled them out of the stadium.

Although the day before he had been one-eyed, the second far more serious disturbance rattled Dalmiya, who was angry and embarrassed. "I exactly don't find any reason for provocation today," he said. "The action is totally unjustified and uncalled for. The excitement of the crowd last evening was also too much. The spectators should learn that winning and losing is part of the game. Today's gesture was very clear that the last wicket would not be allowed to fall. I condemn today's action in strongest possible manner. Yesterday something happened in a spur of the moment but today there is no explanation.

"If that is the only motive of the spectators, that the visiting team shouldn't win here, I only leave it to the future and hope the God changes their [the crowd's] attitude."

At the post-match press conference, Wasim Akram lambasted the Indian media for stoking up the unrest. "Whatever has happened today, it is only because of you people and your reports. You have said that Shoaib obstructed Sachin from making his ground and I should have re-invited him to bat. Why should I do that? If a team fails for only one man, that is our bonus. The whole world saw none of them were responsible for the collision. But you have blamed me. Is that wise?

"You have held [the crowd] responsible for the whole wrong-doings, but I will never blame them for this because they were all pre-occupied with those reports, for which the saddest thing in Test cricket happened here today."


The Calcutta police chase spectators out of the stadium to clear the stands after trouble erupted as the spectators started throwing water bottles and stones onto the playing field during the final day of the inaugural match of the Asian Test Championship. Play was halted and finally resumed after all the spectators were sent out of the stadium. , India v Pakistan, Calcutta, February 21, 1999
The police go about their eviction duties on day five © Getty Images
Enlarge

Azharuddin was much more downbeat. "I don't want to say anything more because I've already said that in 1996, when we lost the World Cup semi-final to Sri Lanka by default. I just want them to behave, because every time we cannot win. We are also human beings and any day we can fail. This incident has let us down in the world of cricket, and I don't know why they did that."

The great shame was that the match was a superb advertisement for Test cricket, even if the crowd's behaviour was not. But the next two games - Sri Lanka v India in Colombo and Pakistan v Sri Lanka in Lahore - were less so, and the final was woefully one-sided as Pakistan defeated Sri Lanka by an innings and 175 runs in Dhaka.

Perhaps the last word should go to Dalmiya, who, after composing himself in the aftermath of the riots on the final day in Calcutta, cheerily told the media: "The game was finished and cricket was the winner."

The era of administrators genuinely out of touch with the real world and believing income was the be-all and end-all was with us.

What happened next?

  • Planned as a biannual event, the second Championship took place over eight months in 2001 and 2002 and was rendered fairly meaningless by the withdrawal of India because of another escalation of political tensions with Pakistan. Sri Lanka gained revenge over Pakistan in the final but Bangladesh, who managed to take only eight wickets in all, were thrashed by an innings in their two matches and the public and media interest without India's participation was negligible. With an increasingly packed international calendar, the third staging of the Championship was postponed and then it was quietly abandoned in 2006
  • Wasim Akram called for a two-year ban on Tests at Eden Gardens; the next game was not staged there until March 2001

Is there an incident from the past you would like to know more about? E-mail us with your comments and suggestions.

Martin Williamson is managing editor of Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: Martin Williamson

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Rohan1 on (November 2, 2010, 13:43 GMT)

@wolver, If you would bother to take time out to understand what the stats bases are actually telling you it may improve your "general knowledge". If you don't feel inclined to take the effort yourself please browse through several other blogs on the world xi...a lot of commentators have explained them....In any case your frustration and that of kiwirocker, etc is fully understandable. Tendulkar has now gone so far above all others besides the Don that certain folk are getting increasingly desperate to somehow bring him down. But you know what- Tendulkar isnt even done yet! so get ready for plenty more PAIN as the Maestro continues to get the runs and firmly plant himself in cricket history alongside the Don! LOL...all the best.

Posted by Kreacher_Rocks on (November 2, 2010, 10:09 GMT)

@Kiwirocker & @Wolver - the stats game can be played from both sides of the fence and figures can be moulded to highlight facts as you wish. Every player has had some players against whom he hasn't fared well and some against whom he has done pretty well. The net balance is what makes one player a great and another not so much. For your Akram, Donald and McGrath one can throw in SRT's averages against Ambrose (57.58), Walsh (66.11) and Warne (60.45), each a great bowler. FYI Lara's averages against Donald and Akram are pretty similar to SRT's and higher in case of McGrath. That just goes to show that a great bowler cannot have great averages against all great batsmen, the same way that a great batsman cannot have great averages against all great bowlers.

Posted by Truecricketbuff on (November 2, 2010, 9:09 GMT)

Another eg..."2)On the other hand in matches "including" a bowler , if even another bowler has got the batsman in question..credit goes to all bowlers. So, for eg. ,in the 98 pak series akram did not get tendulkar out once...but he still gets credit in matched "including" akram...understand?...".........Oh, by the way im sure you are aware that tendulkar has effectively again been voted in as the 2nd best batsman after Bradman on the world XI with 51 points (then richards 42, lara 28)......so, unless you and your dear friend kiwirocker know more than experts and ex captains who have watched cricket for 60 yrs.....this means you need to reexamine your knowledge of cricket...cheers

Posted by Truecricketbuff on (November 2, 2010, 9:06 GMT)

@wolver...here's an eg from another blog. there's lots of egs out there...if only you would be bothered to look...which obviously you arent' coz it doesnt suit you ..."1) For eg. in the 2000s lara "averages" 50 in matches "including" Flintoff. But his head-to-head( not "averages" as found on stats guru) vs. Flintoff in the 2000s is 20. Of course, we need entire career stats before judging ,but this is just an eg.The difference as you can see is a whopping 60%. The real problem is that at any point we don't know the quantum of difference involved,or even whether it is positive or negative…".........

Posted by Proteas123 on (November 2, 2010, 7:04 GMT)

@ Rohan1 - '(coincidentally?) ' Don't know what you're implying but it is ridiculous and shows a very single minded mentality. Don't know if Kiwirocker's stats are exact but they are definitely close, check the stats on cric info. Of course you won't do this as it will bring some reality to your perception of Sachin. And no I don't post on every forum and this forum is definitely not soley for fanatical sachin supporters. If these fanatical supporters are going to post some crazy comments, you can't expect other readers to not challenge it.

Posted by Rohan1 on (November 2, 2010, 4:56 GMT)

Finally let me add- All laws are made to "ensure" a "fair" judgement. It is only with a "lawyer" mentality that anyone can argue that what transpired was "fair"......no true cricket/sportsfan would ever argue that

Posted by Rohan1 on (November 2, 2010, 4:44 GMT)

@Riyas Izzedeen...This is the problem. i.e You argue blindly on parochial or nationalistic grounds. Did you ppl even SEE the run out? Tendulkar had ALREADY grounded his bat IN the crease BEFORE the ball arrived....THEN he collided with Shoaib.....AFTER that the bat bounced up........and EVEN after that the ball hit the stumps......Never mind the high horse......By which act of sportsmanship or skill would you consider that out?

Posted by AhmadSaleem on (November 1, 2010, 19:41 GMT)

Hundred percent agree with Meety. Kiwirocker should try to find another job

Posted by   on (November 1, 2010, 16:22 GMT)

its so dumb to blame the feilding sideall ST had to do was look where he was running. all batsmen do not walk and wicketkeepers constantly appeal for catched when the ball hit nothing so get off your high horse Rohan!

Posted by Rohan1 on (November 1, 2010, 15:52 GMT)

@meety, kiwirocker......etc. well said meety. he has got a cut and paste job which he goes on ad infinitum and ad nausuem with..and then wolver just waiting in the wings (coincidentally?) jumps in. you see it on each and every blog. point is , as so many others have mentioned, they dont even know that they are using wrong stats or what info they are getting out of the stats bases.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Martin WilliamsonClose
Martin Williamson Executive editor Martin Williamson joined the Wisden website in its planning stages in 2001 after failing to make his millions in the internet boom when managing editor of Sportal. Before that he was in charge of Sky Sports Online and helped launch and run Sky News Online. With a preference for all things old (except his wife and children), he has recently confounded colleagues by displaying an uncharacteristic fondness for Twenty20 cricket. His enthusiasm for the game is sadly not matched by his ability, but he remains convinced that he might be a late developer and perseveres in the hope of an England call-up with his middle-order batting and non-spinning offbreaks. He is now managing editor of ESPN EMEA Digital Group as well as his Cricinfo responsibilities.

'Ponting was an instinctive, aggressive player'

Modern Masters: Rahul Dravid and Sanjay Manjrekar discuss Ricky Ponting's technique

    MacLeod spells hope for Scotland

Allrounder Calum MacLeod's return from a faulty action is key to Scotland's World Cup hopes. By Tim Wigmore

The Australian who dares to attack spin

From lead spinner and No. 8, Steven Smith has become a central figure in the batting line-up. By Brydon Coverdale

    'Gibbs used to toss the ball like a basketball'

My XI: Erapalli Prasanna on the West Indian offspinner who had a killer instinct

Cricket's humanity resists specialisation

Jon Hotten: Major sports are driving their competitors towards homogenous physical ideals, but cricket seems to celebrate diversity

News | Features Last 7 days

Manic one-day chases, and daddy partnerships

Also, most brothers in a Test XI, and the fastest to 20 ODI centuries

Has international cricket begun to break up?

The gap between the haves and the have-nots is growing wider, and the disenchantment is forcing a devaluation of Test cricket among weaker teams

Well worth the wait

Zulfiqar Babar missed five seasons between his first two first-class matches, and was 34 when he finally made his Test debut, but he is quickly making up for all the lost time with his artful left-arm spin

Younis Khan and the art of scoring hundreds

Out of 70 batsmen who've scored 15 or more Test hundreds only five are from Pakistan, but Younis Khan's appetite for hundreds matches that of some of the top contemporary batsmen

Australia outdone in every way

Surviving into the final session of the last day cannot disguise the fact that Australia's continued inability to play spin contributed to an all-round thrashing

News | Features Last 7 days

    Has international cricket begun to break up? (83)

    The gap between the haves and the have-nots is growing wider, and the disenchantment is forcing a devaluation of Test cricket among weaker teams

    Lyon low after high of 2013 (51)

    The offspinner was Australia's highest wicket-taker in 2013, but his form has dipped sharply this year

    Australia outdone in every way (51)

    Surviving into the final session of the last day cannot disguise the fact that Australia's continued inability to play spin contributed to an all-round thrashing

    Well worth the wait (36)

    Zulfiqar Babar missed five seasons between his first two first-class matches, and was 34 when he finally made his Test debut, but he is quickly making up for all the lost time with his artful left-arm spin

    No Ajmal, no problem for Pakistan (33)

    When a team loses its best bowler, it is expected that the team's performance will suffer. As usual, Pakistan defied the expectations