O runner, where art thou?

Following the ICC's ban on runners, we pay tribute to the hardworking breed of men who provided cricket with some of its quirkiest moments

Siddhartha Talya

July 4, 2011

Comments: 37 | Text size: A | A

Ridley Jacobs, Wavell Hinds (Jacobs's runner), Shivnarine Chanderpaul, and Marlon Samuels (Chanderpaul's runner) have a conference, West Indies v Australia, 1st Test, Bourda Oval, Guyana, April 13, 2003
Marlon Samuels, Wavell Hinds, Ridley Jacobs and Shivnarine Chanderpaul do their bit to fuel confusion in 2003 © Getty Images
Enlarge

Forgetful moment, Part I
Opinions are divided about the ban on runners in international cricket, but that the provision was sometimes abused, caused embarrassment, and was a source of comic relief cannot be denied. One such iffy instance was in an ODI between England and Australia at Trent Bridge, where Ian Healy, upon hurting his knee in a tight chase, requested a runner and was granted one by captain David Gower. In came Dean Jones, considered one of the quickest in the Australian team, though he soon found he had a competitor - the man he was running for. Forgetting his injury and that he had help, Healy scrambled back for a couple, almost outpacing Jones at square leg. Gower was not amused and sent Jones back. The drama didn't end there. In a game decided off the final ball, Healy sneaked a bye with two needed and sealed a tie.

Forgetful moment, Part II
The 2010 Twenty20 final between Hampshire and Somerset at the Rose Bowl summed up the chaos the runner rule had the potential to create. Daniel Christian pulled his hamstring while running back for a second off the penultimate ball of the game, and had to call in Jimmy Adams as his runner for the final delivery, with two needed. Christian swung at Zander de Bruyn off the final ball, missed, and stole a leg-bye, sprinting to the other end of the pitch in the heat of the moment, oblivious to the fact that Adams had done the same at square leg. Amid the mess, which included a strong lbw appeal, Somerset simply forgot they could have run Christian out at the wicketkeeper's end since he had left his crease. Though the game was a tie, Hampshire took the title, having lost fewer wickets. "It'll probably haunt me for a few years," said Marcus Trescothick, the Somerset captain, after the game.

No love lost, Part I
There's no love lost between Arjuna Ranatunga and some well-known Australians, and his spat with Healy in an ODI final in Sydney in 1996 marked an acrimonious end to a highly controversial tour. Ranatunga wasn't known to be the fittest cricketer of his time, and when he complained of "cramp", Healy was having none of it. ''You don't get a runner for being an overweight, unfit, fat c***," he was caught saying by the Channel Nine stump microphone. In a recent interview with the Age, Healy said: ''I saw what the physio was doing on his leg - nothing. Then Sanath Jayasuriya was padded up, the fastest man in world cricket, to replace the slowest man. So I blew up. There was no way he was as injured as he was making out. He was nine not out or something, and he said it was cramp.'' Last we heard, the pair had had dinner together in Brisbane.

No love lost, Part II
When Mark Waugh made his debut in 1990-91, it came at the expense of his brother Steve's place in the side. Almost five years later, with both having established themselves in the XI, Mark left his older twin to endure another brief phase of agony. As a runner for last man Craig McDermott, who had strained his back, in the fifth Test in Perth, Mark was expected to assist Steve to stretch Australia's score and complete a thoroughly deserved century, after having braved a tough spell of bowling for his first 50 runs. Things seemed on track, until, in a moment of mindlessness, Mark attempted an improbable single, realised his folly and turned back but was run out at the non-striker's end by Graham Gooch. Steve was stranded on 99, deprived by his younger sibling again.

Creating history
In 1836, Alfred Mynn became the first batsman to score a first-class century using a runner for the entire duration of his innings. The MCC had legalised round-arm bowling in 1835 and the year after, Mynn, facing his pace rival Samuel Redgate, injured his leg so badly that doctors later contemplated amputation. He missed the first day's action for North v South with his leg strapped up, made 21 the next day batting with a runner, fought through on the third with a swollen ankle that kept getting pelted by Redgate, to finish unbeaten on 125, with wild celebrations marking his 100th run. His next first-class appearance was two years later. Mynn's ordeal is said to have led to the introduction of leg guards in cricket.

Overworked runners
The ICC's runner ban is also a means of addressing the disparity between batsmen and bowlers. If you can have someone help you get 228 runs in a game, why wouldn't the bowler complain? In Lancashire's County Championship game against Warwickshire in 1982, Graeme Fowler, having suffered a thigh strain, inflicted a taxing ordeal on two unfortunate team-mates, who helped him score a century in each innings. David Lloyd ran 100 of Fowler's 126 in the first innings, and Ian Folley helped him out with 128 in the second. Folley, in fact, raised his own bat to acknowledge the appreciation for the landmark, to which he could stake an equal claim.

A helping hand
The sweltering Chennai heat took its toll on Saeed Anwar in Pakistan's Independence Cup clash with India there in 1997, and the resulting exhaustion and loss of fluid meant he had to rely on Shahid Afridi while scripting one of the great one-day innings. Anwar called for a runner at the end of the 18th over, but managed to preserve the fluency with which he had begun the innings. His timing remained immaculate, his assault against Anil Kumble in a 24-run over left a packed stadium stunned, and his stamina saw him through to what was then a record for the highest score in ODIs, broken 13 years later by the man who dismissed him in this game: Sachin Tendulkar. Afridi hung around for a while, and while his contribution was significant, Anwar managed 118 runs in boundaries.


England v Australia, 5th npower Ashes Test, The Oval , 23-27 August 2001
The Waugh twins in happier circumstances Paul McGregor / © ESPNcricinfo Ltd
Enlarge

Playing on one's mind
That Australia could not get past VVS Laxman even when he was injured is a sign of how much of a nemesis he's been for them. They were on top in India's chase in Mohali last year, just two wickets away from a series lead, but Laxman, who had batted at No. 10 in the first innings due to a sore back, showed great endurance and resolve, hanging in with the tail to clinch a nerve-wracking one-wicket win. Batting with a runner, in a game of fluctuations, he kept his emotions in check, except for one instance. MS Dhoni had been run out after failing to spot Laxman's runner, Suresh Raina, who had almost got Laxman himself run out before the lunch break. When it came down to the last partnership, with decisiveness in calling the need of the hour, Pragyan Ojha, the last man, prevaricated and was at the receiving end of a tongue-lashing from Laxman. It was a rare transgression for Laxman, and one he apologised for, after the match was thrillingly sealed.

And then there were four, Part I
A perfect recipe for disaster, and an umpire's nightmare. One runner is a handful, imagine having two at the same time. It was probably a relief for those on the field, apart from the batsmen, that the partnership lasted only seven runs but Shivnarine Chanderpaul, Ridley Jacobs, Marlon Samuels and Wavell Hinds did their bit to infuse some excitement into a losing battle against Australia in Guyana in 2003. Chanderpaul had been struck hard on the knee during his whirlwind century in the first innings, while Jacobs had damaged a groin muscle on the first day. Four batsmen consulting mid-pitch, and the umpires stepping in to decide who stands where, are sights that won't be seen again.

And then there were four, Part II
Another such instance, this time from county cricket and involving the late Bob Woolmer. In a Championship game at Dartford in 1983 between Kent and Middlesex, Woolmer broke his toe during the second half of a century in the first innings, and walked out at No. 11 with a runner in the second innings to set a fighting target. He joined Chris Cowdrey, who also had a runner, but the stand lasted just two runs, "rather to the relief of my colleague, Ken Palmer, and myself", said Don Oslear, the umpire in that game.

"No runners for cramps, full stop"
Andrew Strauss's decision to not allow a runner for Graeme Smith in the Champions Trophy in 2009 may have played a role in prompting the ban. Smith had scored a sparkling century in a big chase, but suffered cramps and duly requested a runner. Strauss, upon discussion with the umpires sent back AB de Villiers, who came in to run for Smith. Runners had been granted to batsmen for cramping in the past, but Strauss argued: "Cramping to a certain extent is a preparation thing. To a certain extent, it's a conditioning thing. I didn't feel that he merited having a runner at that stage." Abuse of the privilege could be one of the reasons for doing away with runners; inconsistency in its use is likely to have played a part as well.

Siddhartha Talya is a sub editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Siddhartha Talya

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (July 5, 2011, 17:36 GMT)

Good. Runners raise the question- if you're too hurt to run between the wickets, why aren't you too hurt to bat? Imagine Beckham going "i'm too hurt to play... but I can take free kicks."

Posted by aapatankar on (July 5, 2011, 14:52 GMT)

Runners should be allowed. But the fielding captain should be allowed to choose the runner. This could mean the fielding captain is allowed to strategically choose the runner. Consider a fielding captain granting a runner to the batsman, but asking Arjuna Ranatunga or Inzaman to be the runner. Also if Sehwag was the batsman asking for a runner, the fielding captain could ask Tendulkar to be the runner so as to tire him out, etc. Something in there that would give the fielding captain a strategic advantage instead of just granting anyone to be the runner.

Posted by Stos on (July 5, 2011, 13:29 GMT)

I would advocate that, rather than abolishing them, a policy should be put in place dictating that if runners are to be brought on due to injury or something of the sort, each batsman on the pitch, including any without injury, must have one. On paper, this may seem like it helps the batting side, but if it were put into practice it would be more likely to have an opposite effect.

Posted by B.C.G on (July 5, 2011, 9:04 GMT)

What about substitute fielders?When was the last time Sachin fielded for an entire day in test/odi?????

Posted by blackie on (July 5, 2011, 4:07 GMT)

The photo of the four Windies players dressed in full batting gear plus bats made me bust out laughing, Gotta love this game. lol.

Posted by   on (July 5, 2011, 1:38 GMT)

This is a great move by the ICC given the fact that most of the cricketing laws are tilted more towards the batsman...and with the two bouncers rule coming into effect the game will be marginally be balanced out. Though lot has to be done for the plight of the bowlers. Great Move.

Posted by donda on (July 5, 2011, 0:24 GMT)

Cricket is no more Gentleman game, this decision is last nail in the coffin by ICC. Cricket cannot be back to normal any more. Bad luck for batsmen.

Posted by   on (July 4, 2011, 22:37 GMT)

awesome article. the 'comedy of runners'... was a treat to read. i was not aware of the guyana 2003 incident, when there were 4 WI players in the middle, but the situation must be quite silly.

Posted by Samirl on (July 4, 2011, 20:29 GMT)

It's a sad thing this doing away with runners. One of the last bastions of what used to be the basis of this great game being called a "Gentlemens game". Maybe stricter definitions could have helped avoid abusing this clause. Add to that - the funniest moments in cricketing history were provided by these runners.

Posted by MartinC on (July 4, 2011, 18:44 GMT)

I have to say I think sub fielders need more control than runners for batsmen. They need turnstiles onto the field not gates.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Siddhartha TalyaClose

'Smith's record in India is an aberration'

Modern Masters: Rahul Dravid and Sanjay Manjrekar discuss Graeme Smith's terrific record in different conditions

    A hole in England's bucket

Jarrod Kimber: Overworked bowlers, poor selection, and plenty of business jargon - England's cup of woe is full

    England don't need a visible coach

Martin Crowe: The team now consists of two halves: a burnt-out one and a fresh one

    'The guy you want to go to war with'

My XI: Martin Crowe on the gritty approach that turned Allan Border into a run-machine

Do India stick with the same team?

V Ramnarayan: Binny did well at Trent Bridge, but surely he must make way for Ashwin now?

News | Features Last 7 days

Ridiculed Ishant ridicules England

Ishant Sharma has often been the butt of jokes, and sometimes deservedly so. Today, however, the joke was on England

Vijay rediscovers the old Monk

The leave outside off stump has been critical to M Vijay's success since his India comeback last year. Contrary to popular opinion, such patience and self-denial comes naturally to him

England seem to have forgotten about personality

They have to see a glass that is half-full, and play the game as if it is just that, a game; and an opportunity

Ishant's fourth-innings heroics in rare company

In India's win at Lord's, Ishant Sharma took the best bowling figures by an Indian in the fourth innings of a Test outside Asia. Here are five other best bowling efforts by Indians in the fourth innings of Tests outside Asia

Another battle, another defeat on Planet Al

Alastair Cook has got used to feeling of the axe hanging over him. Only his team-mates can save England now

News | Features Last 7 days