October 28, 2010

The liberation of Watto

Shane Watson has fought off injuries, succeeded at the top of the batting order, and revelled in the freedom of not having to bear an allrounder's burden
  shares 29

The first time Shane Watson heard about the Ashes was in 1989. It was a good time for an Australian boy to start taking an interest, as Allan Border's men were turning from easy-beats towards world beaters. Sitting next to his dad, the nine-year-old Watson would listen to the radio late on crisp winter nights in the Queensland city of Ipswich.

Twenty-one years and a few revolutions later, Australia have slid from their long-standing peak to rest at No. 5 in the Test rankings. Watson is now muscular and mature, a dominant presence in the side as an opener and fast-medium bowler. Over the next three months a new batch of children will be introduced to the Ashes thanks to the internet and mobile phones. It's nowhere near as romantic as the not-so-olden days, but the young hearts of cricket lovers and learners don't judge the medium. They are attracted by the major performers - and Watson has become one of those.

Watson was besotted by the game as a child and appears to fall for it more with every success. During his tough years in his early- and mid-20s, the times when playing for a month without an injury scare was an achievement, the game seemed mostly a chore. A pursuit to endure rather than enjoy. Since he first became an unconventional choice as opener, at Edgbaston in the 2009 Ashes, he has become settled and relaxed, a modern cricketer finally in control of his body and destiny.

"To go and open the batting in all forms of the game for nearly a year, I feel I'm in a really good place," he said. "I'm getting a lot of cricket and a lot of continuity with my cricket and I'm not breaking down at the moment. To see that continued development is very exciting because at the start I didn't have that much continuity. To have that and see the gradual improvement of all facets of my game is very exciting."

The switch to opener should have broken Watson, who was previously a middle-order stylist, but instead it liberated him from his allrounder status. While the multi-skilled cricketer is treasured, he is under pressure every time he's called to do something. After the 2005 Ashes defeat Watson was promoted to the Test side in the hope he could be Australia's Andrew Flintoff.

That project was abandoned after three years, eight Tests and various injuries. The experiment to partner him with Simon Katich at the top of the order has succeeded not only in terms of runs but in a dramatic change of psyche. By having one main job, he no longer has to worry about being everything to everyone.

"Absolutely, with opening the batting, the reason why you're in the team is for batting," he said. "If you're not scoring runs, it doesn't matter how well I'm going with the ball, you're not going to fit into the make-up of the team. There's no doubt it's taken the pressure off my bowling."

At the start of the last Australian summer he wondered how his body would be able to cope with opening and delivering 10 to 15 overs an innings. "There's no doubt I know that I can do it now," he said. "I've been able to do it for six to eight months, and that really comes down to Ricky Ponting and how great he has been at looking after my workload and understanding that. He's been very kind to me."

As a permanent part-time bowler Warson is a huge asset, chipping in regularly. He claimed 11 victims in the two Tests against Pakistan in July. The easing of pressure on his all-round performance has actually released more wickets. In his 14 Tests as an opener, he has two centuries and averages 50.44, figures that sit alongside 26 breakthroughs at 24.23. They are the numbers of someone who is much more than a handy allrounder.

"I've been able to do it for six to eight months, and that really comes down to Ricky Ponting and how great he has been at looking after my workload. He's been very kind to me"
Watson on being able to cope with opening and bowling

But through all of Watson's gains the side has struggled when it has run into in-form opponents. It happened in England last year, when the hosts won the final Test to grab the Ashes, and in July when Pakistan drew the two-game series. Two more losses in India, where Watson raised his second Test century, leave Australia starting the Ashes on their worst losing streak since 1988-89.

"The way to hit back is to start winning again," he said. "It hasn't been ideal, the last three Tests especially. We did play some really good cricket in India at times, but then we played some not so good cricket as well, for an hour or a session. In India, and against really good teams, it means the difference between winning and losing.

"There's no doubt that's a thing we've got to get right as a team for this Ashes. To try to reduce the amount of damage that we can have, either batting or bowling. If we can get to that point, which I know we can - we've got the talent and skill to do that - then we're going to be very successful and achieve the things we want to achieve as a team."

During the last Ashes it was two sessions that cost Australia the series. The first major lapse came after the toss at Lord's when Mitchell Johnson's action deactivated and England's openers sped to 126 at lunch. At The Oval it was the second session of the second day. Eight wickets fell - five went to Stuart Broad - to ensure the urn would be handed over again.

"They were the two sessions that in the end meant we didn't win the Ashes," Watson said. "Against good teams, they are going to take the game away from you. That's a really important part of this Ashes, trying to eliminate those bad periods."

Watson will enter the series at the Gabba on November 25 content with his life and his technique. He is recently married, lives in Sydney and trains with New South Wales, his third state side. Before the first Test he will appear in his first games for the Blues, despite being "a Queenslander through and through". That sort of thing is accepted now.

The cricket world is unrecognisable from when Watson was a boy. He is admired by impressionable children in India, where he is currently without an IPL franchise, and in Australia for his deeds in all three formats. But he grew up listening to the Ashes, wishing that one day he could have an impact on the game's oldest contest.

Peter English is the Australasia editor of Cricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • WilliamFranklin on November 4, 2010, 16:11 GMT

    oh please. So overrated. And so overrates himself; to have the nerve to 'send off' gayle like he did last winter. Weak link for Australia, especially if they have to turn to his 'bowling' more often.

  • ygkd on October 30, 2010, 10:14 GMT

    I agree that if Shakib Al Hasan is the allrounder to watch over the next decade. I will even go as far to say that Bangladesh will also rise to substantial heights. I would much rather talk about them anyday. As for Australians not liking some Australian players, why does anyone have to like their national team? Personally, although Australian, I would rather watch the Lankans and Banglas.

  • Sajeesh.M.S on October 29, 2010, 21:08 GMT

    @ youngkeepersdad We are not saying that Watson is the best allrounder now or He is better than Kallis. Kallis was the best allrounder for the last decade. And he is second best allrounder ever(After Sobers).But because of injuries(or some other reasons) he is not bowling and taking wickets recently.And SA don't need his bowling skills that much due to the presence of quality bowlers like Steyn and Morkel.Rating on the basis of performance in last 2 years,I will say Shakib is The BEST Allrounder now.Watson is also performing Brilliantly with the bat. He is doing a good job with the ball as well.We are definitely missing a player like him.

  • ygkd on October 29, 2010, 20:33 GMT

    Watto, to some, the best allrounder in the world? Did I fail to notice the announcement of the retirement of one Jacques Kallis?

  • on October 29, 2010, 6:51 GMT

    he used to be a very handy middle order batsman but now he has transformed himself into the opening slot and boy he grabbed them with both hands....his bowling is very handy now but his batting is improving every games he plays as an opener. He can smash the ball in every corner of the grounds as Hayden used to do. He's a much improved cricekter to evolve over the year. Can't wait to see how he performs during the Australian summer and the Ashes. If he scores heavily this coming seson, I know for which Philip Hughes would not the happiest man alive in the face of this earth, but he'll appreciate every bit of the Australian's and Watson's successes. But on the other hand, if he fails during the summer ahead, his place up in the order will be questioned by many critics. But lets not look so far ahead and sit back and enjoy the belligerent hittings that Watson brings with his game............

  • varunrallapalli on October 29, 2010, 6:42 GMT

    Shane Watson, like many other Australians play horizontal batshots well. He is susceptable to good swing and seam bowling. Being an opener means you have to have a very good alround game. He is not a proven batsman at the international level. Come Ashes The english will test him on all fronts. He is better in middle order.

  • popcorn on October 29, 2010, 5:15 GMT

    It's great that we now have a SOLID opening pair - they are sinmilar to the rest -of -the - world -dominating pair of Hayden and Langer - Watson is belligerent like Hayden, Katich is a steady accumulator like Langer.

  • jkaussie on October 29, 2010, 3:04 GMT

    ed.dixon asks why do so many Aussies not like watto that much. Well, we don't really like big heads at the best of times and Watto has been painted one due to some behaviour in the past. His penchant for big muscles, blond hair, bimbo partners and looking soft coz he broke down all the time contributed to that. Then he behaved like a prat when he dismissed Chris Gayle last year in the test series. But, since apologising for that, settling down with his intelligent journalist partner, being well behaved but still highly competitive on the field and playing fantastically well I think that attitude may be softening.

  • Meety on October 29, 2010, 2:10 GMT

    @ Eliya Abbas Syed - I think you are a bit extreme mate. Aussies don'y hate Watto, he is not as loved as David Boon or Merv Hughes, but then again aince Symonds - there are no BIG personalities in the Oz side anymore, (Bollinger maybe). The players are trained too much in the "we'll take it one match at a time", and "I just want to get my game right", type of generic responses drilled into them by media trainers. @Sajeesh.M.S - I am a huge fan of Shakib, he definately is the best allrounder in ODI's, he needs to do more with the bat in Tests though. In tests of late he is playing a frontline spinner who bats a bit - the Bangars need more from him (I think he has the ability to ave. 45+ in tests). I am not quite sure where the best position is for him in the batting line up. I also agree with you re: Pathan, I think he is under appreciated in India, he should of been trialled more in the top 3 in the batting order for Test matches. India could still play 2 spinners overseas then.

  • aditya104 on October 29, 2010, 1:48 GMT

    Whenever Shane Watson is in the squad of the opposing team, I feel he is the biggest danger to the team I am supporting.

  • WilliamFranklin on November 4, 2010, 16:11 GMT

    oh please. So overrated. And so overrates himself; to have the nerve to 'send off' gayle like he did last winter. Weak link for Australia, especially if they have to turn to his 'bowling' more often.

  • ygkd on October 30, 2010, 10:14 GMT

    I agree that if Shakib Al Hasan is the allrounder to watch over the next decade. I will even go as far to say that Bangladesh will also rise to substantial heights. I would much rather talk about them anyday. As for Australians not liking some Australian players, why does anyone have to like their national team? Personally, although Australian, I would rather watch the Lankans and Banglas.

  • Sajeesh.M.S on October 29, 2010, 21:08 GMT

    @ youngkeepersdad We are not saying that Watson is the best allrounder now or He is better than Kallis. Kallis was the best allrounder for the last decade. And he is second best allrounder ever(After Sobers).But because of injuries(or some other reasons) he is not bowling and taking wickets recently.And SA don't need his bowling skills that much due to the presence of quality bowlers like Steyn and Morkel.Rating on the basis of performance in last 2 years,I will say Shakib is The BEST Allrounder now.Watson is also performing Brilliantly with the bat. He is doing a good job with the ball as well.We are definitely missing a player like him.

  • ygkd on October 29, 2010, 20:33 GMT

    Watto, to some, the best allrounder in the world? Did I fail to notice the announcement of the retirement of one Jacques Kallis?

  • on October 29, 2010, 6:51 GMT

    he used to be a very handy middle order batsman but now he has transformed himself into the opening slot and boy he grabbed them with both hands....his bowling is very handy now but his batting is improving every games he plays as an opener. He can smash the ball in every corner of the grounds as Hayden used to do. He's a much improved cricekter to evolve over the year. Can't wait to see how he performs during the Australian summer and the Ashes. If he scores heavily this coming seson, I know for which Philip Hughes would not the happiest man alive in the face of this earth, but he'll appreciate every bit of the Australian's and Watson's successes. But on the other hand, if he fails during the summer ahead, his place up in the order will be questioned by many critics. But lets not look so far ahead and sit back and enjoy the belligerent hittings that Watson brings with his game............

  • varunrallapalli on October 29, 2010, 6:42 GMT

    Shane Watson, like many other Australians play horizontal batshots well. He is susceptable to good swing and seam bowling. Being an opener means you have to have a very good alround game. He is not a proven batsman at the international level. Come Ashes The english will test him on all fronts. He is better in middle order.

  • popcorn on October 29, 2010, 5:15 GMT

    It's great that we now have a SOLID opening pair - they are sinmilar to the rest -of -the - world -dominating pair of Hayden and Langer - Watson is belligerent like Hayden, Katich is a steady accumulator like Langer.

  • jkaussie on October 29, 2010, 3:04 GMT

    ed.dixon asks why do so many Aussies not like watto that much. Well, we don't really like big heads at the best of times and Watto has been painted one due to some behaviour in the past. His penchant for big muscles, blond hair, bimbo partners and looking soft coz he broke down all the time contributed to that. Then he behaved like a prat when he dismissed Chris Gayle last year in the test series. But, since apologising for that, settling down with his intelligent journalist partner, being well behaved but still highly competitive on the field and playing fantastically well I think that attitude may be softening.

  • Meety on October 29, 2010, 2:10 GMT

    @ Eliya Abbas Syed - I think you are a bit extreme mate. Aussies don'y hate Watto, he is not as loved as David Boon or Merv Hughes, but then again aince Symonds - there are no BIG personalities in the Oz side anymore, (Bollinger maybe). The players are trained too much in the "we'll take it one match at a time", and "I just want to get my game right", type of generic responses drilled into them by media trainers. @Sajeesh.M.S - I am a huge fan of Shakib, he definately is the best allrounder in ODI's, he needs to do more with the bat in Tests though. In tests of late he is playing a frontline spinner who bats a bit - the Bangars need more from him (I think he has the ability to ave. 45+ in tests). I am not quite sure where the best position is for him in the batting line up. I also agree with you re: Pathan, I think he is under appreciated in India, he should of been trialled more in the top 3 in the batting order for Test matches. India could still play 2 spinners overseas then.

  • aditya104 on October 29, 2010, 1:48 GMT

    Whenever Shane Watson is in the squad of the opposing team, I feel he is the biggest danger to the team I am supporting.

  • Biggus on October 29, 2010, 0:38 GMT

    I'm not sure that we Aussies don't like him. We were a bit frustrated with his constant injuries there for a while and I'm not altogether thrilled with his tendency to get into verbal altercations on the field but that seems to be par for the course in recent times for many players. Altogether I'd say we're pretty pleased with his recent form and hoping for more.

  • Sajeesh.M.S on October 28, 2010, 21:02 GMT

    @ Eliya Abbas Syed It is not true,Afridi is not the best all rounder right now. Shakib is the #1 all-rounder. Afridi performs 2-3 times in a calendar year with the bat. His quota for this year is already over.[Asia Cup :-)]. Shakib is much better and consistent batsman. Also a better bowler than Afridi. Secondly, don't say, many people hate Watson.Why should Australians hate him?He is one of their star performers. Although I am an Indian, I like Watson so much. We are very much missing an all-rounder like him in ODIs. I wish If Irfan Pathan could return to the national squad.

  • Don0910 on October 28, 2010, 19:21 GMT

    Figures are like bikini, bathing costumes. What they hide is more important that what they reveal. Wato is man look in ASHES & WC11.

  • on October 28, 2010, 17:09 GMT

    There was probably never any doubt about Shane Watson's batting ability. He averaged significantly higher than michael clarke in first class cricket in the early years and was batting in the middle order as a regular batsman. His bowling on the other hand isn't special, (his recent figures have been inflated by 11 wickets against a pakistan side with no batsmen) he started off pretty quick (pacewise) but injuries have taken their toll on that now which has turned him into a handy medium pace bowler with a hint of swing now and again. His bowling should be very useful in ODI cricket so Im surprised he hasnt bowed a lot in ODIs of late. For test cricket 10-15 overs a day to rest the quicks or to try something different to break a partnership is adequate for him. If he gets wickets thats a bonus but when you've got a prolific world class attacking opening batsman in the side what more can u ask for.........

  • on October 28, 2010, 16:58 GMT

    @Eliya Abbas Syed I think even Sakib Hasan is a better all rounder than Afridi.Why Pakistanis rate him so much?Watson is a very good batsman and he deserves all the accolades.IPL 2008 was his comeback vehicle and he surprised many by becoming a good test opener.He is not that great a bowler now but it is understandable considering his recurring injuries from 2003-2007.He is the man to watch out for in the WC.

  • on October 28, 2010, 16:15 GMT

    For me he is the most complete player in cricket history.

  • on October 28, 2010, 14:23 GMT

    In his 14 Tests as an opener, he has two centuries and averages 50.44, figures that sit alongside 26 breakthroughs at 24.23. They are the numbers of someone who is much more than a handy allrounder.

    These statistics say it all really. While I think one has to maintain such statistics over a longer period to be considered world-class, he is finally on the road many assumed he would travel earlier on. Persistence has paid off!!

  • Vice-Captain on October 28, 2010, 14:21 GMT

    He does not give me confidence as a player ... feels like he can break down any time. Sort of like India's Zaheer Khan -- fun to watch, but don't know for how long ...

  • on October 28, 2010, 13:22 GMT

    he is probly the best allrounder in the world after AFridi(:P) though i dunno y, i still just dont lyk him... neither do many Aussies, there is sumfing that jst makes him unlikeable... Though i gotta admit, he is an awesome cricketer who can bowl above 140 km/h at tyms with bounce and swing while also open the innings and make lots of runz..

  • ed.dixon on October 28, 2010, 12:48 GMT

    He's done alright recently, but here's the big question, why does everybody hate him so much - even Australians?

  • thewayitwass on October 28, 2010, 11:30 GMT

    Great to see him get the recognition he deserves, massively under-rated cricketer, one of the few highlights of australia's dismal batting in the past 18 months. Always rated him ever since he took the stage in 04, was just a matter of time till he grew into australia's best batting allrounder of all time. (albeit debate-able)

  • Proteas123 on October 28, 2010, 11:11 GMT

    Interesting comments. Watson is a good player and his batting in the last year has been very good but he is certainly not a world class all-rounder, at least not yet. Lets see how he goes in the next few years. He needs to improve as a bowler, his bowling against pakistan was good but they are not a good benchmark. Hope he does well.

  • thestunner316_15 on October 28, 2010, 9:45 GMT

    he should thank the IPL - that was the major transformation in his cricketing career... probably one of the very few good things that have come out of IPL

  • on October 28, 2010, 8:01 GMT

    great player but has a bad attitude n ego...pretty much sums him up

  • chad_reid on October 28, 2010, 7:46 GMT

    watson will be the man to lead australia to the Odi world cup win but he will need support from other batsman as well even though if Australia don't win the world cup next year expect Watson to be one of the highest run getter in the tournament against good all highly ranked opposition

  • Slidercraft on October 28, 2010, 6:38 GMT

    Watching Shane Watson open the batting has been a treat the past 18 months. His technique is fantastic and I dont think there is a better cover drive in world cricket at the moment. Really hope he has a good ashes because his consistancy has really hidden some shaky batting performances from the aussie boys over this time. And come on, hes a world class line and length reverse swinging fast/medium pacer! What a champion.

  • Match_Referee on October 28, 2010, 6:35 GMT

    I am not sure if you can get reverse swing on Aussie pitches. If you find that there, Watson will be key with old ball as he has done good in recent Bangalore test against India. It was always a nightmare for England as generations of English players struggled to play against reverse swinging balls.

  • soorajiyer on October 28, 2010, 4:13 GMT

    What a player! If only we had an allrounder half as good as Watto! He has mellowed a lot now a days and he is one excellent exponent of reverse swing as we saw him in Nagpur in 2008. Ricky uses him sporadically and may be its a tactic to protect him. All the best Watto for the ashes!

  • Something_Witty on October 28, 2010, 3:48 GMT

    What a player. His bowling may not be as game-changing as the likes of Botham and Flintoff, but it is very very useful and sorely underrated by a lot of people. And his batting, well it's a class above Botham/Flintoff's, because he relies on an almost flawless, flowing technique, rather than just playing a shot a ball. For anyone to deny him his place as one of the top all-rounders of the modern game would be churlish in the extreme.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Something_Witty on October 28, 2010, 3:48 GMT

    What a player. His bowling may not be as game-changing as the likes of Botham and Flintoff, but it is very very useful and sorely underrated by a lot of people. And his batting, well it's a class above Botham/Flintoff's, because he relies on an almost flawless, flowing technique, rather than just playing a shot a ball. For anyone to deny him his place as one of the top all-rounders of the modern game would be churlish in the extreme.

  • soorajiyer on October 28, 2010, 4:13 GMT

    What a player! If only we had an allrounder half as good as Watto! He has mellowed a lot now a days and he is one excellent exponent of reverse swing as we saw him in Nagpur in 2008. Ricky uses him sporadically and may be its a tactic to protect him. All the best Watto for the ashes!

  • Match_Referee on October 28, 2010, 6:35 GMT

    I am not sure if you can get reverse swing on Aussie pitches. If you find that there, Watson will be key with old ball as he has done good in recent Bangalore test against India. It was always a nightmare for England as generations of English players struggled to play against reverse swinging balls.

  • Slidercraft on October 28, 2010, 6:38 GMT

    Watching Shane Watson open the batting has been a treat the past 18 months. His technique is fantastic and I dont think there is a better cover drive in world cricket at the moment. Really hope he has a good ashes because his consistancy has really hidden some shaky batting performances from the aussie boys over this time. And come on, hes a world class line and length reverse swinging fast/medium pacer! What a champion.

  • chad_reid on October 28, 2010, 7:46 GMT

    watson will be the man to lead australia to the Odi world cup win but he will need support from other batsman as well even though if Australia don't win the world cup next year expect Watson to be one of the highest run getter in the tournament against good all highly ranked opposition

  • on October 28, 2010, 8:01 GMT

    great player but has a bad attitude n ego...pretty much sums him up

  • thestunner316_15 on October 28, 2010, 9:45 GMT

    he should thank the IPL - that was the major transformation in his cricketing career... probably one of the very few good things that have come out of IPL

  • Proteas123 on October 28, 2010, 11:11 GMT

    Interesting comments. Watson is a good player and his batting in the last year has been very good but he is certainly not a world class all-rounder, at least not yet. Lets see how he goes in the next few years. He needs to improve as a bowler, his bowling against pakistan was good but they are not a good benchmark. Hope he does well.

  • thewayitwass on October 28, 2010, 11:30 GMT

    Great to see him get the recognition he deserves, massively under-rated cricketer, one of the few highlights of australia's dismal batting in the past 18 months. Always rated him ever since he took the stage in 04, was just a matter of time till he grew into australia's best batting allrounder of all time. (albeit debate-able)

  • ed.dixon on October 28, 2010, 12:48 GMT

    He's done alright recently, but here's the big question, why does everybody hate him so much - even Australians?